Please support Ekidel with "Buy a Super Thanks".❤ Your support will be highly helpful to us thank you ❤
@marvellousogedegbe5941
Ай бұрын
Well done engr I have been following your videos for a while now but I think using a fixed end support is totally preferable in RCC structure as hinging create a huge beam deflection under heavy load
@EkidelCAD
Ай бұрын
🍷👍
@agostinhoinocencio7013
3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the lecture
@EkidelCAD
3 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@agostinhoinocencio7013
3 ай бұрын
@@EkidelCADit's my pleasure
@ngalacaroline8966
Ай бұрын
Nice content. A question, how is a Hinge End achieved in Actual In- Situ Concrete Structure during construction?
@EkidelCAD
29 күн бұрын
The effect will show on the reinforcement
@Phemi_01
18 күн бұрын
Well done, sir! Is the detailing of hinge support different from fixed support?
@EkidelCAD
17 күн бұрын
Fixed support has more development anchor lengths also fixed support introduces more reinforcement at the support region
@kunleomitogun360
5 ай бұрын
Thanks for this videos sir 🎉
@EkidelCAD
5 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@daberechukwumiracle7562
5 ай бұрын
Thanks Ekidel ♥️ for this video
@EkidelCAD
5 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@adegbiteadetola9571
5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the lecture sir.
@EkidelCAD
5 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@victorchukwuemekaokezuonu1290
5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the lecture. But I have a few questions. 1. While applying hinge end is possible in Prota Structures, is it obtainable in real life, considering holistically the entire structural behaviour? 2. If it is obtainable in real life, what physical/structural conditions could suggest its use? Thanks.
@EkidelCAD
5 ай бұрын
You're welcome I believe you watched the video to the end, you have seen how the hinge and fixed end impact on the support size and also impact on the reinforcements of the beam and supports. If you didn't watch the video to the end of you skipped any part of the video, I will advise you watch the entire video as every part is important to fully understand the demonstration of the video.
@victorchukwuemekaokezuonu1290
5 ай бұрын
@@EkidelCAD I really did watch it till the end, without skipping any part. My question is if hinge condition is practicable on site. And if in reality, a beam can exist without transferring moments to the supporting columns.
@abachevictor897
5 ай бұрын
Same questions I was about to ask
@white_phoenix10
4 ай бұрын
@@victorchukwuemekaokezuonu1290As far as I know, hinged joints are mostly applicable in steel frame structures/precast assemblies. In a regular structure like an insitu cast structure, if hinge joints are the end conditions to minimize the number of reinforcement in the structural members, then a member such as a pin had to be available/provided to account for the absence of transference of moments, without an introduction of such, I am afraid the software basically designed what we input with the assumption that a pin joint would be introduced in real-life whereas iron benders/contractors would simply apply the reinforcement provided in the drawing disregarding the conditions of introducing an hinge joint... Perhaps Ekidel can enlighten us more on this...
@ikiriye
5 ай бұрын
you hinge on simply supported ends,for continuous columns that joint must be fixed.
@EkidelCAD
5 ай бұрын
You can go an read your theory of Structures again
Пікірлер: 23