आप जैसे विद्वान समाज जब भी दिग्भ्रमित होता है, समय समय पर आप विद्वान पुरुष समाज का मार्गदर्शन करते हैं। आपको सहस्त्र बार प्रणाम। जय श्री राम।
@user-br3ed6cx9n
7 ай бұрын
ye khud hi bharmit hai....aise har shabd ka matlab kuchh bhi nikaal lo
@Rakshita442
7 ай бұрын
@@user-br3ed6cx9ntumhe sanskrit aati hai??wo sanskrit ke e scholar hai,tumhe aati hai sanskrit??apni credibility batao iss topic pe??
@user-br3ed6cx9n
7 ай бұрын
@@Rakshita442 aati hai...mujhe jo maanana hai main vo maanunga...unko maans ka matlab phal ka gooda maananaa hai vo maanein...aap meri credibility ki chhodiye pahle khud aapne jitne ghalat shab likhein hain unhein dekhiye...dhanyvaad
@Rakshita442
7 ай бұрын
@@user-br3ed6cx9n aree toh tum video banake sabit karo ki ram maans khate the,yaha pe comment me veer kyun ban rahe ho??tumhe aati hai sanskrit??mere Bhai se sanskrit pe debate karoge unhe bhi sanskrit aati hai..
@deadbeat_genius_daydreamer
7 ай бұрын
Dhanyawad nityanand ji, for your effort, you continue to inspire to learn Sanskrit and why so, because of the misleading narrative in the mainstream.
@user-dj5ub3hu8o
7 ай бұрын
😊 सभी प्रियजनों से अनुरोध है कि यदि कोई व्यक्ति हिन्दी भाषा के शुद्धिकरण के लिए इतना प्रयास कर रहा है; तो हमारा भी यह कर्त्तव्य बनता है कि हम साधु हिन्दी में टिप्पणियाँ लिखकर उनका उत्साह-वर्धन करें! 🙏🏽 आप जनों से विशेष अनुरोध है कि कृपया हिंदी लेखन में रोमन अथवा लैटिन लिपि का उपयोग न करें।
@PrabhakarSharma-qg4ov
7 ай бұрын
सुप्रभात 🚩🕉️🌞🙏🙏 जय श्री राम जय सिया राम हर हर महादेव शिव सक्ति गौरी शंकर बाबा जी सादर प्रणाम बहुत बहुत सुन्दर जानकारी दी आप ने जारी रखें नित्य नंद जी सादर प्रणाम 🙏🙏✍️👌🎤👌👌💯✔️👍
@kavitasharma4257
7 ай бұрын
राम जी तो सबसे पवित्र,दयालु करुणामय सोच भी नही सकते वेज न रहने का।
@parasnathyadav3869
7 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम 🌹🌹💐🌹🙏🙏
@parthsarathik6242
7 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम 🙏🙏🙏
@JeevithChandra
7 ай бұрын
Jai Shree Ram 🙏
@jyotivyas9286
7 ай бұрын
😮😮maams गुदा ही है फल का।।यह बोध रहा मुझे। जय श्री राम। आभार । बहुत।
@swapnilpatil2447
7 ай бұрын
Jai Shri Ram
@HIMANSHU79879
7 ай бұрын
you are really doing job .. at this day and age when its very hard to find reliable and authentic first hand source + sanskrit scholar.
@pinkijindal7280
Ай бұрын
धन्यवाद 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@Leya1999E
7 ай бұрын
In Malayalam we say mamsam for fruit pulp
@p.s.rathore2335
7 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤ Jai Shri Ram
@mukul7414
7 ай бұрын
प्रिय मित्र साधुवाद है आपको
@Sinister1008
7 ай бұрын
Kya high quality video hai sir !
@RC0921
7 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter all I know Lord Raama is my hero and my Lord Shri Hari's Avatar❤
@rj-hd6hy
7 ай бұрын
अति सुंदर व्याख्या 🙏
@manojkulkarni9083
7 ай бұрын
This must go viral... #sriram #ayodhya
@user-sz4rm4jj8j
27 күн бұрын
Jy,sriRam
@AmitKumar-oy5oy
7 ай бұрын
बहुत सुंदर नित्यानंद जी 👌
@kuldeeppandey2433
7 ай бұрын
बहुत शानदार 🙏
@alienplanet8203
6 ай бұрын
Hare Krishna
@angeldarshana4573
7 ай бұрын
Jai shree Ram 🙏🏻
@Vch19
7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. Due to the cryptic nature of Samskrit, which easily can be misconstrued, the knowledge was always meant to be passed down by gurus, and not just by learning the language which is the modern way.
