"you'd use them against american troops?" So you'd use american troops to enforce tyranny? That's a weird and telling answer to that statement.
@mattw3190
2 жыл бұрын
I think Jerry just realized that American Patriots and citizens could reject this tyranny run government at any minute and come for them anytime and I also think it opened his eyes that the military took an oath to protect the Constitution against tyrants running the government Bet Jerry didn't sleep too well last night.
@fuzzyone99
2 жыл бұрын
The word "tyranny" implies domestic government and the history right wingers have of threatening violence at the American government and the killing they did of capitol police officers proves that they're the ones revealing something about themselves. In any event, they're the ones who elected a Russian puppet.
@ivanov13
2 жыл бұрын
@@fuzzyone99 What a dump collection of trash words that mean nothing.
@fuzzyone99
2 жыл бұрын
@@ivanov13 Hahaha so says a RUSSIAN ROBOT!
@fuzzyone99
2 жыл бұрын
@@ivanov13 Say hi to your buddy Vlad P. for me, ok?
@jimhollenbeck4088
2 жыл бұрын
My great grandfather was born in 1870, dies in 1969, reflecting on life in the 1800's he once told me that "when everyone was assumed to be armed, we had a very polite society" I'll take his word for it.
@tm-ym2ye
2 жыл бұрын
I live in Texas we hold the door for one another... my grandmother will shoot a burglar in the face..
@jeremiahsams2848
2 жыл бұрын
@@tm-ym2ye smart woman your grandmother is/was🤣🤣🤣.
@thanksforbeingausefulidiot9016
2 жыл бұрын
Were those the polite days where you'd have a nice, polite lynching about once a week down in the town square?
@joshhernandez6974
2 жыл бұрын
@@tm-ym2ye yes but what if the burglar is the sleepy Hollow guy ??
@yourma-uh5um
Жыл бұрын
@@thanksforbeingausefulidiot9016 They also breathed in air during those days, you gonna stop doing that because lynching people happened then too?
@crimsonwolf3421
2 жыл бұрын
When the idea of what a tyrannical government becomes a partisan idea, is when this becomes an issue.
@nealamesbury7953
10 ай бұрын
Don't trust a political party, - that would disarm its citizens. We used to value freedom, now we dont
@MoswenMedia
2 жыл бұрын
"American troops" is a subjective term in the presence of tyranny.
@trishsumerlin1
2 жыл бұрын
I am sure “American troops” implies Government military personnel in his question. The word tyranny is not even implied in the current or original text of the 2nd amendment. It was written not very long after our war against England and it’s Anarchist rule. We needed patriotic citizen’s to have arms to defend the new government against foreign and domestic combatants. After all that’s who fought for independence against British soldiers! A rifle in those days cost more money than most people had, unlike today! Nowadays families will go on starvation rations to purchase an AR-15 to go with the rest of their excessive collection they now have as a sign of their machismo. A cult headed by a lying POS, snake oil salesman, are fooled into believing the re-election he lost was stolen from him. However nobody has ever seen the first piece of reliable evidence. A person standing up saying it had to have been stolen, bc their guy “SHOULD HAVE WON!” Is NOT reliable evidence of anything. But it is HOPEFUL THINKING! They get kissed and accuse the government of tyranny because their fraud didn’t win. It’s madness……..
Each individual American is militia. Why have a standing army?
@kevinhempstead8074
Жыл бұрын
God given rights is also a subjective term, in regards to militias and militant groups.
@adamgonzalez7450
2 жыл бұрын
“You would use these weapons against American soldiers!?!” Yeah dude, against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC
@davidkirby1138
2 жыл бұрын
Only Soldier that doesn't know what an illegal order is.
@MrSimoMlt
2 жыл бұрын
So the military is your enemy now?
@louismoffett3571
2 жыл бұрын
Please go up against the u.s. military and let me know how that works out for ya.
@davidkirby1138
2 жыл бұрын
Conflating is ignorance or gaslighting. Unless tyranny is the subject.
@LuisRodriguez-gt9hx
2 жыл бұрын
@@louismoffett3571 The Taliban did pretty well.
@nateb4543
2 жыл бұрын
Warms my heart to hear him say "stand up against tyranny" . So often we hear why do you need 30 magazine round bullets in an automatic rifle to hunt deer? 2A isn't for food or private protection.
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler thinks tyranny is a creme filled pastry.
@jimjones3065
2 жыл бұрын
Yes Sir. But the founders were racist idiots who need their statues removed. 🙄
@jimjones3065
2 жыл бұрын
@@1247.cccccc nadler thinks he will benefit from tyranny. Too many Americans think it won't effect them.
@odysseus2656
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, if your read he federalist papers it is obvious that the second amendment is to allow the people to violently overthrow a tyrannical government. The founders had a military with muskets and thought that the military would never be much better armed than the citizenry in general. Which means that "arms" is any offensive weapon our military has, including thermonuclear warheads if you can afford one and if you can find a seller. Don't want private citizens to own one? Then take them away from our military.
@jimjones3065
2 жыл бұрын
Wow, I'm the only like so far? Maybe because most american students don't study the works that shaped our colonies, states or nation
@cameronfleetmartinette9957
2 жыл бұрын
this video should go viral. this man brings up some facts from the past that are very important for everyone to remember today.
@caryfrancis8030
2 жыл бұрын
Like when he used a gun to defend himself and stop tyranny ? Oh wait, he's never used a gun for that.
