Hashim never destroy Christianity, never at all. It's the Christian destroy Christianity.
@kamulakamula
4 жыл бұрын
not the christian..but the holy bible itself.
@deficrypto1234
4 жыл бұрын
What exactly is Hashims point? Does he disagree with the standards of the true God? If he agrees with it, is he willing to practise it?
@audiannasilva7185
4 жыл бұрын
That old Indian uncle caught himself nodding along when Hashim was talking about half way, and tried to stop himself haha
@nazmulslater8398
4 жыл бұрын
Ill nod to you everytime.
@muhdnawfal9086
4 жыл бұрын
@@nazmulslater8398 oh my
@covffchannel
4 жыл бұрын
Poor paperboy always getting smashed !
@imbithur607
4 жыл бұрын
@@ruelmashi1121 You can't compare the flood of Noah to the horrific abuse and killing of children in your bible. First God never told Noah to kill any children but in your bible Samuel is told to kill children and babies. Secondly God used a flood, floods happen all over the world even today. There's a difference between a flood natural disasters and your God telling Samuel to go out and kill children for revenge.
@imbithur607
4 жыл бұрын
@@ruelmashi1121 You said "are you saying the flood happened with out the knowledge of..." I don't know why your asking that when I clearly said above "God used a flood" As I said above floods happen all over the world even today this happens because God allows it to happen. You said is " is that not horrific " No its not "horrific" because Noah told the people for 900 years the flood was coming but they did not listen and they refused to go on his ship that is their fault. God gave them a way out but they ignored him as a result they paid with their life's. God didn't target children unlike Samuel who targeted children as commanded by your God Jesus. Unlike Noah's flood the people had a choice to join Noah and be saved or die in the flood they choice to put themselves and their children at risk of the flood, also some people were saved and joined Noah on the ship. Its not horrific or Gods fault if people make bad choice and die even tho god gave them a way out. You can't compare that to the killing of children in your bible stop trying to justify the killing of children. Also God never killed children in Noah flood, if children did die in Noah flood that is not God's fault that is the fault of the parents of those children for not thinking about the safety of their children and joining Noah on the ship. Don't try to blame God for parents bad choices.
@imbithur607
4 жыл бұрын
@@ruelmashi1121 Quran 9:29 is in context of war when Muslims are being killed. The emissary of the Prophet was assassinated while delivering a letter to a romans that is when Quran 9:29 was revealed in context it is a distinct response to aggression in particular the assassination of one of the Prophet’s ambassadors. There's nothing wrong with that.
@imbithur607
4 жыл бұрын
@@ruelmashi1121 However not only did the so called Prince of peace order the killing of children and babies for revenge (1sameul 15) he also allowed the Jews to sell the own daughter into slavery(exodus 21:7). You have problem with Islam because we can fight those who kill us but your okay with the killing and abuse of children in your own bible hypocrisy. As I said before if you looking of abuse and rape and killings go read your bible its full of it.
@imbithur607
4 жыл бұрын
@@ruelmashi1121you said "your prophet rapped Aisha" can you show where? Your bible is full of abuse of children like in 1 Samuel 15 where your God Jesus tells Samuel to kill children and babies for revenge. Or how about Moses "keeping virgin children girls for himself and killing male children in numbers 31.
@ambreenkhan4570
4 жыл бұрын
These Christian missionaries must be getting a very good pay to get insulted everytime
@ibrahimsalah3232
4 жыл бұрын
Ambreen Khan no one insults them. They’re only being humiliated as their religion is being exposed.
