It's nice that developers have contact with a guy that knows a lot about a game. Hope you will stay around for full a release keep up the good content.
@hitman_zulu
6 ай бұрын
(cept it BS)
@ThornEthics
6 ай бұрын
The only thing I'd change is instead of the Terminators, I'd rather run 4 Sprut-SDs. I typically use them as a flanking force and since its 400 credits for 4 tanks, it's usually very cost effective even if they do end up dying.
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
They shoot one at a time terms shoot 2, then shoot another 2 quickly after and have cannons and can take more damage.
@ThornEthics
6 ай бұрын
@@NoiceGuy honestly i think you're overlooking the pros of having 4 separate targets instead of 2, it definitely makes up for each individual sprut not being as tanky or having more firepower
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
@@ThornEthics You'll figure it out eventually
@ThornEthics
6 ай бұрын
@@NoiceGuy no, ive given it a try and i definitely prefer 4 tanks over 2 slightly better tanks. expand your horizons my friend
@klob4524
6 ай бұрын
@@ThornEthics thank you for your service. everyone appreciates you patting their k/ds
@anderssn
6 ай бұрын
Just because people disagree with you doesn't mean they're wrong by the way, its probably just what worked for them and what they prefer. I like some parts of your deck but not all of it, for example.
@RickyDigits505
6 ай бұрын
I counter your plane tab with 3x SU-34 w/ 1x KAB1500, 2x SEAD, 2x R77-1, 2x R34+ECM. You get the functionality of basically all roles in one fighter that after the opening air battle you can basically always have one ready as a oh shit option. They also tend to survive well for me due to sead+ecm and they designate for themselves on top of all that.
@Howard-j6e
6 ай бұрын
You have the best advice I can find for broken arrow on KZitem. Thank you!.
@sadhu4624
6 ай бұрын
i just cannot fuken wait for this game to release, MP is great and ima enjoy it but im so stoked for the hundreds of hours of fun im gonna have in SP
@kingsman5436
6 ай бұрын
Is there any reason to use the Bumerang module for the extra, more powerful missiles as opposed to the Kinzhal module with the 57mm on the T-15?
@ThornEthics
6 ай бұрын
the 57mm is 10x better
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
57 is much more effective against most targets
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
57mm shreds even sep v3s from behind, which is quite funny in a push xD
@Nick-sh8ul
Ай бұрын
ive found the T80um drozd is good because it has aps and they are cheap at 210
@Kesen2003
6 ай бұрын
I mean I’ve played almost 200 games where’s my fucking badge
@akkorokamui8319
6 ай бұрын
I'm sure this guy has a lot of experience, but I kind of wish he'd actually explain why something is good instead of saying "it's just the best" and "I have hundreds of hours". Like 11:30 with the LMURs. You really can't give any detail?
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
So LMUR are top attack, long range missles, which the tooltip doesnt even show. They damage and kill any ground units, even sep v3 abrams very reliably. Very fast aim time, shoots on the move, fire and forget, top attack and fast firerate. Its what the javelin wishes it would be. Yeah, the amount of "just feels this way" drags his whole point down sadly. Also the depth missing.
@NoiceGuy_
4 ай бұрын
I make a lot of videos and talk to a lot of people I sometimes forget when I do or don't explain certain things. That explanation is more of an attempted shortcut to glassing over most this as "just trust me"
@Rexini_Kobalt
6 ай бұрын
i can already see the marder 2 and its hypothetical 50mm autocannon on the horizon... it scares me
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
Cant wait for all the Boxer and Puma OFV versions xDD
@itsericzhou
4 ай бұрын
I know this video is old but I’m curious as to why you don’t use typhoons for your snipers.
@NoiceGuy_
4 ай бұрын
could just use kamazs from transport if needed and it was a more efficient use of points to get those choppers for support
@christopherbramkamp9661
6 ай бұрын
@NoiceGuy have a Question. Why you use so much T15 Barbarias? You can take the B10. That cost less and you can more to bring. The Weapon are equal. The Armor only a little bit less. I think you can 2 B10 for 1 T15 take. that makes the armor not worth.
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
57mm and tankier.
@christopherbramkamp9661
6 ай бұрын
@@NoiceGuy 57 can the b10 too.
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
@@NoiceGuy as others said, both B-15 and T-15 have 57mm guns. B-15 gains bulat HE rockets on top of AT rocket and 57mm while having way weaker armour. But they are also way cheaper at 145 instead of 250.
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
@@TheFlohRiDa What I am basing my picks off of is gameplay. I have been more successful with the t15s likely because theyre tankier.
@neniAAinen
6 ай бұрын
B,K,T all have their merits (made decks specializing on all 3, made them work quite well), but on average, T(with armor and hp of Armata, and a massively powerful long 57mm gun) is the specialty of the Ru deck, and they're far more forgiving. Also, importantly, T-14/15s are fast as hell(80), so this isn't an advantage for lighter platforms(wheels are faser ofc, but nowhere near as much as you'd expect).
@Daniel-ie3mt
6 ай бұрын
Does the Derivatsiya act as a good gun AA though? I always use a Tunguska instead, especially for those goddamn helicopters
@dracotey
6 ай бұрын
yea its pretty good, it can engage helicopters fairly far without radar and even further with radar on for only 130pts
@braydopaintrain4346
6 ай бұрын
Imo the derivatsiya is garbage but its cheap and can protect your backline.