@brijeshkumardixit4201
7 ай бұрын
न मांसम् राघवो भुङ्कते न चैव मधु सेवते। वाल्मीकीय रामायणम् ५/३६/४१. अति सुंदर प्रस्तुति। यद्यपि आप सदा नित्यानंद में रहते है, तदपि आज विशेष तरङ्ग में है।
@divakargupta8016
4 ай бұрын
गीताप्रेस का तर्क: यदि मांस की आलोचना की जाती है तो यह मांस है, और यदि इसकी प्रशंसा की जाती है तो यह फल का गूदा है।
@saurabhbhadoria3299
7 ай бұрын
29:33 आमीश् का अर्थ राजस्यभोग भी होता है और कई जगह इसी संधर्भ मे आया है (जब श्री राम कौशल्या के पास जाते है आज्ञा लेने तब वहाँ अग्निहोत्र हो रहा था और उसमे कई सारे फल भी थे और वह उस भोज्य को आमीश् कहा गया है और ये श्लोक भी पाठ भेद मे उपयुक्त होता है जिसे दूसरे पाठों मे तो सीधा सीधा राजस्यभोग लिखा है)
@tarushishukla8081
7 ай бұрын
Namo Raghvaya!! Very informative!!
@montuedge
7 ай бұрын
आभार
@pramodshukla9913
5 ай бұрын
नहीं तो नहीं 🎉 नमन दयालु हरि कृपा जी सबका सम्मान आपके विचारों के साथ है जी नमन दयालु।
@varungk3388
6 ай бұрын
'Flesh of Fruit' is also a well known English expression. Fruits can be fleshy or dry.
@shashwattripathi8997
7 ай бұрын
It's proven even by genetic studies that ancient Indians, including Brahmins, used to eat meat. Our Vedas, Smritis, Mahabharata and Ramayana talk about it in great detail. The animal sacrifice was prevalent in both Ramayana and Mahabharata times. The Vedas and Smritis give description of how the animal must be slaughtered, sacrificed and eaten. Meat could be eaten only after sacrificing it to the Gods otherwise the person eating that meat would be called a 'Meat Eater' (with negative connotation associated with it). Eating meat after the sacrifice was never discouraged in scriptures although vegetarian diet was always preferred. It should be noted that in Ramayana- Rama, Sita, Mlechhas and Asuras, all of them ate meat but only Mlechhas and Asuras have been called 'Meat Eaters' because they did not use to sacrifice it before eating. It was only after the advent of Buddhism that the diet of many Indians changed to pure vegetarianism.
@Rakshita442
7 ай бұрын
Buddhism me Buddha khud pork meat khake mare the toh Buddhism me kaun sa mana kiya hai meat eating ko?? Mahabharat me Jin yagyo me pashubali hoti thi wahi pe uski ninda bhi ki gayi hai,kuch pada bhi hai??Buddha khud kehte hai pehle ke yagyo me pashubali nahi di jati thi aur Aaj ke time pe matlab Buddha ke time ie Brahmin yagyo me pashubali de rahe hai.
@shashwattripathi8997
7 ай бұрын
@@Rakshita442 First of all, I am a practising Hindu and a vegetarian and have read the scriptures. Whatever I stated earlier was based on scientific facts. The Indians' diet changed to pure vegetarianism around 2500 years ago. Before this time, the people were flexitarians (mostly vegetarian diet with occasional meat eating). Although Buddha taught Ahimsa, he gave permission to his disciples to eat meat, if offered in alms or is from an animal that has died naturally.
@Rakshita442
7 ай бұрын
@@shashwattripathi8997 indus se jo fat Mila hai wo toh milk,ghee ka bhi hota hai toh wo meat khate the iss se sabit nahi hota,ye leftist ka failaya narrative hai..Buddha ne meat khana kabhi mana nahi Kiya..
@shashwattripathi8997
7 ай бұрын
@@Rakshita442 No. The dietary pattern is checked by stable isotope analysis which is done on the teeth. It gives very accurate results. This analysis tells that the Harappan people used to eat meat.
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
@@shashwattripathi8997 these pseudo-science lovers doesn't really understand the scientific explanation and science based tools done for research
@tamashbeen6610
7 ай бұрын
The Valmiki Ramayana, an ancient Indian epic, does mention instances of hunting and meat consumption. However, it's important to note that interpretations and translations can vary, and the cultural and religious contexts surrounding these texts are complex. In the Valmiki Ramayana, there are references to hunting, primarily in the context of the royal Kshatriya duty. For instance, in the Aranya Kanda (Book of the Forest), there's a mention of Lord Rama hunting deer, which was a common practice among Kshatriyas for food and sacrifice. This can be seen in verses like Aranya Kanda, Sarga 16, where Rama goes to hunt deer for the sage's ritual feast.Another instance is in the Ayodhya Kanda, where Rama, while in exile, tells Sita about the life in the forest, which includes hunting and eating roots and fruits.These instances show that hunting was a part of the life of a Kshatriya like Rama, especially when living in the forest. However, interpretations vary, and some believe these references to be symbolic or specific to the context of the times. The Valmiki Ramayana is a complex and multi-layered text, and its understanding often depends on the perspective and interpretation of the reader.
@Upanishad11
7 ай бұрын
You are useful tool of intellectual communist terror 😂😂 you know sanskrit which dharmguru said this nonsense
@ancientminds199
7 ай бұрын
Thankyou chatgpt!
@abhishekmishra9549
7 ай бұрын
@@ancientminds199 they believe on chatgpt more than our ancient texts, acharyas and gurus😅
@suryaprakashvyas3627
7 ай бұрын
No matter Shri Ram was veg. Or non. veg. He is our Maryada Purushottam, Prabhu, Raja, Bhagwan.
