No need for speculation. Must be him. The jury sucked, too many sympathetic females, ignoring the agony of the dead and families. Was it necessary to have video to prove the defendant to be guilty. There were kind of objective evidences. If one wipes out DNA and dumps the weapon, one cannot be proved to be guilty?
He is guilty definitely. 1) Why was he sleeping over at his friends on the night of the murder and not go back home? 2) Why would the owner’s wallet be in his room? 3) He should have known his gf was pregnant a head of time. Buying a plane ticket right after the murder makes no sense. 4) If the relationship between the defendant and the victim was good, there would not have been a need to terminate his contract.
@judysycheung
2 жыл бұрын
yes but all circumstancial evidence. no direct conclusive evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that manalili was the killer.
@chloechloe3080
2 жыл бұрын
Also inside the house there should be his finger prints, cuz he works there
其实除了那些寻仇杀人(现今也不多),我相信是身边人干的。两人没有仇家、没欠人钱,生活规律,应该也不会遇到随机杀人的人吧。。。最大可疑不是男佣,难道还有谁?正如李昌钰先生说:always the husband! 意思不只是指丈夫是凶手,其实是身边的人。谁料疑点利益归于被告。天知,天知,他知,两夫妇知。
@deluxya
Жыл бұрын
當年牛佬係我班主任,因為SARS 停課,有一日我打開見到Mr. Ng 張相喺A1 … 好記得有之後一晚發夢見到佢,好平靜拍左我膊頭一下,乜都冇講,靜靜地行左去一個好光既地方⋯消失左,呢個真係好似佢性格,完全冇仇恨感覺, 去左第二度旅行 gum。。。 以前上堂果陣Mr. Ng 會周不時分享佢屋企個工人(即兇手)既事,好高好大力,打風果陣會幫手搬樹; 已經廿幾年啦...潤物無聲 - 以前會同我地去六四集會, 歷史已經同以前唔一樣 有天上的牛佬伉儷,希望您們一切平安! 都多謝探員X!
He is definitely guilty. He had the motive, the opportunity and the need to murder. He owed a large sum to the loan sharks. The prosecutor most probably inexperienced. Conviction can be based on circunstantial evidence. That guy fits the character of a real bastard without mirak standards, a sociopath and a real trouble maker for anyone he meets to benefit his interests or to give him money.
@Rainbow_EMIL
2 жыл бұрын
Cannot Agree More! But unfortunately, there is no Precedent for the Jail to accept a Deep Shit like Manalili!
Yea but the fact that they can’t find his finger prints in the house, it is clearly someone had wiped it down already! Cuz it should be normal to have his finger print all over the house
@circlewatch6721
2 жыл бұрын
無證據都無辦法 疑點利益歸於被告 世界各地嘅法律都會有佢嘅漏洞
@tszwingau8843
2 жыл бұрын
但系亦都杜絕左冤案既發生
@lunglunglunglunglung
2 жыл бұрын
我覺得佢係兇手,因為佢太熟識佢兩個家裡環境,所以有好多時間比佢清潔現場
@veralun6407
2 жыл бұрын
I think Manalili is guilty. Circumstantial evidence is quite compelling.
Пікірлер: 612