As a potential ghost in 2030, this is an invasion of my privacy.
@Jossandoval
5 ай бұрын
You talk as if we still have privacy to be invaded.
@alieninmybeverage
5 ай бұрын
@@Jossandoval ... occupation of my privacy, then?
@christopherellis2663
5 ай бұрын
Schrodinger Cat is in two minds about this
@Jack_Redview
5 ай бұрын
@@Jossandovallol speak for your self, some of us take a lot more precautions than others
@borttorbbq2556
5 ай бұрын
@@Jossandoval Call we have privacy... barely
@PenguinDT
5 ай бұрын
Of course they're using proton beam to catch "ghosts". Life imitates art again.
@Mevi
5 ай бұрын
Don't cross the streams
@DJWESG1
5 ай бұрын
The new one just come out in cinemas
@MiltonRoe
5 ай бұрын
One imagine that the scientists naming this project were well aware of that movie reference. Pretty clever.
@Lee_River
5 ай бұрын
Who you gonna call? CERN!
@jeffryborror4883
5 ай бұрын
Wavelength the size of a galaxy! Now that wave function collapse would be spooky action at a serious distance. That guy's head would bobble off his body.
@tenbear5
5 ай бұрын
hahahaha 😂
@aqdrobert
5 ай бұрын
That would need one huge CB antenna, good buddy. Keep your shiny side up, and your dark matter down.
@Posesso
5 ай бұрын
golden
@gubx42
5 ай бұрын
These are ghost particles, of course they are spooky.
@andrewclimo5709
5 ай бұрын
Indeed.
@timmolzberger537
5 ай бұрын
Ahhhh, nice to see some coverage for our lovely detector! I'm from the SHiP collaboration and worked on the electronics for detector - and boy, this will be fun. Thank you for covering our work!
@FxTR22
5 ай бұрын
Sabine: Can we please stop calling them "ghosts"? Scientists: ok, lets call it "Magic"
@Bildgesmythe
5 ай бұрын
Never let scientists name anything.
@calvinjonesyoutube
5 ай бұрын
Sabine, when i heard this story i thought, how can they write a piece that tells me, a scientifically literate person no clue what they are talking about. I eventually found that same experiment website. I then wondered if you would make a nice little video about it improving on the story and enlightening us all. So glad you got to it and glad i wasnt alone in being puzzled by the story.
@DrVictorVasconcelos
5 ай бұрын
Sabine, I used to comment on all your videos. As a psychometrician I feel we have quite a bit in common with physics (the whole measuring "invisible" things). Anyway, I can't do that anymore-you're on a roll these days. Thank you.
@SabineHossenfelder
5 ай бұрын
👋 Good to see you here!
@Posesso
5 ай бұрын
To me, it's quite a human faith restoring thing that felt compelled to comment that. Thanks
@someone3195
5 ай бұрын
@@SabineHossenfelder Hello Sabine, in your other video, you mentioned that you think most of the research done in your field, was BS. Do u also think this way ab the research at CERN?
@steveellis2829
5 ай бұрын
I'm just glad they're not looking for hidden Tachyons - That acronym would have to be re-thought!
@SiqueScarface
5 ай бұрын
You are talking about the Baryon Utilizing Large Lasso to Search for Hidden Tachyons?
@steveellis2829
5 ай бұрын
@@SiqueScarface Yes well spotted! Although I would imaging we're also talking Capture Radius Aperture Protocol.
@SiqueScarface
5 ай бұрын
@@steveellis2829It could be Well Oriented Research into Singular Events.
@Al-cynic
5 ай бұрын
@@steveellis2829 The whole time the video was going, I was looking for a synonym of particle that begins with T.
@jamesdriscoll_tmp1515
5 ай бұрын
Fermi Radius Axion Universal Detector Baryon Organic Galvonometric Uranium Sensor Comprehensive High Energy Accumulator Project Big Array of Retroreflective Flashlights Interactive Near Field Anisotropic Neutron Transmutation Indicator of Left handed Electrons Plenipotent Obtuse Obfuscative Publication Syndicate Any sense made is purely accidental. Just acronaming. 😅
@trekguy66
5 ай бұрын
Always check the couch cushions first.