@InPursuitOfShriRam
7 ай бұрын
This is what they hate. Our immense and earth shattering faith in our Shri Ram. Never let it go, bhai. Jai Shree Ram ❤
@Aghori_Tantrik208
7 ай бұрын
@@InPursuitOfShriRam Shri Ram was totally vegetarian,But fools don't know the true meaning of words like Mansam etc. And valmiki ramayan was interpolated too
@mittusharma3824
7 ай бұрын
no one is saying that non veg. is bad other than vagitarian goons, why they feel insult to Ram when someone said Ram was non vegitarian?
@anand1311
7 ай бұрын
What is Maryada?
@AbcDef-gw4dg
7 ай бұрын
ram is not a good character bro. He is very weird character. He kicked out pregnant sita. He said very harsh words to sita. He doubts sita's character and tell her to go with vibhishan He hates shudras. As soon as he knew about sambhuk's varna he cut his head immediately. He was a coward, he killed bali binding behind a tree. Ram sent surpanakha to the angry laxman , he knew laxman the one will short temper will do some thing to surpanakha There are many more instances like these.
@rendevous9253
7 ай бұрын
Very important topic to talk on .
@jojosoni
7 ай бұрын
I don't think we should impose the ethics of this time on someone who lived thousands of years ago. It would be no problem if anyone(especially a kshatriya) ate meat during thousands of years ago when agriculture wasn't that well developed.
@suketudanke9897
7 ай бұрын
Well actually, in India, vegetarianism was popular because we had fertile plains in the north & perennial rivers So, eating of meat was never required for surviving. That's also the reason India didn't develop innovative techniques the way Israel did due to lack of water in their region; we remained complacent & continued with the age old techniques Then the British came & ruined our soil
@tehseenchoonawala5713
7 ай бұрын
@@suketudanke9897 tell your vegetarian stories to kashmiris bengalis nepalis and mallus. theyll help put things in perspective for you. thanks
@suketudanke9897
7 ай бұрын
@@tehseenchoonawala5713 If you think that the situation today is what it was thousands of years ago then I have a bridge that I want to sell you 😭😭
@Mallikarjun-g
7 ай бұрын
India was well developed agriculture, westerners gave label that we don't know.
@Mallikarjun-g
7 ай бұрын
@@suketudanke9897not only British bro, we have been under attack for 2400 years since Alexander. So we have lost lot of things, we will regain that balance in 25 years.
@vsh111
7 ай бұрын
What a timely efforts mahashaya! Atyanta krutagnya honge sanatana Samaja aapke uchit prayas ke prathi 🙏🙏🙏
@Roar1921
7 ай бұрын
Not sure if this matters to some people, but it is important to know and get rid of any misinformation. Knowledge is important
@nirajbarot9099
7 ай бұрын
Very interesting indepth and well researched video on a controversial topic. Hope you make many more such videos.
@saileshbabut9696
7 ай бұрын
Lot of valueable information,Thank you
@Utube071
7 ай бұрын
👍👍👍👍
@benefactor4309
7 ай бұрын
मैं उन्हें ऐतिहासिक महापुरुष मानता हूँ, अगर वो मांस खाए तभी भी कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता।
@thakurshouryapratapsingh3506
7 ай бұрын
सच कहूं तो कोई अंतर नहीं पड़ता। राम अवतार ने मांस खाया या नहीं, क्षत्रियकुल में प्रगट मर्यादा और पुरुषों में सर्वोत्तम राम ने उस काल के अनुसार सर्वश्रेष्ठ अनुकरणीय अनुसरणीय उदाहरण स्थापित किए।
@SaurabhTawlare
7 ай бұрын
🙏
@ysdeepak90
7 ай бұрын
very nice
@tamashbeen6610
7 ай бұрын
Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 20, Verses 29-30:Sanskrit : मूलानि च फलानि च नित्यमाहारवृत्तये। आहरिष्याम्यहं नित्यम् मृगान् च विविधान् बहून्॥ २०-२९॥ English Translation: "For our sustenance, I shall daily gather roots and fruits, and I will also hunt various kinds of deer."Aranya Kanda, Sarga 16:The Aranya Kanda contains descriptions of Rama hunting deer, especially in the context of preparing for a sage's ritual feast.
@lovekanaujia345
7 ай бұрын
What about the Golden Mriga story? Nobody would domesticate a deer. What is this obsession with Vegetarianism? Hindus have always eaten non-veg. Stop this non-veg hatred.
@Krupashanker18
7 ай бұрын
Excellent effort Mishra ji - you have blown away many cobwebs from the minds of confused Hindus while lambasting the detractors simultaneously 👌🏽🙏🏽
@rushtyin318
7 ай бұрын
Why this insane obsession with trying to prove the vegeterian credentials of the devas/avataras! When even in the present times 60-70% log at least has tasted meat, in those days probably the no. was even higher! If shree Rama is not a vegeterian, then what's the problem! Its natures way that one form of life nourishes itself on another form of life!
