You guys really should post a warning that these lectures are really addictive. People should know coming in that they could be spending the next several hours watching RI videos.
@thekaxmax
8 жыл бұрын
go check the Tvtropes article on that effect. :p
@erictaylor5462
8 жыл бұрын
thekaxmax link?
@suntoritime
8 жыл бұрын
It's an inside joke. TVTropes is a website that is highly addictive (even more so than these RI videos) and whenever someone posts a link to a TVT article it's common to reply with something along the lines of 'there goes the rest of my day' or the like.
@TheChuchurocket
7 жыл бұрын
Applications: medicine, energy, creating and destroying entire universes. You know, just another waste of tax payer money.
@AvatarOfBhaal
5 жыл бұрын
Would recommend looking into the many university channels available!
@brentwalker8596
5 жыл бұрын
I love how she laughs at things which only a small number of people would find funny. Very endearing quality and shows how brilliant she is.
@Django44
Жыл бұрын
Good observation. To me she has an attitude seldom seen in adults, a child-like (not childish) curiosity about the world. Fortunate are those who work with her.
@ronpearson1912
Ай бұрын
If you are finanically independant you can seek out who you "work" with. That should be the aspiration of every scientist, your only there as everyone is nice and curious, as soon as the environment is cut throat, ruthess or toxic then you just disappear.
@TheEVEInspiration
6 жыл бұрын
Honestly, her voice is gold...her jokes disarming and it makes me feel great every time I hear it.
@jackpullen3820
7 жыл бұрын
At 14:12 She grounds out the high voltage charge.You don't want to forget and yes these videos are addictive! TY
@theflyingfool
8 жыл бұрын
What a lovely lady! Such enthusiasm and passion for her subject. I learnt a lot watching this discourse and thanks for the humour, even if it was geeky! :)
@DemoniteBL
7 жыл бұрын
Making others a compliment means you're a pervert now? What?
@pdr.
4 жыл бұрын
@@DemoniteBL Smart people are attractive to all of us, that is our nature.
@jeffreyjaystein
3 жыл бұрын
@@DemoniteBL geeky is the new sexy!
@AntoniGawlikowski
3 жыл бұрын
This is THE BEST lecture I've ever had the pleasure to listen to. Really top-notch!
@jenko701
8 жыл бұрын
This lady is a great example for our young people. Just inspiring .
@richardedgar2783
2 жыл бұрын
Great talk. I really enjoyed listening to you bring back memories. You are in an exciting field with great potential for the future. Keep up with your good work! As a young engineer working in my employer's Super Power Lab my first job was to take a 10 foot section of an "S-band" linear accelerator and marry it to a high power crossed field amplifier in a single vacuum for a medical application. I went on from that application to design high power microwave tubes for military radar and industrial applications. Later I led a group for over two decades working on high power industrial microwave designs for many applications in the food, foundry, ceramics, nuclear waste remediation, medical sterilization, and even power beaming to name just a few. I hope you are still at it and wish you the very best.
@ruimartins2615
8 жыл бұрын
Sure BBC will pick Suzie for documentaries. Pleasant presentation, not too heavy.
@ruimartins2615
8 жыл бұрын
More than beauty, the mind matters: I.e. Carl Sagan and Jacob Bronowski where quite ugly for me, but amazing. Hannah has a sharp and clear speech and is funny! Alice Roberts is beautiful.
@AlphaNumeric123
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent talk, both in the sense of the content and the speaker. No surprise that she’s an Oxonian through and through, as this was excellent. One of the very best RI talks I’ve seen.
@bobd5119
7 жыл бұрын
It's fun to imagine what Meitner, Curie, Rutherford, and Thomson would have to say if they could listen to Ms Sheehy's talk.
@TrapperAaron
3 жыл бұрын
K M
@ObeySilence
6 жыл бұрын
This is like Ted but without being shit.
@RFC3514
6 жыл бұрын
TED is quite good. TEDx, on the other hand, is kind of amateur night.
@codebulletin
5 жыл бұрын
She is sexy
@codebulletin
5 жыл бұрын
I wanna marry her
@erictaylor5462
8 жыл бұрын
4:00 In the words of my favorite scientist, in responding to the question, "But what use are they?" "What use is a new born baby?"