@ambreenkhan4570
4 жыл бұрын
@@ibrahimsalah3232 I apologise for using a wrong word
@_eLf45
4 жыл бұрын
i realy like this debates with paperboy this videos just prove that the christians is going againts their own God and their holy scripture and corrupted his teaching,
@reecemesser
4 жыл бұрын
Allah of Quran isn't our God
@reecemesser
4 жыл бұрын
@@arturasustinovas1283 What did you say
@arturasustinovas1283
4 жыл бұрын
@@reecemesser read it again
@A1.4U
4 жыл бұрын
Reece officially Yh cuz ur own god is evil killin innocent ppl our got is just
@mohdshahrizan5665
4 жыл бұрын
Uncle hashim is the best 😽
@ImerSadiku
4 жыл бұрын
15:23 - 17:55. 3 minutes had not yet passed from when Hashim started speaking til he pointed at the man who is taking the time and said: "That was very quick 3 minutes"
@nadeemhussain9923
Жыл бұрын
Debates not started yet but Toilet Paper boy is about to get FLUSHED!!! 😆😂
@LETSUNITEUPONHAQQ
4 жыл бұрын
Looks like paperboy left his papers at home lol . please don't forget to like and subscribe and share
@nadeemhussain9923
Жыл бұрын
7:25 At that Time??? He’s standing on the very spot where his fellow Christians Burned Millions at the Stake in 1960!!!!
@OemerLee
4 жыл бұрын
this christians missionaries are so hypercritic, nobody tells his name why?! The muslims names his names but why do they not tell their names?! A Man who does not tell his name is hypercritic and starts with a lying name. How can you take from such a person. Who hides his name will hide more than this.
@ibrahimsalah3232
4 жыл бұрын
Point number 1) With regards to Surah 18:74-76, first and foremost, there is a difference between the word “Ghulam” and the word “Sabi”. Although the latter does mean the word “boy”, the word “Ghulam” doesn’t. This word is derived from the verb “ightalam” or “Ghalam”. Let’s see what Lisan al-Arab says regarding this: غلم: الغلمة، بالضم، الشهوة....وأغتلم أغتلاماً إذا هاج، وفي الحكم: غلب شهوة. Ghalam: Meaning, fully developed desires (sexual ones)....in other words it is used to refer to someone who has attained full maturity. Reference: Lisan al-Arab, section 12, page 439. So we see the word Ghulam is used to refer to someone who has developed sexual desires. We all know children don’t have that feature. And according to the Raven and the Falcon: Youth versus Old Age in Medieval Arabic Literature, page 42, al-Kahl is called a Ghulam. In case you don’t know what al-Kahl is, it is an elderly man. So we see that the word Ghulam could be used in referring to a boy or an old man. What we have evidence that this “Ghulam” was not a child at all. Which brings me to point number 2. Point number 2) That “kid” wasn’t actually a “kid”. Why do I say this? Well if you pay attention to verse 47, you’d find something really interesting. Something that proves that that “boy” was well past the age of puberty. فَٱنطَلَقَا حَتَّىٰٓ إِذَا لَقِيَا غُلَٰمٗا فَقَتَلَهُۥ قَالَ أَقَتَلۡتَ نَفۡسٗا زَكِيَّةَۢ بِغَيۡرِ نَفۡسٖ لَّقَدۡ جِئۡتَ شَيۡـٔٗا نُّكۡرٗا • Sahih International: So they set out, until when they met a boy, al-Khidh r killed him. [Moses] said, "Have you killed a pure soul for other than [having killed] a soul? You have certainly done a deplorable thing." 18:74 Al-Kahf, Ayah 74 Notice here Musa said “Have you killed a pure soul for other than [having killed] a soul”. What’s really important is when he said “Other than having killed a soul”. This phrase shows that al-Khidr didn’t kill a young boy. This phrase is only used when talking about adults or fully matured people. Why do I say this? Because killing a soul for a soul is the one of the laws in Sharia that only applies to grown-ups. What proof do I have to substantiate this? Well we know that children are not held responsible for anything they do. Ali ibn Abi Talib reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The pen is lifted from three people: a sleeping person until he awakens, a child until he becomes an adult, and an insane person until he regains his sanity.