This was a nice presentation. I agree that they should stick to realism at the moment and nail that 1st. I have the Pianoteq and that can do amazing stuff like have your audio filter through various parts of the modelled piano. However when it comes to the final mix I am always swapping it out for a sampled piano. I do think modelling is the future though. I think the hybrid modelling/sampling looks promising.
@craigpurdie3528
Жыл бұрын
Lovely performance! Who makes the WIND CONTROLLER? Thank you.
@newignis
Жыл бұрын
I believe Tecontrol from Sweden.
@craigpurdie3528
Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@ilio_official
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your great coverage!
@GTChris
Жыл бұрын
I'm still hoping for a Guitar or Harp by SWAM. One can hope.
@SandcastleTheory
Жыл бұрын
Given that they're not bound by actual acoustic properties, it seems to me that they could have simply made just one model of each type of instrument (i.e. strings, brass, woodwind) that covers the entire tonal range from bass to soprano. And for the price, I would expect that kind of forward thinking, at the very least. Cheers!
@robertschulz6488
Жыл бұрын
Hi, where do I find the price of 750 USD/EUR or a link to this offer? I found this price not on their website.
@BOOelectric
Жыл бұрын
Sorry, their price structure is pretty confusing, the 750 is just for the solo woodwinds bundle. Looks like the whole shebang is 1,400.
@superultramegarobot
Жыл бұрын
Main downside of SWAM (besides the price) is the fact that they are almost entirely monophonic... If they could handle some amount of polyphony (and MPE), it'd be a dream come true!
@raidmarji
Жыл бұрын
Hi, they support MPE for sure. I tested the violin today with Lumi keys with realistic result
@superultramegarobot
Жыл бұрын
@@raidmarji They actually don't support MPE, they just are monophonic, so you can use a single voice with a wide pitch bend for some expressive behavior. The "M" in MPE stands for multichannel, and as it is SWAM is handicapped by the fact that it can only play a single voice, so it does not actually support MPE. In other words, any monophonic plugin with a wide pitch bend range and aftertouch support could be said to support "1 voice MPE", but the cool part of MPE is playing multiple voices and having each voice be able to express independently, which SWAM cannot do.
@@superultramegarobot agree. For me monophony can be useful in integration with other instruments and effects, particularly in adding stereo effects, spatial and pingpong effects, because what ever you do, you destroy the original stereo harmonic waves. Most violins and Saxo are recorded with a mono microphone, so for me, this is only my proper view, I use two mixer tables for all my instruments live but if record or amplifying my Clarinet, I Use a mono Microphone, and can mix it in stereo positionnement live with effects. But where this is right, is that as player I have two ears, with spacial interaction. In a room, the public is listening like with a canon microphone in mono mode with spacial effects due to the room, which add the stereo reception in the ears. That's what tried to do stereo and after 5.1 amps and systems, stereo place as Public listener, then the 5.1place the listener at the musician place when playing solo, with effects due to the room refraction. In my view, Clarinet produces a well localized mono sound, but with harmonics, vibrations and later resonnances, room later distortions, phasing, which can be imitated by effects added, or early by aftertouch and why not portamento, sustain, velocity, adsr, things you find in your modular, or in wave players, and your keyboard. I'm not so aware of the technical things, I juge mostly by the way I can create music with this technical amazing electronical things!🙏🧡💚😺🐶☺️🙋
@patriciaoudart1508
Жыл бұрын
👌👍💚🧡🙏🙋 exactly what interesting me a lot . I compare to my Roland Jupiter 50. Remind me to buy a breath controller to my CME uF 70☺️🙀
@leonidassavalas745
Жыл бұрын
What about posting some video from Guitar Center with Rudess? I simply could not be there. Yes, I have all of SWAM. Please?
@hugo54758
Жыл бұрын
The problem with this company is the price of the plugins, prohibitive
@voicesofdust4749
Жыл бұрын
If the entire aspect of bringing down the footprint of an instrument from gb's to mb's is great. With that said, shouldn't the price point be brought down as well? I personally like SWAM's engine but hate their pricing. Make your plugins price point comprable and your company would grow it's user base.
Пікірлер: 22