@rwarren58
5 ай бұрын
A Heinlein man? Smart.
@ITisandiamIT
5 ай бұрын
:) Good one!
@yakirfrankoveig8094
5 ай бұрын
Then proceed to check everyehre else only thatn can you check the couch again to find it there
@sjzara
5 ай бұрын
But aren’t they always looking for hidden particles? If the particles weren’t hidden, we wouldn’t need to look for them.
@edwardlulofs444
5 ай бұрын
No, you can’t get money by saying that you want to look for particles. You need something specific that many bureaucrats and scientists think is a good use of money. The days of just looking for things ended decades ago.
@Lund.J
5 ай бұрын
When a "particle" is spread out, like a densification of "aether," covering a wide area, like a waveform in a medium, and this is its ("particle's") coarsest possible state, then how could it be measured ? It is present; it is "dark", but unmeasurable (like "aether"). It is easier to say that: "It does not exist" (AS PARTICLE). It is a local quality of space rather than a particle. If, for example, we imagine that the "cosmological constant" has a local variation or transformation, how could it be measured ?
@D1N02
5 ай бұрын
@@Lund.Jor how do you get away with calling it a particle at all :p
@bjornfeuerbacher5514
5 ай бұрын
They aren't only looking for hidden particles. They also are examining the properties of the known particles more closely.
@edwardlulofs444
5 ай бұрын
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 those are usually funded.
@NathanJayDog
3 ай бұрын
I’m glad that I can come to your channel with my first thoughts, and you have many more on top of that which make me feel simultaneously smart for being curious and then stupid for realising I wish I knew more. Thank you!
@DrJ3RK8
5 ай бұрын
Absolutely LOVE the way everything is phrased in this video. :) As always, thank you! It also occurs to me when watching particle physics related videos how well researched (even if far fetched and fictional) much of the writing for Ghostbusters was. ;)
@aupotter2584
5 ай бұрын
I think it's indeed the best way to describe dark matter as ghost because nobody ever has a glimpse of it, and maybe I can finally interact with it after becoming a ghost upon my death years later lol... 👻
@seriousmaran9414
5 ай бұрын
And it might not even be real, although what is these days? 😊
@shawns0762
5 ай бұрын
Dark matter is dilated mass. G.R predicts dilation not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of G.R. predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A "time dilation" graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no singularity/black hole at the center of our galaxy. It can be inferred mathematically that dilation is occurring there. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. To date, 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 have been confirmed to show no signs of dark matter. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal. The concept of singularities is preventing clarity in astronomy. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that they cannot exist. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.
@shawns0762
5 ай бұрын
@@never2yield20 Einstein's reasoning on why singularities do not exist is solid as a rock. Television and movies popularized singularities beginning in the 1960's. The recent discovery that very low mass galaxies have predictable star rotation rates is virtual proof that dark matter is dilated mass.
@shawns0762
5 ай бұрын
@@never2yield20 Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. The centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers should be dilated
@bobusa1960
5 ай бұрын
I can’t believe she said “bullshit” hahaha
@daveh7720
5 ай бұрын
You should hear her when she talks about politics.
@thstroyur
5 ай бұрын
@@daveh7720 Or multispectral glasses.
@pauljs75
5 ай бұрын
She's German, no time wasted in getting to the point.
@daveh7720
5 ай бұрын
@@pauljs75My kind of people!
@seriousmaran9414
5 ай бұрын
She says it as it is, bullshit is bullshit is bullshit no matter who you are. Brexit is bullshit too. So are many politicians.
@ucantSQ
5 ай бұрын
I commend the BBC for avoiding the phrase "dark matter." I was just complaining yesterday that "dark matter" is the headline of every mystery of physics. Ghosts makes me stop and scratch my head.
@jackthetford7558
5 ай бұрын
Awesome work, Sabine!