@erictaylor5462
4 жыл бұрын
@Heads Mess Well, it can be food, or if your lucky, a teaching tool.
@GodlikeIridium
3 жыл бұрын
"Get the particles, give them some energy, bend them around the corner. Done. NO!" xD Love it.
@jordiewalters871
6 жыл бұрын
I've watched this about 300 times and I love it, it's beautiful😊
@Houmer
5 жыл бұрын
I could listen to Suzies voice for the rest of my life.
@dkathrens77
4 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't need to listen, just watch her lips moving :D
@turkerozturk6889
3 жыл бұрын
Listen to this woman also: Sophie Ellis-Bextor
@Dr10Jeeps
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Very informative and interesting. Thank you RI and Dr. Sheehy.
@nicolezyta3072
3 жыл бұрын
Ri has some of the best lectures i've found!
@robadams5799
2 жыл бұрын
I will freely admit that I clicked on this link because I saw a pretty lady wearing a mic. She's got a great accent and she has the crucial ability to simplify complex ideas. When she got to the part about resonance, I immediately remembered a commercial featuring Ella Fitzgerald's voice shattering a wine glass.
@shaneavion4390
2 жыл бұрын
Another person genuinely amazed by this intelligent and unique person 👌 being true to yourself is the only way you'll never lose-
@pedrovelazquez138
8 жыл бұрын
I like the way she shares her knowledge with the audience. She makes it look so easy.
@ctdieselnut
2 жыл бұрын
This is a awesome channel and I'm very thankful they post these vids, let alone for free. It's a beautiful thing.
@raenayers815
Жыл бұрын
My responses to these videos may be late, but I feel somebody somewhere might appreciate them so here I go; Thanks for the BRILLIANT presentation. I spent a while thinking "Oh particle accelerator, I get it", but you've realy demonstrated great depth that I must have been previously missing, as that's the only way to explain the racing thoughts this video gave me. Miniature accelerators, suuuper sized orbital accelerators, from medicine to magic.
@mohannadwazwaz5111
Жыл бұрын
الشكر الجزيل للعالِمة والقناة الناشرة
@felixthecrazy
8 жыл бұрын
I love how she has written in all these moments of things she finds legitimately humorous, but kind of fall flat on the audience.
@xorboy
7 жыл бұрын
The audience is always a bit dull at the royal institution... :C You can sometimes see it in the lecturers, when their joy dies, and they just give the lecture go get it over with. I think this one was really good!
@TheDruidKing
7 жыл бұрын
You'll love this then... What's the presenters name? Gesundheit! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha hahaha haha ha no?
@youcanfoolmeonce
6 жыл бұрын
+felixthecrazy There is nothing funny about a ten billion dollar accelerator that creates a particle which disappears a billionth of a second after the (proton) collision. Aye, there is tremendous amount of data that came came about, and the fizzisists can study it for decades! For six figure salaries...
@RogerBarraud
6 жыл бұрын
+Thomas Anderson (Neo?): Attention Span? What use is a brain, if you can't think? ;-)
@gunnargrautnes4451
6 жыл бұрын
youcanfoolmeonce I agree. Just imagine all the stone axes and deer hides we could have bought for that money! We could have afforded not to kill of our elderly for a winter or two, perhaps we could even hold a great feast to honour the Great Orange One, to ensure bountiful hunts for years to come? My family could have had enough sea shells to pay the mortgage on our cave, instead of having to sell three of my siblings to Othvar Man-eater...
@hamradio3716
2 жыл бұрын
A truly excellent speaker and lovely manner. More women like her are needed as STEM role models for young women.
@slowburntm3584
4 жыл бұрын
This kinda of knowledge just available for practically free just blows my mind!!
@bokchoiman
3 жыл бұрын
10/10 talk. You've enlightened me to the world of particle accelerators.
@Neura1net
4 жыл бұрын
17:00 - 17:09 400MHz is 400 Million oscillations per second not 400 oscillations per second. Otherwise interesting talk.
@gregalexander4660
2 жыл бұрын
NDT freq? 17-05 was destroyed. But the 787 Flew as a graphite tube. Why is there carbon fiber in the vax? [Just asking 5G] I have asteroids!
@gregalexander4660
2 жыл бұрын
A bit of CERN HUMOR...
@orp0piru
7 жыл бұрын
lol (26:10) those guys working at ISIS must have a great time at airports.
