Watch more videos of this event or by other airshows on the playlists of my channel below. 🙂 MAKS Airshow: kzitem.info/door/PL_kDcX2_3uppH-JU7Z52Ux8VSebVlrcT3 Russian Aircraft: kzitem.info/door/PL_kDcX2_3upqOTztY_1IuBXKtruFLBpmL Airshows: kzitem.info/door/PL_kDcX2_3upoftlBOhtnzEPE_eiDNejG-
@indridcold8433
3 жыл бұрын
Wow! It has full length slats on all four wings! Amazing! I had to come back to admire this beautiful aeroplane.
@JC130676
4 жыл бұрын
Very impressive. Do you know how you land an An-2 on an aircraft carrier? You fly in front of the carrier at minimum speed and let the carrier overtake you...
@AceMcMoron
4 жыл бұрын
You are not far off the mark.. The org. version could according to its manual do a vertical emergency landing. Full stick back, stall vertically to the ground and the pilots could (in theory) make it out the plane in one piece thanks to its weight/ surface ratio, landing gears, and seats. Dunno if it was ever tried in real life though.
@bradargyle5524
3 жыл бұрын
Damm near. Slick sexy planes are cool until you you need that fat battle axe to get you down in the weeds. Then she's beautiful even if a bit chunky.
@LilleyAdam
2 жыл бұрын
@@AceMcMoron there is a video on the tube of one stalling after takeoff
@cheddar2648
2 жыл бұрын
@@AceMcMoron The slats and giant wing surface are supposed to allow it to descend like a parachute and at about the same rate of descent.
@carjac820
2 жыл бұрын
You could even land a C130 on a carrier.
@robworsencroft8416
6 жыл бұрын
The legend continues - what a workhorse - the AN-2 rocks.
@pilot3016
4 жыл бұрын
I didn't think it would be possible to "pretty up" a AN-2.... But they did it!
@charliebowman785
6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful! those giant winglets at the wing tip for the lower wing are really impressive. Outstanding.
@repentuklondonwatchman1373
2 жыл бұрын
SIMPLY THE BEST AT THIS,,,, AND THAT HUGE PAYLOAD TOO. BEAUTIFUL.
@mike.47
4 жыл бұрын
Usually I like videos on this channel but please zoom out once in a while, you can’t appreciate how slow the aircraft is going if you can’t reference it against anything.
@flyinkiwi01
3 жыл бұрын
To add reference; it was probably going 15-20KIAS (minus any headwind) during the slow flight portion
@MichaelOZimmermannJCDECS
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly! There is no reference...
@trevchar
6 жыл бұрын
There is still a vintage AN-2 flying out of Oshawa Airport in Ontario, Canada. Its age is apparent, but it still has a rugged appeal to it. The modern AN-2 here is absolutely beautiful.
@orangepants5749
4 жыл бұрын
There was an old one with radial engine towering over Cessnas and Pipers at Buttonville as well for many years. I guess someone was lucky enough to snatch one for cheap from eastern Europe in the 90th. Maybe it's the same one as on Oshawa? Can't believe it will soon be 100 years of their mass production. And it's too bad Transport Canada doesn't approve these for commercial use. Would make a perfect bush plane.
@normg2242
4 жыл бұрын
I've seen two or three there. And one in Buttonville, which they let me climb around in....
@LanceWinslow
6 жыл бұрын
Very smart aerospace design - kudos to the brilliant designers - well done, good pilot in the video too.
@viktordemichev1579
3 жыл бұрын
Чертовски красивая машина. Сразу видно, что очень хорошо ухаживают. Красиво.
@efesair4336
6 жыл бұрын
I was at the MAKS airshow and inspected this aircraft. Very good finish, forget the old Soviet technology thinking. This is a real fine piece of technology.
@limshooter
4 жыл бұрын
For better performance it needs a retractable landing gears.
@donk2metal
4 жыл бұрын
@@limshooter No,its to heavy.