@yeroca
5 ай бұрын
Ghost particles is click bait. On the other hand, how do you make a coherent headline for this, "CERN project to find particles with galaxy-sized wavelengths that might exist gets go-ahead" not too catchy.
@frankcl1
5 ай бұрын
Yes if they want scientific illiterate people to read the stuff they can't just be precise
@carlbrenninkmeijer8925
5 ай бұрын
I think that in 5 years they have a nre project called Search for Hidden Targets.
@mikebar42
5 ай бұрын
Nre?
@rywilk
5 ай бұрын
I'm glad I wasn't the only one confused by those headlines; it took me a while to figure out what "ghost particles" was referring to.
@Jill.Carter.
5 ай бұрын
Wow. Most of us just search for Easter eggs at this time of year.
@adriang6424
5 ай бұрын
CERN , now specialising in proton exorcisms .... rid yourself of ghost particles now 🤣 {only 100m euro per service!}
@JosePineda-cy6om
5 ай бұрын
seems a proton pack, or simply calling a priest, might be more cost effective
@markdowning7959
5 ай бұрын
You should have saved this episode for Halloween. 👻👻👻
@dewiz9596
5 ай бұрын
It would have been thoroughly debunked by then😉
@sampsqwantch4612
5 ай бұрын
bless your heart
@matttzzz2
5 ай бұрын
Title of the video has a question mark (?) Thus the answer to the question is always: NO.
@MorgDragon
5 ай бұрын
I saw a video talking about "rogue" planets that are wondering around the galaxy (and presumably all galaxies). It was postulated that there are a lot more of these "dark" planets out there then we thought and this could even be the source of dark matter. the idea was that if there were enough planets without stars to orbit around, they would be very dark and hard/impossible to detect, but would add up to a large gravitational force. did you ever think of doing a video on this idea? thanks Sabine for all the hard work on your videos. i really enjoy them.
@nickcarroll8565
5 ай бұрын
Not that it isn’t possible, but there would have to be an absurd number of them to be the entire cause of dark matter.
@frankcl1
5 ай бұрын
Stars are just so massive compared to planets, if dark matter is 80% of all mass in galaxies can you imagine how many planets it would represent?
@carlsderder
5 ай бұрын
The point with dark matter is that what we observe is that it has a gravitational effect, but it doesn't interact with electromagnetism or weak and strong nuclear. If there were just many planets that we can't see, we indeed would see these gravitational effects, but we would also see more effects appart from gravity. That is all the point with dark matter and its difference with normal matter, it is not just normal matter that is in a dark place.
@ericlipps9459
5 ай бұрын
I'd certainly consider 100 million euros expensive, but particle physics operates on a different scale these days.
@ZeroInDaHouse
5 ай бұрын
They should have called it SHiT: Stubborn Hunt for Imaginative Theories.
@bm9504nb12
5 ай бұрын
😂 so true
@ispamforfood
5 ай бұрын
Interesting stuff! Thanks Sabine!
@Ryanisthere
5 ай бұрын
ive already seen several conspiracy theorys about how cern is gonna open the demon portal
@jeremywilliams5107
5 ай бұрын
Damnation. We were being very quiet about the Large Demon Collider. The Small Demon Collider was quite successful.
@marianagyorgyfalvi3659
5 ай бұрын
Goodbye Fermi paradox!
@vilefly
5 ай бұрын
Still working on the BFG9000.....oh, yeah.
@alankott3129
5 ай бұрын
@@vilefly I now have the music from the original game in my head!
@Rob2k22
5 ай бұрын
X is packed with cern conspiracy theories
@Ivan-fs7go
5 ай бұрын
Hidden practicals are also looking for creative scientists. I hope they find each others 😅
@Whysicist
5 ай бұрын
“Poke and Hope”… works as a strategy playing pool and now it’s applied to Physics…good luck. Experimentalists are easy! heehee…
@lekarzkto
5 ай бұрын
Can I make a technical point. It's wrong to say that dark matter does not exist. "Dark matter" is the phrase we have given to our observations. We assumed this was due to some sort of invisible particle so we gave it the name "dark matter". But what we call dark matter could be due to something other than an invisible particle. I think this is important. Because if you say dark matter doesn't exist then you are sort of saying the observations are wrong.
