Of course the most historical part of the video ,the victory!
@ThatHigh1
Ай бұрын
As the founding fathers intended
@Spaghetter813
11 ай бұрын
Thompsons were not standard loudout for infantry squads. The official TO&E would have squads with 11 Garands and 1 BAR. Six submachineguns (M1s or M3s) were issued to each company to be distributed at the company commanders discretion- aka usually before planned assaults which would include urban, wooded or other terrain where close quarter fighting was expected. Of course, in practice, there was a lot of variance. By late 1944 two BARs were basically standard. One platoon is documented as having pooled all its BARs in just one of its three squads (etc. etc.).
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
I thought NCO's were allowed to choose between Thompsons and Garands? Maybe thats a video game myth im subscribing to
@olekzajac5948
11 ай бұрын
I'm always down for historical accuracy, so I really liked this video. As for the loadout ideas, I have a fun one - Volkssturm. Play Berlin Axis with just Volkssturm squads (including the premium one), equipped with a random mix of bolt action rifles, but mostly the Kar98k Kriegsmodell and the VG 2 as well as the MP 3008, EMP 44 and VG 1-5 for assaulters. No binoculars, no flasks, no TNT charges and a random mix of grenades - frag, smoke, molotov, TNT pack or none. And optionally, dressed in the civilian uniforms (IIRC there is one or two appearance options that aren't uniforms but rather period correct civilian clothes).
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
ive actually done several Volkssturm videos already
@chewcacachewpipi8879
10 ай бұрын
Why no binos or flasks?
@matthewjones39
7 ай бұрын
@@chewcacachewpipi8879Are you saying the Volkssturm had those?
@chewcacachewpipi8879
7 ай бұрын
@@matthewjones39 Did they not…? I was genuinely asking as I thought being smaller than most other equipment binos and canteens would require less materials to make and thus be easier to obtain.
@matthewjones39
7 ай бұрын
@@chewcacachewpipi8879 I think you misunderstand the concept of the Volkssturm. No equipment was really being produced for them.
@dirtyskieschemifornia3091
11 ай бұрын
Honestly, the flame troopers are so op. So much fun making jerry crisps. And the sound of them coming closer to you is terrifying
@jasperoliger
11 ай бұрын
I have a historical accurate squad for my Germans, it’s just the first rifle squad with an mg34, and engineer and a radio guy, the rest are rifles and they all use mannlichers lol the squad shreds, plus there’s like 10 of them
@lebozo869
11 ай бұрын
I'm personally looking forward to larping like this being a viable option for fun gameplay, unlike how it is at the current time when you usually need the best stuff to have a chance at winning :L
@DontStealMyNoEffortName
11 ай бұрын
skill issue
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
absolutely agree. You can win with anything, but it does feel really bad when you run into strong teams and youre just playing with like K98's.
@Franfran2424
11 ай бұрын
Great game. Its so much more fun to use stuff outside the meta.
@Nitram7482
21 күн бұрын
Some late small correction: the radio operator would use a m2 carabine, not a M1 grand, the grand is very heavy, + the radio equipement would be hard to carry.
@jaredjosephsongheng372
3 ай бұрын
14:49 Bro got 11 kills using just a grenade.
@theendermenofficial
4 ай бұрын
Cant wait for a historical accurate soviet video
@Prussian_Tsar
11 ай бұрын
historical loadouts are always a ton of fun, I do it just cause I can most of the time.
@russiancosmonaughtivan9685
11 ай бұрын
Should have used the M1 Bazooka. I could be wrong but I don’t think they used the M9 in Normandy
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
from by (limited) research, it looks like it was
@flapbe
11 ай бұрын
bro needed a excuse to not suffer, let the man cook!!
@ulfhedtyrsson
11 ай бұрын
2:48 Oh my god, you're war face is terrifying...
@Nathator97
11 ай бұрын
my favorite part of this video was when it was historically inaccurate
@chewcacachewpipi8879
7 ай бұрын
The merge was a mistake “BaLaNcED”
@whiplash8277
7 ай бұрын
That series of grenades was awesome.