@ilyazhevago2105
4 жыл бұрын
But... Unfortunately it has Honeywell engine. It's sad for me as Russian. I hope there will be a unique own engine someday. I believe, it will. 🙂
@bradargyle5524
3 жыл бұрын
@@limshooter simplicity repeat simplicity
@user-dv5yt9yc9x
2 жыл бұрын
@@donk2metal The chassis bogie was also optimized by Antonov, it was intended for the most severe landing tests on unprepared sites. You can improve the wheels, put pantons, skis. Of course, you can present low aerodynamics, but 77 years of the toughest operation prove the rationality of this decision. This is a kind of Ford Transit and Fiat Ducato.
@Tom-Lahaye
6 жыл бұрын
A design that looks modern and antique at the same moment. They took a lot of features that were good on the original AN-2, like the double wing, taildragger landing gear and cockpit which has a very wide view angle. All suited for short fields which you can barely call runways, it's a real bush plane. The new turboprop engine, all metal wings and fuselage should make it even better and safer (can you make something safer which already has the best safety records in aviation?) A plane to consider on some routes in Alaska as well.
@leneanderthalien
6 жыл бұрын
the AN2 is a legendary all purpose plane, the first time i see one was on a short ultralight grass runway in France: it land and take of with the half runway leght like a simple ultralight skyranger with rotax 912 engine (80hp)!
@ducfandan1117
6 жыл бұрын
Fantastic update to a highly functional classic design. This looks like an excellent backcountry family hauler. Bring the whole gang, and their gear, and the mountain bikes, and the dog...
@nosnibor800
4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful logical design. If it looks right, then it is.
@ImpendingJoker
4 жыл бұрын
Then this isn't. Looks like the love child of a PC-12 and a Stearman.
@065Tim
4 жыл бұрын
Boeing 737 MAX looked right...
@badlandskid
4 жыл бұрын
Looks very.... Russian.
@georgeosvald8349
4 жыл бұрын
Looks like it was designed by Homer Simpson.
@rubenbueno3926
3 жыл бұрын
Luego de 70 año de servicio en casi todo el mundo , un desarrollo de modernización total . Diseño del siglo XXI y motor turbo hélice para un biplano impresionante STOL.
@abbaby555
6 жыл бұрын
this must have awesome lift capabilities due to the bi-wing design, was fun to watch thanks for sharing
@fredtedstedman
6 жыл бұрын
Love this plane - very impressive !
@johannmckraken9399
4 жыл бұрын
Wrap it up. I'll take it! Oleg Antonov’s finest design stands the test of time.
@wendeltravassos847
6 жыл бұрын
How an old design can reborn in all its glory. Willing to see the numbers but I guess its going to be an amazing bush plane in fuel x load x safety factors.
@inselvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Sehr schickes und modernes Design! Gefällt mir sehr gut die neue AN 2. Daumen hoch! Gruss inselvideo!
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Danke für deinen Kommentar! Ja, diese An-2 hat ein sehr schönes Design. Neben dieser Version gibt es noch eine Ausführung als reiner Schulterdecker mit Trapezflügel aus kohlenstofffaserverstärktem Kunststoff. Die flog zwar auch auf der MAKS, habe die aber nur fotografiert. Schöne Grüße nach Usedom!
@johanndebeer5059
4 жыл бұрын
Ideal plane for bush pilots - Africa, Alaska outback etc.
@joewoodchuck3824
4 жыл бұрын
I would agree with you more if the lower wing wasn't there to hit things such as plant life and anything else an undeveloped landing area might offer. Otherwise looks very capable.
@vumba1331
4 жыл бұрын
You need to remember that there are lots of narrow strips at high altitude where you cannot get a wide wingspan aircraft in, for example Papua New Guinea highlands, so this configuration could work quite well. Hot and high in Africa and Asia as well so it has potential.
@soliv27
4 жыл бұрын
@@joewoodchuck3824 I have the same feeling. But the gear legs are quite long. And for some short flight bigger wheels could be mounted.
@therealunclevanya
3 жыл бұрын
You lot know this is based on an aircraft that has been in continuous successful production for over 70 years and doing exactly that kind of extreme work all over Siberia, etc. It is based on the Antonov AN2. Plant life, bigger wheels, lol
@srinivasvaranasi1645
6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful!
