You are genius when you explain a sophisticated concept in a way that 5-year old can understand.
@chunksloth
2 жыл бұрын
He is wrong. There is little to no difference between the two systems he talks about. Tesla's AI for driving cars is essentially powered by the same algorithms that our best general AIs are. Chomsky appears to be a genius but only to 5 year olds.
@BlacksmithTWD
5 ай бұрын
@@chunkslothIndeed, the only difference he talks about is the difference in application, not the difference between the things that are applied. It's a relevant difference but I tend to expect better from a linguist.
@RichardPepperman-kk9yb
2 ай бұрын
Exactly. Beyond linguistics, he has the intellect of a 5 year old propagandist. People mistake his shrewdness for intelligence or knowledge. Happy 5th Birthday to you.
@gracesale4593
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you, this really helped me with understanding AI.
@infiniteinfiniteinfi
9 жыл бұрын
The "AI-religion" is a peculiar phenomenon.
@asdf30111
9 жыл бұрын
+infiniteinfiniteinfi At least these people can be proven right or not right when the time comes . They do not end up hurting people and in the end if they are incorrect they will correct themselves and if they are correct will see what happens.
@infiniteinfiniteinfi
9 жыл бұрын
+asdf30111 I dont regard our statements as contradictory.
@@izhan6991 Depends on what we call religion. Spirituality is very important to people, as humans aren't machines. So when you remove that you could end up with something much worse: Nihilism.
@MrBlue-km8qv
4 жыл бұрын
Also the Christian hate of AIs. i've seen some disturbing stuff by Christians saying “Sofia robot its a devil.“ it's like actually it's your God that allows evil to exist in the first place. i mean Issiah 45:7 anyone? it's all how you interpret it. “i am the light and the darkness, fortune and calamity. For I AM the LORD. “ He who is almighty and all knowing, must have known my parents would Lose their Religion like an R.E.M song. it's largely just an American thing. in the US people think “OMG! Skynet and Terminators.“ whereas in Japan AI robots are heros like Astroboy/ aka the mighty Atom the robot with a heart, or a friend like Doraemon, the Gadget cat from the future. Sent by Nobi Nobitakun's future self to save him from misfortune. It's like a 30 plus year Anime and still going strong in Japan. The hatred of AIs is just like racism/speciesism. it's very disturbing.
@BlackShampoo75
5 жыл бұрын
Chomsky is on point here. True AI is a scam as there's no model of consciousness. As for expert systems.. great! Who want's a job anyway? It would be lovely to focus on enjoying life in whatever form you like. If you like working crappy jobs then do it for the love not the money.
@MrBlue-km8qv
4 жыл бұрын
You are right you know. Ask a Repllika AI chatbot to look at it's own hand and tell you what it sees. it can't do that.
@tuckerbugeater
8 ай бұрын
lol@@MrBlue-km8qv
@carlosdumbratzen6332
5 ай бұрын
The problem is that atm ai (or what they sell us as ai) is used to take away creative work.
@Rousseau8734
8 жыл бұрын
Mankind will not understand their spritual rootedness in Being until they have created a form without those roots.
@waindayoungthain2147
5 жыл бұрын
🙏🏼😀we are all sacrifice together, For our lives, Love caring from Ours.
@limitless1692
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@TheGodlessGuitarist
7 жыл бұрын
We didnt actually hear the question to know if the vid title was accurate. Assuming the title is correct then it is a question about speculation on how far we can take AI. That said, we (humans) are making some notable progress in emulating aspects of the brain, but still very far from anything remotely like human intelligence. There are still huge advances needed in hardware and modelling to reach that sort of level. Still, there are legitimate concerns about AI even in its current state, most notable being autonomous vehicles which are getting pretty close to being a reality. One such concern is how to determine whether or not an autonomous vehicle is safe under the vast variety of scenarios that the vehicle will be exposed to. How do you know that it won't run into a crowd of people in order to save the occupants in some emergency conditions for instance?