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
There was never a time when human beings were entirely vegetarian and nor there will ever be in future as well too 😏
@MadaraUchiha-iu3ld
7 ай бұрын
Many of these vegcelling acharyas and babas are to blame for this lunacy. There is no authentic scriptural source for meat = rajasik or tamasic.
@19683
7 ай бұрын
Because no god will kill his own creation to satiate his carnal desire.
@19683
7 ай бұрын
Anyone who is a carnist isn't a god but the devil.
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
@@19683 in Vālmiki Rāmāyaṇa, Sri Rāma is described as a human rather than an anthropomorphic supernatural extraterrestrial god
@shripadjoshi7352
7 ай бұрын
श्रीमान पशु बलि को बड़े बड़े पद पर बैठे संत भी समर्थन करते है(शंकर और रामानुज परंपरा के)। और केरल,तमिलनाडु,महाराष्ट्र,कर्नाटक में को सोम यज्ञ करवाते है वे पशु बलि को मानते है। कहते है की यह ब्रह्म सूत्र मैं भी है। यह बात मुझे बहुत पीढ़ा दे रही है।
@minalkhamkar1754
7 ай бұрын
Thank you brother 🙏
@mauli_bhakti5
7 ай бұрын
Best❤
@6ofPentacles
7 ай бұрын
Thank you Mr. Misra for educating people. I wish people would start learning Samskrit and reading our literature.
@adityaaima3302
7 ай бұрын
The most simplest explanation is usually the correct explanation, if you have to twist and break the words to align it to the meaning you like that is going to be a fallacy.
@Loksog47
7 ай бұрын
If we begin to reject verses from our Hindu scriptures, based on our prevalent food habit and belief system, which are quite different from those ages, then I consider it as a dangerous trend. Soon we will be rejecting parts of the Vedas, Brahmanas, Upanishads, Smritis and Puranas. This habit of rigidity and imposition of our selective tastes over the documents of Rishis will prove disastrous in the long run. What fault is there then, with the politicians, who burn Manu Samhita at the drop of a hat? Purging our scriptures and burning them, are one and the same thing! We are considering ourselves as WISER than the sages. There are numerous instances of meat eating in the Vedas, Upanishads, Ramayana, Mahabharata and the Puranas. There are parts of the Puranas that are too dogmatic and consider other Puranas, as paths to hell! Dogmatism and rigidity are just bad.
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
Politicians are indeed correct for burning manusmriti
@Krupashanker18
7 ай бұрын
If meat had been there in ved - Gita , it's essence would've endorsed it- but patram pushpam is what krishna says - anyway its unthinkable to presume that Vedic rishis were immolating animals and gorging on the barbecued flesh
@sanyamgarg8288
7 ай бұрын
You are right. 😊
@sumitdutta7043
7 ай бұрын
Yup atleast some of the intelligent comments
@phoenix94_akrs
7 ай бұрын
Chalo, koi toh samajhdar nikla.
@choudhurysaheb8326
7 ай бұрын
Ancient people used to eat more meat. Peacock and deer meat were common among the royals. Sri Krishna’s bother used to consume all
@universe6735
7 ай бұрын
But what about tasty beef bhuna? Should we give credit to Mughals for this or to brother of krishna?
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
@@universe6735 beef was consumed in India since Harappan times as the archaeological evidences suggested, so much before Mughals it existed here
@choudhurysaheb8326
7 ай бұрын
@@universe6735 there is nothing wrong with barren cow or buffalo or even male cattle consumption. We can have jhatka meat of those not halal.
@universe6735
7 ай бұрын
@@choudhurysaheb8326 what I am sad about it is I cannot lick azz of Muhgals for beef bhuna anymore . 😔😔
@sumitdutta7043
7 ай бұрын
Its true that beef consumption was done once, but due to influence of Buddhism and then later Vaishanism it stopped.
@ashoksinghal5620
7 ай бұрын
Thanks. Just wondering if Kaikeyi ( like in RCM) stipulated ways of living during Vanvaas i.e. Tapas Vesh? Tapasvi won't be consuming Maams.
@mohansinghthakur6493
7 ай бұрын
Purana up Purana Nam video ban aye guruji
@ratnamurlidharan9885
7 ай бұрын
Vali argued with Bhagvan Ram about his reason for killing him, because he the Vanar’s meat was not eaten, nor his nails or skin was of any use….. Bhagvan Ram during his 14 years of vanvas didn’t eat meat but being a Kshtriya Raja was permitted but not regularly consumed….only Brahmins were strictly prohibited to eat meat….Why argue about Treta in Kaliyuga when hardly anyone is Satvik?