@robadams5799
2 жыл бұрын
I grew up in Burbank, Illinois, about 40 miles from Fermilab.
@Sc0ttPrian
Жыл бұрын
I never thought I'd see a resonance cascade.
@AGAMTV108
7 жыл бұрын
Perfect and pleasing one.....many many thanks Suize
@AntiProtonBoy
6 жыл бұрын
Great to see Aussie physicists contributing to great things abroad.
@mitzvahgolem8366
8 жыл бұрын
Excellent!! I am sending this to my daughter as an inspirational video. שלום
@ashoknaganur8551
2 жыл бұрын
Studied about. The working applications technology and particle physics in accelerator
@dghart76
6 жыл бұрын
These talks are more entertaining than anything you can find on television . If science was favoured over celebrity society would be all the more richer
@rimckd825
4 жыл бұрын
I dumped my cable tv service - have internet only now
@jono.7350
7 жыл бұрын
She Explains Her Work So Thoroughly... Her Laugh Is Super Cute To!👍😊
@101virtualtours
Жыл бұрын
Amazingly performed. I became infatuated with it all.
@fleXcope
8 жыл бұрын
She should have been my physics teacher at my high school...
@crabcrab2024
4 жыл бұрын
Definitely not! You wouldn’t have been able to write. You right hand would be constantly busy, school boy.
@infidel6728
4 жыл бұрын
I would never have skipped that class, and would have listened raptly.
@erictaylor5462
8 жыл бұрын
38:30 I would bet, just based on our relative intelligence that her guess would be better than mine.
@dineshhosamani2924
7 жыл бұрын
A very educational video, I often see it. Also I appeal to people please don't post vulgar and sexist comments. She is a scientist and just because she is a woman we should not slander her we should be proud of her and support her with constructive feedback
@travisfitzwater8093
2 жыл бұрын
There is some lost energy (particles) when a beam is coaxed in more than one direction at once. Meaning in a Zed Vector? Or, are you saying the entire beam is lost if you change the algebra of the curve to bend in an additional direction?
@danielash1704
3 жыл бұрын
I would add statically charge energy from lambs hairs and glass rods or curved glass sheets and spacers to static ballance.
@aryehfinklestein9041
6 жыл бұрын
Especially marvelous presentation...enlightening. Thankyou.
@justimagine2403
Жыл бұрын
I so want to go back to school. Especially science.
@A.Lifecraft
4 жыл бұрын
As an interdisciplinary guy, i am amused by the fact that particle physicists only recently came up with the idea to run through resonances. Because this is what railroad engineers do for over 100 years now. Railroad suspension and wheels are designed in a way that they encounter resonance at about 5-20kph, because no train will go 5-20 kph for any extended period of time.
@fbcaware8805
4 жыл бұрын
Science and research tend to develop in silos, which is very detrimental to finding simple solutions to common problems.
@A.Lifecraft
4 жыл бұрын
@@fbcaware8805 Yes, also there ist little encouragement for people with a broad set of interests. Usually you have to dive in deep in the very discipline you choose to study and it leaves little time and ressources for anything else. This ist why many highly intelligent people abort university.
@A.Lifecraft
4 жыл бұрын
@Dirk Knight try to grasp what i am saying first before insulting me. This is not about some general understanding of harmonic oscillation. This is about a specific way to deal with it in engineering. A way that has been implemented in railroad engineering for about 150 years and is used to earthquake-proof buildings for at least 50 years.
@A.Lifecraft
4 жыл бұрын
@Dirk Knight This video is titled "Accelerators reimagined". According to what you are stating here, this "reimagination" should have happened in 1930 - only it did not. This kind of physical knowledge was implemented in railway engineering by the early 1800s but it never made it into accelerator design until now, yet you see an opportunity to throw your butthurtness at me... Whatever you come up with now, i will not read it and will not answer to it. You are in my opinion not a person worth perceiving.
@Serotonindude
2 жыл бұрын
wow! respect! i was shouting out when she showed us the rotating sattle thingy: yes! that is physics! it explains it suddendly! it made me so happy today! :)
@electrospank
5 жыл бұрын
The platter used to spin the demo quadrupole trap is out of balance. The unit is beautifully built so I expect it didn't start that way. With all the smart people in the room I'm sure it can be repaired.
