PhysicsPolice in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
@Norman92151
5 жыл бұрын
Hope there isn't the tech/engineering overreach that JWST has exhibited. Years of delays and unserviceable to boot. I vote for LUVOIR as it appears to be more technically achievable and serviceable. Excellent panel and discussion. Thanks to all.
@MozartificeR
4 жыл бұрын
Hooray for Origins space telescope...
@zapfanzapfan
5 жыл бұрын
Make sure to put in the contracts that you can publicly whip the contractors if they don't deliver on time and on budget :-)
@TheSoundrookie
5 жыл бұрын
If you're serious about searching for intelligent life, scan the universe for traces of beer.
@meropealcyone
2 жыл бұрын
Ms Luvoir was pretty skeptical regarding the Star Shade!
@shanecreamer6889
5 жыл бұрын
Watching astronomers play the game 'Snake Oil' with their designs and each other was great fun. I would like to see all of them receive funding.
@MrStarkiller17
5 жыл бұрын
Wait! James Webb in 2021?? first was 2014, then 2018, than 19 and now 2021. Cmon, i dont have time. Please, please dont move the date again
Me thinks they keep coming up with more sophisticated instruments and can never finalize a design.
@sprungmonkey6inches
3 жыл бұрын
Government jobs last forever
@MrGoMario
3 жыл бұрын
FFS Chill... This is NASA and the US 😂
@marksmadhousemetaphysicalm2938
3 жыл бұрын
LUVIOR would be my choice...also the least likely to get funding because of the JWST delays and cost overruns...
@PCMcGee1
5 жыл бұрын
"I know I can't get my slideshow to work but, can I have a billion dollars for a telescope that orbits the Moon?"
@nadahere
3 жыл бұрын
+++ All telescopes will be displaced by our low cost [$5MM], compact telescope with a broad field magnification from 10X to continent resolution/discernability at 100 light year distance. Similar performance on the obverse side with table top sized microscopes where even the interior of the nucleus will be viewable. Path to atomic scale electronics manufacturing with real time defect removal for perfect outcomes each and every time. I think I'll call it the Tiny Wonder Scope
@marthalinagregory7379
2 жыл бұрын
How Exciting!!!
@leraisonandtheseason
4 жыл бұрын
Impressive this HabEx. It makes James Webb ST looks out of date. It also remembers a Dyson structure with optical instead of energetic purposes.
@redriver6541
4 жыл бұрын
If the Webb had went up when they said it would....it wouldn't be so out of date. I was so so excited about the Webb at one time.....now it's just a boy crying wolf. I'll believe it when I see it. Until then....it doesn't exist. Lol.
@jari2018
2 жыл бұрын
cant the big sail be made some kind a detector itself -its a huge area it has
@karlthemel2678
4 жыл бұрын
HabEx is too small if it (for any reason) must work without the occulter. If for any reason JWST (infrared) is a failure The Origin Telescope must have priority. If JWST is a success the general-purpose LUVOIR using JWST´s segmented mirror technology needs the priority.
@NewPipeFTW
2 жыл бұрын
What a time for astronomical discoveries. I wonder what the costs of those big "one piece" scopes next to another and compared to a big virtual telescop consisting out of smaller cheaper diameter satellites would be. I also would see a big radio tele scope on the backside of the moon in the next decades. Maybe if its cheaper we can get both sooner 😆
@lithostheory
5 жыл бұрын
40:30 Arrays can very efficiently be made with MKID's.
@JohnStopman
5 жыл бұрын
The Future is going to be thrilling! :-)
@nadahere
3 жыл бұрын
+++ All telescopes will be displaced by our low cost [$5MM], compact telescope with a broad field magnification from 10X to continent resolution/discernability at 100 light year distance. Similar performance on the obverse side with table top sized microscopes where even the interior of the nucleus will be viewable. Path to atomic scale electronics manufacturing with real time defect removal for perfect outcomes each and every time. I think I'll call it the Tiny Wonder Scope
@twstf8905
5 жыл бұрын
Haha at 8:00 she said, "ha-b'da-b'l" lol Like "habitable," came up on a prompter and she's never seen the word before, so she just said it REALLY fast. "Ha-biddabull" (It's hard to type it out here and get the point across lol go to that time 8:00 if you care, you'll see what I mean.) It's not a big deal, clearly, but there's so much negativity in the world these days, you gotta laugh at the little things sometimes.
@tralfazz211
3 жыл бұрын
Its kinda kile huhBITabuhl
@Greenhead24
5 жыл бұрын
nice this is what i want...ps seti Mr.Shostak and Miss Tarter big fan!!
@lithostheory
5 жыл бұрын
Origins is best!
@jimlahey5354
3 жыл бұрын
Dat brain power though.
@mj-ov6rw
5 жыл бұрын
we're not alone.
@zaboomafia
5 жыл бұрын
You are most likely right.
@Taffeyboy
3 жыл бұрын
Oh no! Not another NASA space telescope!
@whirledpeas3477
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe this is the day you leave mama's basement
@Deepfake820
3 жыл бұрын
None of these compare to the gravity lensing of the Sun. That's gonna be the one.
@jimlahey5354
3 жыл бұрын
36:11 This moderator is a doofus.
@alangarland8571
5 жыл бұрын
CNO process in stars is not well undetood
@spacegalaxiesplanetsastron344
4 жыл бұрын
great video
@dgloria
5 жыл бұрын
that is why I love Asimov. How could we think of this technique if we never had a Moon?