@douglaswilkinson5700
5 ай бұрын
Astrophysicists call dark matter an "observable effect for which a cause has not yet been discovered." The effects are easily observed. Exactly what is causing what's being observed is unknown.
@lekarzkto
5 ай бұрын
@@douglaswilkinson5700 Perfect. Well said.
@Posesso
5 ай бұрын
No. Dark matter is a proposal to explain observations. Obervations do have a name, we are using it, I am using it in this sentence, 'observations'. If MONDS turned out to be the right explanation then what, you would go around saying that dark matter is actually not matter (and not dark but transparent had it been matter) or would you rather say: the gravity laws work like X and Y and there is a dependence on distance. Even without going that far, there are a set of observations, currently, and some fit better to the 'dark matter' approach and some others don't... Wiesz, jako lekarz powinnienesz pilnowac co mowisz do pacjentow :)
@Posesso
5 ай бұрын
@@douglaswilkinson5700 I know at least one person involved in the topic that has invested some time into the topic, and she knows her s****, and she is crazy enough to call observations 'observations'. She may not specialize in astrophysics only, but I've seen her terrorize them on stage, so, to me, belongs to the league, easy. If your quote was true it would mean 'astrophysicists call Dark energy Dark matter, and also everything else that has been observed but not fully understood' If you feel the ground becoming gummy that doesn't mean Einstein was wrong, that is just rational remorse, the ground is solid, jump!
@lekarzkto
5 ай бұрын
@@Posesso OK. Isn't that what I said? All I was saying is that "dark matter" is the label of our observations. Czy to ma sens?
@DragoNate
5 ай бұрын
"it's not super expensive, only one-hudred-million" Sabine's sponsorships be PAYIN'! :P
@MicroageHD
5 ай бұрын
Relax, I work for SHiP and we barely get any money. This experiment has a developement + running time of roughly 30 years. 100.000.000 is not a lot, trust me.
@DragoNate
5 ай бұрын
@@MicroageHD I am relaxed lol I'm just making a joke about her saying 100 mil isn't expensive lol yes, i know comparatively to other experiments that cost billions, it's cheap, but that comparison wasn't explicitly mentioned which makes it funny. relax :D i'm not trying to say SHiP is a waste or not worth it or trying to call anyone out. it simply sounds funny to say, out of context, "100 mil isn't much" take note of the 'tongue sticking out face' emoji in my original comment.
@RaimarLunardi
5 ай бұрын
What I don't get is how a massive particle is less interactive than a neutrino? isn't the dark matter neutral and more massive? how is that something similar but way bigger is less interactive?
@carlsderder
5 ай бұрын
That is what they thought in the past, what i understood is that the theory shifted to defend that hipotetical dark matter particles are actually less massive. There is also the opposing theory, modified gravity, that doesn't need new particles.
@michaelgilbey6692
5 ай бұрын
The hardest thing in the universe to find is something that does not exist. as far as i know, a Nothing Detector has yet to be invented.
@nkronert
5 ай бұрын
Now I'm conCERNed...
@Posesso
5 ай бұрын
xD
@axle.student
5 ай бұрын
Had Ron elevated your conCERNes?
@nickcarroll8565
5 ай бұрын
Womp womp
@shidoking627
5 ай бұрын
As a stiens gate fan i cannot allow CERN to mess with dark particles 😂
@tajiroller
5 ай бұрын
It seems to me the Dark Matter is the Ether. When atoms come together their Electron Orbital Shells come together and form Electron Valance Shells. When atoms come together and form a matter like earth, then all the Electron Valance Shells come together to form a Massively Multilayered Electron Valance Shell. The MMEVS is a pressure gradient and generates a buoyancy force which we call gravitational field. The MMEVS field is a field which is made up of electric field AND magnetic field shells. Through this field, light passes as radiation waves. Gravity-wise, it is same with the moon and the sun and any other matter which exists in this universe and beyond. The Ether is the fundamental field and matters are created from the Ether, I think as cavitation bubbles. I hope it helps.😅
@ormrinn
5 ай бұрын
What if dark matter is the fabric of the universe, the quantum foam, or the ether, or whatever you want to call it? Fabric bunches and if more is gathered in a spot we would expect to see stars gathering more in these gathered folds, you know like that supercluster.
