His work is more an exploration of subjects instead of a final judgment on them.
@EuropeanQoheleth
8 жыл бұрын
Why did Nietzsche cross the road? Because he wanted to.
@nyusa78
4 жыл бұрын
Because he had neurosyphilis and schizophrenia
@theoryismypraxis3538
6 жыл бұрын
this is one of the best explainations of nietzsche's take on morality as such includign all his most profound philosophical interests and intimations of the goal of his philosophy and what warranted it as a motivation. Though it has to be marked, it was only a secondary goal, one that inspired hus philosophical drive, but ultimately was a mere way towards discovering the possibility of achieving a free spirit, which for himself was the true possibility of philosophy. He was a peculiar character, a brilliant one at that
@Jenab7
6 жыл бұрын
I don't think that learning to be "good" (in whatever sense that any particular culture might define good) is the point of moral philosophy. Like most else that has guided human evolution, or much else that humans do, moral philosophy is a memetic tool for survival. Being "good" isn't even secondary, but tertiary. In any proper moral system, the survival of the practitioners' group always has the highest value. Next comes truth, which has a value that overrides everything other than survival. After that come values such as justice, freedom, etc. Justice has a value inferior to truth. That's because the pursuit of justice depends on knowing truth, or more exactly on the ability accurately to distinguish truth from falsehood. And likewise for freedom. Without a means by which the truth can be identified after all its imposters have been found and discarded, you can't even tell whether you really are free, let alone pursue freedom with any confidence. Notice also that the only value higher than truth is survival. Nothing matters to the dead - not even truth. Only to something alive may anything else be good (or have value). A rock doesn't care whether you hit it with a hammer. But a mouse does. Why the group, and not the individual? Because individuals are ephemeral. We can by no means endure as the ages pass. But the group of practitioners, having a moral system in common, which they heed and advance in the world, can indeed endure. And the most natural group is a race, which is strongest when its members hold a moral system in common; i.e. isn't factionalized, and therefore cannot be induced to attack itself. When the group of practitioners is also a race, it gains the ability to replace its dying members with new members who are born compatible with the culture of their fellows. Because inherited are most of the human qualities that determine which memetic qualities the individual can easily acquire, or can acquire at all. Native members have the requisite temperament and innate attributes for engaging in the group's culture; they're organic, not grafted in. They belong without having to adapt, as an outsider would have to adapt though continuous exertion. (And the immigrant will in most cases be unwilling to put forth the required effort.) What doesn't exist is worthless. What can't exist for long because of self-sabotage isn't worth much. Proper moral codes, which put the survival of the practitioners' group first in value, are therefore always better than improper moral codes, which give the highest value to anything else. A group that puts the highest moral value on anything other than survival will, sooner or later, encounter circumstances in which their survival is in conflict with whatever that other thing is. When that happens, the group will either abandon their improper moral system in favor of a proper one, or they will die off, and their improper code will vanish along with them. I won't declare the foregoing summary of moral philosophy to be the final word in moral philosophy. I'm not that pretentious. But it appears to be self-consistent and consistent with how the world really works. If anyone discovers a flaw, I'd like to hear about it. I think that one of the ways in which one culture can make war on another is by inducing its rival, by propaganda or by some other means, to get their moral priorities improperly sorted. Has this already happened; i.e., is such a war going on now? I suspect so, but I'll save the details for some other time.
@starx8775
5 жыл бұрын
Perfect, thank you
@GoonRenegade69
8 жыл бұрын
Digging that Runescape music.
@zalasyu
7 жыл бұрын
hahahahaha
@marcianopadilla3404
7 жыл бұрын
Naturalist,Naturalism? Amazing concept. Examining human nature using the scientific method and developing a rational criteria for human behavior. The Geneology of Morals is a good example of this exercise.
@beautifulInner
11 жыл бұрын
Moral is a argument created and started,with one person seeing the a gain to itself in using it,as a mean to get a safe haven from the reality of our nature. As morality is a evolutionary dead end,in the sense of the Darwinist idea of the survival of the fittest. Morality only exist in man, as a way of manipulation, and is easier to understand as a self defends mechanism of Ego. This is why moral often acts upon non morality by the ones setting the moral,often the most aggressive of the two.
@tommyodonovan3883
4 жыл бұрын
Behold....the Syphilistic mind.
@felizgrun2610
9 жыл бұрын
thanks for the video, it s proved useful for me
@infinitesimotel
11 жыл бұрын
Neitzsche is the bomb. indisputable, end of.
@kartikaysharma7836
9 жыл бұрын
I had a question in a term paper that to what extent can religious morality incorporate individual freedom? Couldn't find any specific answer. What are your views on the subject?
@heyhyolo2821
11 жыл бұрын
this vid was great,liked and subbed ;-)
@andreivermes81
11 жыл бұрын
love your videos amazing
@MrRasierapparat
11 жыл бұрын
that video is nice.
@meanmrmustard89
11 жыл бұрын
Could you please tell me the name of the music at the beginning?
@wesmann3999
7 жыл бұрын
@24:30 - Analytic philosophy is Kantian Analytic A Posteriori philosophy. A triangle has 3 sides is true, but useless. Nothing new is learned. But that the inside angles equal 180° is new information not inherent in the concept of a triangle. That's an example of analytic philosophy, so far as I understand it. Same with π. I don't understand why Mr Leiter says there's no such thing as analytic philosophy.
