Experiment for you: Your telescope will focus on an object 10m to 15m away, wait till dark, focus in on a dim object 10m to 15m away, (use a dim torch to illuminate if needed) , look with your eye, then through scope with a 10mm eyepiece. it will be a lot dimmer through scope. Not brighter. Now, how can that telescope see stars or Neptune to dim to see with the naked eye, if its not making the light brighter?
@BrotherBrotherMusic-tj9db
5 күн бұрын
I absolutely love your channel and content. I've watched your videos many, many, times. I was elated to see you back. Thank you for what you do, you have taught me a great deal. You should have 100k subs minimum.
@KryptonitePhysics
5 күн бұрын
Yep blocked
@BrotherBrotherMusic-tj9db
5 күн бұрын
@@KryptonitePhysics That's just pure wickedness.
@outlawedTV88
3 күн бұрын
@@BrotherBrotherMusic-tj9db they don't want the truth out, by any means necessary !! Such channels will never be allowed to get viral and are blocked on purpose by YT Algo, I know bcz I see how views and subs disappear on my channel every day.....
@BrotherBrotherMusic-tj9db
5 күн бұрын
Ben put this up on Taboo Conspiracy today. Ben does a great job too.
@mt-mg7tt
5 күн бұрын
Mars is bright enough for us to perceive its colour because it's an entire planet, bathed in sunlight that is still at least 1/3 of the solar illumination on Earth. Telescopes DO NOT just magnify (and sometimes do not magnify at all, e..g.,, wide-field instruments). Sure, increasing magnification leads to dimmer images. But compensating for this is their ability to gather HUGE amounts of light, compared with the human eye (what else would you expect from a light collector several metres across compared to the small size and aperture of the human eye?). Anyone who's actually LOOKED through a telescope (i.e., directly with their eyes) can see vastly fainter stars than with the naked eye. And most scientific telescopic observations are done to CCD cameras or film. Telescopes can use electronic amplification (or ultra sensitive film) and do time exposures to increase the amount of light gathered from each object. They are NOT, so to speak, "dimming it down".
@KryptonitePhysics
5 күн бұрын
HUGE amounts of light Oh yep right , what telescope do you have?
@KryptonitePhysics
5 күн бұрын
Anyone who's actually LOOKED through a telescope (i.e., directly with their eyes) can see vastly fainter stars than with the naked eye. That's my point, they should not if they are as far away as we are told, see telescopes and light, and conclusion video.
@KryptonitePhysics
5 күн бұрын
Experiment for you: get your scope out, 10mm eyepiece. get a light , low light . walk away from it till its not visible. Now get your scope out, try and see it again. You wont see it. Why? You need equal brightness level, see video, then go below that level, accounting for a loss of light due to optics 10 to 30%
@stephenandrusyszyn3444
4 күн бұрын
“If Mars is far away as commonly believed, it will not provide enough light for us to see its color.” - Show us the calculations that you did to arrive at this conclusion. My guess is that you didn’t do any.
@KryptonitePhysics
4 күн бұрын
@@stephenandrusyszyn3444 Watch impossible planets, then go on geogebra link, open and look at the math
@gs1100ed
5 күн бұрын
Excellent! Great to see you back.
@KryptonitePhysics
5 күн бұрын
Never been away, this took a lot of work and research.
@gs1100ed
5 күн бұрын
@@KryptonitePhysicsyes! Impressive body of work. Sincerely appreciate your efforts. Thank you!
@Canal104Plus
3 күн бұрын
Hi Cris, I send an email about the translation in Italian language and make this your new Playlist like last time Physics of Kryptonite. Check the spam Have my best and thank you in advance Dino
@KryptonitePhysics
3 күн бұрын
Yes no problem
@MikinessAnalog
4 күн бұрын
Another bot upload with the intent to spread doubt and distrust. It even includes non-human narration.
@outlawedTV88
3 күн бұрын
ahahahah writen by another bot! why we should trust you? Bcz you say so? Geeez
Пікірлер: 19