@garu0076
7 ай бұрын
Mishra is a so called Brahmin... Not actual Brahmin....These people want to gain supremacy by showing that they are veg and hence superior... Whats biggest quality of bharhmin.... Sacrifice.... Give importance to that... Ask Mishra what varna is he... Otherwise read Vyadha geeta in Mahabharat where a kaushik Brahmin is humbled by a butcher... These satvic rajasic tamasic etc are basic laws.... It dosent exactly follow what u eat.... Its your charechter and vasanas... U can be perfect asura by eating veg.... And most of Indian ao called bhrahmin has amassed wealth in 20th century by serving Anglosaxon Mleachs..... What did Mishras father,, his great grandfather did 😮
@DudewithaGoodMood
7 ай бұрын
I don't care if he had eaten meat or not, he will still be our Ram. Let me tell you when I was inspired by ISKCON, I practiced vegetarianism strictly for 3 years, and I lost immense weight. Vegetarianism is not that practical unless you're done with your life and now a Spiritual seeker. I am Kshatriya by nature (not by surname) and very rajasik. Its okay to eat meat to gain strength, especially for Kshatriyas. They had to fight wars, so they had to eat meat. Remember, eating meat is prohibited for those who are seeking Moksha not Dharma. Understand the difference. For doing Dharma and eradicate Adharma, we have to gain strentgh in any way possible. If not then people who follow a certain dessert man will subdue us. Hope my comment will be taken with open mind.
@KKpandita88
7 ай бұрын
They used to hunt animals, not grow them in cages. This is the only difference. And it should not be consumed for taste of tongue.
@Vladimir_Putin_2021
7 ай бұрын
See the fact is he doesn't eat meat and that's what the video is trying to tell .. Secondly ,telling warriors can't be vegetarian is a void statement..there are multiple option in vegetarian food which can make you fit and healthy....Even in Roman Empire,the warriors known as gladiators are vegetarian...so don't say vegetarian food is not sufficient...
@jitendrasinghpanwar5639
7 ай бұрын
Maharan pratap was also vegetarian. He is a great warrior.
@DudewithaGoodMood
7 ай бұрын
@@jitendrasinghpanwar5639 Kaha se padhe ho
@gravity.inescapable
6 ай бұрын
"unless you are done with your family" lol my whole family is vegetarian from generation and I am 22 years old, vegetarian from birth. I am completely healthy 🗿
@AjaySingh-bp4sx
7 ай бұрын
👍👍👍👌
@DharmYogi
7 ай бұрын
There is a guy name rami Sivan who made such claims about meat on Quora and I exposed him verse by verse and clearly it shows in Gita press version that he is not a meat eater. The sad part is many Hindus accept such information and keep quiet or use it to justify there own meat eating desires
@arungupta3509
7 ай бұрын
सुन्दरकाण्ड में हनुमानजी सीताजी से कहते हैं: न मांस राघवो भुङ्न्त्के न चैव मधु सेवते । वन्यं सुविहितं नित्यं भत्त्कमश्र्नाति पञ्चमम् ॥ (सुन्दरकाण्ड, षट्त्रिशः सर्गः, ४१)
@ArpitaRC
6 ай бұрын
I have only one question - So when हनुमान said to सीता in अशोक वाटिका that SriRam has left consuming मांस in your विरह, हनुमान was saying that SriRam has stopped consuming fruit pulp? If there are 20+ citations where Ram did not consume meat, and 6 places where there is mention of meat. It means like most mordern people they used to mostly consume veg and occasionally non-veg 🙏🏻
@raghavkhokhar9529
5 ай бұрын
Usme gita press ka meaning dekho usme aate hain ki raghuvanshi na to maans khate hain na madhu ka paan kaete hain aise aap iit kanpur ki website se phaltu arth nikalte ho gitapress wale dekho na
@chandramohanvashistha2764
7 ай бұрын
ॐ नमो नमः श्रीमान, यदि भगवान राम मांस का भक्षण करते थे तो वे फिर भगवान नहीं हो सकते हैं।यह विषय किसी टीका-टिप्पणी का नहीं है।यह लोगों के मन-मस्तिष्क को विकृत और विकार युक्त करना ही होगा। फिर सबकी अपनी अपनी सोच है। ||जय श्री राम 🌷🌷🌹🌹🙏🙏|।
@foundationpersnickety462
7 ай бұрын
In the balkand's fourteenth chapter of Valmiki Maharshi's Sri Ramayanam, पतत्रिणस्तस्य वपामुद्धृत्य नियतेन्द्रियः | ऋत्विक् परमसंपन्नः श्रपयामास शास्त्रतः || Gita Press translates the पतत्रिणस्तस्य वपामु as 'tuber' or 'Ashwakanda,' while, on the other hand, all other translators, including Pandit Jwala Prasad Mishra, take it as a horse sacrifice. I am quite confused by this interpretation; could you please explain it?
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
Gitapress has just sanitized it considering the emotions and sentiments of poor hindus
@rudraveda
7 ай бұрын
Gītāpress has more authority because it is based on Commentary. In Sāttvika Yajña no animal can be killed. Aitarēya Brāhmaṇa, Mahābhārata (Anuśāsana Parva), and Skanda Purāṇa say this clearly. Rājasika Yajñas animals are killed. Rājasika Yajñas are low and done only by lower people and Tāmasika is done by Asuras and Āsurika people by sacrificing humans. The Yajña of Daśaratha was done by Vasiṣṭha and Vasiṣṭha was a Brahmrṣi and hence will follow Sāttvika Yajña. In Sāttvika Yajña Piṣṭapaśu is given hence Gītāpress is correct.