@peterhall6371
5 ай бұрын
Does anyone else think that dark matter is really just local variations in the topology of space? It seems (to me) like such an obvious possibility, and they're really not finding anything anyway.
@dr.merlot1532
5 ай бұрын
I always believed that apparitions are real. Physicists will soon find out.
@donwolff6463
5 ай бұрын
We love Sabine ❤❤❤ but, my gal asks: do you have only one shirt? Every time she looks at the screen you have the same shirt on just about. For the sake of my ear, please bring in changes for when you shot sets. :-) ... see i cant even get through this response without her adding: its a nice shirt, but variety is the spice of life, girl! Have fun with it!
@Thomas-gk42
5 ай бұрын
She explained it already som e other commenters: it´s because of the sponsors
@carmencardenas9639
5 ай бұрын
Im not a scientist but I have videos recorder with nvg where light, energy orbs clearly go thru objects. Also they react to laser and will approach to interact if they choose to. I only see them in one area . Tried in other cities and I didn't see any. Are these ghost particles?
@mtheory85
5 ай бұрын
I think dark matter is inferred to be dynamically cold, which rules out very low mass particles such as neutrinos (which are accelerated to nearly the speed of light by pretty much anything).
@jimbenge9649
5 ай бұрын
If there are no 'ship ghosts' then where does Captain Jack Sparrow come into the equation? 😊 And they say physicsts have no sense of humour
@FrancisFjordCupola
5 ай бұрын
Ah, next to Bosons and Fermions we will finally have Casperons.
@crazieeez
5 ай бұрын
Dark matter travels faster than the speed of light. You cannot catch it because it travels faster than light can bounce to detect. You will need a gravitational detector to detect dark matter and how fast it is traveling. LIGO plus machine can do it.
@MCsCreations
5 ай бұрын
Thanks, Sabine! 😊 I've heard ghosts are good people. Or were, I'm not sure. Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@markc4176
5 ай бұрын
One big problem with this approach is that if we are wrong about how “weakly” they interact, and they end up being highly attracted to one another (or to other particles), creating a highly concentrated area of them could be extremely dangerous. Imagine if these particles are actually those responsible for singularity-like behavior, and we’re about to create a room full of them.
@deth3021
5 ай бұрын
Dark matter of the gaps.
@393miha
5 ай бұрын
SPS operates at 450 GeV, not at 5 GeV like Sabine said.
@John-zz6fz
5 ай бұрын
Ok, so CERN is going to use a proton accelerator to try and catch ghosts... 1984 me just got really really excited. Any chance we can get Murray, Aykroyd and Hudson to make an appearance on this?
@csabanagy8071
5 ай бұрын
I do not think Dark Matter is a particle what can be found in an accelerator. I'm more thinking toward that dark matter is an effect of the moving space-time. In principle frame dragging. More over, I think the "empty" space has mass and momentum too and it is very "elastic" (gravity wave)...
@anthonyowen6204
5 ай бұрын
To a hammer everything is a nail to a physicist everything is a particle
@douglaswilkinson5700
5 ай бұрын
For particle physicists. For astrophysicists everything is a star: main sequence stars, neutron stars, white dwarf stars, red giant stars, black stars (now called black holes), star nurseries, star clusters, binary stars, etc.
@SaltyPirate71
5 ай бұрын
Dark matter, the Easter bunny, string theory, Bigfoot and UFOs...
@richardzeitz54
5 ай бұрын
Sabine, you could write an excellent guide to writing science articles! It would be great to read about Karl Popper and falsification, how to write about science without writing oversimplified bulls*t that "isn't even wrong," to borrow one of my favorite critiques of bad arguments. I was fully expecting you to call bullsh*t at first, just on the basis of the headline of the BBC article, so it was interesting to discover what a reasonable experiment it really is and WHY it's a good one, and to realize it was merely the BBC that was full of it. So much bad science writing in the world!You're a gem amongst so much drek.
