I agree with every single take here… mild takes that just need to be more widely accepted by the masses. Nicely done!
@Timeless_fnaf
13 күн бұрын
@@footballops3510 Thanks!
@widerekxxanimations6842
13 күн бұрын
We need a fnaf world sequel
@dogmug_
15 күн бұрын
I actually agree with you on almost all of these! You bring up some really good points about each of your opinions. Genuinely you’re really cool, have a fantastic day. :]
@Timeless_fnaf
14 күн бұрын
You too! Thanks for the feedback :)
@nikolaytablet1394
13 күн бұрын
Don't you Disrestect My boy M.X.E.S., he's got the Best Jawli-
@DiamondrockPC
15 күн бұрын
Subbed because of this vid
@Timeless_fnaf
14 күн бұрын
Appreciate it 🤭
@jasdjasd-wj8ii
3 күн бұрын
I love the five laps at Freddy’s in the background
@liixiiil
12 күн бұрын
U LITERALLY SAID EVERYTHING THAT I HAD IN MIND 👹
@eefbeef
13 күн бұрын
I agree with a lot of the stuff here. I personally enjoyed RUIN, but I can see why you don't.
@lunastifaliamusic
13 күн бұрын
I do have a hot take that would make a lot of people hate me for it. FNAF 2 was genuinely a terrible game. It added WAY too many characters into it for seemingly a "harder" experience, when the rest of the series has proven that you don't need a million characters to make it a good game. FNAF 1, there's only 4, disregarding Golden Freddy since he's a secret, and they are split into half. While they all have the exact same way of being blocked, the doors, they require a lot more management. Bonnie and Chica are pretty much the same, with Bonnie moving faster, and Chica being a lot easier to know if she's still there or not. Freddy and Foxy are similar with slowing them down, through looking at the cameras. Then there's FNAF 3, which did the complete opposite of FNAF 2 and just gave us one threat. With how FNAF 3's gameplay works, it definitely needed only a SINGLE threat (seriously y'all need to shut up about how FNAF 3 sucks because of the fact that it only has one animatronic.) Then there's FNAF 4, with it returning to form and having every animatronic being maintained differently to keep them away. But what do they all have in common? They have very few animatronics in them. And even then, the other games still kept this idea. Sister Location only had 5 animatronics, Pizza Sim had 4 threatening animatronics, and Security Breach... well, it's a bit different to talk about since it's a free roam game, but just 3 mainline threat animatronics. 4 for the few times Freddy might kill you. FNAF 2 has 10 characters in total, with 8 of them requiring you to do the EXACT SAME THING. Put on the mask. The puppet could've been executed way better, having it's music box being a whole lot slower and not needing NEARLY as much management for the first two nights. Foxy's the only one that requires you to use your flashlight and THAT'S IT. The gameplay loop is way too repetitive, which is rich coming from a series all about repetition.
@Timeless_fnaf
13 күн бұрын
I do actually agree with you. FNaF 2 could have been done a lot better, but I do love the chaotic-ness.
@maximustheshoosh227
6 күн бұрын
Honestly I do agree of how FNAF 2 isn’t the best game of the franchise, plus the withereds should of had a mechanic involving the camera lights or using the flashlight when they enter the office
@bsheepdestroyermakesstuff7222
13 күн бұрын
fnaf 4 is the scariest: i mean sure yeah its pretty scary fnaf world is overhated: yes springtrap shouldnt have been in SB: yes this was horrible and he was never even supposed to be an actual character the books are strange: not really arguable against since theres literally a story where a guy gives birth to plushtrap the lore is too hidden: i disagree, the problem isnt that its too hidden its that theres a lot of things that go completely unexplained im tired of fnaf theories: yeah its getting annoying, especially the theories that make no sense like ennard being planned since fnaf 1 (the guy doesnt even plan 1 game ahead yet alone 4). another thing that also annoys me is when they say that dream theory was correct and was retconned when dream theory was never correct in the first place i dont like ruin: yes oh my god im so tired of people saying its "peak fnaf", its just not no more golden freddy: golden freddy is definitely inhabited by one of the missing children, although its entirely possible that it is also inhabited by the crying child. also you dont play as the crying child in fnaf 4's night gameplay, you play as michael. (I dont care what the character encyclopedia says unless scott cawthon says its correct because it actively contradicts other things from the games and books that scott cawthon made directly.)