@johnyted
6 жыл бұрын
It does the service of the Fieseler Fi 156 Storch, only 100 times more. This is a characteristic of biplanes - short runways. This wing design I saw for the first time on a homemade airplane model of the future a few years ago. Children know that box - shaped wings fly well - see their kites in the wind. The Russians tell us there is a lot to explore in aviation. Beautiful plane. Great doc. Beauty post.
@mmrd50112
6 жыл бұрын
The Fieseler Fi 156 Storch, my favourite and famous for its excellent STOL performance, is not a biplane.
@jodyfulford8215
6 жыл бұрын
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-3en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_156en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_27 Gret plane but the DO 27 kicked ass too.
@_djsport
6 жыл бұрын
Landing speed 50km/h. Amazing!
@alanwhiteside410
6 жыл бұрын
31MPH that’s real nice and slow.
@rogertycholiz2218
6 жыл бұрын
I heard it lands at 35MPH [50KPH] and is a tried and true STOL with unique wings and control surfaces.
@hotrodray6802
4 жыл бұрын
Thrown in 8,000 pounds, gross it out and install bush tires. Then we can see how it really flies.
@jwg72
4 жыл бұрын
@@hotrodray6802 Yeah, but even if the take-off speed doubles, that is still pretty slow - and pretty short too if it has good acceleration.
@steffenrocktaeschel8015
4 жыл бұрын
Absolutely clever symbiosis of proved technique and modern ones 👍
@amramjose
5 жыл бұрын
AN-2 redux, new powerplant, beautiful design!
@ulrichkalber9039
6 жыл бұрын
it was somewhat obvious that some day they would modernise the An2, there was simply to much potential in it not to.
@delten-eleven1910
6 жыл бұрын
Interesting design: high-tech revision to the Antonov original.
@stephenreid7043
6 жыл бұрын
What a legend! Thanks for this!
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
U're welcome! :)
@nitrosama
3 жыл бұрын
Loved New Antonov An-2MC
@doffincodger
6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant flying! Innovative updates to an old design. All sky diving clubs should love this aircraft?
@MrLotnik171
6 жыл бұрын
Piękny, super
@kerenchadwick7866
6 жыл бұрын
I wish I knew what that fella is saying...it looks a fantastic flyer...!!😊😊🙆🙆👍👍👍👍✈✈✈✈✈
@Hopeless_and_Forlorn
6 жыл бұрын
What I need is a hangar with a heated floor and room for one of these beauties, plus a TBM 930 to keep it company.
@flyinkiwi01
3 жыл бұрын
This would be the perfect plane for rough short strips in Papua. Apparently you can't stall it. The procedure for engine failure with no available glide options (I hear) is full back stick; once below 10-15KIAS the leading edge slats pop out and you descend with minimal forward speed and a reasonable descent rate - sort of like a parachute. The main issue is that US sanctions will rule out the US turboprop and necessitate fitting a vodka burning engine with about 20% less fuel efficiency. I hope they just build it in a state not subject to sanctions.
@gordonmccoy4537
6 жыл бұрын
An aerodynamic WONDER....!
@xistsixt
6 жыл бұрын
I like the wing configuration 👍🏼
@ryanking1595
6 жыл бұрын
This thing isn't even trying to fly, it just does. Beautiful. Although I'd still love to see it with a giant radial engine.
@neilb1619
4 жыл бұрын
It's just not the same without that huge radial piston engine up front...