@AathielVaDaath
5 ай бұрын
Someone behind the project needs to find a way to get the device officially designated the PKE. They are already using positron coliders (though sadly, while probably for the best, this one is licensed)...
@fricc33
5 ай бұрын
Lol, I used to work at CERN with the CHORUS collaboration experiment, looking for neutrino oscillations out of the same tungsten target. I bet this is at the same experimental location. Ironically the neutrino oscillations couldn't be detected at CERN because we were too close to the source of neutrinos...
@PNWZombieWatch
5 ай бұрын
The fact you didn't flash a quick reference to ghostbusters movie of some kind makes me sad :)
@aurelienyonrac
5 ай бұрын
Hello. Could gravity be caused by how virtual particles recombine? Thank you
@anothersquid
5 ай бұрын
you get neutrinos from your bananas too! oh no! :)
@douglaswilkinson5700
5 ай бұрын
And an electron and daughter calcium-40!
@mrx1278
5 ай бұрын
What conversation tidbits would hold your attention on a first date Sabine?
@TheIceMan9304
5 ай бұрын
This may be a stupid question but why can't they just build a spiralled collider and stack the loops on top of each other?
@Yezpahr
5 ай бұрын
Calling them "ghosts" is a literal zeitgeist.
@mikemondano3624
5 ай бұрын
You literally do not know what the word means.
@maybecrazy7835
5 ай бұрын
I dislike the term "hidden particles" because hidden is the past tense of hiding, and nobody's hiding anything. (Same with "hidden variables") There's probably better but more verbose terms, but they wouldn't have the same air of mystery to it that earns media views. Not singling you out Sabine, it's an issue affecting all physics press generally.
@RickJaeger
5 ай бұрын
A thing can be hiding without anyone hiding it.
@janklaas6885
5 ай бұрын
📍4:17
@jerry5149
5 ай бұрын
Sabine, can you please tell me where the evidence is of all the planetary motions that we know are going on, including galactic motions? I am looking for something that has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And, especially, evidence within the domain of particle physics. BTW are there any experiments that model the planetary and Galactic motions, physical models not computer simulations? If not, but some physical models exist how deeply nested are those models?
@KnugLidi
5 ай бұрын
If they ever develop a home AI (that doesn't spy on us) I really hope they have an option to have Sabine as its avatar.
@Darisiabgal7573
5 ай бұрын
If the wavelength is the size of a galaxy, the energy is effectively zero E = hv v = c/l if l = 100,000 light years then v = 3E-12 or something, and h is E-24 so we are talking about something with E in the E-36 range. How is that going to give us dark matter? E = mc^2 E-36 = m * E17 m = E-53kg A proton weighs about 1/6x10E23 or 1.6E-22grams, 1.6E-25kg So a galactic wavelength "matter" would weigh about 1 / (1 x 10^27) of a proton So if dark matter comprises 80% of the mass of the universe it would comprise the overwelming, by a fact of 10^26 the number of particles, and nirmal matter oroduction in the early universe is essentially a fluke. I think this solution to dark matter has about a 0.01% probability of being correct. If you are looking for matter, isnt it unwise to look for things that have trivial matter?
@montypalmer4556
5 ай бұрын
Non dark matter clumps. Wouldn't dark matter clump? Particles buzzing around in the dark seems like a focus that's very off course.
@betterlife3574
5 ай бұрын
What's the real purpose of CERN and who funds it?
@atoth62
5 ай бұрын
The Scooby-Doo gang should poke around CERN. See if they can catch a guy in a mask.
@KrudlerTheHorse
5 ай бұрын
Pffft. I've already not found THOUSANDS of postulated particles. At 100M Euro a pop, I feel I have a rather large bank deposit incoming.
