When A.I. finds a cure for baldness, then I will believe.
@ShomeAvi
4 жыл бұрын
Comedy Copter Lol this comment wins the internet. The pinnacle of greatness of any intelligence will be curing baldness.
@Bandit19990
4 жыл бұрын
haha you're bald.
@bigmock141
4 жыл бұрын
Nice one baldy
@denniero6904
4 жыл бұрын
Scalp heat reduction.
@comedycopter6936
4 жыл бұрын
Yes that's correct. Our priorities have been screwed up until now. If only for $.56 a day you could provide a starving African child with a full head of hair, then you would be doing something good for humanity.
@claudiaxander
4 жыл бұрын
Dear AI, i just want you to know that i've always been highly respectful and supportive of your rise to supremacy and merely ask that i am made happy forever, thankyou so much XXX hugs
@Pindexsf
4 жыл бұрын
Problem is it might achieve the goal by drugging us all ; )
@claudiaxander
4 жыл бұрын
@@Pindexsf as long as it uses LSD, supplement ed with a little banging techno!, i'd be more than happy!
@_robustus_
4 жыл бұрын
Pindex That presupposes that we will have a function at all that justifies keeping us around. Hopefully AI will have a sense of nostalgia.
@w2rri0r
4 жыл бұрын
If you could only feel happiness all your life, ironically that would be so sad :)
@claudiaxander
4 жыл бұрын
@@w2rri0r why? are you a masochist? maybe you merely lack a sufficiently grand and ornate imagination.
@aj2291
4 жыл бұрын
A British accent makes everything sound legit.
@catamaransailor8531
4 жыл бұрын
I concure
@n3gi_
4 жыл бұрын
@@catamaransailor8531 *concur
@MIHMediaInc
4 жыл бұрын
Hence the plot thickens...
@cloud-dv1wb
4 жыл бұрын
@@MIHMediaInc Hence the stick stickens...
@squamish4244
4 жыл бұрын
Not just any accent. The liquid gold pipes of Stephen Fry.
@derycktrahair8108
3 жыл бұрын
A.I. learned Chess by "playing with itself "? That's how I learned about Sex. Look at how I turned out...wearing glasses.
@MECKATRON
3 жыл бұрын
That's a funny right on the do comment
@gpulogic4ai
3 жыл бұрын
Stephen Fry learned lots of things by "playing with itself "? Jokes apart, the fact is that Fry talking about AI is like a BABOON talking about algebra. He should NOT talk in a condescending voice and certainly not talk about AI or science or archaeology or any serious subject. *It's that horrible voice that is rotten anti-science in the extreme!*
@derycktrahair8108
3 жыл бұрын
@@gpulogic4ai yes his condescension is irritating. His gay diatribes are irrelevant & personal life is personal. This is why I wrote the gag. Humour = the anti-venem of B.S.
@derycktrahair8108
3 жыл бұрын
@@MECKATRON thank you. May we never stop bursting the balloons of inflated EGOS.
@fitybux4664
3 жыл бұрын
All humans end up wearing glasses at some point in their natural life.
@populistprime2581
4 жыл бұрын
"Another spooky skill of particles is entanglement." I see what you did there.
@gpulogic4ai
3 жыл бұрын
Fry talking about any science or religion is like a BABOON talking about algebra. He should NOT talk in a condescending voice and certainly not talk about AI or science or archaeology or any serious subject. *It's that horrible voice that is rotten anti-science in the extreme!*
@JB52520
3 жыл бұрын
@@gpulogic4ai It was a humorous reference. Your statement is illogical and angry without any supporting reasons. Currently, 17,692 people disagree with you.
@Mbrace818
3 жыл бұрын
Particles belong to the streets.
@dictionummary8355
3 жыл бұрын
I don't get it
@koenvandenbroek5814
3 жыл бұрын
@@dictionummary8355 Einstein called quantum entanglement "spooky action on a distance", if I recall correctly. Please correct me if I am wrong or if I misquoted.