@travisfitzwater8093
2 жыл бұрын
Study interfering with the magnets. Get Goggles deep blue to work out how the winding of wires of brass mixed with some mercury interlineated or interlocking interlaced interphased and bolts of brass shot through the windings and lead steel wood. A wooden bolt like a telephone poll but made out of compress cedar but ONLY with the knots of the tree as the raw material and some binding agent. Also with wormy chestnut and redwood. DB will spit out like a million different ways you can bend an energy beam. Then build a a two figure 8 shaped loop that has been twisted over itself enough to stack vertically and drill giant deep bore holes around the perimeter filled with wave absorbing material that will divert waves travelling across the top of the ground into energy transferred into them to damping seismic interference. Save a 100km of digging.
@maxdoubt5219
6 жыл бұрын
Way over my head, but impressive and enchanting.
@gregalexander4660
2 жыл бұрын
Inverted DOME = Free Energy = What to the Fear Most? People Knowing [35]
@douro20
4 жыл бұрын
The cyclotron at TRIUMF will continue to be important in the coming years due to its exceptionally bright proton beam and the ability to accelerate rare isotopes.
@lasuperneta3042
Жыл бұрын
Miss Sheehy are You for real?? All that intelligence, beauty an sympathy bundled in one individual is simply too difficult to believe… all my good will and admiration for You… Best regards!! Victor Micha Mexico City. 🇲🇽 ✌🏽😎
@amusedz2012
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if there is a correlation between that saddle shape and the idea that the universe is saddle shaped.
@chriswhitt6618
2 жыл бұрын
What a brilliant video this was. Thanks
@ThePixel1983
2 жыл бұрын
Sooo... What would we need to divert asteroids using a particle cannon? Would it be easier on earth or in orbit?
@zubble7144
4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Sheely, have you considered augmenting your Paul trap design together with the motivating force of a Cyclotron? IOW use a synchronized electric charge to attenuate the attractive (counter-containment force) of the alternating magnetic fields.
@MrPinknumber
8 жыл бұрын
pretty interesting talk :)
@SG-SilverGaming
4 жыл бұрын
How can someone dislike this A deep explanation
@quill444
6 жыл бұрын
We could simply build the World's Greatest Linear Accelerator between Texas and California, and then just let 'certain people' *think* it's a WALL.....(!)
@Peter_Scheen
6 жыл бұрын
And you would proof the Earth is not flat at the same time!!!
@mikakorhonen5715
5 жыл бұрын
You are talking about Hyberloop. :)
@TheBukaj150
5 жыл бұрын
LOL hyper loop linear accelerator to aid humans in genetic development smash to groups of people together to get a supertior new race of home spaien evulcian
@DanielRetureau
4 жыл бұрын
please post the concept to the White House Washington DC USA; & thank you it's a wonderful idea !
@justincallahan972
4 жыл бұрын
And the price might ultimately be less than a wall. Show financial benefits and the administration might go for it.
@evolvedcopper2205
4 жыл бұрын
Thumbnail 10/10 and lecture 11/10
@martinwilliams9866
Жыл бұрын
How do you actually know how many stars there are in the Universe, not just the observable Universe, but the unobservable one as well?
@squarerootof2
Жыл бұрын
I's very simple: you make a guess and you establish unquestionable scientific consensus, presenting that guess as a scientific "fact". If anybody disagrees then you just ignore them or ridicule them.
@natasfresas
8 жыл бұрын
Great! I love this channel.
@sirvapalot
4 жыл бұрын
me too its straight up educational and i love youtube more than ever im all about understanding i have questions
@monabuster312
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent Talk
@PhotonicEmission
8 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, I work for Varian. I didn't know that Suzie was talking at the RI. Why doesn't my company tell me things like this?!
@andyb2339
7 жыл бұрын
Alternating gradient at 32:00!
@daveb5041
7 жыл бұрын
They should accelerate the particle with the U-Beam. It's CEO doesn't have a degree in engineering and it definitely shows.
@ronlokk
5 жыл бұрын
I love the RI videos, but I have to keep going back Jay Leno's garage to get back down to earth and then come back here and try to understand it all. Wew!
@bobgoodall1603
2 жыл бұрын
Just wondering if a flood of electrons could be used to reduce space charge effects.