@wendyjohansen6174
2 жыл бұрын
Lol. Good luck with your semi automatic against drones!🤣
@largemarge1603
2 жыл бұрын
@@wendyjohansen6174 Drone operators? Their families? Drone manufacturers? Their families? Collaborators, anybody furnishing aid, food, utilities, fuel to drone bases? Their families? . Wendy, The tyrants are terrorfied of freedom.
@frostymapleleaf2443
2 жыл бұрын
@@wendyjohansen6174 you got a drone? Cool!
@wendyjohansen6174
2 жыл бұрын
@@frostymapleleaf2443 Oh it’s terrific. Military grade too!
@apcook34
2 жыл бұрын
Why do we have automobiles that go faster than the speed limit?
@ironmiron08
2 жыл бұрын
We should not.
@Kazuma_Kiryu247
2 жыл бұрын
@@ironmiron08 We should because it’s our right, like we use guns for sport we have the right to use cars for sport. Just because it doesn’t appeal to you doesn’t mean you should take away the enjoyment for everyone else.
@greybuckleton
2 жыл бұрын
The against tyranny bit is the argument that needs to be made more and more. Well spoken and focusing very much on the correct topics.
@paulmm5175
2 жыл бұрын
I dont get get the tyranny bit. When in all of American history has there been a govt that imposed tryanny agaisnt its people, besides African Americans or Native Americans who have been put down all through American history. They would be within their "right" to bear arms against the govt according to that logic.
@johnross6786
2 жыл бұрын
we are
@johnross6786
2 жыл бұрын
have we all forgotten that the second amendment was created fight back against tyranny. That was the reason. Do you not remember the 13 colonies separated from England or Britain or whatever and they used to impose the colonies rating their homes Farms personal items and persons. This is why the law was created.
@americangirl8960
2 жыл бұрын
@@paulmm5175 It's happening now, don't you see it? They haven't yet unleashed martial law on us but they are working on it. Why do you think they are taking away our jobs and our access to food and supplies? To cause chaos so they can "justify" sending in the troops. Of course they won't send them to the border.
@larrythompson8630
2 жыл бұрын
“Would you use it against a illegal government?” As he said. THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE 2ND AMENDMENT. Not deer, pheasant hunting.
@jkee9760
2 жыл бұрын
If someone asks you this question, dont answer because they have shown how little they know about fire arms
@dertythegrower
2 жыл бұрын
Literally. Well said. And then he only brings on "experts" that side his opinion to get rid of all these weapons, yet he used a weapon guard to shoot Ashlii Babbitt at the capitol to protect him from being kicked out of office.
@mrdannyheim6712
2 жыл бұрын
What Do You Use Semi-Automatic Weapons For?
@mrdannyheim6712
2 жыл бұрын
@@dertythegrower 'What Do You Use Semi-Automatic Weapons For?
@slimjimnyc270
2 жыл бұрын
You cannot convince ignorant people without civil discussion. I am pro-gun now but I was neutral on guns because I knew nothing about guns. Neither it's actual history and real life uses. Now I know better and realize its importance in keeping and protecting our democracy.
@johanvanderpants9363
2 жыл бұрын
That is such bad advice. If someone doesn't know something, as long as they are willing to listen, it is your responsibility to inform them. You shouldn't argue with someone about it, but there is such a far line between arguing and informing. If you are a true 2-A advocate you should be trying to talk to anyone willing to listen and bring them to the side of freedom.
@SimplestUsername
2 жыл бұрын
I honestly don't think Nadler knows what a Simi-Automatic weapon is.
@dertythegrower
2 жыл бұрын
Jerry Nadler is one of the most ignorant people, and I toned down my comment a lot.. he knows almost nothing about anything we talk about in society... literally. How is that guy in charge of anything is beyond corruption.
@mrdannyheim6712
2 жыл бұрын
@@dertythegrower what republican would be his equal?
@SimplestUsername
2 жыл бұрын
@@aaron783 I don't know 0:30 He seemed genuinely baffled by the fact that the guy owns simi-auto weapons. The only way that's surprising is if you don't realize that most all pistols and most soft recoil low caliber weapons are simi-auto.
@JMBeaushriimp
2 жыл бұрын
Only works on the valley...
@carldouglasmiles5594
2 жыл бұрын
He knows. He doesn’t care.
@egillis214
2 жыл бұрын
That anyone does NOT understand this today is incomprehensible
@braddouglas7839
2 жыл бұрын
ESPECIALLY a supposed " lawmaker". These anti 2a assbags really floor me.
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
LOL, Dan Crenshaw lost the eye that could see it.
@6spdkeg
2 жыл бұрын
The people in the US have had it too cush for too long it appears bc there's obviously a lot of people that very anti gun and simply fooled.
@rc391995
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler don't know . that's part of the problem they don't know the differences between auto and semi auto. They hear auto !!!
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
@@6spdkeg and simply fooled. Yes, they glory in their acquired ignorance. The fake news is unintentional self parody.
@GFTCNJ
2 жыл бұрын
Same reason Nadler’s security detail uses them.
@joebauers3746
2 жыл бұрын
Should ask Nadler why Israeli citizens have guns, does he want them disarmed as well?
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
@@joebauers3746 Nadler: What do you mean Jewish citizens?
@MtPilot-mh3zl
2 жыл бұрын
IT would take twice as many security guards to surround him !!! LOL !!!