@abhirupSinha
7 ай бұрын
@@descendantofbharatbharatva7155😂😂😂😂😂
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
@@abhirupSinha Many translators (including Gita press) have done them, per their best judgment, with Vivek in mind (since many take Rama’s Kshatriya non-vegetarianism as a license for non-veg eating). From Itihasa research perspective, those translations (where mansa/meat etc translated at the inner soft matter of the fruit, etc.) is incorrect.
So what if he ate meat? He is Kaala, he is kalabhairava, he is Sankarshana, he is pradyumna, aniruddha and vasudeva. Anything he eats he can digest without dosha or klesha or shaastravirodha he is hutabhuk as in aham viashwanaro bhutva etc etc...There is no reason to get offended by such remarks. Yes God is omicient, omnipotent and omnipresent. He has no dosha whatsoever. So let it be.
@kalidas1965
7 ай бұрын
I admire your videos but this one is biased and baseless. Why would Rama torture the animals unnecessarily!
@rudraveda
7 ай бұрын
Not unnecessary, but to scare them away. Animals attack humans in forests.
@kalidas1965
7 ай бұрын
@@rudraveda And it became the duty of Rama to run behind and frighten them regularly? This sounds ridiculous.
@rudraveda
7 ай бұрын
@@kalidas1965 Most of the time yes. Look at the animals that are mentioned. And Rāma rarely went behind them. Boars were common and still ate in forests that attack humans or tribes residing. The other animal mentioned is Iguana which is used to make thumb and arm guards for archery. Another one is deer which is needed to make the quivering rests and shoulder guards. Secondly, if you believe in Rāma's divinity then all he does is give the Prārabdha of those Jīvas. Idk how is your point even logical.
@kalidas1965
7 ай бұрын
@rudraveda From the great Swami Vivekananda to Professor Nrisimha Prasad Bhaduri many are devoid of kogical sense then. Thanks so much. Dogmatism and bigotry are the indications of the pseudovaishnavas!
@medico-gnition8016
7 ай бұрын
Sir please make a video on ashwamedh yagna as well.
@rajdivecha
7 ай бұрын
If you think ancient people did not eat meat, I would suggest you try backcountry camping for a month in a forest without much tools. See how many fruits or roots you can find. When you find no veggies and your body is in a severe need of protein, you will automatically end up eating meat. Humans are very adaptable, which is why we have survived for so long on this planet. To eat or not eat something is a choice but if you don’t have a choice then anything is good! Thus, I have no doubt that Ram and family consumed meat during their time in the forest. People who deny the obvious are merely blinded by their personal bias and have definitely never tried backcountry camping or know any science at all!
@H00o0DA1
7 ай бұрын
😅 Rama's strength and capabilities werent human ,In those times it must have been available in abundance since human population was lower . And as it is mentioned in the video he took pledge to live like a Muni so we can't deny his own words
@AbhiN_1289
6 ай бұрын
@@H00o0DA1No, protein rich plants aren’t as available in the forests at anytime. And those that were would be available seasonally. That too in low quantities. I am sorry, but it is difficult to be vegetarian in the forest, unless you bring cows with you for dairy.
@H00o0DA1
6 ай бұрын
@@AbhiN_1289 and you will deny Raama 's own word?
@VedaSay
7 ай бұрын
Guruji, Pranam. Now am little confused. I thought Samskrit is as per sutras (with mathematical precision). This is what I had understood for long. My question, how is sandhi-vichhed happening creating different meanings? Thought if the sutras are applied properly, this should not happen.
@000Aful
7 ай бұрын
In sanskrit, each word can mean different things because objects are named according to their characteristics in sanskrit. Therefore, things of similar characteristics will obviously have similar or same names. This is a practice found, although in lesser quantity, in most of the languages originating from the sanskrit language family. For example, in english too, the ripe part of fruits is called "flesh" only.
@newrevolution3838
7 ай бұрын
I ❤ Shri Ram And don't dare to demean him but I have one Question Abhijit chavda once Said In Ashvamegha Yagya The Horse Is Killed or sacrificed even eaten. according to uttra khand It is mentioned that Ashvamegha Yagaya was Organised by Shri Rama when Luv Kush met with Hanumana. Please Enlighten Me 🙏
@000Aful
7 ай бұрын
There is a difference between eating hunted wild animals and birds, which is a perfectly accepted thing in hinduism, although a rajasik practice and therefore not really ideal for spiritual development, and on the other hand, killing domesticated animals and breeding animals for their meat, which is considered adharmic, because killing domesticated animals is like killing someone under your protection, which is quite evil.
@H00o0DA1
7 ай бұрын
So you want people to hunt in forest for meat? Domestic breeding the right way to it and animals live much better as long as they live compared to forest where they strive for living all the time
@H00o0DA1
7 ай бұрын
in those times it was easy to find animals in abundance but today it's not
@000Aful
7 ай бұрын
@@H00o0DA1 people can always buy from professional hunters just like they do in the case of fish. Also, jungle is reduced because large parts of land have been converted for pastures and agriculture. Not the other way around. Anyways, smaller animals can still be found in decent quantities. Besides, I am not telling what people should do. I am just saying what is not considered right in hinduism. Perhaps, this was the reason why a majority hindu population had turned to vegetarianism, when hunting went down and instead livestock breeding for meat increased in the medieval and colonial times. Not that earlier everyone was eating meat, but that percentage reduced even further.