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1423 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani عَنْ عَلِيٍّ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ رُفِعَ الْقَلَمُ عَنْ ثَلَاثَةٍ عَنْ النَّائِمِ حَتَّى يَسْتَيْقِظَ وَعَنْ الصَّبِيِّ حَتَّى يَشِبَّ وَعَنْ الْمَعْتُوهِ حَتَّى يَعْقِلَ وفي رواية أخرى قال وَعَنْ الْغُلَامِ حَتَّى يَحْتَلِمَ 1423 سنن الترمذي كتاب الحدود باب ما جاء فيمن لا يجب عليه الحد 1423 المحدث الألباني خلاصة حكم المحدث صحيح في صحيح الترمذي Want even more proof this word means what I say it means? Let’s open Sahih al-Bukhari shall we? During the night journey, as the Prophet SAAW was passing through one heaven after the other (there are seven heavens), he met Musa (Moses) (Alayhi Assalam) in the sixth heaven. After greeting him, the Prophet SAAW left. And while he was leaving, Moses started to weep. When he was asked why he was crying, he said the following: ........When I went (over the sixth heaven), there I saw Moses. Gabriel said (to me),' This is Moses; pay him your greeting. So I greeted him and he returned the greetings to me and said, 'You are welcomed, O pious brother and pious Prophet.' When I left him (i.e. Moses) he wept. Someone asked him, 'What makes you weep?' Moses said, 'I weep because after me there has been sent (as Prophet) a young man (THE ARABIC WORD IS GHULAM) whose followers will enter Paradise in greater numbers than my followers.' Reference: Sahih al-Bukhari 3887 In-book reference: Book 63, Hadith 113 USC-MSA web (English) reference: Vol. 5, Book 58, Hadith 227 So we see the Prophet Moses Peace be upon him calling the Prophet Muhammad SAAW “Ghulam” and the Prophet SAAW was in his fifties when this event occurred. Point number 3) You didn’t finish the entire story. According to verse 80 of Surah 18, after al-Khidr and Musa finished their journey and were about to part ways, al-Khidr told Musa why he killed that “boy”. وَأَمَّا ٱلۡغُلَٰمُ فَكَانَ أَبَوَاهُ مُؤۡمِنَيۡنِ فَخَشِينَآ أَن يُرۡهِقَهُمَا طُغۡيَٰنٗا وَكُفۡرٗا • Sahih International: And as for the boy, his parents were believers, and we feared that he would overburden them by transgression and disbelief. 18:80 Al-Kahf, Ayah 80 So this verse tells us that the boy would become a disbeliever and transgress against his parents. So al-Khidr had divine revelation telling him that this man would be an evildoer. This was a special power that only prophets had. However, today we don’t have prophets to tell us about divine revelation, so killing them would be unjustified. Al-Khidr even told Musa that Allah would replace the deceased individual with a righteous boy who would be dutiful to his parents. فَأَرَدۡنَآ أَن يُبۡدِلَهُمَا رَبُّهُمَا خَيۡرٗا مِّنۡهُ زَكَوٰةٗ وَأَقۡرَبَ رُحۡمٗا • Sahih International: So we intended that their Lord should substitute for them one better than him in purity and nearer to mercy. 18:81 Al-Kahf, Ayah 81 Case closed!
@aboeAimen
4 жыл бұрын
that irritating man standing behind brother hasim like his qarin attempting to mislead and give wasawis. why don't you stand behind your boy and read the paper in stead.
@mrnice8028
4 жыл бұрын
Poor sound
@udasalleh9
4 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if 7 clips of da'wah with Paperboy will amount to anything... but here we go.
@wolverinescratch
4 жыл бұрын
I like the debates with Paperboy
@mikesuhadi9822
4 жыл бұрын
Uncle Assif why you never try yourself to have own discussion, but when uncle Assif had a chance then he ruined . but he will appear on other people discussion to interfere.
@theshepard7864
4 жыл бұрын
4:20 in2 this video and the double standards starts...need i say anymore...
@rashidqureshi6458
4 жыл бұрын
Rabbit is watching from behind for The carrot. he only find in the park .