@scottpecora371
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah but how eager would you be to put 12-14 passengers behind s single radial engine, especially in subzero conditions with 50wt oil thick as peanut butter (creamy style obviously), vs a modern turbo prop like a PT6 or equivalent with 0wt synthetic oil that pours like water at 50f below zero not to mention all the valves, rocker arms, push rods, crank shaft, connecting rods, twin ignition, and the list goes on. Those big old radials are wonderful to romanticize about, but dealing with one in daily operations is an entirely different matter, just look at Buffalo Airlines out of Whitehorse and the nightmare of trying to get these engines to work at 30-40f below zero. The repeated cracked cylinders and so on. The truth is these engines were engineered in the 1930's and first manufactured in the 1940 or earlier. People didn't attempt to fly in conditions that today are routine. My brother just retired off a major carrier after 25 years and about 24,000 hours. I asked him how many times he'd had to shut down one of the PT6's or CFM56's he flew throughout his career and he said never except in the simulator! He stated he had never once had to shut a turbine engine down and flew all over the world on just two
@boblaryson3621
3 жыл бұрын
@@scottpecora371 this is a composite an-2 modern variant and it is a turbo prop, you can differentiate the variants if you see a pointed nose its a newer turboprop the more stub noses are older models
@mpnq128
2 жыл бұрын
Ver este extraordinario avión y maravilla de la ingeniería moderna rusa, deja a muchos sin palabras, por las cosas buenas que nos depara la aviación de la mano de los aeronáuticos de Rusia para el mundo civil y las infinidades de posibilidades que nos depara el TVS-2DTS, ya que sí el AN-2 nos ha dado más de 70 años de buenas razones para su confiabilidad, este nuevo avión con su misma mística y visión nos dará a la humanidad un extraordinario panorama de futuro. Espero haber podido resumir mi perspectiva y alentar con ello a los ingenieros y diseñadores de éste nuevo avión para hacerlo tan bien, como su predecesor. !.Saludos desde Venezuela.!
@HermitagePrepper
Жыл бұрын
The bottom wings folding upward into support struts is a great idea!
@scottc977
4 жыл бұрын
21st century "Two Wings, Round Engine" well done
@orneryokinawan4529
2 жыл бұрын
Turboprop actually
@patmasonbayouboogie4859
6 жыл бұрын
Now THAT is just too cool.
@Rich77UK
4 жыл бұрын
What a great little bush plane. Brilliant idea.
@Fadil1954
6 жыл бұрын
Simply Adorable A/C ..... Good Job
@eligriggs9221
5 жыл бұрын
I wonder if this bi-wing concept could be imagined with an oval shaped, mono-wing, for reducing wing span, specifically for use with very narrow landing fields. I also wonder if lift can be achieved with a dual hull shaped airframe, in which an outer hull, structured to support an inner hull where pilot and cabin are located, similar to newer buildings, which have a duel shell, with structural, pierced support in the outer and pierced shell, for the inner shell. The piercings themselves would direct air flow inwards in effect making the outer hull/inner hull a turbine itself, with airflow creating a turbine like thrust AND lift through other piercings? I know many will say it can no be done, but I would like to hear from those pilots, builders on how such a concept would actually function, just for fun!
@alexmontgomery255
4 жыл бұрын
This is a great airplane made even better. Well done.
@ricardokawabe
6 жыл бұрын
Impressionante!
@MrZippy109
6 жыл бұрын
Wow! I love this plane.
@lucadp7351
4 жыл бұрын
Uau, the legend still alive. Amazing low speed Flight.
@brendaproffitt1011
6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful plane awesome video and you done an excellent job..Thank you so so much for your videos too..
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your kind comment! :-)
@brendaproffitt1011
6 жыл бұрын
KNIGHT FLIGHT VIDEO your welcome and my heart too.
@cheems2992
2 жыл бұрын
Such a cool design
@pauldiaco3817
6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful bird!
@Tex1947
6 жыл бұрын
Had a chance to fly an AN2 several years ago they are great planes. Would love to fly this model.
@i_am_the_void
6 жыл бұрын
i have been an AN-2 passenger several years ago in my polar business trip)
@subtoimtoxic5149
6 жыл бұрын
Blending the tips into one reduces the drag from wing tips back to one pair, but keeping the lift two wings affords! Quite sharp
@call_me_stan5887
6 жыл бұрын
I like the idea :)
@antaranexpress7502
4 жыл бұрын
Stunning performance
@luispadilla7519
4 жыл бұрын
Que bestia de avión por favor una leyenda felicidades 👍🇦🇷
@MrGdg1969
6 жыл бұрын
Nice plane for many smaller airfields. If the plane is like its parent AN-2 then it should carry 10-12 passengers or 1.5-2 tons of cargo. And it should be possible to use a ski landing gear for winter, it is important here in Russia.