@Jzcash47
3 ай бұрын
Do the same thing with historical accurate guns but also real life movments
@Kvorning0
11 ай бұрын
super fun video idea really intertaning
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
Glad you think so!
@intodark321
9 ай бұрын
No se ablar ingles pero pude entender un poco tu video Bueno me entreteni viendolo
@Deustch__keisserreich
11 ай бұрын
Next you should do the japanese or the british.
@stancojocaru1724
11 ай бұрын
Quadro what do you think is best campaign to play as the Axis?
@74wf
11 ай бұрын
Tunisia obviously
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
Normandy is pretty much the answer to all questions regarding "best campaign". Its simply the only one players are always active in. Berlin Axis can be good too, but Berlin is typically dominated by high level players with weapons that will absolutely stomp everyone else
@nicholasyannaccone5696
11 ай бұрын
It would be more historically accurate if you were mowed down as soon as you spawned because a lot of people were killed as soon as the bay door dropped
@joaogomes9405
Ай бұрын
Small correction, the tank crew should have been equipped with M3A1s, as they were supplied to tank crews over the Thompson due to being cheaper, more compact and lighter.
@forlorn_squad
11 ай бұрын
15:35, "Quadro!" lmao
@markmulder9845
11 ай бұрын
We have a winner! PING! PING! PING!
@drj0221
11 ай бұрын
Do the same with other nations please 🙏
@LibertyLion1776
11 ай бұрын
Great gameplay, your skills are on another level. If you ever see me in your lobby my gamertag is macdeezy420.
@ismovirtanen7225
11 ай бұрын
shouldn't the radiomen and at-gunners have M1 carbines?
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
artillerymen had m1 carbines. I dunno about AT-gunners, maybe.
@DomagojSkiljan
11 ай бұрын
@HeyQuadro I have a question about binoculars, do you think it would be balanced if you could mark soldiers with them as you can mark tanks? Or maybe planes?
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
yeah it'd be fine IMO
@connorjordanng8898
11 ай бұрын
I some things to ask and say about the M10 GMC after watching this video. First: Why create and use the M18 Hellcat when the M10 GMC has better armor than it? Second: Even if the M18 Hellcat was faster, the M10 GMC already had great mobility being based on the M4 Sherman. Third: The M10 GMC could have been equipped with electric turret drives instead of simple hand cranks like its successor the M36 Jackson, but why wasn’t that the case? I hope you guys could give some answers.
@GFTheWriter
11 ай бұрын
1st: Disclaimer; This one is pure hindsight. Even if the M10 did have better armor than M18... For the most part, it's not significant. The German didn't put Heavy machine gun on everything like the US did. So basically, when you're facing any vehicles it would be 7.92 that both M18 and M10 could withstand or anything bigger that would instantly blow them both up anyway. 2nd: While the M10 is not slow, the hellcat is not just faster, it's a lot faster, with way better acceleration. Basically the Hellcat could get into the position way faster than one would expect a 'tank' could do, and an unexpected strike is always a powerful strike. And the acceleration of the M18 could make it maneuver a lot better for repositioning the position, baically you can't hit what's not there anymore. But this would also depend on the user. Some units prefered the M18's mobility while the others prefered 'extra' armor of the M10. 3rd: In late 1943 there was an M10 tested with an Oilgear hydraulic traversing motor but at that point just use 76 M4 tbh. And before the 76 M4 was put into the production, TD for the American is pretty much the cheapest and the fastest way to put firepower on a mobile platform down the range. Anything that would add complexity or were deemed 'unnecesssary' were pretty much removed.
@flench1901
11 ай бұрын
Good stuff
@BjornTheFearLess
11 ай бұрын
why is there so meny bots? the game lacks players or what?
@BjornTheFearLess
11 ай бұрын
@@DarkIsToNight i know this. But alot of The “players” in a game is in fact bots playing
@coloneljason9094
11 ай бұрын
Because there are too many theaters to play and few players are playing them thats why bots are present.I hope it gets patched by the merge.
@HeyQuadro
11 ай бұрын
In Normandy, there arent. This game was full at the start (players tend to leave, though). Other campaigns its because lack of players
Пікірлер: 54