@joebauers3746
2 жыл бұрын
@@1247.cccccc No, I meant Israelis. Nadler is a J, and I am 100% sure he would not hold Israel to the same standards. Kinda like "Walls for me but not for thee", which guys like him always are as well.
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
@@joebauers3746 I was joking about Nadler and his unfortunate practice of misunderstanding and misconstruing facts, events and general elements of reality.
@joelhanson5304
2 жыл бұрын
why do they continue to waste everyones time with these pointless hearings?
@stephenbrecht1696
2 ай бұрын
I'd tell you, but my answer would probably be unprintable!
@JasonCloseOK
2 жыл бұрын
They are saying "semi automatic weapon" like a scary buzzword. It's like calling a knife a "serrated slicing flesh ripper".
@sabinereynaudsf
2 жыл бұрын
It's the preferred weapon of mall and school shooters.
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
Or in terms Nadler can understand: Butter spreading Tuna sandwich divider.
@cccCCCccc123ccc
2 жыл бұрын
@@sabinereynaudsf You do know almost all handguns are semi automatic right? Lol who am I kidding? Of course you don't!
@JasonCloseOK
2 жыл бұрын
@@sabinereynaudsf It's also the preferred weapon of governments against its citizens.
@SiliconFlux
2 жыл бұрын
Not all guns are semi,, but yes most
@AngelRodriguez-zt6nv
2 жыл бұрын
High powered weapons are for hunting the most dangerous predators, like humans 😈☠
@TheRepublicOfJohn
2 жыл бұрын
Most "anti-tyranny" guns... AR-15 and AK-pattern assault rifles (as defined by military nomenclature, not anti-gun lobbyists) are too small caliber for effectively hunting wild game. But a 5.56 will definitely put down bad-faith gov't actors.
@larrysutliff2264
2 жыл бұрын
An AR 15 is a civilian version of the M16 military rifle. It was NOT designed to be particularly deadly. I military wants to wound a combatant. 1 wounded, 2 needed to carry him out, 3 out of the fight. There are alot of more distructive weapons. The most distructive are distributed humans. There are millions of AR15s in private hands, the percentage used in crime is extremely small. The FBI stats show twice as many people are killed with hands and feet as ALL rifles put together.
@jonicab
2 жыл бұрын
@@larrysutliff2264 that is correct Larry... Also for situations like the battle of Athens, in Tennessee 1946.
@TheRepublicOfJohn
2 жыл бұрын
@Fah Q hey, people can be a leftists and pro-2A at the same time. We anti-capitalists share the Right's concerns about tyranny and authoritarian gov't oppression.
@nickloven6728
2 жыл бұрын
Remind me how many people the governments around the world including our very own have murdered only in the last hundred years? The 2nd Amendment is for hunting tyrants 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@ericheick7044
2 жыл бұрын
Fully Semi-Automatic
@emstut
2 жыл бұрын
The Authoritarian Despots on full display for all to see!!!
@dangreene9846
2 жыл бұрын
Makes no difference, you have the right .
@dusteedawg2915
2 жыл бұрын
EXACTLY.....mi think it's time they give us back full auto......... They're GOING in the wrong direction
@user-ii4zf5iq3t
2 жыл бұрын
@@dusteedawg2915 You can bet new people arriving here would use full automatic to achieve their purpose.
@WarMachine550
2 жыл бұрын
Roy: "Semi auto weapons can be used to defend against tyranny." Nadler: "You mean you'd use them against American troops?" Me: "You mean American troops would be used to enforce tyranny?"
@NuRealm2020
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly he said it believe the weeezelllll!!!! Kick him the fluck in da mouth litttttle weeezeeeelllll
@NuRealm2020
2 жыл бұрын
Roy alpha male godly man!!!!
@nissangeek
2 жыл бұрын
Thats the way I interpreted it too.. Though I know for a fact there are many American troops that would stand up against tyranny, with civilians, if it came down to a real fight.
@davidbaker9089
2 жыл бұрын
Unless those members were following orders from commanders that are unsure what it means to be white.
@roberthanna3012
2 жыл бұрын
The problem is that tyranny is in the eye of the beholder -- and the last practitioners of armed insurrection, on January 6, 2021, thought that properly certifying a free and fair election constituted tyranny because their preferred candidate lost the said free and fair election because he stank as a president and as a candidate. So, no, I don't think a government should tolerate a bunch of free-lance yahoos running around doing political violence.
@largemarge1603
2 жыл бұрын
"Mister nadler, are you insinuating you intend to order American soldiers and Marines to enforce your tyranny? I would love to hear your Plan 'B', because your Plan 'A' just might back-fire..."
@ricfax
2 жыл бұрын
Many of those alive at the founding of our republic carried the best version of assault rifles of the day that they could procure. If they could have procured AR-15s and today's ammunition, you can be sure they'd have owned and used them for both military and personal use, just as today. They knew what tyranny looked like. Many today seem to have forgotten or never studied enough history to have a clue.
@Adirondacks4me
2 жыл бұрын
They are destroying that history, so sheep will follow what they want as history...
@ricfax
2 жыл бұрын
@OneInsideTheEye : First thing tyrants do is seek to disarm the citizens, unless the citizens have foolishly given up their guns already. As Santayana warned, "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
@ricfax
2 жыл бұрын
@OneInsideTheEye : 🤣🤣🤣 Yeah, right. Try owning guns in cities like NYC or DC.