@000Aful
7 ай бұрын
@@H00o0DA1 "Domestic breeding the right way..." That's what you think is right from a human-centric point of view, my friend. Ask any animal and they'll surely differ from you. Striving for survival is what comes naturally to them, and is the real joy of life for them, just like for humans, compared to just sitting in a cage all life long and then getting slaughtered without a fight.
@H00o0DA1
7 ай бұрын
@@000Aful in Arthshastr written by chankya it's Domesticated animals are mentioned
@ramanujadasa121
7 ай бұрын
Bhagavan Ram agar mans khate v tha toh koi adharm nhi tha , wo kshatriya varn ma prakat hua or khastriya varn ma mans khana adharm nhi ha yugadharm ke anusar
@Athato_Brahmajijnasa
7 ай бұрын
सत्य है, परंतु "कस्यापि प्राणिनो हिंसा नैव कर्तव्यम्" आदि शास्त्रवाक्यों से, तथा "रामो विग्रहवान् धर्मः" ऐसा जानकर भी यही जान पड़ता है की भगवान भागवत धर्म के स्थापनार्थ ही अवतरित हुए थे और सभी वैश्णवों के लिए उदाहरण स्वरूप है, इसलिए प्याज लहसुन समेत समस्त अभक्ष्य पदार्थों का त्याग करके उन्होंने आदर्श उदाहरण प्रस्थापित किया।
@darshan4you
7 ай бұрын
Also. Is there a hint to this in the dialogue between Maa Sita and Shree Hanuman at Ashok vatika where Shree Hanuman says Prabhu didn’t eat meat since he was leaving in forest?
@rekha903
7 ай бұрын
the mahabharat anushaasan parv reference is great. it mentions not only rama but also many of his ancestors and also Janaka, so it is very unlikely that Rama and Sita ate meat. Vali also tells Rama while asking why Rama killed him - you could not have killed me for meat because dharmic people like you don't eat meat. Hanuman Ji also tells Mother Sita that Rama has not taken to meat or wine in her separation. So we believe bheeshma, hanuman, and vaali instead of modern-day monkeys who said Rama ate meat.
@samratvchakraborty5157
7 ай бұрын
Maans ka tyag karke, matlab pehle khaate the ?
@ayansharma4373
7 ай бұрын
श्रीमद्वाल्मीकीयरामायणम् १,८२,००,००० (1,82,00,000) वर्ष पूर्व ब्रह्मर्षि वाल्मीकि जी ने रचा है, यह आदि काव्य है , यह हमारा इतिहास है।
@कामदेवपुरुष
7 ай бұрын
भारत के रामायण, महाभारत,स्मृति, पुराणों में बहुत मिलावट की गई है। जहा लोगो की भक्ति थी उन पर हमला किया गया है।
@rajkumarpathak1913
7 ай бұрын
मर्यादा पुरुषोत्तम थे भगवान श्री राम इसी शब्द से यह ज्ञात होता है कि मांस भक्षण उनके लिए अनुचित है जय श्री राम जय हिंदू राष्ट्र
@anaghism
7 ай бұрын
अरे भैया थोड़ा अपनी किताबों को पढ़ लें तो कोई दुविधा ही नहीं रहेगी। कैकेयी ने राम को वनवास के समय शर्त ही रखी थी की वह चौदह वर्ष वनवास में ऋषियों की वृत्ति से रहेंगे। अब ऋषि वृत्ति मांसाहार तो होती नहीं।
@DipenDas-nf7ho
7 ай бұрын
मेरा मानना है कि यह प्रश्न पूछने के लिए यह सही वीडियो है। इसका संबंध अश्वमेध यज्ञ से है। क्या बलि के लिए घोड़े को मारना शामिल था? क्या यज्ञ के बाद घोड़े का मांस खाया जाता था? क्या रानी को घोड़े के साथ संभोग करने की नकल करते हुए घोड़े के मृत शरीर के पास सोना पड़ता था?
@anupamakoneru66
7 ай бұрын
Pig means cat. Now I leave it to the discretion of whoever reads this to agree or disagree. 😢 Ram was a Kshatriya as per the epic and meat had been food since evolution of mankind
@ns1001
7 ай бұрын
Toomuch defense is a sign of weakness
@thestoicrealist9804
7 ай бұрын
Surely, Shiromani tikakaar was on a wild stretches of imagination when he was applying rules of vyakarna for he flouted the most basic rules of Mimansa.
@sumila56
7 ай бұрын
Give example how he flouted the basic rules of mimansa!
@gravity.inescapable
6 ай бұрын
Explain your point how did he flout fundamentals of mimansa?
@Loksog47
7 ай бұрын
Rama, Laxmana, and all the kings and princes of Raghu lineage were sworn to not harm, or, kill Brahmins, and yet they killed Ravana, Kumbhakarna, the sons and relatives of Ravana, who were Brahmins and descendants of Vishrava Rishi. If that can happen, as instances of special consideration, so can be with trifling matters as food. Don't you think?
