Brief Introduction to the PCPNDT Act for UPSC
The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act of 1994 has banned pre-natal sex-determination.
Very genetic counselling centre, genetic laboratory or genetic clinic engaged in counselling or conducting pre-natal diagnostics techniques, like in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with the potential of sex selection (Preimplantation genetic diagnosis) before and after conception comes under the preview of the PCPNDT Act and are banned.
The main objective of the act is the arrest of the declining sex-ratio in India due to rampant female foeticide.
Need For PCPNDT Act
Owing to the patrilineal line of succession regarding property rights as well as cultural practices, the male child has always been preferred instead of the female child. As such there was a tendency for families to continue producing children until a male child was born, which only magnified India’s overpopulated demographics.
This was the norm until the 1990’s when the availability of ultrasound techniques lead to the widespread practice of pre-natal sex-determination. This lead to a rise of an Rs.1000 crore industry where medical professionals practise selective abortion for a price.
Social discrimination against women and a preference for sons have promoted female foeticide in various forms skewing the sex ratio of the country towards men. Thus necessitating the passing of the PCPNDT act.
To know more about the Indian Penal Code, visit the linked article
Salient features of the PCPNDT act
As per the PCPNDT act, sex selection is an act of identifying the sex of the foetus and elimination of the foetus if it is of the unwanted sex.
Offences under this act include conducting or helping in the conduct of prenatal diagnostic technique in the unregistered units, sex selection on a man or woman, conducting PND test for any purpose other than the one mentioned in the act, sale, distribution, supply, renting etc. of any ultrasound machine or any other equipment capable of detecting sex of the foetus. Main provisions in the act are
The Act provides for the prohibition of sex selection, before or after conception.
It regulates the use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques, like ultrasound and amniocentesis by allowing them their use only to detect: Genetic abnormalities, metabolic disorders, chromosomal abnormalities,
certain congenital malformations, haemoglobinopathies and sex-linked disorders.
No laboratory or centre or clinic will conduct any test including ultrasonography for the purpose of determining the sex of the foetus.
No person, including the one who is conducting the procedure as per the law, will communicate the sex of the foetus to the pregnant woman or her relatives by words, signs or any other method.
Any person who puts an advertisement for pre-natal and pre-conception sex determination facilities in the form of a notice, circular, label, wrapper or any document, or advertises through the interior or other media in electronic or print form or engages in any visible representation made by means of hoarding, wall painting, signal, light, sound, smoke or gas, can be imprisoned for up to three years and fined Rs. 10,000.
To know more about the Major Features of the Indian Constitution, visit the linked article.
Amendment of PCPNDT Act 2003
Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (PNDT), was amended in 2003 to The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition Of Sex Selection) Act (PCPNDT Act) to improve the regulation of the technology used in sex selection.
Implications of the amendment are:
Amendment of the act mainly covered bringing the technique of preconception sex selection within the ambit of the act.
Bringing ultrasound within its ambit.
Empowering the central supervisory board, the constitution of the state-level supervisory board
Provision for more stringent punishments.
Latest Context related to PCPNDT Act
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed the writ petition filed by Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI), upheld the constitutional validity of Section 23 of the PCPNDT Act, 1994. Section 23 of the Act, provides for penalties for anomalies in paperwork/record keeping/clerical errors regarding the provisions of the Act.
In the writ petition, it was aggrieved that Section 23, what they term as ‘clerical errors’, is treated on the same footing as the actual offense of sex determination.
Supreme Court in its judgment opined that:
Any dilution of the provisions of the Act or the rules would only defeat the purpose of the Act to prevent female foeticide, and relegate the right to life of a girl child under Article 21 of the Constitution, to a mere formality.
Non-maintenance of records is not merely a technical or procedural lapse in the con
#SexSelection #femalefoeticide #foeticide
Негізгі бет Pre-conception And Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994
Пікірлер