@awangs.130
4 жыл бұрын
Wa'alaikum Salam
@Camillo5693
4 жыл бұрын
when ever you see two people debate believe me the one who doesnot answers questions put forth to him and in his answers always deflects to some other subject is always wrong. hashim always replies to paperboys questions but paperboy never answers even one of the question asked by hashim.
@badbritish2061
4 жыл бұрын
THE ATTRIBUTES OF ALLAAH... - وقال الإمام الحافظ أبو عبد الله محمد بن إسحاق بن منده (395 هـ) Imam al-Haafiz Abu ‘Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ishaaq ibn Mandah (d. 395) said, في إثبات صفة اليدين لله تعالى: affirming the divine attribute of the two hands: " باب ذكر قول الله عز وجل : Chapter on the verse in which Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says ( ما منعك أن تسجد لما خلقت بيدي ) (Allah) said: ‘O Iblees (Satan)! What prevents you from prostrating yourself to one whom I have created with Both My Hands’” [Saad 38:75]. و ذكر ما يُستدل به من كلام النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم على أن الله جل وعز خلق آدم عليه السلام بيدين حقيقة ".And he quoted words of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that could prove that Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, created Adam (peace be upon him) with His two hands in a real sense. وقال في إثبات الوجه لله تعالى: And he said, affirming the divine attribute of the countenance or face: باب قول الله جل وعز : Chapter on the verse in which Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says كل شيء هالك إلا وجهه (“Everything will perish save His Face” ) [al-Qasas 28:88]. ، وقال الله عز وجل : And Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says ; ( ويبقى وجه ربك ذو الجلال ) ، “And the Face of your Lord full of Majesty and Honour will abide forever” [ar-Rahmaan 55:27] وذكر ما ثبت عن النبي مما يدل على حقيقة ذلك . And he quoted proven reports from the Prophet which indicate that this is to be understood in a real sense. انتهى من "الرد على الجهمية" ص 68، 94 End quote from ar-Radd ‘ala al-Jahamiyyah, p. 68, 94 وقال الإمام حافظ المغرب أبو عمر يوسف بن عبد الله بن عبد البر الأندلسي القرطبي المالكي (463 هـ) : Imam Haafiz al-Maghrib Abu ‘Umar Yoosuf ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi al-Qurtubi al-Maaliki (d. 463) said: " ومن حق الكلام أن يُحمل على حقيقته In principle, words are to be understood in a real sense, ، حتى تتفق الأمة أنه أريد به المجاز؛ unless the ummah is unanimously agreed that something is not to be understood in a real sense إذ لا سبيل إلى اتباع ما أنزل إلينا من ربنا إلا على ذلك ، and is rather a metaphor, because there is no way to follow what has been revealed to us from our Lord except on that basis وإنما يوجه كلام الله عز وجل إلى الأشهر والأظهر من وجوهه ، . Rather we should understand the words of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, on the basis of the most apparent and clearest meaning, ما لم يمنع من ذلك ما يجب له التسليم . unless there is a strong reason to do otherwise ولو ساغ ادعاء المجاز لكل مدع ما ثبت شيء من العبارات ، .. If it were justifiable for anyone to claim that something is a metaphor, then no statement would mean anything. وجل الله عز وجل عن أن يخاطب إلا بما تفهمه العرب في معهود مخاطباتها مما يصح معناه عند السامعين ، Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, is far above saying anything in the Qur’an except that which is said in a manner that may be understood by the Arabs on the basis of their style of speech. والاستواء معلوم في اللغة Istiwa’ (rising above (the Throne)) is well known and understood in Arabic ومفهوم ; it means ، وهو العلو والارتفاع على الشيء والاستقرار والتمكن فيه ". rising above something and becoming settled and established. وقال He said ناقلاً إجماع أهل السنة على ذلك , narrating that there was consensus among Ahl as-Sunnah concerning this matter : " أهل السنة مجمعون على الإقرار بالصفات : Ahl as-Sunnah are unanimously agreed that all the divine attributes الواردة كلها في القرآن والسنة والإيمان بها mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah are to be affirmed, and we are to believe in them ، وحملها على الحقيقة لا على المجاز