@lk9650
7 жыл бұрын
Number of atoms in the human body is about 10^27. Number of stars in the observable universe is about 10^24
@LocalMarksFishing
Жыл бұрын
She's stunning! Her eyes must be infinitely dense coz I'm falling for them!
@DanceAffectionist
8 жыл бұрын
One of the DSLR cameras used for filming has so many dead pixels that it contaminates the image quite noticeably.
@cupajoesir
7 жыл бұрын
talk nerdy to me
@douro20
4 жыл бұрын
There is a video of various Paul traps acting upon dust particles in the air...
@FrancisMaxino
4 жыл бұрын
There is no reason why a particle accelerator couldn't be reduced to a small size and the particles accelerated faster and faster in the same loop then diverted from their cyclic path when reaching the desired velocity. Calling the Universe 'pretty massive' is bit of an understatement when the known observed universe is utterly gargantuan on a scale barely conceivable in distance.
@michaelbourrell2693
3 жыл бұрын
The moon is mostly iron right? And the center of the earth is a big iron core that rotates to help create earths magnetic field right? So instead of trying to rotate the moon to create a massive energy field why don't we build a synclatron around the moon and use the speed of the particles inside the synclatron to mimic the earth core and allow us to create a giant gravity wave projector.
@nadabutsi7537
8 жыл бұрын
Great lecture! :)
@MrKay-fm4kd
4 жыл бұрын
Is proton-beam decay acceleration necessary for nuclear waste recycling in a Thorium reactor if you use a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)?
@johntowner1893
4 жыл бұрын
Definitely my kind of Girl. Although I like the audience question and answer section to be included, It felt like the single audience question included at the end was asked by someone with a self interest in the area of “investment” that he inquired about re high energy particle accelerators and a particular innovation therein.
@ericaspitzfaden4280
2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely Brilliant!
@jayyyzeee6409
7 жыл бұрын
At 17:04, mentioned 400 MHz saying that's 400 times per second, but should have said 400 million times per second. She corrected it at 17:20 though.
@Lothnothus
7 жыл бұрын
GREAT COMMENT.
@treatb09
3 жыл бұрын
i can tell you waht is going to happen when you reach the speed of light with that thing. if you can perfectly time a pulse to prevent the particle from slowing back down. it's going to fall apart. you'll need a detector lining the walls.
@ZeedijkMike
8 жыл бұрын
Very nice lecture.
@marc-andrebrunet5386
8 жыл бұрын
je suis amoureux de la science grâce à RI....Bravo Suzie
@sanjuansteve
7 жыл бұрын
It seems the most obvious & logical explanation for a #particle acting like an #AxialWave when moving thru space is that it's orbiting something (a dark matter particle perhaps) or visa versa. It's not unlike Earth being pulled into a wobble by the moon, or a distant star's wobble evidencing planet orbits making our trajectory as we fly thru space have an axial wave (packet) as well. And since we think we know undetectable dark matter exists but don't yet know where it's distributed, this seems the most logical possibility. What do you think? This could explain the double slit experiment results, including with a detector with some interaction between the dark matter and the detector.
@TheEvilmooseofdoom
6 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry but from what I know everything you said is largely nonsense.
@sanjuansteve
6 жыл бұрын
What theory do you believe best explains wave particle duality for example?
@troelsfischerthomsen1892
7 жыл бұрын
Hi, i was watching a video on lathe work, and how resonant can ruin surface finish, but constantly accelerating and de accelerating the RPM would help. That might work on the turntable model too, you mentioned experiment similar in the video but to be honest i didn't that part
@CDeruiter5963
8 жыл бұрын
It was a very interesting talk, but I had trouble understanding the resonance graph at 37:30 can someone break it down for me? Is she trying to show that 2.5 is the ideal value to reach for both vertical and horizontal oscillations?
@garysamuel9521
5 жыл бұрын
Can an accelerated proton beam be created into a Bose Einstein Condensate, of even a low number of protons, thus overcoming the mutual Coulomb force? Something like the electron pairs in superconducting circuits. Or would all of the protons’ positive charges be somehow altered so that the proton packet could not be controlled? So, fewer protons but better aimed and more dense thus achieving a satisfactory collision rate. Where is the positive charge in a ‘plasma’ of nucleons made of protons and neutrons inside an atom’s nucleus? Could the quark/gluon and virtual q/g flux be studied better if beams of light weight element ions were collided?