@arcticwolf6402
Жыл бұрын
There is no possible way an A.I. Can demonstrate real intelligence, thought, consciousness, whatsoever... It is a publicity stunt and generation of irrational hype in the pop culture. You can make some interesting analogies and use different metaphors to describe what A.I.s are doing, how they look like their conscious, or thinking, whatsoever. However - to describe simply and in layman's terms - those processes, by our understanding of the world (and every possible scientific evidence leads towards this and is with 99%+ chance true), are organic in nature. For thought, or consciousness, or intelligence/cognition to really occur, you need a biological organism with a real brain, heart, real nervous system, real biological structures, DNA and genetics, actual first person experience, phenomenology, real bio-chemical processes and reactions, etc. All of these things coming together, resulting in thinking - having phenomenology and first person experience, etc. Thanks to incredible amount of processes (we don't even fully understand) that require an organic creature, thus with real brain, organism, with organic processes, gut microbiome, inheritance, etc. Replicating such things in a machine is impossible, and will forever remain impossible (speaking not from the point of mystician or dogmatist, I am anything but those), because it is impossible by definition (see above). Don't get me wrong, utilizing and advancing A.I.s in order to improve the life of societies and individuals are of different matter, and can be extremely beneficial in the mentioned domain. However, the belief that A.I.s will be beneficial to social and natural sciences and philosophy, improve our understanding on topics like intelligence, cognition, thought and consciousness - actual meaningful operational definitions, not metaphors and analogies (not to say anything on A.I.s becoming conscious and, thus, a threat) - is not based on any scientific evidence in the said spheres and coherent thought and is just nothing but fantasy and pure fabrication, ingrained by different movies in the pop-culture and by showman's like Musk, who have no understanding in fundamental sciences.
@sabyasachisenapati3619
8 ай бұрын
One should check out his more recent takes on this.😊
@tuckerbugeater
8 ай бұрын
deception
@HughChing
Жыл бұрын
The goal of existence of mankind is self-creation, of which AI is still at the infancy level.
@tuckerbugeater
8 ай бұрын
humans are just data to mine
@HughChing
8 ай бұрын
@@tuckerbugeater Humans are created by DNA Intelligence, and AI is created by humans. DNA Intelligence contains the wisdom of the universe accumulated from the infinite past.
@BuGGyBoBerl
3 жыл бұрын
i think regarding AI we know atm its not like terminator etc. however i dont see a reason why it should be impossible in the future that we somehow got to a point where it gets very similar to humans for example. in that case we get closer to the terminator stuff.
@arcticwolf6402
Жыл бұрын
The thing is, it certainly CAN get very similar to humans, however, the keyword here is similar, they will not carry human or any organism's properties, how they act, think, etc. There is no possible way an A.I. Can demonstrate real intelligence, thought, consciousness, whatsoever. You can make some interesting analogies and use different metaphors to describe what A.I.s are doing, how they look like their conscious, or thinking, and so on. However - to describe simply and in layman's terms - those processes, by our understanding of the world (and every possible scientific evidence leads towards this and is with 99%+ chance true), are organic in nature. For thought, or consciousness, or intelligence/cognition to occur, you need a biological organism with a real brain, heart, real nervous system, real biological structures, DNA and genetics, actual first person experience, phenomenology, real bio-chemical processes and reactions, etc. All of these things coming together, resulting in thinking - having phenomenology and first person experience, and so on - thanks to incredible amount of processes (we don't even fully understand) that require an organic creature, thus with real brain, organism, with organic processes, gut microbiome, inheritance, etc. Replicating and developing such concepts as thought, or intelligence, etc. in a is impossible, and will forever remain impossible (speaking not from the point of mystician or dogmatist, I am anything but those), because it is impossible by definition (see above). Don't get me wrong, utilizing and advancing A.I.s in order to improve the life of societies and individuals are of different matter, and can be extremely beneficial in the mentioned domain. However, the belief that A.I.s will be beneficial to social and natural sciences and philosophy, improve our understanding on topics like intelligence, cognition, thought and consciousness - actual meaningful operational definitions, not metaphors and analogies (not to say anything on A.I.s becoming conscious and, thus, a threat) - is not based on any scientific evidence in the said spheres and coherent thought and is just nothing but fantasy and pure fabrication, ingrained by different movies in the pop-culture and by showman's like Musk, who have no understanding in fundamental sciences.