@andijonathan6930
11 жыл бұрын
Awesome job
@debrareed8806
11 жыл бұрын
o yeah,this is what im talking about,great job!!!
@AlbinosaurusR3X
6 жыл бұрын
Content is great, but sound is too soft.
@DeeZyTeeVee
11 жыл бұрын
epic video!
@ericmasters9680
11 жыл бұрын
It's from Niko Nyman only identify as ''Music Theme''.
@DeeZyTeeVee
11 жыл бұрын
Oh my god! Thats amazing
@srinp8726
6 жыл бұрын
What’s difference between morality and character, I wonder
@MichaelLopresto
10 жыл бұрын
I'd love to know what music that is!
@ericmasters9680
10 жыл бұрын
It's known as "Music Theme" composed by Niko Nyman.
@MichaelLopresto
9 жыл бұрын
Cool, thanks!
@TheZabbiemaster
8 жыл бұрын
Hey! I've been looking, and I cant find it. any clue where I might find it?
@tommyodonovan3883
4 жыл бұрын
Define *"Good"*
@ericmasters9680
11 жыл бұрын
@ranwar083
11 жыл бұрын
1Simply extravagant
@s.hedayathussainzaidi5235
11 жыл бұрын
5/5 you cant ask for more than that.
@taikhoanhoisua
11 жыл бұрын
a favorite from me?
@Hypnus9
10 жыл бұрын
Nietzsche was. I am.
@grimawormtongue1949
10 жыл бұрын
Too much peripheral commentary.
@andhemills
9 жыл бұрын
Mm-kay?
@dalerichards357
11 жыл бұрын
Wow... thats all i can say
@dextetgremlin1988
10 жыл бұрын
He kilLed my wolf. Banished!
@heyassmanx
10 жыл бұрын
great video but this guy convoluted the living shit out of nietzsche
@wilsonsmith9821
11 жыл бұрын
like my dad
@Thetom463
11 жыл бұрын
Marry me? lol so hot and sing so good.
@user-jp1sp6yq5v
11 жыл бұрын
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@nyusa78
4 жыл бұрын
Who want learn morals of man who's brain was ravaged by neurosyphilis and consequent schizophrenia.
@billba
10 жыл бұрын
An insider of the lodge, work of evil.
@starx8775
5 жыл бұрын
Freemason? Although they’re oppressive I’m not going to be petty and act like they hold a lot of truths, wisdom, accuracy, beauty etc.
@starx8775
5 жыл бұрын
*like they don’t, I mean
@EXALTEDDIRT
10 жыл бұрын
Are you good enough to go to heaven and escape Hell? Ever lied? Ever stolen? Ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used God's name in vain or as a curse word? If you have, then God sees you as a lying, thieving, blasphemous adulterer at heart and you must face God on judgment day. Revelation 21v8 says; "All liars will have their part in the lake of fire" The bible says; "No thief, adulterer, or blasphemer will enter" The guilty will end up in Hell. That is not God's will. You broke God's laws but Jesus paid you're fine! Repent, turn from sin, and trust in Christ alone
@andhemills
9 жыл бұрын
That makes no sense. And, the concept of morality is that I don't need you to tell me any of that. It's supposed to be "written in my heart by god", not rammed down my throat by the clergy. If you or anyone else has to tell me what to do, that's ethics. If I make a choice when I'm alone in a room in a situation I've never encountered, that may be considered morality. And if you think that any of that stuff is bad (lying, etc), then the solution is not to randomly say so to nobody in particular (I'm not doing any of that and I don't expect to go to heaven, but every person I ever met who claims to be a christian lies regularly). A better solution is to work toward a society in which there's no apparent benefit, no incentive to doing those things. I dare you to call out a liar to their face. Stop a thief. It's not going to help to wait for god to judge them after they die! If you believe you'll be judged when you die, that's fine. But, I don't need to hear about it. If you're so secure and confident in your belief, you don't need anyone else to believe it. There's nothing in the bible that says you won't make it to heaven if you haven't convinced someone else of your imaginary friend, Christ. Buddhism on the other hand, is strict. As happy as you might be able to feel, as long as there is unhappiness in any person, then you can't be fully happy (because we are all as one). In The Lotus Sutra, the Buddha says [paraphrased] "In response to a person's needs for salvation, I preach various doctrines. At all times I think to myself: How can I cause living beings to gain entry into the unsurpassed way and quickly acquire the body of a Buddha?"
@Blonguin
9 жыл бұрын
Lol evolution
@samuelwolfblade7621
9 жыл бұрын
EXALTEDDIRT Yeah, have fun with using a fake threat to tell humanity that they will be punished for being the humans they apparently were created to be. Hopefully someone will only take this threat seriously if they hve proof of this god.
@spom9898
9 жыл бұрын
+Samuel Wolfblade if God made man in his image but said all that then he's a fucking hypocrite.
@themonrovian8441
6 жыл бұрын
God at this point is nothing more than an obsolete conjecture, worshipped by the unfit for the purpose of castigating the strong.
@Johanna040713
7 жыл бұрын
Jesus is the tuth. He's the Son of God, born a man, He atoned for our sins on the cross and rose from the dead!
@lisawilson6346
7 жыл бұрын
Johanna040713 o,rlly? :)
@lovepeace-er1wl
7 жыл бұрын
Johanna040713 ...but who did the rain dance to make the water fall from the sky so he could turn water into wine? That's right, the natives did.
Пікірлер: 63