The evidence is plain as day, Judas was set up and accused falsely by the writers of the Gospels you only have to get your bible and pen and paper, and note how the story of Judas differs, the Christian scriptures present conflicting reports in many details concerning Judas, Mark the first Gospel narrates, ( 1 ) Judas of his own accord went to the chief priests to betray Jesus, ( 2 ) they were glad to hear his offer, ( 3 ) they promised to give him money to complete the deed to betray Jesus, and ( 4 ), from that time on, Judas watched for an opportunity to betray Jesus, Mark omits the motive for Judas's betrayal, Matthew's narratives makes two additions to Mark 14:10--11, Matthew 26:14--15, has Judas asking the chief priests what he would receive in exchange for delivering Jesus, the chief priests counts out thirty pieces of silver coins, the text implies that the money was given To Judas at this time, Luke 22:3--6, adds three additional facts that do not appear in Matthew or Mark's account, ( 1 ) Satan entered Judas, ( 2 ) Judas communed with the chief priests and captains ( 3 ) and Judas sought an opportunity to betray Jesus in the absence of the multitude, similar to Mark, Luke's Judas did not received any money up-front, Luke 22 :4--5, and they were glad, and covenanted/agreed to give him money, in contradiction, Matthew 26- 14--15, reports that Judas received his money up-front, this account in Matthew prepares the writer for the repentance and the returning of the money in Matthew 27:3--10, in conclusion, in Mark and Luke, Judas did not, received any money up-front, the chief priests only agreed to enter into an agreement to give him money, John's Gospel contradicts the Synoptics adding elements that no other gospel knew about, like Judas was A Thief, suggesting that the story was developed over-time, but as sure as the sun shines Judas, if he existed at all was falsely accused.
Пікірлер: 9