@TheGl124
6 жыл бұрын
It carries up to 2.5 tons of cargo (dictor of the movie said)
@aleksandrshtyrov8276
6 жыл бұрын
Dmity says about Anotonov-2 As for TVS2 DT it carries up to 3.5 tons on 4500 km with speed up to 350 km/h To participate on MAKS it took-off from Novosibirsk and had non-stop flight to Moskow
@holgerschmidt2023
6 жыл бұрын
sehr schönes flugzeug. beste maschine fuer fallschirmspringer. nun auch sehr ökonomisch. mit vorfluegeln an der oberen und unteren tragfläche. nun kann die anna auch mit dem 5- blatt propeller bremsen. mit turbine,also kein benzin mehr. genial das teil. leider bekommen wir es in deutschland nicht zugelassen, wegen der russlandphobie. leider leider. und die russen haben die anna noch weiter entwickelt. anderes fahrwerk, neue pilotenkanzel. digitale instrumente usw. genial. respekt. ich liebe das flugzeug
@knobowski
6 жыл бұрын
So ein schönes Flugzeug! Eine richtig gute Weiterentwicklung!
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Ja, das stimmt. :-)
@rogerhowell6269
4 жыл бұрын
Looks like a very sturdy Turbo Bush plan, GR8 👍😁
@datathunderstorm
4 жыл бұрын
From the same company who brought you the Antonov An-225 Mriya...!!! I’m impressed!
@George_Henshaw
6 жыл бұрын
Wow that a very modern an 2 model
@richardhilton2000
4 жыл бұрын
Love to see it fitted with floats.
@benchodegs9100
4 жыл бұрын
This airplane is absolutely beautiful!
@grochomarx2002
6 жыл бұрын
An updated version of one incredible airplane.
@drwtoinvest5116
4 жыл бұрын
One speech only... GREAT...I like this aircraft can back/return flight beside that many of benefits.... love from Indonesia
@MrSedura
5 жыл бұрын
Perfect piece of technology... I love it 💜💜
@user-bv7fq1zp6g
2 ай бұрын
Великолепно!!!👍
@airjuneau
6 жыл бұрын
Interessantes Design und tolle Aufnahme :)
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Ich danke dir! Ja, sieht schon sehr ungewöhnlich aus.
@indridcold8433
4 жыл бұрын
Even if it was a derelict Antonov AN-2 that can not fly, it would still get a thumbs up from me just because it is an Antonov AN-2.
@galinskiy1605
6 жыл бұрын
Отлично!
@ChrisB257
6 жыл бұрын
Most innovative design.
@miksal26
6 жыл бұрын
The Yanks have turboed their old DC3s to become brand new modern aircraft The Russkies have done an equally remarkable job with their old workhorse. Well done!😋
@luigiduca
6 жыл бұрын
Not to mention the neat job on the wings!
@jasonlong2145
6 жыл бұрын
Luigi Pacetti Agreed, nice to see some innovation that's actually real, and not just a conceptual design... might only be a small biplane, but proves there is still some advantages for that design, still in 2018
@johnnyllooddte3415
6 жыл бұрын
nope.. the tail dragger makes it worthless
@johnnyllooddte3415
6 жыл бұрын
ahaha where do you see a modern dc3... ahahaha maybe in argentina
@andrzejpadzik4342
5 жыл бұрын
the best ANTONOW
@AnastasisGarametsis
6 жыл бұрын
Perfect video!
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Anastasis! :-)
@bassmith448bassist5
6 жыл бұрын
love it!!! always liked the original AN2. this is an awesome modernized STOL aircraft. I want one!!!!!
@haripermadi1549
2 жыл бұрын
Perfect beast to fly cargo in Papua Indonesia. Hopefully they fly it here for exhibition, look forward to fly ridw this beauty.
@auroraborayelisR2D2
4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@Leon81927
4 жыл бұрын
Very nice & elegant the new An 2👍
@albertogarciaarango2411
6 жыл бұрын
GOOD DESIGN IMPRENSSIVE.
@xoio
6 жыл бұрын
Very Nice
@knightflightvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks! :-)
@Garuda_indoliner
2 жыл бұрын
what a beautiful plane
@americanrambler4972
4 жыл бұрын
I have seen a number of AN2 Cubs. I would never have referred to them as a pretty airplane. But I admired their capability and usefulness of their design. A good stout plane. This is the 1st attractive one I have seen.