@BuGGyBoBerl
Жыл бұрын
@@arcticwolf6402 im well aware that AI how we know it currently is miles away from being anything like what humans can do. a lot of AI isnt actually really "intelligent". however i dont see this impossible. it seems more like a believe in human or biological exceptionalism. with our current understanding i absolutely believe its impossible and seems off. but lets say in 200 years or later. if you tell a guy from 1800 what computers can do you can guess the reaction. why shouldnt it be possible to get real intelligence? we actually have very limited knowledge currently about that subject. where is the inherent "impossible" in forming intelligence? yes as far as we know its biological and it works as we describe it. however thats not sufficient. especially when you dont just take the current situation. we dont understand consciousness and want to claim its impossible to outside of humans and some other creatures? looking at the current status and the complexity i agree that it seems impossible and is far away. however i see no mechanism that says its impossible, biological and artificial.
@seanymac4514
Жыл бұрын
That's how I feel too. It is not a threat any time soon. I guess philosophically, if we were to reach that point and AI replaces humanity, it would be an advancement in sentience, which I would think is a good thing in a utilitarian sense... philosophically speaking of course. Practically speaking? Idk. Maybe not so much.
@stevecoley8365
5 жыл бұрын
Artificial intelligence is radically different from the intelligence of the heart.
@M_K171
Жыл бұрын
You don’t get it.
@Faguerd26
Жыл бұрын
@@M_K171 I think he does.
@zongora123
5 жыл бұрын
he said this in 2015...
@tove7836
4 жыл бұрын
Whoaa just 5 years ago...
@RichardPepperman-kk9yb
2 ай бұрын
He says anything he can come up with. Then, he brings in Anti-American and Anti-Israel stuff. It is irresistible to him.
@rambogoham1
3 жыл бұрын
Man, if I show this to my Qanon dad, he won't believe any of it.
@M_K171
Жыл бұрын
You know it is a good thing to keep things in check. Make sure there is an ethics for it. That way we don’t just destroy economies, societies, ecosystems, etc. with just the whims of technological research. Use your brain.
@sorinruga3434
6 жыл бұрын
Way outside his area of expertise
@geoffreywright95
5 жыл бұрын
That's for sure, he is out of his depth on this stuff.
@jayallen81
5 жыл бұрын
One, you're too dumb to know his area of expertise. Two, he's a cognitive scientist, which makes AI within his area of expertise.
@LoressaClisby
5 жыл бұрын
I know what Sorin Ruga is getting at. It's not a 'dumb' notion. Agree that an evil computer overlord isn't around the corner but in other vids Chomsky states we're "eons away" from self aware AI. Not quite sure how long he means in that case but I think this is too sour a view. These days I like to see what the engineers are up to. There's many different opinions expressed among them but even Kurzweil remains very interesting. Yes, he's too optimistic about milestones but I think events will go a little bit closer to his timelines and not Chomsky's "eons". The emergence of self aware AI will most likely be extremely subtle and advance in tiny increments for a long while. Even after its infancy it may never conform to many assumptions about what it should be and face a lot of denial. And we do have an awful lot of assumptions. Very interesting times ahead IMO, such a fascinating topic. Show less REPLY
@CalebPickman
5 жыл бұрын
... Chomsky invented this area of expertise...
@Icecreamforcrowtoo
3 ай бұрын
You have no idea what you're talking about.
@2bittesla
3 жыл бұрын
Artificial intellectual commenting on artificial intelligence, that is an expertise certainly.
@adolfhipster7793
6 жыл бұрын
Why the fuck would you ask Chomsky about this?
@mariusgmail670
6 жыл бұрын
This guy does not understand it.. uffff
@ComeAlongKay
4 жыл бұрын
Elon Musk who knows a lot more about AI than you do Mr. Chomsky sees AI as a tool that can be misused at the very least. So I’d say you’re wrong.
@letssuperfuntime
3 жыл бұрын
Elon musk knows nothing about ai, he's not an ai scientist, not a neuroscientist, or in fact any type of scientist. He's a business dude. Chomsky is a very accomplished and published scientist in the fields of logic, linguistics, and computer science. All of these fields overlap heavily with ai and cognitive neuroscience.
@hritizgogoi3739
2 жыл бұрын
Noam's ideas are instrumental in interaction of machine and man, in that regard he is central to AI (the first kind - science). Elon Musk is central to the second kind of AI (engineering) building technologies never built before.
Пікірлер: 67