@Sycophantichallenger
4 жыл бұрын
Watching this saddens me that I've wasted my life.
@mickmccabe8141
5 жыл бұрын
Come together and make the best one everyone seeks the same work together be the best
@Sycophantichallenger
4 жыл бұрын
I dissagree. Having several, but more specialized instruments would enable more science on a broader scale. Think about how astronomers today fight for, have to apply for and wait months and months just to get time at an observatory. I like the idea of Luvoir telescope which is broader in scope, but it also estimated to be significantly higher cost than the 3 other projects (including lynx). By my understanding, the 3 other telescopes are estimated to be in the 5-8 billion range, whereas the Luvoir is estimated around 20 billion. The cosmos are so vast and when you are looking far in to the distance, essentially at a pinhole size of space, you can only survey so much. Having more instruments looking for interesting anomalies and discoveries should yield more interesting results.
@pensante69
2 жыл бұрын
let´s get real nasa, we want to know if we are alone in the universe or not thats the big question, LUVOIR and habex must be priority
@DomingosCJM
5 жыл бұрын
After Juno mission the head of the program said that all they though they knew about Jupiter was wrong, so why NASA still talk with so much certainty about black holes and the big bang? When the electromagnetic paradigm will be part of their missions?
@DomingosCJM
5 жыл бұрын
@@matusmotlo3854 "Nearly every astronomer on the entire planet is." As in the past with the flat Earth...
@DomingosCJM
5 жыл бұрын
@@matusmotlo3854 Mathematics ain't physics and we still see those 'modern astronomers' defend the formation of the solar system with the same theory of 1796 of Laplace or a derivation of it (modern Laplacian theory). Or what about the 'thought experiment' of Einstein? Or the Big Bang theory formulated by a priest? There are so many dogmas in modern astronomy that it looks much more a religion then science. Real modern observation points to electromagnetism, not gravity as the driving force of universe. Electricity run our body, the internet and is present in space, just pay attention for the result of Juno mission about Jupiter's aurora.
@DomingosCJM
5 жыл бұрын
@@matusmotlo3854 First of all no body say gravity doesn't exist, this is your word (as "BS"), second much better electromagnetism than inventing particles as dark matter / dark energy or neutron star or even "strange matter". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_matter Why not apply what we know in the space? We know electromagnetism, we are detecting it, but still resist to give it the importance it deserves in space. This is a dogmatic point of view!
@DomingosCJM
5 жыл бұрын
@@matusmotlo3854 When I look this image of 67P ( sci.esa.int/rosetta/54472-comet-67p-on-3-august-2014/ ) I don't see a dirt snow ball, what I see is a rock! But as Groucho Marx said: "Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?" Why those modern astronomers insist on this dirt snow ball theory?
@DomingosCJM
5 жыл бұрын
@@matusmotlo3854 "That's all this electromagnetic retardation is." We normally know when a person don't have good arguments when he star offending, so I'll stop here.
@jewymchoser
Жыл бұрын
If we were a rational society we would build & finance all these projects
@oneworld5877
3 жыл бұрын
Yeh..
@alangarland8571
5 жыл бұрын
Water, yes you need water if you want life,
@nadahere
3 жыл бұрын
+++ All telescopes will be displaced by our low cost [$5MM], compact telescope with a broad field magnification from 10X to continent resolution/discernability at 100 light year distance. Similar performance on the obverse side with table top sized microscopes where even the interior of the nucleus will be viewable. Path to atomic scale electronics manufacturing with real time defect removal for perfect outcomes each and every time. I think I'll call it the Tiny Wonder Scope
@chuckdude4376
5 жыл бұрын
Stop saying ‘impactful.’
@VatVat-bv4pj
2 жыл бұрын
I can help u.allain
@alangarland8571
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@alangarland8571
5 жыл бұрын
Personally my vote is for Oxygen
@Jesusismykin
3 жыл бұрын
Genesis chapter 1.
@whirledpeas3477
2 жыл бұрын
Idiot, all bologna. every page
@Jesusismykin
2 жыл бұрын
@@whirledpeas3477 So tell me how did everything come from nothing just popped out of nowhere by itself, you are uninformed God is very real you just don't know it doesn't make it untrue.
@Autovetus
4 жыл бұрын
Stdt doesnt seem like a honorable name...
@dougg1075
5 жыл бұрын
Who cares are planets formed, I want to know what the hell is living on the planets that we know are already formed.
@PaulHigginbothamSr
5 жыл бұрын
Unlike Nasa, what I expect is a lunar colony, on the moon's far side or at least the south pole with a thorium molten salt reactor, started with the kilograms of Uranium 233 now in storage for the energy source, underground, the entire base except the attennas and mirrors for deep space. The cost of the entire base would value in the trillion range of 5 to 10 thousand souls for a permanent base. All units would have an expected lifetime in the range of human understanding, that is 50 to 100 years with very little maintenance needed till then, and produce its tunnels with melted rock faces, where the oxygen and metals and minerals would be extracted for consumer needs. Little surface mobility would be needed or wanted, unless peripheral sensors needed attention. In fact every egress portal would need multiple sealing levels. Large underground parks with good light through shaded glens would perform the outdoor function for human comfort, including wild animals for emotional uncertainty, needed for human health. Just not rats, fleas, or mosquitos, as a misery item.
Пікірлер: 79