What books and courses would you suggest on Hanbali and Hanafi Usool al Fiqh (beginner to advanced)?
@severianconciliator1862
9 ай бұрын
Marc Baer has a general history of the Ottomans that is quite good. Franz Babinger’s bio of Mehmet the Conqueror is worth a look as well. For a fun historical novel set during the Ottoman conquest of Albania, check out The Siege by Ismail Kadare.
@bradchilders5546
9 ай бұрын
salaam hamza. Have you heard of Sh Hasan Farhan al Maliki from Saudi Arabia? He is an erudite scholar of Islamic(early) history and all the hadith sciences, but he takes sort of a critical stance on our inherited history and corpus, some call him a Quranist(hes not). If even you disagree with his positions on creedal matters, he has some really great insights on early islam and its formative years.
@HamzaTheHistorian
9 ай бұрын
I have not, thanks for sharing
@tahmidislam5208
9 ай бұрын
Banger Q&A, this was long awaited 🙂
@HamzaTheHistorian
9 ай бұрын
I am glad you liked it :) Should I do more live ones?
@tahmidislam5208
9 ай бұрын
@@HamzaTheHistoriandefinitely!
@isagoge
8 ай бұрын
@@HamzaTheHistorianYess please
@isagoge
8 ай бұрын
1:10:18 Ibn Muda??
@tahmidislam5208
8 ай бұрын
@@isagoge Ibn Mada' al-Qurtubi
@SIGSEGV1337
9 ай бұрын
1:01:00 this isn't true, ahlul dhahir do consider beer haram based on the hadith "[...] every intoxicant is khamar and every intoxicant is haram [...]" [Muslim 2003a]. This doesn't require qiyas, also deductive syllogisms aren't the same as analogy, when Ibn Hazm (RH) refers to qiyas he means the definition of Al-Shafi'i (RH). The asl of rejecting qiyas is that it's root is speculative and unfalsifiable, and Allah tells us in the Qur'an that speculation is something other than the truth (Qur'an 53:28). Bukhari (RH) also mentions his evidence for rejecting qiyas in his sahih. 1:09:00 When we talk about the 'dhahir' what's intended is the 'most apparent meaning'. This isn't necessarily literal and some included metaphors when using this term. Imam Dawud (RH) did not accept metaphors, while Ibn Hazm (RH) did and today Abdul Aziz Al-Harbi (RH) does perhaps to an even greater extent than even Ibn Hazm (RH) did.
@HamzaTheHistorian
9 ай бұрын
I’m publishing an article soon that addresses those issues. Thank you 😊
@SIGSEGV1337
9 ай бұрын
@@HamzaTheHistorian Looking forward to it! I recommend also looking into some contemporary figures of ahlul dhahir too
@MacmillansDiciple
9 ай бұрын
I would be very careful in promoting nominalism given its role in founding modernity and all its offshoots, including colonialism. Hasan Spiker has done excellent work on the dangers of nominalism for an Islamic worldview and its consequences in modernity.
@HamzaTheHistorian
9 ай бұрын
Thank you. I’ll look into that!
@ThePrincipleLogician
9 ай бұрын
He did an episode on blogging theology where he briefly discussed nominalism.
Пікірлер: 17