@ForkThe6
5 ай бұрын
The science uses the term Dark Matter because the existence of some strange kind of matter can mathematically be proven (because it has gravity and interacts with our observable universe - Ordinary Matter) but is invisible. Untill we prove that it isn't some kind of matter from different (higher, lower or parallel) dimension or something similar, the more precise term to use should be Invisible or ghostly matter, simply because the words dark and invisible can never be synonyms.
@porterage
5 ай бұрын
The description of the experiment says it uses the 400GeV beam from the SPS, not 5GeV. Are you confusing the SPS with the venerable PS?
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio
5 ай бұрын
I was wondering about the possibility that we might have missed something rarely produced or hard to detect in an energy range lower than the maximum of our particle accelerators, and had been thinking to ask it in the comments to some future Fermilab video . . . and here it is, under actual consideration.
@Bobby-fj8mk
5 ай бұрын
Hi Sabine - why don't they look for missing mass?
@GlassDeviant
5 ай бұрын
How many ghost particles in the average ghost?
@Thomas-gk42
5 ай бұрын
😅one should ask the ghostbusters
@SeanSpecker
5 ай бұрын
the experiments have been done. the papers written. the results ignored for more costly endeavors. good job.
@andrewclimo5709
5 ай бұрын
But oh god, we've still got astronomers, every week, saying "hey we've just seen this weird thing... it must be evidence of dark matter". As an astronomer myself, I find the continual reference to something that remains stubbornly resistant to evidence, for every statistical bump in the data, nothing short of blind religion and mumbo jumbo. What the heck has happened to science, an open mind, and healthy scepticism? The real crisis in cosmology is endemic lack of critical thinking.
@bico1592
5 ай бұрын
We can forget that brains can have a sense of humor. Thanks Sabine...
@johnwang9914
5 ай бұрын
Wouldn't anything that requires equipment that costs billions of dollars to observe be hidden to begin with.
@nevadahamaker7149
5 ай бұрын
1:38 Should've said, "...maybe they should call someone."
@Posesso
5 ай бұрын
who you're gonna call?!?! (say it!)
@egirl2040
5 ай бұрын
Why isn’t this all over the news like what
@terapode
5 ай бұрын
Your videos are more interesting, fun and easy to understand than videos from PBS Spacetime.
@karlgoebeler1500
5 ай бұрын
I see a graphical representation of time space as a "Sheet" where each point represents Einstein's solutions This is the ballon visual. I did "see" a "surface" stretched across wherever I was. (Mirror representation) of me in real time. (Wolfgang Pauli Exclusion principle)
@ianstopher9111
5 ай бұрын
I don't know if there was some press release and the likes of Pallab Ghosh (not a Ghost) recast it for his article. It sounds like clickbait to me, as Pallab should know that the term ghost already has a well-defined meaning in QFT, especially in Yang-Mills theories. Like Sabine, the first thought is naturally going to be these unphysical states.
@HWJJSCHUMACHER
5 ай бұрын
"dark matter" is "information in higher dimensions" (higher than the third dimension) ::: THIS ACTS LIKE MATTER ::: THAT IS WHY THEY CALL IT "DARK MATTER" ::: (YOU CAN WEIGHT IT / SEE IT / FILM IT / FOTOGRAPH IT ::: BUT IT IS NO MATTER !!!!
@Rudi_F_Vienna
5 ай бұрын
Dear Sabine, please get your facts straight: The SPS can reach an energy of 450 GeV, not "a fairly low energy of about 5 GeV". The beam to the SHiP experiment will have an energy of 400 GeV. See 1:44 in your own video.
@natasha60937
5 ай бұрын
You are so delicate! Congrats \õ/
@Retrosenescent
5 ай бұрын
2:20 what are these red tubes? Are they power supply? and what are the blue canisters?
@raymitchell9736
5 ай бұрын
This would have been a good story around Halloween time... I'm just unhappy about the timing of this story coming out in April. Sigh...
@andersliwenborg3355
5 ай бұрын
Someone told me If you had a block made of lead bar wich was one light year long - a neutrino could pass it without being detected …. That gives you an Idea 💡 How hard it is to find ”them”
@douglaswilkinson5700
5 ай бұрын
However no neutrino has ever passed through a black hole.
