The US in Armenia is a step too far. Actually, it’s an ocean too far. Just leave countries alone! For God’s Sake!
@BlahBlah-kb1wf
7 күн бұрын
14:56 Putin never cared about Sweden or Finland joining. Because of the geographical location it would be incredibly difficult and almost stupid to invade Russia from there. On the other hand Ukraine is part of the European Plain which is perfect for land invasions. Napoleon, the Mongol Hords and Hitler (I may be missing a few) invaded Russia in that area because of the low flatlands/stepps. Importantly, Russia expects NATO to use the great Europeean plain to invade someday; given that Ukraine in NATO is only important from an offensive perspective, we can assume Russia is correct in its suspicions. And obviously this is what the Russian Federation is trying to prevent. And yes, because of all the things Non Seen News stated, Russia is winning. And, as far as we know, could gain a lot more territory. Not only is the geolocation of Ukraine important to Russian security, but Ukrainians and Russians are essentially one people, three letter organizations over the last few decades worked very hard to plant in the minds of Ukrainian people that they were not Russian. They were a separate people. Unfortunately, western Ukrainians are subject to a very impactful western media and propaganda campaign, so that's a loss for Russia. I won't keep going, but I could. Essentially, Russians and Ukrainians are one the same people and the US created a division where there otherwise wouldn't be one and exploited it. It’s kind of their thing. As far as this international ideological division, from a global perspective Russia is winning. Importantly, there are NATO countries that have ideologically sided with Russia. Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia and Turkiye have sided with Russia (and I'm sure the US/EU will make them pay for that) and so that is an ideological victory for Russia but in addition the "Global South", which is majority of the global population, has ideologically sided with Russia. The conflict is due to NATO expansion and the "west" is trying to tear the Ukraineans and Russians apart. Similar to what the "west" did to Vietnam and Korea, for example. Aside from who's winning, I want to say that in many ways this war is much more than an objective war on the ground. It's a battle of good vs evil. Right vs wrong. And as I've stated in my first paragraph, Ukraine only of importance to NATO if in years or decades in the future NATO plans to attack Russia from there. Which makes NATO the baddies. Not only that, but the way NATO uses Ukrainian men as a battering ram as a means to their end is evil. This war by the west has killed hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men. It's evil. The Ukrainian government isn't even legitimate. It was installed after THEY led a coup d'etat in 2014. Which is evil. Besides all of these things, no one can deny that if NATO truly didn't have plans to some day invade Russia, the logical thing to do would let Ukraine be neutral. The most peaceful and safe policy for both Russia and western nations would for Ukraine to be neutral. If western European nations claim they feel threatened by Russia, then why would they want to move closer and provoke Russia? The safest thing and most logical would be that Ukraine is neutral (with no military) and acting as a buffer zone as it has for hundreds of years. It's name, Ukraine, means border lands or buffer lands and has always been populated by Belarussians, Russians and Ukrainians who all descend from current day Kyiv and have lived alongside each other for hundreds of years. NATO expanding into areas that would otherwise be peaceful without its presence is evil.
@sydneyhardin-vw2ym
7 күн бұрын
Well said,and well done.brilliantly written.🎁🎁🍺
@denarjan
8 күн бұрын
I think I read Ukraine needs to leave Donbass, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia AND Novo-Russia, which would also include Odessa, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Kirovohrad. So first it was just Crimea, the Ukraine started trouble in Donbass, then it became 2 (Luhansk, Donestk) and the Ukraine started to make more trouble, so it became 4, (Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk, Donestk), and the Ukrainians never seem to learn, making more trouble, so now it has become 8 Oblasts (Odessa, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Kirovohrad, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk, Donestk). I'm starting to see a pattern here..... Probably wise to settle on the 8, before it becomes 16 Oblasts.
@zachrivers1078
8 күн бұрын
No one sent ol fart memo pointing out Russia can destroy all surrounding NATO countries in minutes 😂
@davidcollishaw2771
8 күн бұрын
NATO expanding hasn't helped NATO at all. The Finnish border is longer than the Ukrainian front lines and they have huge hyperways up to the border on the Russian side. It will cost NATO much more than they think they have gained and the Finn's and swedish public were not pro NATO this was politics not a referendum result.