and understand them in a real sense, not as metaphorical. ، إلا أنهم لا يكيفون شيئا من ذلك But they do not discuss the nature of any of them ، وأما أهل البدع والجهمية والمعتزلة كلها والخوارج فكلهم ينكرها . As for the followers of innovation, the Jahamis, all the Mu‘tazilah and the Khaarijis, all of them deny the divine attributes ، ولا يحمل شيئا منها على الحقيقة and do not understand them in a true sense; ، ويزعمون أن من أقر بها مشبه ;they claimed that the one who affirms them is likening Him to His creation. ، وهم عند من أثبتها نافون للمعبود According to those who do affirm the divine attributes, these people are denying God. . والحق فيما قاله القائلون بما نطق به كتاب الله وسنة رسوله وهم أئمة الجماعة والحمد لله " . The truth is on the side of those who base their understanding on the wording of the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messengers, and they are the leaders of al-jamaa‘ah, praise be to Allah. انتهى من "التمهيد" (7/ 131، 145). End quote from at-Tamheed, 7/131, 145
@yogeshdesai5999
4 жыл бұрын
It means Allah is a Supreme Person.
@ekkopoohbear9236
4 жыл бұрын
Romans 12:17-19 New King James Version (NKJV) 17 Repay no one evil for evil. Have regard for good things in the sight of all men. 18 If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men. 19 Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord This verse defeats all the shariah lovers out there. Justice belongs to God and should not be in the hands of any shariah police
@shaami8622
4 жыл бұрын
You know in the sharia there is the ability to forgive, right? In fact, when it comes to the sharia, forgiving is highly recommended. This jaw doesnt just serve justice where it is due, but will also teach muslims to forgive even the harshes of actions.
@ekkopoohbear9236
4 жыл бұрын
@anas kh how can man give justice when we all have sinned. No one is sinless except for jesus christ..that's why we should not be executing people because jesus christ said let who is without sin cast the first stone..he basically said that the punishers of people are just as guilty and should by no means applying justice..only jesus christ can apply justice..
@ekkopoohbear9236
4 жыл бұрын
@anas kh I didn't say to removed mans judicial justice you need that in a modern society.I'm talking about islam shariah law flogging gays chopping off hands for stealing and stoning people for adultery. In a normal judeo christian society that is not normal. You know exactly what I mean.
@ekkopoohbear9236
4 жыл бұрын
@anas kh if you ask me those who are applying harsh punishments should be punished just as well. That's why jesus called them hypocrites. Punishment should be left up to God alone..The bible says that man looks on the outside appearance but God studies the heart so no you can't get away with whatever sin you do and dont repent. I find it funny how you make fun of western societies but immigrants and muslims are all want to.come.here
@ekkopoohbear9236
4 жыл бұрын
kh so your telling me.that you want to lived in a shariah based country. That is the biggest joke anyone can say. Muslims are leaving their islamic countries in bunches to come to western countries because you're not only guaranteed religious freedom but protection from.religious police and Islamic state only goverment
@edidarma
4 жыл бұрын
Ngeri ah...
@MadMaxNado
4 жыл бұрын
dont go to paperboy
@bigwpg204
4 жыл бұрын
6:35 my question would be who are you to say what nation or time deserves certain judgement from god thats for allah to decide
@5thdawg917
4 жыл бұрын
Not gonna lie, it was a dead debate. Lost interest.
@barungirl6477
4 жыл бұрын
❤❤❤
@kerrangzapplin
4 жыл бұрын
Hmmm paper just got nothing to present.. he got smashed. The way i see it, if it is a proper timed debate, Christian argument just cannot beat the argument from muslim. This is the truth always prevail. To Christian out there, be more arrogant and stubborn as you may but you christians just do not follow the teaching of Jesus. You guys follow the teaching of Paul..
@Kevn37
3 жыл бұрын
You can find both sides getting humiliated if you look for it.
Пікірлер: 97