In a recent legal development, the Supreme Court raised concerns about the filing of a writ petition by Xylem Learning, a coaching institution assisting NEET-UG students. A vacation bench led by Justice Manoj Misra questioned the senior counsel representing Xylem Learning, asking, "What fundamental rights of yours are violated to enable you to maintain a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution?"
Join us as we delve into the details of this case, the implications for NEET-UG coaching centers, and the broader impact on students preparing for one of India's most competitive exams.
🔔 Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more updates on educational news and legal insights!
#NEETUG #SupremeCourt #XylemLearning #LegalNews #Education #CoachingInstitutes #FundamentalRights #Article32 #India #JusticeManojMisra #WritPetition
The Supreme Court has questioned a Kerala firm, which coaches students for competitive examinations such as NEET through its app, for claiming violation of fundamental rights in its plea alleging discrepancies in the test for admission to medical colleges.
This year’s National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), the result of which was declared earlier this month, has triggered a wave of protests with aspirants alleging large-scale irregularities, including paper leak. Several petitions have been filed demanding the test be scrapped, with questions raised over the role of the National Testing Agency that conducts the exam.
"This is an Article 32 petition by an instance of a coaching centre. What fundamental right of yours is violated? You provide them coaching and your duty is discharged that is all," a vacation bench of justices Manoj Mishra and SVN Bhatti asked Xylem Learning on June 27.
Writ petitions are filed under Article 32 only when the fundamental right of an individual is violated by governmental actions.
Негізгі бет NEET-UG Row: Supreme Court Questions Coaching Institute's Plea Filing
Пікірлер: 23