@ricfax
2 жыл бұрын
@OneInsideTheEye : 🤣🤣🤣 Do you own a semi-automatic pistol with magazines that hold eight or more rounds in NYC? Do you own an AR-15 with detachable magazines that hold more than ten rounds in NYC?
@drondello1
2 жыл бұрын
You do know that an AR-15 is not an assault rifle, what do you think AR stands for its not Assault Rifle.
@formdoggie5
2 жыл бұрын
He should ask his security guards.
@dertythegrower
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler is the same guy who says antifa does not have a twitter page and groups of people in portland.. talk about backwards thinking..Nadler is proving himself naive for years, this is not a shocker at all.. he knows almost nothing about anything.
@joebauers3746
2 жыл бұрын
Should ask Nadler why Israeli citizens have guns... Does he want them disarmed as well?
@formdoggie5
2 жыл бұрын
@@dertythegrower yet another reason why he should talk to his security guards.
@joebauers3746
2 жыл бұрын
@Globglogabgolab 2.0 Hence my comment, and his double standards, same as the rest of the J Lefties in America. The "Walls for me but not for thee" types...
@BThack
2 жыл бұрын
@@dertythegrower nah Nadler isn't naive he's a shill. He's just pretending to be naive.
@abrahamnichols7734
2 жыл бұрын
Senator Chip could not have explained the 2nd amendment God given right better!
@mileshorn1489
2 жыл бұрын
There are no rights handed down from God. We have rules and laws created by Man. God has nothing to do with the United States. Benjamin Franklin believed there should always be a separation between church and state.
@SickndSoul
2 жыл бұрын
@@mileshorn1489 In God We Trust! Ring a bell?
@mileshorn1489
2 жыл бұрын
@@SickndSoul that was an add on in 1955. Had nothing to do with the founding fathers.
@PiousPriest
2 жыл бұрын
@@mileshorn1489 If you want to argue The United States was not intended to be a theocracy, you are in good company. With that said, to say that the founders argued morality had nothing to do with government and the constitution, you are incorrect. It was John Adams himself who said to Massachusetts Militia on Oct 11th 1798: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other" There are plenty of atheists arguing for natural law theory, arguing by virtue of being the apex being of evolution, humanity possesses rights.
@SickndSoul
2 жыл бұрын
@@mileshorn1489 intriguing... And extremely correct. See, to all the naysayers, the Constitution was written without prejudice or discrimination towards any group or individual!
@grochomarx2002
2 жыл бұрын
What do you use semi automatic weapons for? I use them for sport and recreation myself, and I am sure they have other uses. Just like my boat, or my car have other uses then just fishing or driving to work. Just because some tools have multiple uses does not mean that you yourself must use those same tools for all their potential multiple uses. A nail can fasten two boards together, and it can also be used to make a protrusion for hanging a hat up. It usage depends upon its need at the time. Nothing about this is noteworthy in any way.
@carldouglasmiles5594
2 жыл бұрын
It’s none of his business.
@1247.cccccc
2 жыл бұрын
Mister Maintenance Diet shouldn't be asking about what others do by personal choice.
@shanehaggard2630
2 жыл бұрын
I'm just surprised Naddler was awake.
@dertythegrower
2 жыл бұрын
Jerry Nadler is one of the most ignorant people, and I toned down my comment a lot.. he knows almost nothing about anything we talk about in society... literally. How is that guy in charge of anything is beyond corruption.
@Carma123
2 жыл бұрын
Or not pooping his pants live on tv like last time.
@markhuss5960
2 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah he's awake for this nothing else
@ivanov13
2 жыл бұрын
Right in the middle Mr Roy!!! Well said. I rewatch it a few times to remember the explanation. Very well said.
@keithmerce3863
2 жыл бұрын
Isn’t amazing how people who know absolutely nothing about firearms are making laws for firearms.
@jimjones3065
2 жыл бұрын
Keith, are your reps this vocal? If not then CALL THEM NOW!!
@MtPilot-mh3zl
2 жыл бұрын
YEP !! What do you expect from a bunch of liberal , lived in a gated community all their life , can't spell GUN, demonrats !
@Divine1Right
2 жыл бұрын
Same way people who know absolutely nothing about taking care of children are having children. Nobody can stop them
@p.k.3666
2 жыл бұрын
Same way people who know nothing about health are making healthcare laws. Here's a good one - do you know why NYC banned vaping wherever smoking is banned? The health committee felt it made it difficult to enforce smoking laws because vaping "resembled" smoking.. therefore let's just ban vaping because it looks like something that's banned already. They literally said this - I'm sure the transcript is someplace.
@jimcaldwell2354
2 жыл бұрын
I use semi-automatic weapons for self-defense, the most Human Right there is.
@markguitarlfk
2 жыл бұрын
Then you should tell Mr. Roy he is confused. He is mistakenly suggesting he can use guns against his government. Mr. Roy does not have the right to define what he calls "tyranny" and then shoot people. It is dangerous to suggest otherwise.
@jimcaldwell2354
2 жыл бұрын
@@markguitarlfk You don't have the right to define anything either.
@markguitarlfk
2 жыл бұрын
@@jimcaldwell2354 You are correct, Jim. However, Mr. Roy remains confused.
@jimcaldwell2354
2 жыл бұрын
@@markguitarlfk Nope. As long as Mr. Roy is not engaged in criminal activities, it is none of Mr. Nadlers business what Mr. Roy or any individual does in the full, free exercise of their Constitutional rights.