@Krupashanker18
7 ай бұрын
Bad logic
@descendantofbharatbharatva7155
7 ай бұрын
Why do Ravan refered Indrajit as a kshatriya in Sundarkand 😏
@manideepbhattacharjee5131
7 ай бұрын
Govindaraja in his teeka, as well as Swami Karpatri Maharaj in Ramayana Mimamsa have resolved the appealingly contradictory verses saying Sri Rama ate Medhya Maamsa only for the purpose of doing the ritual and not for self gratification. Tulasidas Ji also talks about Sri Ram doing Mrgaya as a Ksatriya. Ramanandacharya as well as your own Guru Sri Ramabhadracharya, both in their Brahmasutra Bhasya 3.1.25 have justified Shrauta Bali. Ramabhadracharya in his Brahmasutra 3.1.25 quotes this verse from Bhagavat- लोके व्यवायामिषमद्यसेवा नित्या हि जन्तोर्न हि तत्र चोदना । व्यवस्थितिस्तेषु विवाहयज्ञ- सुराग्रहैरासु निवृत्तिरिष्टा ॥
@moonwalkerindia4919
7 ай бұрын
हत्वा के लिए आधुनिक काल में "हकालना" शब्द प्रयोग किया जाता है।
@GrandDad_001
7 ай бұрын
In Sundarkand's 36th sarg's 41st shloka it is written that Sri Ram never ate nonveg. Shloka:- न मांसं राघवो भुङ्क्ते न चैव मधु सेवते । वन्यं सुविहितं नित्यं भक्तमश्नाति पञ्चमम् ॥ ४१॥ Meaning:- 'कोई भी रघुवंशी न तो मांस खाता है और न मधु का ही सेवन करता है; फिर भगवान् श्रीराम इन वस्तुओं का सेवन क्यों करेंगे? वे सदा चार समय उपवास करके पाँचवें समय शास्त्रविहित जंगली फल-मूल और नीवार आदि भोजन करते हैं॥ ४१॥
@bhagwanmishra7243
7 ай бұрын
There are no audio and videos and no first hand witness of all the events of Ram Laxman and seeta. Valmiki was not present with them at the all places and time. The events are told to him by different persons like by saints Hanumanji seetaji. Who knows what is truth. Any way so nice of you for correct interpretations and clearing doubts. Thanks
@MadaraUchiha-iu3ld
7 ай бұрын
This shiromani tika guy seems to just ignore the most obvious interpretations in favor of whatever convoluted mess he wants to see. Why is this tika authoritative?
@kamalagrawal9576
7 ай бұрын
namaste nityanand ji, mujhe aapke saath sanskrit/himdi ke bhaarat mein vistaar ke vishay mein kuchh vichaar sanjhe karne hain. batana, main kaese sampark kar sakta hoon?
@anubhasharma2428
2 ай бұрын
Display me inka phone number likha hua hai
@viyom801
7 ай бұрын
Sanskrit vyakaran ki knowledge naaa honee ke Karan ....misslead hoo rahe sir ji
@tamashbeen6610
7 ай бұрын
Who the hell is Dr. Rangan? Is he higher than Valmiki who said Rama was an avid hunter and meat eater? It is just the case of Jainism influenced Hindu Brahmins retrospectively imposing their own interpretations on the ancient text. Kshatriya who prays to Durga cannot get away from "Maha Prasad". Ritual slaughter is enjoined on him. Without it he is not even a proper Kshatriya.
@bmm55
7 ай бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@indranilmondal1270
7 ай бұрын
Then how do we decide how to divide the word as dividing it differently changes the meaning
@suvankarkarmakar
7 ай бұрын
Bhagwan Ram chahen kuch bhi khaye aap kripaya bhagwan Krishna ke bare main bataiye
@amaratvak6998
7 ай бұрын
Dekhiye, mere mataanusaar Shree Ram apne 14 varsh ke vanvaas ke samay jungalon mein se kewal shaak, phal aadi hi toh nahin khaate honge...Smaran rahe, ke wo ek Kshatriya the aur unse maans ka sewan karna apekshit tha. Ramji toh Sitaji ke aagrah par maayaavi sunhere hiran ka aakhet karne hetu uske peechhe bhaage hi the....toh kya usey maar ke, kewal uska sunhera charm hi toh nahin lena hoga...baad mein unke vichaar mein uske maans ka sewan bhi avashya hoga. Phir, ek Kshatriya hoke, apne Ayodhya ke rajmahal mein kaun sa saag paat, phal aadi hi khaate honge. Jin shraddhaaluon ko unke sambhaavit maans ke sewan ke vichaar se uljhan ya tilmilaahat hoti hai, unhen tanik tark aur tab ki sambhavnaaon pe vichaar karna chahiye. Is mein kuchh bhi anuchit athwa adharm / paap nahin hai. Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏😇😇😇
@knowledge-21234
7 ай бұрын
Sir maine apse twitter pe balkand ka ek sholka pochha tha isse se juda hua kripiya usse be dekhe
Пікірлер: 459