This little video rescued my soul destroyed by countless hours of tedious lectures and text book reading. I’ll most certainly be availing of your knowledge in the future. Thank you.
@euphoria1942
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I had my 3 hours lecture on this and I didn’t understand anything but you have explained it really well
@euphoria1942
2 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video on leases?
@bitesizelaw9163
2 жыл бұрын
@@euphoria1942 It's on my list!
@Terabyte1244
3 жыл бұрын
Very helpful. Thanks!
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@anijones1512
3 ай бұрын
thanks Amanda
@emydalby4529
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your explanation, you are the only person I am yet to find that can explain these concepts with clarity! I just had a small question: at the end of the video it states that if overreaching does apply then we move to the doctrine of notice for unregistered land? I was under the impression that overreaching applies irrespective of notice. Does this mean if the interest is not overreached, it could still NOT be binding on the purchaser as long as they do not have notice of the right? Thank you!
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your question and feedback Emy. If overreaching does NOT apply then you should consider the DoN. So, if not overreached, the right is not binding so long as the purchaser is a bfpfv without notice.
@elleanorloz
4 ай бұрын
So helpful!! Thank you
@bitesizelaw9163
4 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@evaclaramunt431
Жыл бұрын
thank you so much for this video, very helpful
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@altoriaimmigrationandbusin4239
2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO!
@bitesizelaw9163
2 жыл бұрын
You are welcome
@sambaugh8464
8 ай бұрын
Thanks this was really helpful :)
@ebiedorothy4671
Жыл бұрын
Best explanation so I have seen Thank you 😊 ❤
@melvinburton5554
Жыл бұрын
That made things much, much clear thank you for the video.
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear it!
@chrislazarou2202
2 жыл бұрын
Amanda your video was simply phenomenal!
@bitesizelaw9163
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@mariabeardsley1227
Жыл бұрын
This was so helpful. Thank you!
@melleni
Жыл бұрын
This is very helpful thank you
@simonerichaywood
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic explanation thank you! 😊
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@user-ez7pq9eu8e
Жыл бұрын
LOVE YOUR VIDEO SO MUCH! Now I can understand overreaching!!
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad it helped.
@nuhermd
3 жыл бұрын
Hi Amanda. Please do videos on mortgage and adverse possession. Thank you for these!
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
Hi there, I am planning to cover mortgagees' remedies at some point but won't be covering adverse possession.
@phoebethomas3027
3 жыл бұрын
Great video. I wanted to ask what is the rationale behind having two trustees? Thanks.
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I guess it's more protection for the beneficiary.
@MinecraftDrunkenLads
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@bitesizelaw9163
2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@cookielicious82
8 ай бұрын
Are you able to explain why the trust for the parent are under a constructive trust not a resultant trust? I agree it’s a constructive trust for Boris but not sure why the parents though?
@hathawayamato
Жыл бұрын
At 17:41, is the authority for the rule s2 LPA 1925, or does it include s27 LPA 1925 as well?
@johnoneill5072
2 жыл бұрын
Really clear explanation, do you have a video on legal interests (Prescription easement) & overreaching? I am studying this and it seems only SLA 1925 will overreach and only before TOLATA 1996.
@bitesizelaw9163
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the feedback. I'm sorry but I don't have any videos on prescriptive easements at present. I do have a video on overreaching (it applies post TOLATA and isn't confined to the SLA 1925). Hope it helps.
@elenaclariisa7795
5 ай бұрын
Will this apply to multiple problem questions? Where would be the case where there will be differences? Can you please make more videos on this topic? please is in my exam and I am so scared
@hathawayamato
Жыл бұрын
What is the motivation behind overreaching occuring when there are two legal owners and not when there is only one?
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
To reduce fraud maybe? Don't know the answer - sorry
@hathawayamato
Жыл бұрын
At 16:42, where did the rule mention that the beneficial interest was created under a constructive trust? The conclusion included 'constructive trust', but this wasn't mentioned in the rule. Was there a step that was skipped? Thank you.
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
Hi, I have referred to Lloyds Bank v Rosset as the relevant rule.
@abrarislam1193
Жыл бұрын
if overreach is applicable and the purchaser is not bound by the 3rd party's interests anymore, from whom does the third party seek remedy from then for their equitable rights
@bitesizelaw9163
Жыл бұрын
They can sue the trustees
@chronicallyonline22
2 жыл бұрын
I'm a bit confused - in order for overreaching to be triggered, there must be a conveyance of a legal estate (e.g. a freehold or a leasehold), but how then does the grant of a legal charge to a mortgagee who has paid two trustees trigger overreaching, if the legal charge is only a right to take possession of the relevant legal estate and not the conveyance of the actual legal estate? (not sure if this makes sense; I've most likely misunderstood the whole nature of a legal charge) Thank you!
@bitesizelaw9163
2 жыл бұрын
Hi there, The acquisition of a mortgage over the legal estate can trigger overreaching. A 'purchaser' includes a mortgagee.
@ajithsidhu7183
3 жыл бұрын
Please do more on company and equity and trust please
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
Hi there, Thank you for your comment. I don't know anything about Company law but I will be adding more content on Equity and Trusts. Are there any particular topics you think would be useful? I have done a series on formalites and constitution, and trustees' duties so far.
@ajithsidhu7183
3 жыл бұрын
@@bitesizelaw9163 on secret trust, charitable trust,imperfect gifts, private purpose trust ,tracing and unincorporated organisation please
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
@@ajithsidhu7183 Hi, I've done a series on imperfect gifts (formalities and constitution). I will put tracing on my 'to do 'list but I'm afraid that I don't cover secret trusts, charities, purpose trusts or unincorporated associations. Thanks for the feedback.
@ajithsidhu7183
3 жыл бұрын
@@bitesizelaw9163 welcome.,can you do one on academic opinion on equity as well
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
@@ajithsidhu7183 Hello again, I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean by 'academic opinion on equity'. It takes me several weeks/ months to make my videos so I pick topics that I am very familiar with.
@yizhang4017
3 жыл бұрын
really nice contents, save my exams! please do more on easement and lease, trust, Adverse Possession!!
@bitesizelaw9163
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I do plan to cover easements, leases and trusts of the family home in due course. It takes me a long time to make each video though. Good luck with your exam!
Пікірлер: 58