@markguitarlfk
2 жыл бұрын
@@jimcaldwell2354 We agree again. But Roy is still wrong when he suggests the constitution allows him to use a gun against the government he thinks is "tyrannical."
@BigCoolLou61
2 жыл бұрын
His reply should of included are US troops coming on my land for Tyranny?
@jimjones3065
2 жыл бұрын
Luis, are your reps this vocal? If not then CALL THEM NOW!!!
@andrewjaman4697
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler actually needs to be schooled on the 2nd Amendment. Wow....
@andrewjaman4697
2 жыл бұрын
@Lancaster Stiltstalking Proof? Otherwise, you're a total stranger trolling people for saying things you don't like.
@epicepidemic7131
2 жыл бұрын
@Lancaster Stiltstalking Please point us to the debates you say have nothing to do with preventing tyranny. It's all written, and even if the purpose weren't written, keeping government in check fits perfectly within the context of what they had to do, to gain independence from tyranny. Have you read the Declaration of Independence lately? Anyway... What do YOU say was the purpose of the 2nd Amendment?? I'd absolutely love to hear...
@epicepidemic7131
2 жыл бұрын
@Lancaster Stiltstalking I will read what you recommend. You give good info, and I'm open to adjustments in what I've believed if good info arrives. What about the Dec of Independence in terms of timing in the events you gave?
@marcelobrozovic9872
2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjaman4697 trump was a tyran and autocrat who`s biggest idols are Putin and Kim Jong-un, both of the publicly support trump and right wing in America
@novaui4014
2 жыл бұрын
Does Nadler think that muzzle loaders are still used?
@markhuss5960
2 жыл бұрын
He would say what do you use a muzzle loader for ???
@slimpickens3220
2 жыл бұрын
I have 5 muzzle loaders
@trumptardtearcollector9867
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I think during the special muzzle loader season or that's all you can use I think people still use them because you can't use anything else and they still want to hunt . I've shot one of their cool I could go buy 1 right now without a gun license because they're grandfather dead they're fun they're then they're fun to shoot they make a lot of smoke
@domidayv
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler, a tyrannical government man: "What DO you use semi-automatics for?" Americans: "Ar... are you serious right now?"
@thetornquads3968
2 жыл бұрын
@Lancaster Stiltstalking Nice projection kid.
@largemarge1603
2 жыл бұрын
To give to taliban by the billions of dollars worth. Without s 'back-ground' check.
@dsta9996
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine if all the homies having gun battles had 22 lever action
@mitchthompson3160
2 жыл бұрын
So the immediate obvious question to Nader should have been ‘Do you intend to use the military to enforce your tyrannical rule?’
@americangirl8960
2 жыл бұрын
Of course they are. That is why they are weeding out those who won't acquiesce to mandatory vaccination. They don't want freedom lovers in their ranks - only the submissive.
@thanksforbeingausefulidiot9016
2 жыл бұрын
So you have such a low opinion of the military that you think they are ready, at Nadler's or Pelosi's word, to enforce tyranny? If you have such an opinion spare us your BS about supporting our troops or supporting the police. Hypocrite.
@IslandBuzzy
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe Jerry should ask his security detail what they use their semi automatic weapons for!!!!
@Bradon32
2 жыл бұрын
Ok everyone. Nadler finally asked his phantom security detail (because he doesn’t actually have one) what their semi-automatic weapons were for and all three thousand of them answered: Clearly to defend the Congress against the murdering traitorous insurrectionist Republicans mobs the last President called to Capitol Hill.
@FirearmsEngineering
2 жыл бұрын
YoU wOuLd UsE tHeM oN oUr TrOoPs! Get that man out of government right now
@pprdrolshfgh4460
2 жыл бұрын
I think your missing the point sir
@FirearmsEngineering
2 жыл бұрын
@@pprdrolshfgh4460 i really dont think i am but go ahead and convince me other wise
@dertythegrower
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler, naive as always.
@dertythegrower
2 жыл бұрын
Wow you actually approved this 3rd comment.. Jerry Nadler is one of the most ignorant people, and I toned down my comment a lot.. he knows almost nothing about anything we talk about in society... literally. How is that guy in charge of anything is beyond corruption.
@carramrod8232
2 жыл бұрын
Naive...I say he's playing dumb
@MDallDayPrepper
2 жыл бұрын
As a sitting Congressman...Why does Nadler need an education in the Constitution and Bill Of Rights? Shouldn’t he know it inside & out?
@ericgriffin5974
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler just made the case for giving the people automatic firearms
@yurkellis
2 жыл бұрын
And tanks 😁
@crlheureux
2 жыл бұрын
This shows how ignorant these people are about guns. They think semi automatic means somewhat automatic. Why are they making decisions about things they have no clue about. Climate change, economy, foreign relations, domestic relations, etc.
@RXNZL
2 жыл бұрын
Lol that literally is what semi-automatic means.
@Adirondacks4me
2 жыл бұрын
They know guns and also they know if they don't take them from you they can't continue to dismantle the US Constitution.
@crlheureux
2 жыл бұрын
@@RXNZL no a automatic weapon is a weapon that if trigger is pulled once and held bullets come out until trigger is let go or out of ammunition. This type of weapon is already illegal and impossible to get without a special license. A semi automatic is a weapon that one bullet comes out per trigger pull. No comparison.
@RXNZL
2 жыл бұрын
@@crlheureux yes but the reload is automatic. So it is literally "somewhat automatic". It's in the name.
