Please show us the Eulerian approach for same as well.
@pundir08
5 жыл бұрын
Is it okay to do such simulation through Lagrangian approach? How accurate are the readings as compared to experimental results.?
@truptipatil3422
5 жыл бұрын
The Eulerian approach gives better insight into this phenomenon. But for this, you need to place very fine Euler mesh. Let's say for 3 mm thick plate you need to place element size less than 0.4 mm and it should be nearly perfect hex mesh (aspect ratio = 1). That's why Element count goes very high. In the Lagrangian approach, you get fairly good results with lesser mesh count. I prefer the Eulerian approach for this kind of problem. But in both approaches plate velocity matches well.
@RakeshPatel-vs9kv
4 жыл бұрын
Hi, Great tutorial. But I have one concerned, When I runnig model on my system, It comes error like 1) An error occured when post processor attempted to load a specific result 2) Current result file may not contain requested result data 3) The result file can not be open Can you tell me what is problem behind these all error. Thankyou
@truptipatil3422
3 жыл бұрын
You are not storing some output variables. By defaults ansys stores few variables but not all. You can choose which is and is not in output.
@jasontim4681
5 жыл бұрын
How about using SPH in Ansys to solve this problem?
@truptipatil3422
5 жыл бұрын
I am not conversant with SPH. But I know people solved these kind of problem using SPH.
@variousvideos554
Жыл бұрын
not correct simulation , should be turn off for large deflection ...
@truptipatil3422
Жыл бұрын
No need for specification of deformation. Explicit solvers can handle large deformation or small deformation.
Пікірлер: 11