What a fantastic opportunity to hear the author himself of a great system of thought. I feel enriched by this.
@EstherOdonohue
4 жыл бұрын
My psychology lecturer got everyone in my course to watch this and identify which of Piagets cognitive development stages are being shown in the clip. So helpful! Especially when it comes to developing pychoanaylic skills! 🙂
@MrCrunchybizzle
12 жыл бұрын
it's a lot easier to learn this stuff seeing the actual man talk about it. I wish this was a part of in class learning.
@zennway4101
5 жыл бұрын
The most astounding discoveries are usually done in the light of simplicity,and of course of truths.
@FriendlyFactory
11 жыл бұрын
My professor in a Childhood Development course I'm taking showed this video to us in class. Incredibly helpful.
@ChristopherFontes
12 жыл бұрын
So much cooler then a book ; )
@TheElusiveReality
3 жыл бұрын
The subtitles aren’t directly translating him, it’s more like a condensed version of what he says
@parkercarter7062
11 жыл бұрын
très enrichissant!
@heavyman217
11 жыл бұрын
@bulletinthewind All children go through the same stages of development, but some take longer and some go through the stages faster. Piaget's studies are accepted and taught at very prestigious schools throughout the world. So on behalf of the world, you should agree with Piaget :)
@chrisalyne
12 жыл бұрын
Love jean piaget !
@tomhopf
11 жыл бұрын
Could you help translate where it errors? I'd greatly appreciate it!
@marioriospinot
10 жыл бұрын
Nice.
@potugadu5160
11 жыл бұрын
Am I missing something wrt his Chomsky reference at 6:07 ? Chomsky never said knowledge is pre-formed. Chomsky's conclusions about language acquisition implied humans are born with certain mental framework for knowledge acquisition and anything that doesn't fit the framework can't be grasped/sensed or even be understood. This is somewhat similar to what Immanuel Kant had also argued before him.
@noamtrotsky9601
4 жыл бұрын
I know this comment is from 6 years ago but I cannot help but reply. Stating that children are born with an innate framework for which only certain types of knowledge can be acquired through is virtually synonymous with saying knowledge is pre-formed. The distinction between knowing now and knowing later in development is a frivolous distinction given that the knowledge that is to be learnt is already determined.
@lesp9919
12 жыл бұрын
Great video! Good way to question the basic assumption: are children really like sponges?
@colexiberras4367
2 жыл бұрын
I'm really confused, why can't that child draw a triangle
@cherrycharlotte777
6 ай бұрын
same lmao like just copy paste it
@brunkke
11 жыл бұрын
The idea is to use a language that the child uses to describe the objects. A more accurate description of the object is only better if the child knows the difference between the terms. Does it make sense?
@appleadvert
11 жыл бұрын
i'd love to, by now im very busy with some exams but i'll try to contact soon. best regards!
@bilstew
11 жыл бұрын
I notice that the teacher uses the words littleist and biggest when describing the sticks. Why not describe them to the child as "The Longest" and "The Shortest" This surely gives the child a more correct description of the objects.
@shmily335
6 жыл бұрын
She used the child's own words. What she did was appropriate to the experiment. If she changed the adjectives the child used then she could confuse the child and possibly take away from the experiment that is trying to be tested.
@bilstew
11 жыл бұрын
The problem is Who is the teacher and Who is the learner. If we apply logic the adult must be the teacher who knows the logical answer. Therefore if we accept that the adult is the teacher and the child the learner. The teacher by posing and prompting the child should direct the child to the right answer which should be that of the teacher.
@appleadvert
12 жыл бұрын
English subtitles are not accurate, it's a shame.
@helisakahanni4581
4 ай бұрын
IACAPAP brought me here.
@Udthinkthat
11 жыл бұрын
It's really obvious, too. You just need to know a teeny bit of French and you can tell.
@erkkiboy
9 жыл бұрын
which year is the interview from?
@zephyraa1
7 жыл бұрын
1979
@jimimorijixopegujiuvoqi3479
7 жыл бұрын
0:47 1977
@appleadvert
12 жыл бұрын
Gracias, Thanks, Merci
@ilinez23
8 жыл бұрын
i believe the triangle experiment must be tried to other kids as well it does not make sense that piaget make that theory base on one kid experiment only??? I interacted with many toddlers and asked them to copy my simple drawing. most of them done it very well, the only hindrance is their fingers strength in holding the pencil which made their drawing still shaky. just like the way we try to use our left hand to draw!
@VestinVestin
8 жыл бұрын
I don't think the point of THAT particular experiment was to show that kids can't draw triangles. It was an objection to pure empiricism. An empiricist (in Piaget's caricature) would argue that the process should go as follows: 1* Child sees triangle and copies it into its mind 2* Child draws triangle from the copy it has in its mind Piaget's understanding of the process is a little different: 1* Child sees the triangle and *conceptualizes it using the notions it already has* 2* Child tries to represent *the content of the mental image it has formed* Even something as trivial as perception is shown to be affected by subjective dispositions. "When all you have is a square...".
@FunnyHaHaFunnyHaHa
6 жыл бұрын
Are you kidding?? This was an example for the film of MANY experiments.
@kattentissari3247
6 жыл бұрын
line samantha :) quantitive n qualitative research n statistik, suppose
@kattentissari3247
6 жыл бұрын
line samantha neuro tic/psy at start b tlc... Imagine blanked out one of the names so... NO. Not that is therefor in question csuse. presentings
@MoleDownunder
6 жыл бұрын
I disagree with Piaget on empiricism. In order to attach a function to an entity, the child must first recognise that the entity exists. If they recognise the entity exists without yet attaching a function to it, they are looking at the objective attributes of the entity; the entity for what it really is, which is empiricism. Once functions are attached to the entity, the child forms the idea that there are things a person can do with the entity, but not that the entity is determined by the function. It's very strange to say 'this exists because I can do something with it'.
@kingIkeable
5 жыл бұрын
We cannot draw conclusion based on one kid. This experiment has to be repeated
@tailasousa1505
4 жыл бұрын
kingIkeable It was. Several times.
@bulletinthewind
12 жыл бұрын
I don't agree with what I have seen so far. His approach and ideas seem very rigid and a little ignorant. Firstly, you're creating your own preferred outcome by using a kid who can't copy something as simple as a triangle as an example. She was away with the fairies this kid. I was drawing and reading at a higher level than this at her age, and I'm certainly no genius, but, a triangle? C'mon.
@miguelclarkeottovonbismarck
4 жыл бұрын
Agreed, Emanuelle looks like a dopey kid; she needs more practice.
Пікірлер: 44