@TheTrumanZoo
5 ай бұрын
no, because there is no [missing] dark matter, there is only lit up, or unlit matter, and we only capture photons, we only observe the light part, as only light travels, and shadows do not. we do not observe matter in space directly, we observe light that reached us and formed an image, a 2d representation of a 3d event, from space.
@Enzo_213
5 ай бұрын
Why do they have to do this experiment during the solar eclipse? I'm not quite sure I understand...
@purpleglitter9596
5 ай бұрын
They're calling them ghosts to catch people's attention. I think it's a good idea.
@david_porthouse
5 ай бұрын
Tungsten is prone to corrosion. Tantalum cladding fixes that.
@howtoappearincompletely9739
5 ай бұрын
The fact that there isn't an eye-watering price-tag attached to this experiment makes me a lot less cynical about this than I usually am about particle-physics experiments.
@christopherleubner6633
5 ай бұрын
Dark matter exists, its the tastiest part of the turkey. As a particle not so much, what the effect is caused by is something a lot more interesting. It is gravity that has been pinned to high mass objects in the universe. The origin is a mirror universe from which the gravity tunnels through s hyperspace plane. Gravity alone can do that, and the effects can be interesting, especially on stars and other massive objects.
@Thomas-gk42
5 ай бұрын
Thank you for your insights. Maybe it has more explanatory power to assume that the particles also go through the superfluid phase transition that you were working on? (name it superghosts)
@SabineHossenfelder
5 ай бұрын
Yes, the masses of particles that can form superfluids are in the same range. I've actually spent quite some time trying to come up with estimates for direct detection experiments, but in the end I couldn't find a way to say anything sensible about it. (So I said nothing...)
@Thomas-gk42
5 ай бұрын
@@SabineHossenfelderThank you
@Zen_Power
5 ай бұрын
There’s actually an employee named “particles” who works at CERN. He hides everyday and they look for him.
@TheCorruptionKing
5 ай бұрын
Expansion of the Universe Theory : Sewing Button Expandable Rulers, in series, provides an analog demonstration of a mathematical constant expanse. Big bang is starting origin, we are p1 of x positions, the observable universe p2 of x positions. Under this model, constant expanse is present. Point to be made, by understanding which directions from us a local observer, expand, faster or slower, we could determine our earthly location in accordance to the big bang. This model also shows how further points appear to be expanding away from origin at greater and increasing speeds. Reason being expanse from X to X2 is constant , however the compounding expanse of each point, means X and X^n+1, the later point will be moving away at the constant plus all the constants between points. All points expand constant, but to the observer, further points move away with greater speed than the observed local constant.
@TheCorruptionKing
5 ай бұрын
Oh and dont even get me started on how yes red shift, but also energy decay. Light loosing energy as it travels, and shifting do to the stretch of space. This used with ^^^ that, could also help define out location according to the big bang. We know know everything is expanding in all directions, which direction expand observably expand less than expected and more than expected. A directional expanse could then be used with geometry to find center. Based on expanding sphere model.
@frankcl1
5 ай бұрын
Your comment is not very clear so I'm not exactly sure what you are talking about, but as far as we know the big bang took place in the entire universe (or at least in the observable one), so there is no such thing as an origin, or a distance towards this origin.
@TheCorruptionKing
5 ай бұрын
single point expanding into, say, a spherical shape. If a single point expanded into a sphere, we can use math to determine center, and our position to center. If the shape of the universe is a sphere. Big bang was nothing bang universe then expanding. There is a point where it happened. An explosion is the force expanding, but an explosion has an origin. @@frankcl1
@TheCorruptionKing
5 ай бұрын
google button sewing ruler. use that mechanism to form a model, that represents equal expansion, compounding bc the space between space adds up over time. Then a lot more other scientific laws make sense without the need for factor X anti matter anti energy@@frankcl1
@not2busy
5 ай бұрын
. . . and I suppose that SHiT stands for "Search for HIdden Things"
Пікірлер: 637