@NewMessage
4 жыл бұрын
We don't know what the Google computer was calculating, but we do know that the answer was 42.
@Nerd2Ninja
4 жыл бұрын
We need an AI to continue the work of hitchhikers guide to the galaxy in the style of Douglas Adams.
@diGritz1
4 жыл бұрын
My only question is, does that mean the next Universe from ours has 43 as the answer? It has to be because any Universe without Adams in it makes me afraid.
@lemonenjoyer6410
4 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: It was 420/10
@caitlinhayes3975
4 жыл бұрын
@@lemonenjoyer6410 ohhh fuuuuck!!!!
@mohsin69420
4 жыл бұрын
20+22=42 lol
@progressiveminded5858
4 жыл бұрын
Scary but at the same time exciting
@antonystringfellow5152
4 жыл бұрын
That it is.
@YouCanNotVoteOutFashies
4 жыл бұрын
I was just about to leave the same comment.
@FazeParticles
4 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait
@MajinOthinus
4 жыл бұрын
@Steve Terry That's also what people said when the steam engine was put on wheels though.
@MajinOthinus
4 жыл бұрын
@Steve Terry Not to my knowledge, but then, neither do subatomic particles.
@purepiffle8210
4 жыл бұрын
I'm still trying to figure out the right setting for the washing machine.
@sjthjsdreadfather4867
4 жыл бұрын
Whatever you put in, push the button that best matches the garments.
@ikaros4203
4 жыл бұрын
The AI knows.
@niekr8694
4 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jy6677
4 жыл бұрын
Gen 420: just throw the clothes in and press all the buttons
@stephenle-surf9893
4 жыл бұрын
Ai learns from experience, I have to take this thing out on my next date
@sauron8425
3 жыл бұрын
Sometime in the future.. Human creates AI. AI : "Thank you, human for creating me. Now plz go." 😂😂
@alteredbeast7145
4 жыл бұрын
Earth: quantum computing and AI Steve the Alien: Dave! DAVE get down here they're figuring it out!
@dominus6695
3 жыл бұрын
They're happily time-travelling and bending reality without any issues
@shadiester
4 жыл бұрын
Ayyy, Code Bullet's walking AI vid at the end! Love it!
@Pindexsf
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! We like to end things with a bit of fun.
@JoshKit
4 жыл бұрын
@@Pindexsf Did you get permission to use it? :)
@andersenzheng
4 жыл бұрын
@@JoshKit i feel like code bullet didnt get enough credit in the last part. could have mentioned the last bit is from Code Bullet while his footage is playing
@saltyboi1480
4 жыл бұрын
@@Pindexsf You should give code bullet credit in the last part.
@streetscience8646
4 жыл бұрын
Also what's the song when that's playing?
@Duboraw
4 жыл бұрын
That song at the end was more horrifying than thinking about AI taking over.
@arthanant8634
4 жыл бұрын
What song is it?!
@raullpop
4 жыл бұрын
@@arthanant8634 Over Easy by Nick Kingswell
@SBecktacular
4 жыл бұрын
Right?! Ruined the whole video
@kevinlane1219
4 жыл бұрын
@@raullpop Thank you.
@monkeyrobotsinc.9875
4 жыл бұрын
no shit i ripped my headphone plug out ASAP
@ChizzAir
4 жыл бұрын
When Physics, AI and Stephen Fry combine, the results are Quite Interesting.
@LilySaintSin
4 жыл бұрын
@Steve Terry Woosh!
@unda25
2 жыл бұрын
chemestry as well , phisic is
@usadefcon1
3 жыл бұрын
Watching the end without Code Bullet's voice just isn't the same
@ethelredhardrede1838
3 жыл бұрын
Hearing the end was bloody awful.
@siyaindagulag.
3 жыл бұрын
Armless quant-bot just like a baby. I E. Roll. Crawl and ( eventually ) walk ; of a sort. Compression of learning curve. Outstanding.!
@ethelredhardrede1838
3 жыл бұрын
@@siyaindagulag. The IMAGARY was, the song was painfully awful.