@crlheureux
2 жыл бұрын
@@RXNZL good try but nope. Used and been around guns since I was young and for my job. Like most liberals you are changing the meaning of words to fit your needs.
@Gun_Molester
9 ай бұрын
Tyrants will disarm those they want to oppress
@petenrita
2 жыл бұрын
Weird conversation. Semi-Autos have been around since the late 19th century and well established by WW1. They replaced rapid manual reloading lever actions. The question asked by Nadler suggests he thinks that self defense is a 5 shot 38 special revolver or a side by side break action or perhaps, a single shot bolt action rifle. All weapons have their purpose, but for self protection from Thugs abs tyrannical government, a semi auto should be on every one’s short list! Also, the word “semi-automatic” seems to trigger in too many the images of Rambo or Arnold firing a M-60 on full auto with one hand. Weird.
@vanscheurich2099
2 жыл бұрын
Actually if you match up a revolver to a semi for firing the fastest.........a trained person with a revolver fires just as fast or even faster than a semi-automatic.
@dontbescaredhomie3137
5 ай бұрын
We're not talking about full semi-automatic weapons here, for those new to the party.
@Ubermentsh
2 жыл бұрын
Every weapon that is not an automatic weapon is semi-automatic. You pull the trigger it fires a shot. One shot per pull 🤔
@BarneyBrimlowe
2 жыл бұрын
wrong. not every weapon chambers another cartridge after each discharge.
@Ubermentsh
2 жыл бұрын
@@BarneyBrimlowe but still only fires one shot per trigger pull. Semi-automatic. Automatic weapons fire continuously as long as you hold the trigger down. Really makes no difference if you're loading shots manually or in a cartridge or magazine. One pull one shot. A revolver is semi automatic. They're trying to capitalize on the fact that most people are uneducated and do not understand what a semi-automatic weapon is. And assume it's a Tommy gun LOL ignorance rules. Would you point your weapon at American soldiers? Would they point their weapons at us unjustifiably with bad and evil intent?
@BarneyBrimlowe
2 жыл бұрын
you are describing a single shot firearm. which requires the operator to manually charge the weapon and put another round into battery position. a semi-auto does this automatically as part of the cycling of the weapon. but doesn't discharge the next round. so... every weapon that is not automatic is NOT by default semi auto.
@BarneyBrimlowe
2 жыл бұрын
otherwise. we agree.
@Ubermentsh
2 жыл бұрын
@@BarneyBrimlowe LOL semi-automatic refers to the firing capability not the loading. Thanks again though. Again even a simple revolver is considered a semi-automatic weapon and would fall in this classification. So no one needs to be confused. Let's clarify semi-automatic refers to the firing capability. Which almost every single firearm currently used has. Semi-automatic firearm does not equal assault weapon. But yet that's what you would be led to believe. With that being said guns are bad. Don't play with guns. Don't have a gun. Unless you absolutely need a gun. Then get more than one
@patriciaeddy7629
2 жыл бұрын
The Constitution isn't designed for firearms protection , it's for human rights and government to protect those humans by it's laws.
@meghan42
2 жыл бұрын
Does the constitution also protect children in schools who have lost their lives to gun violence?
@p.k.3666
2 жыл бұрын
@@meghan42 if the Constitution was followed as it was intended by the framers where every American citizen capable between 16 and 60 were armed? And trained in arms? Yeah. Probably would be a lot less shootings. Probably would have a lot more polite society. Would you pull out a gun and attempt to shoot somebody if you knew ninety percent of the people in the room also had a gun?
@villian5124
2 жыл бұрын
free people have the right to any weapon and have the right to defend their lives with weapons in their hands, and the state has no right to poke its long nose into our rights and brazenly cancel them, especially since bandits are not interested in any laws and, despite all the prohibitions, they just always have weapons and use them
@murrellsummers1987
2 жыл бұрын
Well said Mr. Roy. 🇺🇸
@darylragland1502
2 жыл бұрын
They should learn and know 100 percent about what they are talking about. My God. Everything gets better through technology. We are not back in musket days. Make a criminal use a black powder gun.
@BSalc
2 жыл бұрын
Take out Nadler’s bodyguards and let him walk to his car and run errands in places he’s not been to.
@Robot-Overlord
2 жыл бұрын
I use mine to guarantee the government doesnt overreach.
@justinreschke3642
2 жыл бұрын
yOU wOuLd UsE iT aGAinSt AmEriCaN sOldieRs? 🙃🤡
@Robot-Overlord
2 жыл бұрын
@@aaron783 Oppressors are Oppressors regardless of affiliation. No shame in shooting someone who otherwise wants to enslave you.
@MrJameslascko
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, of course the framers of the Constitution were thinking about modern automatic weapons in 1776, so you know that's what they meant!
How is someone in that position pretending to not know what the 2nd amendment is? Not to mention "due process"? What is "an enemy of the Constitution, domestic or foreign"?🤔
@greybuckleton
2 жыл бұрын
That's the entire Democratic establishment your talking about right there. And because they all talk around it, many of the average Joes never understand that the guns in 2A are primarily to protect you from the government. Its a secondary benefit to protect your person of for sport.
@dennishickey7194
2 жыл бұрын
The argument used that avoids 2nd Amendment rights is the "need"for semi-automatic weapons for sport or hunting in light of their use in horrific attacks by deranged individuals. These mass murders of our people in concerts, theatres,churches and especially wrenching, in schools has a powerful pull on our emotions. It shouldn't cause us to lose our sense. Please refer to my comments elsewhere for a few thoughts why this is so.