@nikoloso
6 ай бұрын
Derivatsiya absolutely annihilate helicopters, it's pretty great I find
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
Cheaper, 57mm go buh buh buh and most cases just as good
@VampiroGaming
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for all the informative coverage! I have two questions. 1) Do you know if the tank/vehicle meta is intentional or is there a chance that inf will be more viable? I think that a lot of the maps/part of the maps would imho be dominated by inf and not tanks irl, so it seems like an intentional design decision to put the focus on vehicles. Also, more survivability on vehicles reduces the micro load a bit. 2) Do you know if the los tool is already working as intended or is it wip? It building up really costs time so I have the impression the players are not supposed to constantly use it. Also, I think it does not display weapon ranges when a unit is selected. What is your take on the los tool? I don't want to argue for or against better inf or a different los tool, game is looking very promising as is with the decisions as they are, but I am very curious :)
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
1) feel like its cuz of modern battlefield setting. Guided ammo, very precise weaponry and all means the only defense infantry have left is stealth. 2) you can press G to have a sorta range tool for units. The visual stuff works pretty good imo. It even differenciates elevation.
@VampiroGaming
6 ай бұрын
@@TheFlohRiDa Thanks a lot for your input! 1) I actually think because of the modern setting infantry is more important, because tanks have close to none defense, not even stealth (some reduce their heat signature a bit etc.; also, drones and vehicles can have devices to read heat signatures from soldiers, so kind of hardly any one has any stealth, depending on the equipment). And there are already drones in the game. Imho modern conflicts (e.g. Ukraine, Fallujah etc) show, that the boots on the ground are (at least) as important as tanks. That is why I think it is possibly a design decision to focus more on vehicle gameplay. 2) Thanks a lot, I have to try that out! Does that show weapon ranges, too? I only used ALT so far! And it builds up so it takes some time till it can be used.
@ketamu5946
6 ай бұрын
lol... kind of the same i came up with during the time i played the open beta.
@fabiofps4055
6 ай бұрын
It's there any overlap in EFT and this game? Time to make another secondary channel.
@firecats5391
6 ай бұрын
sheeeesh, love the vids :3
@DarkDunkelheit
6 ай бұрын
Nice deck, but S-300 is better in all aspects than buk-m3, more range, more penetration for the same price. also, derivatsiya greatest objective is to destroy helicopters backing up your tanks, so its just better to use Strelas, since they have literally the double range (1100 vs 2200) against helis, being even cheaper, only downside is that it doesnt shoot missiles
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
2 more missiles and easier/faster setup. Strelas miss too much and can't shoot ground units turn radar on for der.
@tendertriper4281
6 ай бұрын
I am going to disagree with you there noiceguy i think the s-300v4 with the 2 giant missiles is way better than the buk, in my opinion, you get it for 130 points it has a 9000m range way bigger than the buk with 6400m (and yes it is whit radar) and I find it the early it can shoot early the plane go down hence protecting the things your back and front lines I have seen way too many buk get killed by arty fire and planes whit bombs couse they are to slow to react to them coming whit there really low range the only thing I can fick it is a drawback is they only have 2 missiles but can easily be accommodated to have 2 and ammo depo on them I usually leave them 3000 supplies and it usually lasts the whole game plus you are saving 100 points as well which is very nice. which means with your current deck you can fit a one buk for 180 points in there if you want to if you drop the kamAZ-6560
@snotcycle
6 ай бұрын
any thoughts on the sosna (upgraded strela) compared to the tor?
@NoiceGuy_
4 ай бұрын
In this beta the sosnas loved to miss wasn't worth the points
@2unguska
Ай бұрын
Tushonka - lmao!
@nekko5778
6 ай бұрын
how can i play against friends?
@marsryo6569
28 күн бұрын
pee pee poo poo deck
@Hogboy13
6 ай бұрын
Huge cope within the first minute.
@richter9485
6 ай бұрын
Its a fair take though? He did say he might be wrong of course. But are we really not gonna trust the playtester with hundreds of hours against the devs and other play testers Vs Potato Andy with at most 1 week of gametime On what is actual the good shit in a game. Maybe things work right now in potato land because no match making exists and no ladder is around in a game that is just in Open Beta.
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
Absolutely.
@chiggsy7313
6 ай бұрын
@@richter9485you can say that without acting like a pretentious dick tho. He could have just been like ‘I’ve been a beta tester for around a year now and this is the build I’ve had the most results with instead of stroking his own ego for 5 minutes
@NoiceGuy_
4 ай бұрын
Everything that matters backs it up and you can ask the lead dev yourself if you wish.
@stratdaddy
6 ай бұрын
What makes Abrams better than T14?
@g3koot100
6 ай бұрын
Price performance
@stratdaddy
6 ай бұрын
@@g3koot100 fully upgraded Sep3 he runs is 390 vs 400 for a T14 no?
@NoiceGuy
6 ай бұрын
idk but they win the fights more often when in cannon range could be the way I use them but they just win
@MBunn-uf1we
6 ай бұрын
might because the abrams have higher AP values and a faster reload at every price bracket. Armata and the Sep3s are evenly matched in the combat department the abrams has the better AP round tho while the armata is faster and longer engagement range.
@TheFlohRiDa
6 ай бұрын
Abrams have more pen and armour them armatas or T-90s
Пікірлер: 72