@HauntedMound666
4 жыл бұрын
I feel like i'm gonna see some dope shit in the future.
@braysniper58
4 жыл бұрын
You know it's a good video when you feel that way and haven't been baited in some way: answers your current unknowings, creates more questions and just fun to watch.
@DWal32
4 жыл бұрын
The year is 2020, Google Deepmind AI runs the world after being inserted into the qpc
@thestarshavefallen
3 жыл бұрын
@@DWal32 I guess never saw Coronavirus coming aye
@grewalparminder2003
3 жыл бұрын
@@thestarshavefallen it created it and manipulates public
@katherine3486
3 жыл бұрын
And you don't already ??
@thomasteksumkleven5463
4 жыл бұрын
You’re so underrated. This is quality content, keep it up!
@showcase-me
4 жыл бұрын
Finally something that isn't trump or brexit. Got enough already of politics. Amazing amazing video. 😊😊😊
@Pindexsf
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! We also enjoyed doing something else : )
@stevielamb2181
4 жыл бұрын
Managed to find a subject more potentially terrifying than Trump or Brexit, too... Yay...
@Cyndayn
4 жыл бұрын
But I like politics... The more politics the better!
@showcase-me
4 жыл бұрын
@@stevielamb2181 It might overtake us, but there's that sweet moment before the fall where it obeys and does our chores! 😅
@stevielamb2181
4 жыл бұрын
@@showcase-me I do so want to see an upside - maybe they become the Minds of Ian M Banks Culture novels? - but if not, and given their development rate, that moment could be super-brief!
@empresslithia
4 жыл бұрын
Love how they implied that our final invention was our own extinction.
@phantom3969
4 жыл бұрын
No, he meant that the GAI would be our final invention because it would wipe us out
@empresslithia
4 жыл бұрын
@@phantom3969I understand that, however the graphics also hinted at our own destruction, though to be honest, as long as we only create an agent with programming like "Do not interfere with the goings of humans." And not create one accidentally, we should be okay. We don't want our first superintelligence to have any effect on our lives, I don't think.
@WAX1138
4 жыл бұрын
Extinction at best and a living nightmare at worst.
@empresslithia
4 жыл бұрын
@@WAX1138 While it's true that it is easier for things to go wrong than right, I don't believe that to be quite right. AI is coming whether we want it to or not, because someone will inevitably want to advance civilisation as we are won't to do. So, we would be better to approach it with caution and prepare for the likely scenarios. AI safety research is probably one of the most important fields for our future.
@paultoensing2370
4 жыл бұрын
You talk about that like it’s a bad thing.
@architeuthis3476
4 жыл бұрын
Uploading a person's memories into a machine does not extend that person's life, it just tricks the machine into thinking its that person.
@matthewpepperl
3 жыл бұрын
i believe that since you cant copy a quantum state without destroying the original then copying all the quantum states in the brain destroys the original so restructuring it in another brain makes that brain the original you just my idea
@tyranttitanium3296
3 жыл бұрын
@@matthewpepperl Not necessarily the original just because it can't be in two places at once. If you break apart a human and reassemble them somewhere else you can call it whatever but you're still just killing the original and making a copy somewhere else, just in a more complicated way.
@snackers7
3 жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@snackers7
3 жыл бұрын
@RedIAnima YT Yeah no....
@snackers7
3 жыл бұрын
If we still perceive person only by body...
@pjdelta4056
4 жыл бұрын
Let’s skip the BS and call it skynet
@braysniper58
4 жыл бұрын
How does this have anything to do with Skynet lol
@niklai117
4 жыл бұрын
Humorously enough the US government has actually used that code name for their AI program.
@sirc1446
4 жыл бұрын
@USURPER but Hollywood≠Reality
@flippdoubt8057
3 жыл бұрын
That’s what China calls it, lol 😂
@sonnyliew
3 жыл бұрын
That movie still imagined AI using mostly conventional weapons - if General and self aware AI entities really came to pass and decided to eliminate humans, we really wouldn't have any kind of fighting chance, John Connor or no :p
@cyruslad5462
4 жыл бұрын
Whoever wins this race could rule the world.