@KCrail23
2 жыл бұрын
@@dennishickey7194 there is no argument worth mentioning or humouring that ignores or tries to conditionalize the 2nd amendment that way. Nor the 4th or 1rst for that matter. People need to just stop pretending those conversations are worth having or that people attempting to present such arguments have anything valid to work with.
@dennishickey7194
2 жыл бұрын
@@KCrail23 Agreed to and well said,KC! It shouldn't surprise either if us if we found each other on some red/ blue, left/ right divide used to split Americas apart. It's time for a more nuanced discussion where we do disagree and solidarity on all the things that unite us. Stay engaged. You are needed.
@KCrail23
2 жыл бұрын
@@dennishickey7194 thank you.. and just at a moment when i'm (only barely exaggerating) about ready to walk away into the forest and watch the $h!tshow burn itself down from a distance..
@josmotherman591
2 жыл бұрын
You blew the Penguin's mind. This is his first realization that he is not in charge. He can't come to grips with the fact that people actually have rights he is not in control of. Yes, NadNuts, there is a Second Amendment.
@Stonehombre1
2 жыл бұрын
The Wall Street Journal U.S. government in financial-settlement talks with families separated at southern border . Migrant families separated during the Trump administration could be entitled to around $450,000 a person in compensation, according to people familiar with the matter !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME ???
@TomTom-io8lc
2 жыл бұрын
How about its none of you're damm business side show Nadler
@biglance
2 жыл бұрын
Use them against corrupt politicians.
@Critical-Thinker895
2 жыл бұрын
... as opposed to using automatic weapons? What was that question all about?
@frankwalsh1916
2 жыл бұрын
It was about Nadler revealing he doesn't have a clue what semi-automatic means. We have all run into morons arguing in favor of gun control who think semi-automatic means fully-automatic.
@brendansohan2432
2 жыл бұрын
@@frankwalsh1916 Considering full auto are basically illegal - I think its more "as opposed" to bolt action, or single shot options.
@Keyfer62
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr. Roy.
@khemkaslehrling3840
2 жыл бұрын
At least Chip understands the point of the 2nd Amensment
@Redbird1504
2 жыл бұрын
Why would I need to demonstrate anything for a right?
@MtPilot-mh3zl
2 жыл бұрын
If someone broke into jerry's house in the middle of the night i guess he could throw pots and pans at them . LOL!!!!!!!!!!
@rleon8183
2 жыл бұрын
How dare you make fun of Hon. Nadler!! Obviously NOT!! That would make pots and pans -> semi-automatic assault-cookware! No, Nadler would scream like a girl and he would throw his complete bedside supply of Depends at the attacker!
@TeranceHealy
2 жыл бұрын
Another example of why LAWYERS CANNOT BE PART OF THE LEGISLATIVE OR EXECUTIVE BRANCHES. Lawyers are officers in the judicial branch. As part of the INELIGIBILITY CLAUSE, LAWYERS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, “No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.”
@jakedavid8187
2 жыл бұрын
i thought nadler was doing the right thing in asking what would they be used for...then he asked that nonsense question about fighting American troops.... so glad chip gave him a constitutional lesson
@dannytrujillo5435
Жыл бұрын
Defending against tyranny means putting names on bullets
@XRinger
2 жыл бұрын
I'm 75 with RA, gout & etc. My heavy bolt action rifles, and even my bull barrel 1022 with laminated stock, Is way too heavy! What's light and easy to use? A good PCC or AR..
@jgcelliott1
2 жыл бұрын
We are led, not ruled. .
@emersonglasgow9412
2 жыл бұрын
When tyranny becomes law ... Rebellion becomes duty ! When Nadler asked or made the statement about using our firearms on our soldiers , the real question should of been asked is that the government would use the troops to fire on the American citizens!!! It's a double edged sword and goes both ways , it's to defend my home and my country from foreign and domestic up to and including my own government.
@feralbigdog
2 жыл бұрын
"you say you would use a semi automatic weapon to fight tyranny, you mean you would use it against american troops?" that right there says more than anything else, its him saying "you would refuse to submit to the tyranny we want to impose? " "you would have the nerve to not let us steal your freedoms and rights so we can sit in our high castles and laugh at the little people?" this is why types like 'nadless naddler needs to be removed.
@Lee-rz4pn
4 ай бұрын
It is unfathomable that citizens have a better understanding of the constitution than people who swore a solemn oath to a document they have either never read our are not cognizant of the meaning therein
@kcv3412
2 жыл бұрын
One has to ask the people that defend having semi-automatic weapons how many times have their homes been broken into?
@roryfleming2320
2 жыл бұрын
If they should have the guns
@roryfleming2320
2 жыл бұрын
@C K Which means why aren't we funding social programs to put the people off the street so they don't commit the crime in the first place?
@roryfleming2320
2 жыл бұрын
@C K Why do you need semi auto weapons then. You aren't in a warzone. And you can create social programs in places with a higher crime rate
@roryfleming2320
2 жыл бұрын
@C K Should you? There are so many shootings they aren't being reported on the news anymore.
@roryfleming2320
2 жыл бұрын
@C K Guns aren't the problem? Norway that holds a strict gun policy last attack was in 2011.
@erikivarson5514
2 жыл бұрын
roy won .their whole argument stems from one of control not safety
@sergeantmasson3669
6 ай бұрын
When the US Constitution was written, farmers defeated to most powerful army on earth and forced them back to the UK.