@Aero360Aviation
6 жыл бұрын
I wondered when somebody would make a turbine powered AN-2. Very cool!
@Pixy335
6 жыл бұрын
Turboprop An-3 (An-2's variant) actually exist for maybe four (?) years.
@jodyfulford8215
6 жыл бұрын
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-3
@jameshaury2716
6 жыл бұрын
You can use jet fuel not gas.More economical
@AviationNut
3 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how slow this new AN-2 can fly.
@user-oe8nc6zz6z
4 жыл бұрын
Класс!!!
@andresrodrigoescobararias857
6 жыл бұрын
Mommy, mommy! I want one!!
@user-bb6fq4cf2i
4 жыл бұрын
вааааще не вопрос - заявку и тебе построят его
@Tiagomottadmello
4 жыл бұрын
Real Nice !! 👍👍👍
@JessHull
4 жыл бұрын
beauty wings~!
@palomino73
6 жыл бұрын
Great way to modernize an old concept. The idea to use winglet as struts, connecting both wings is awesome. The look of the inline-engine is something you'll have to get used to but i do not doubt a turbo-prop is a useful upgrade to this legendary bird !
@ryancaugust
5 жыл бұрын
What makes you think this has an inline engine? That exhaust screams 'Turbo-prop" ..... and the Honeywell decal...
@mickvonbornemann3824
5 жыл бұрын
@@ryancaugust He meant the Turbo-prop installation give the fuselage an in-line look.
@davidderenzo7114
5 жыл бұрын
Radial engines are costly (monetarily and time wise) this is an easier platform to maintain and gives better performance.
@arklatxquad3405
Жыл бұрын
@@davidderenzo7114 And very fuel hungry.
@slobodanpavkov5751
4 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful plane.
@MarioDConti
6 жыл бұрын
the most amazing wing technology
@Ludwig1954
6 жыл бұрын
Marvellous! As a next modification I suggest a whisperflight mode!
@chriswilliams7480
6 жыл бұрын
i like this
@an1473
6 жыл бұрын
Curious wings, nice aircraft.
@carlchristensen584
3 жыл бұрын
A good redesign of a classic historic airplane. Holy F! The wind at that airshow with respect to the microphone! Perhaps normal in Russia, certainly on the American Great Plains. Anyhow, a very durable and highly adaptable aircraft. Hope the biplane friction doesn't terribly impede its marketability vs the deHavilland/Viking Air DHC-3 (the Viking Air model of this aircraft to debut once enough of the older single engine deHavilland models become un-airworthy...which will be...uh... I dunno when that will ever happen).
@Lea_Kaderova
3 жыл бұрын
Its actually not that good or better said, its good but not so much for russian conditions. Its composite parts showed up problematic in conditions of russian winter and even bigger problem its their repairs in conditions of russian Siberia or far east. Also there are issues with engine (its american engine and thats big problem for Russia). UZGA abandoned next development of An-2MC and now they are testing LMS-901. They should have flying prototype this year. Its smaller than An-2, just for 9 passengers, max speed up to 300 km/h, range 3000 km. Important is that its much simpler airplane than An-2MS, with easily repairable dural fuselage, russian engine etc. All in all, it should be low cost and much better designed for harsh conditions of russian field airports on Siberia or eastern Russia. Here are some pics: bmpd.livejournal.com/4295195.html
@christopheschwartz7374
6 жыл бұрын
j' Aime de bon vieil Antonov An-2 classique! Mais celui-la il est vraiment étonnant dans son genre, je le trouve superbe!!!
@lebaillidessavoies3889
4 жыл бұрын
Wahoo ....with the 2 wings joining now this thing must be solid as a brick..
@user-fc6zr4fk5u
5 жыл бұрын
Этот чужеземный самолёт с чужеземным двигателем, с надписями на чужеземном языке, напоминает наш самолёт Ан-2, который выпускался в 40-х годах прошлого века
@herbertcourtesie2459
5 жыл бұрын
Nice slow flying demostration WITHOUT practical operating loads. It is still an outdated design. Thanks for posting.
@johanndebeer5059
4 жыл бұрын
It knocks the socks off any American planemaker can field - or UK or Western Europe can ...
Пікірлер: 490