@@smithjerry470 i think the poster meant a share of balance, ie. if one sacrifice A then two should sacrifice B to make C or else its no different than Daddy buying a you know because its A vs Z or X its too far power/$ gap like Employer vs Manager and Employer vs Employee (that's why you see when a company goes into deep financial trouble...its often the employees that gets fired in mass and not the upper management or CEO despite upper and CEO accounts for majority of the company's spend and also maybe because a closer tie (takes long time to form) and harder to replace so in net figures its actually more costly
Пікірлер: 130