@BlahBlah-kb1wf
7 күн бұрын
13:59 sure seems like a foreign policy dictator when he’s always bragging about what he’s made other countries do.
@BlahBlah-kb1wf
7 күн бұрын
13:45 I don’t know if what he’s saying is true or not. But this guy is out of touch. Americans from the far political left, the far political right, independents, greens, and even the left and the right are upset that America is part of these organizations. All of the money spent in propping them up, extending the military in them and everywhere. It’s clear to normal people that the US isn’t just spreading democracy; what it’s doing is reinforcing and trying to extend its empire and many Americans don’t want its country to be an empire. So Joe, you need to wake up.
@barry1fitzgerald
8 күн бұрын
If your question was who is losing. the most, the answer is Ukraine. They lost a sizable part of their population, territory, electrical infrastructure and have amassed an enormous national debt that will be a burden on future generations.
@stevensmith797
8 күн бұрын
mean time russia has lost most of its equipment , needs iran and north korea for weapons and ammo , rubble worth nothing , record losses in there gas industry , all this in a war that was going to last 2 weeks , ukraine will be fine , russia however , gas industry will never be the same again , will never be trusted again and wont be getting any out side investments , russia has already lost
@sammyantri3965
7 күн бұрын
Good evening. Thank you for this interesting informational video. To answer the question, in my opinion I would say that if we take stock today the match is a draw but for me the prospects are clearly in favor of Russia and to the detriment of the USA. On the business side with the brics to which more and more countries are joining, a digital currency will be presented at the end of the year and consequently the dedolarization. What will happen to the US debt when the BRICS currency becomes effective? It could be a complete collapse of the USA and at a minimum a huge means of pressure
@SkinwalkerFarm
8 күн бұрын
As a NATO Veteran I welcome decent objective Analysis from the younger generation, thanks. We are at this point living in a hybrid clown reality.
@BlahBlah-kb1wf
7 күн бұрын
Well since you welcome it, here's my lengthy perspective: 14:56 Putin never cared about Sweden or Finland joining. Because of the geographical location it would be incredibly difficult and almost stupid to invade Russia from there. On the other hand Ukraine is part of the European Plain which is perfect for land invasions. Napoleon, the Mongol Hords and Hitler (I may be missing a few) invaded Russia in that area because of the low flatlands/stepps. Importantly, Russia expects NATO to use the great Europeean plain to invade someday; given that Ukraine in NATO is only important from an offensive perspective, we can assume Russia is correct in its suspicions. And obviously this is what the Russian Federation is trying to prevent. And yes, because of all the things Non Seen News stated, Russia is winning. And, as far as we know, could gain a lot more territory. Not only is the geolocation of Ukraine important to Russian security, but Ukrainians and Russians are essentially one people, three letter organizations over the last few decades worked very hard to plant in the minds of Ukrainian people that they were not Russian. They were a separate people. Unfortunately, western Ukrainians are subject to a very impactful western media and propaganda campaign, so that's a loss for Russia. I won't keep going, but I could. Essentially, Russians and Ukrainians are one the same people and the US created a division where there otherwise wouldn't be one and exploited it. It’s kind of their thing. As far as this international ideological division, from a global perspective Russia is winning. Importantly, there are NATO countries that have ideologically sided with Russia. Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia and Turkiye have sided with Russia (and I'm sure the US/EU will make them pay for that) and so that is an ideological victory for Russia. In addition to that local win, the "Global South", which is majority of the global population, has ideologically sided with Russia. The conflict is due to NATO expansion and the "west" is trying to tear the Ukraineans and Russians apart. Similar to what the "west" did to Vietnam and Korea, for example. Aside from who's winning, I want to say that in many ways this war is much more than an objective war on the ground. It's a battle of good vs evil. Right vs wrong. And as I've stated in my first paragraph, Ukraine only of importance to NATO if in years or decades in the future NATO plans to attack Russia from there. Which makes NATO the baddies. Not only that, but the way NATO uses Ukrainian men as a battering ram as a means to their end is evil. This war by the west has killed hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men. It's evil. The Ukrainian government isn't even legitimate. It was installed after THEY led a coup d'etat in 2014. Which is evil. Besides all of these things, no one can deny that if NATO truly didn't have plans to some day invade Russia, the logical thing to do would let Ukraine be neutral. The most peaceful and safe policy for both Russia and western nations would for Ukraine to be neutral. If western European nations claim they feel threatened by Russia, then why would they want to move closer and provoke Russia? The safest thing and most logical would be that Ukraine is neutral (with no military) and acting as a buffer zone as it has for hundreds of years. It's name, Ukraine, means border lands or buffer lands and has always been populated by Belarussians, Russians and Ukrainians who all descend from current day Kyiv and have lived alongside each other for hundreds of years. NATO expanding into areas that would otherwise be peaceful without its presence is evil.