@bbth3best380
14 күн бұрын
i agree with the not liking ruin, honestly the game was basically security breach but worse designs, it also got boring and repetitive with the vr mask, anyway great vid!
@Timeless_fnaf
14 күн бұрын
Thanks bro!
@gamesuarx
13 күн бұрын
Worse designs...? I genuinely want to hear your thought process here. Character designs are one of Ruin's strongest points. How exactly are they bad
@bbth3best380
12 күн бұрын
@@gamesuarx alright, MXES design is one of the worst in fnaf, Roxy’s is trying to be scary too hard. Glam Bonnie has a boring design, I do think chicas and Monty’s are good
@dylanhudec979
13 күн бұрын
I think the mimic is a boring antagonist
@FredbonFilms
13 күн бұрын
I don't agree at all lol. Theories are a BIG part of the FNAF community, and whether you like it or not, they will always play a significant part. John is still relatively new to making content on KZitem, in that time he's amassed over 500k subscribers, and I personally think he deserves even more. He's just a lovely individual who tries his best to spread love, not hate, and Twitter goes at him for it.
@ThisIsAHandle-xz5yo
13 күн бұрын
And Fnaf theories have always been insane
@Timeless_fnaf
12 күн бұрын
I get were you coming from with that, but I just think FNaF theories have lost their magic. I just really couldn't care less about FNaF theories any more.
@FredbonFilms
12 күн бұрын
@@Timeless_fnaf That's an opinion of yours, I personally disagree.
@user-ij6sn3lo8u
Күн бұрын
I honestly don’t like the mimic cuz it just one big redcon and the twisted animatronics were so interesting.
@FlutterManeTheUber
13 күн бұрын
4:44 womp womp . Golden Freddy can't be Crying Child in my oppinion because he didn't die in Fredbears mouth but in a hospital . I understand you don't like the new Golden Freddy theories , but I like Rye Toast's theory where he says the Crying Child is following Golden Freddy because in his eyes Golden Freddy looks like his Fredbear plush and Cassidy and Michael use the logbook to remind the Crying Child of who he is so his soul could be in peace . One thing we know from the start is that there were five missing children and you are telling me the fifth one didn't even exist even tho that's what the minigames literally show us. Also the Mimic is the GOAT he saved the story from William coming back for the 3717th time and got peak design. But yeah you're right most of ruin is kinda mid.
@ohmanohman...
13 күн бұрын
my hot take is fnaf world is UNDER hated. feels to me like everyone in the fandom is with it
@plushhouse1132
12 күн бұрын
YEESS please no more golden freddy 🎉❤
@ScottClever
13 күн бұрын
Don't you dare be M.X.E.S' hater
@nikolaytablet1394
13 күн бұрын
2 Words: Golden Duo
@Timeless_fnaf
13 күн бұрын
I think the golden duo theory is stupid lol 🤷♂
@nikolaytablet1394
12 күн бұрын
@@Timeless_fnaf I fully disagree
@Timeless_fnaf
12 күн бұрын
@@nikolaytablet1394 respectable
@gamesuarx
13 күн бұрын
"We should accept Golden Freddy is the Crying Child, it makes the most sentence" Just because you want it to be the case doesn't mean it's smth "we should accept", lmao. Because no, it DOESN'T make the most sense. It was established in the FIRST game, THREE GAMES before the Crying Child even existed, that five children were murdered in 1985 by Purple Guy. He killed 5 kids and stuffed them in the Freddy's suits. Where exactly is that 5th child-- Cassidy-- if Golden Freddy is just "the Crying Child".
Пікірлер: 42