Probability Foundation for Electrical Engineers by Dr. Krishna Jagannathan,Department of Electrical Engineering,IIT Madras.For more details on NPTEL visit nptel.ac.in
This is so advanced mathematics, really impressed by how deep the engineering department of IIT teaches!
@keyyyla
4 жыл бұрын
Outstanding how Prof. Jagannathan, who is actually an engineer, presents this mathematical formalism in such a clear way.
@Thefare1234
Жыл бұрын
He has the unique ability of transforming extremely abstract ideas into concrete examples and he knows all the problems that newbies in probability encounter.
@dantheman9270
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this video, finally i found an understandable explanation of what a borel sigma algebra is!
@thybowllingman2752
6 жыл бұрын
I love you. Thank you so much, your explanations are amazing. I had to listen hard at first but now I'm starting to understand. Thankfully you take your time and pause to explain these definitions. I appreciate that, perhaps a better question though if I was in your class "does anyone not understand ?". Thanks again, hope you're well! Keep it up
@piyushkumar-wg8cv
2 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how it is not a well defined probability if we assign probability as length of the subset
@peterr653
6 жыл бұрын
Great lecture, thanks for sharing it.
@karansaini305
5 жыл бұрын
very fantastic teacher
@thomasjefferson6225
Жыл бұрын
I like this teacher. Hes pretty good at explaining this shit.
@udaydeshpande2225
3 ай бұрын
How to prove that the collection of sigma algebras containing a collection of subsets is countably infinite and not uncountable ? Professor assumes that the sigma algebras are countable when he uses subscript notation for the collection of Sigma algebras containing a collection of subsets of R.
@hituldesai7174
5 жыл бұрын
The instructor somewhat sounds like Jerry Seinfeld !! Great lecture though
@kartikkamboj295
4 жыл бұрын
This is GOLD !
@picsou97
8 жыл бұрын
hi, on lecture notes BASIC REAL ANALYSIS. 2.6 METRIC SPACE Triangle inequality: d(a, b) ≤ d(a, c) + d(b, c) for any c ∈ X is is not suppose to be d(a,c) ≤ d(a, c) + d(b, c)
@SpaceExplorer
9 жыл бұрын
thank you dr. jagannathan
@omarsetihe4019
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your AMAZING lectures. I have only one question what is I like small i is in big scripted I so what is big scripted I ?
@ketan9318
5 жыл бұрын
it means i belongs to INDEXING set I={1,2, ... }
@lilyb7439
8 жыл бұрын
thank you!!
@HarpreetSingh-ke2zk
2 жыл бұрын
Help me, please. A_1, . . . , A_k are disjoint sets in B[0, ∞) × B (R\{0}), where B is a Borel set and x is the cartesian product. How do we interpret B[0, ∞) × B (R\{0})?
@juggernaut420
6 жыл бұрын
why is Co collection of pnly open subintervals and not closed?
@akshathashenoy2130
2 жыл бұрын
At 12:21 , how is the powerset of omega a sigma-algebra, it's only true when omega is countable right?
@ujan754
Жыл бұрын
i had the same question. Is it the case that the power set is still a sigma algebra but you can't define a measure on it? As stated by the impossibility theorem
Пікірлер: 22