@SkinwalkerFarm
7 күн бұрын
@BlahBlah-kb1wf I thank You for your extensive and thorough reply, You nailed it in its complex entirety, 👍 People in the West are becoming dependent on ignorance, and when the Bear shit eventually hits their fan they will wake up a bit.
@mahamadoutraore1077
7 күн бұрын
3 countries! Soon to become 4 if Marine Le Pen wins in France. France’s position in NATO and EU will be reconsidered
@BlahBlah-kb1wf
7 күн бұрын
12:12 finally some sense
@HANSMKAMP
6 күн бұрын
2:10 This shows that Russia isn't occupying much of the Ukrainian territory, only a little piece of Kharkivs'ka Oblast'. On the other hand, Ukraine is occupying Russia, except Luganskaya Oblast'.
@clarencejones4717
8 күн бұрын
Great update. I would avoid picking a side on whether or not ‘annexed’ land belongs to Russia. That will be contested.
@NonSeenNewss
8 күн бұрын
yeah I couldn't find the right word I should say on the moment
@user-nz6dt1nc3c
8 күн бұрын
Land that will be contested ? It is being contested right now land that has always had ethnic Orthodox Christian Russians living there and as of now the only people that are living there are Russians millions of them that don't want anything to do with puppet Zilly's Ukraine. Ukraine will never get back that territory, land bridge to Crimea is to important to Russia.
@denarjan
8 күн бұрын
It sure as hell shouldn't belong to BlackRock and JP Morgan, so they'd best just surrender, denazify, and from that moment on the Ukraine will have zero debts to the Wall-Street carpetbaggers who likely bought Ukraine land from the refugees for 10ct on the Dollar, the Wall-Street state loans, the weapon loans, IMF loans,etc etc. The fled Ukrainians can come back, and I'd be very much surprised if the Russians wouldn't just grant the stolen lands back to the refugees so they can start working the land again.
@denarjan
8 күн бұрын
On annexed land : kzitem.info/news/bejne/mW6Mu2WAo592o6gsi=y7G2Kfb-CeRBnokT&t=1556
@clarencejones4717
8 күн бұрын
@@denarjan wait, what's the relationship?
@Augvald
7 күн бұрын
Please stop saying Very interesting after every news segment!!! Its extremly annoying.
@user-vh4fy8ug7r
8 күн бұрын
What have stoltenberg to say in Ukraine negotiations 🤡
@concernedaussie1330
6 күн бұрын
Not sure who’s winning, but Ukraine is certainly losing! I’m very interested to know who Indonesia is looking to side with ? I’m a Aussie, & I can’t stand how weak & smug our government & yuppie population is ! I would love to see xi , modi or Putin in talks with Indonesia. Hahahaha that would sure spook the Australian media .
@MdWaris-tf4ig
8 күн бұрын
Ilegal invaders occupiers and a gressors must free and ieave a illoccupied territory of other na tions and must respect territoti all integrety sovereignty of othr nations and its must wirhdraw- all occupied territoy unconditio nally now and we dont accept t o loose our homeland in any si tuations and aggression occup ations and annexesions is una cceptable at all !
@pedrohpires6608
8 күн бұрын
What? Funny the syrian think the same?But no one tell (in west) a shit to them.😊
@Rick8191-tv8pg
8 күн бұрын
I agree , the Ukrainian occupation of western Russia needs to leave Russian lands
Пікірлер: 50