@rogerromig354
2 жыл бұрын
And here we thought the penguin was just a villain in Gotham City
@JTSA1234
2 жыл бұрын
Weapons have changed in ways unforeseen. This truth is relevant. Had they known, they would never have written it.
@aliciasnow9165
2 жыл бұрын
@@lazorwolf5055 yes. Yes they are that ignorant.
@CitizenLarente
2 жыл бұрын
Listen to him carefully. This is the twisted logic and self-interpreted history the nation is up against.
@alecynot.2016
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's a pity there weren't all those automatic weapons he has the right to bear, actually used on Jan 6th.
@themightycrixus1131
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine being this oblivious
@CitizenLarente
2 жыл бұрын
@@alecynot.2016 .... First, since when are automatic weapons legal? Second, I was surprised the only insurrectionist killed was Babbit. A big Patriot like you must have made it inside the Capitol after the hard fight to enter.
@debbiemesna2411
2 жыл бұрын
It is our God Given Right to own Fire arms. I may not own one but I have the freedom to IF I Choose.
@leebarrett9408
2 жыл бұрын
This is a waste of time we solved this issue in 1791
@stacyreich3783
2 жыл бұрын
It was nice to see Nadler genuinely caring to understand the other sides thinking. I wish there were more discussion between parties about their logic on significant issues. I admit it is surprising that a congressman is unaware of why the second amendment came to be and why it was so important it is the second amendment and not further down on the list. Nadler seems so confused by the fact that one of the main reasons for our gun rights is for the ability to arm ourselves against our own government if the need should arise.
@spydude38
2 жыл бұрын
He was not confused. He was asking that question to attempt to set him up for another question, which he followed by asking if he was going to use semi-automatic weapons against the government.
@Adirondacks4me
2 жыл бұрын
NavyVet gets it...
@tearl5676
2 жыл бұрын
Nadless does not care. In one of his lucid moments he heard the words "semiautomatic weapon" and that triggered his standard gun grabber response "What do you use semiautomatic weapons for?" Nadless was probably back in lala land before Senator Roy finished the first sentence in his reply.
@donjuwann5868
2 жыл бұрын
what type of weapons do all the private security teams for these"politicians? carry single shot revolvers?sling shots?
@ClassicFIHD
2 жыл бұрын
"single shot revolvers"?
@imalikconnor
2 жыл бұрын
If your home is invaded and you can't take them down with one shot, you don't a semi-automatic weapon, you need more time at the firing range.
@Jp82911
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for saying it. It is used against Tyranny, & yes if Government becomes Tyrannical then we should be able to defend ourselves against it.
@tearl5676
2 жыл бұрын
Asked and answered. Probably not understood, but answered.
@myroncaine
2 жыл бұрын
You should not need a semi automatic weapon to protect yourself when in public
@joeradler
2 жыл бұрын
Ok, im a chip roy guy now.
@franklinbittner4683
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler doesn’t understand the constitution,or what,let’s go Branden
@RichardSpeights
2 жыл бұрын
Against tyranny.
@Calallenbrian84
8 ай бұрын
2nd amendment was for a tyrannical government NOT HUNTING. LOVE LOVE LOVE how the Democrat, Jerrold Nadler, literally states he intends the military to be used tyrannically.
@ctamarack5229
Жыл бұрын
Jerry Nadler to Chip Roy: "Are you telling me that you are willing to take up arms against American Troops?" Chip Roy should have responded, "Are you telling me that you are going to use the American Troops against American Citizens soon?"
@JamOweN
2 жыл бұрын
Nadler looks like the type of kid who believes that all one must do is "go to the store" whenever they want meat... 😑🤦🏽♂️
@davidkirby1138
2 жыл бұрын
Cows are brought to zoos in New York.
@MultiRentboy
2 жыл бұрын
Chip Roy the best
@sheensheen6800
2 жыл бұрын
Guns: pull trigger fire, repeat, definition of semi auto. Basically all guns are ok. Stop saying semi auto. Duh! Support 2nd amendment!
@silvypetrisor6979
2 жыл бұрын
Weird they never teach this
@Adirondacks4me
2 жыл бұрын
Why teach something that keeps ya free? Boots on your neck is their interest...
@mlfilion
2 жыл бұрын
A lot of civil war chatter coming out of the extremist party
@Critical-Thinker895
2 жыл бұрын
I haven't heard the progressive alt-left anarchists talk about it even once.
@mlfilion
2 жыл бұрын
@@aaron783 what are you waiting for?
@mlfilion
2 жыл бұрын
@@aaron783 so you're ready to go to war with the government?
@channtastic
2 жыл бұрын
@@mlfilion We don’t need a civil war. We just need a peaceful divorce. The right is getting tired of being constantly gaslighted by the left and the left throws a tantrum when the right finally realizes some power. The two sides of the country are diametrically opposed. I’m neither left nor right but it’s clear they cannot reconcile.
@spydude38
2 жыл бұрын
Speaking of Antifa, what has kept them from burning down any towns lately?
@andrewamirzadeh7678
2 жыл бұрын
Lol Nadler sounds like Rick Moranis 🤣😂🤣😂
@kevinrivard3875
2 жыл бұрын
I love how he named off those guns and even those guns are way more advanced than the founding father's had. So his basis for his argument really doesn't stand to well.
Пікірлер: 1,2 М.