@jorymil
10 ай бұрын
Bose-Einstein condensates happen at extremely low energies; the opposite of what's going on inside a particle accelerator. They're also generally made with somewhat heavy atoms like rubidium, rather than bare protons, hydrogen atoms, helium atoms, etc.
@NathanOkun
5 жыл бұрын
Can the Paul trap be compared to the conical scan radar tracker, where you use the low-power null at the exact center of the beam by cocking the power beam slightly off at an angle and rotating the antenna to make this beam rapidly go round the central axis, which can be very small, allowing very tight tracking of a target?
@railgap
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder what the beam cross sections / diameters are (average in storage rings, not in lenses or experiment halls) or diameters are of the 1MW class machines. Designing beam dumps for those must be fun. O_O
@all-sorts
3 жыл бұрын
Things are moving on🤙
@Mrcloc
6 жыл бұрын
So why not have more accelerators in parallel, each focusing their beam to a common output?
@imetr8r
2 жыл бұрын
In order to avoid protons repelling one another and defocusing, why couldn't you accelerate protons in single file along each wave crest? At 30Mhz you would have 30 million protons per second.
@dante224real1
6 жыл бұрын
the one thing interesting here is that you can charge devices wirelessly. too bad focused wires are more convinient and available
@michaelwiberg9173
4 жыл бұрын
Experience a four sided pyramid as it comes to its top most point it would have less mass as we go to the base it’ll have more mass. Now if you use one AC field current upon anode cathode north/ south polarity yet alternating this machine will drive all matter at its specific density rates. However when two are employed they’ll rectify one another and build a positive ionic coil of electrons out the top inversely it’ll create a negative ionic double helix wave form. This drives matter as it escapes gravity. I imagine a varied cross ignition style with many polarities in relationship.This is a force which has gravity waves to fly with. Two AC fields with dc polarity being what’s being created mass , bolts of lightning are fields of negative energy positive fields find and travel neg fields to ground. Opposites occur in duality neg ions have mass however.
@NorwayT
4 жыл бұрын
Why on earth would you spend an astronomical amount of money to make an accelerator to break down radioactive waste, when a fully working Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) already was built and ran continuously from 1957-1960 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory - but then unfortunately being sidelined by the Uranium Lobby in Washington DC. An MRSE using Thorium (or Uranium) as main fuels could easily burn nuclear waste at a fraction of the cost of an accelerator AND actually produce energy, as opposed to using a lot of energy in an accelerator. Thorium is in abundant supply. It is actually a waste product of rare earth mines, which is causing considerable headache. Burn it together with radioactive waste and make money and energy instead of mindless spending, and use accelerators to advance science instead. Think again!
@morbid1.
8 жыл бұрын
who invent names like "up", "down", "strange" or "charm" ?
@VideosVonAlex
8 жыл бұрын
I believe it was Murray Gell-Mann.
@eldritchcookie7210
8 жыл бұрын
univentive people
@eXtremeDR
8 жыл бұрын
Duck Dogers and Nuck Chorris
@benwilliams5457
8 жыл бұрын
A tale I was told, possibly apocryphal, was thus. There was first a fairly wild hypothesis introducting the Up and Down particles with + one third and -two thirds of a unit charge. They were simply named because they were written as up and down arrows to avoid the confusion of reusing + and - symbols for unit charge. When the hypothesis not only appeared to have some merit but demanded another pair at higher energies, those irreverent young turks of science named them quarks after creatures from a nonsense poem (instead of the usual turgid classicisms) and decided that the logical names top and bottom should be replaced with Truth and Beauty. Ultimately, they lost the fight for whimsy over sense but not before the third, intermediate energy pair were hypothesised and named Strangeness and Charm to match. Unlike T and B, there was no sensible alternate for these last two and the names stuck, though modified to lose some of there elegance. To me, though, the higher energy quarks will always be Truth and Beauty, Strangeness and Charm.
@91722854
7 жыл бұрын
in physics, names are just names, you wouldn't understand it without the corresponding maths and its physical properties etc
Can y'alls stop comparing " *number of stars in the entire universe* " to the bit of science ya *do* 'understand'? [The # of stars in Universe is completely Unknown] It's a good talk but ugghh...
Пікірлер: 491