Would love to see an in depth video on what you feel between your Roland builds vs that stock 17. Even throw the light fighter in for comparison
@RobinsonOhio
Ай бұрын
If you listen to the P&S podcast the man himself who made the “Roland” said it’s not meant to be 100% reliable and was never made to be a primary fighting gun, It’s a secondary to be used in worst case scenario in low light-no light fighting. People glamorized the Roland because it looks cool, There are WAY better options now like a radian after burner on a G19/G45 that doesn’t have the issues the Roland does.
@reker.a5790
Ай бұрын
@@RobinsonOhio I shot that and the sage comp side by side and prefer the sage. Couldn’t tell a recoil difference and one I can take apart without tools
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Ай бұрын
@@reker.a5790 I think the KKM comped G45 is the best shooting Glock. That’s after shooting KKM comped 22s, 19s and 17s, 34s. I have no issues with reliability. That’s also something very clear from the early days of the Roland Special explosion; the issue is your ammo. Cheap, light 9mm is unreliable. Shoot duty ammo in your duty gun and you won’t have a problem. My comped G45 has seen a ton of use and has the factory recoil spring; it sees boring NATO 9mm ball and gold dots. I don’t buy in to any of the current crop of micro or smaller comps; the compensator needs a large chamber/port to be effective. No reason to go small on a G45 as getting it to G34 length is pretty much a non issue especially when using a weapon light.
@reker.a5790
Ай бұрын
@@AmericanAdlerauge1775 all I am saying, would be to give one a try if a friend had one. You may very well be surprised. I was.
@Spudinske
Ай бұрын
Is that an insta360 go 3 on your hat? How the hell is it so clear with HDR and 4k? You using some upscaling software?
@AmericanAdlerauge1775
Ай бұрын
@@Spudinske yes, insta 360 go 3. No software or anything, just normal settings
Пікірлер: 9