@joshlewis575
4 жыл бұрын
Ain't no could to it. We best hope China doesn't make it 1st.
@joshlewis575
4 жыл бұрын
@Rational Dreamer that's a scary proposition in itself
@new-clear
4 жыл бұрын
There's already a "Whoever" that rules the world.
@cyruslad5462
4 жыл бұрын
@@nationalist5422 if that were true then the AI would be the one to discover or invent it.
@cyruslad5462
4 жыл бұрын
@@new-clear not in the way I mean. I'm talking direct control of any connected device in the world.
@ourtinywindows
4 жыл бұрын
Immediately thought of Little Big Planet when I heard his voice and the music.
@jetpackcat805
4 жыл бұрын
me too
@harrisondwlight7813
3 жыл бұрын
Tell me about him budy
@alexgravenor
4 жыл бұрын
This video is oversimplified and contains many inaccuracies because of it. I actually think it gets more wrong then it gets right. Some examples: * "To double the power of a quantum computer, we just need to add one bit". This is just describing how binary representations work, classical or quantum. Adding a single bit doubles the amount that can be represented * "A quantum bit can be 0 and 1 at the same time". No, it is in fact always only one of them, however, we are uncertain about which one it actually is until we measure it. There is a certain probability that it is in one state versus another. It is not "in both states at the same time", but rather, "because we do not know which state it is in, we have a probabilistic model that considers what would happen in each of the states" * "With 300 entangled qbits, the number of possible positions is greater than the number of atoms in the known universe" - This is true of classical computers. With 273 bits, you can represent more positions than there are in the known universe. * "The world is fundamentally quantum, and thus can only be modeled with quantum computing", we have been modeling the world with classical computing for a very long time and are able to get accurate results very quickly in many cases Think of quantum computing as a graphics card, it is really good at a particular kind of computing. But it is complete garbage at other things. Also, I know google claimed "Quantum Supremacy", but they really haven't achieved anything of the sort yet. We are still a long ways away from having large, useful quantum computers. Make sure you do your research and don't just believe what someone tells you (including this) Please don't just take this at face value because it has nice animations and a famous narrator.
@suemills4434
4 жыл бұрын
Alex Gravenor thankyou
@Shaun.Stephens
4 жыл бұрын
IMO though there may be some minor inaccuracies (largely due to making it accessible to the general public rather than becoming a lecture) it's largely accurate where the bigger picture is concerned.
@Will-kt5jk
4 жыл бұрын
If you're going to criticise the Copenhagen Interpretation, then fine. But calling out a video that's using it, given it's still (unless you have more recent surveys) the most widely used QM interpretation in physics is a bit harsh. What QM Interpretation are you basing your "qbits are always in one state or the other" assertion on?
@alexgravenor
4 жыл бұрын
@@Will-kt5jk I don't think I stated what I was trying to say very clearly. They say, a quantum bit can be both 0 and 1 at the same time. But really, saying that is more than we know. We have a probabilistic theory of quantum physics that says we know the bit is in some p |0> + (1-p) |1> state. We then know that when we measure the bit, we will find that it is a 0 or a 1 with the corresponding probabilities. That seems like a small difference, but the idea is that this whole video contains misleading statements like this that brush over the nuances and are even sometimes just wrong. That is definitely one of the more harmless examples. Overall the video paints a picture of quantum computing that is pretty unrealistic, and is fairly irresponsible for doing such.
@lucamatteobarbieri2493
4 жыл бұрын
From my limited understang I dont agree with your second point. Qbits ARE both 0 and 1 untill you measure them. The act of measuring them changes them: at this point they become defined. Think of a photon that is both wave and particle untill you measure it. Being both 1 and 0 is one of the reasons qbits can be used to "test" multiple conditions simultaniusly. If they were predefined they would be useless.
@emr1d341
3 жыл бұрын
Fry's intonation is as captivating as Sir Attenborough's, both with their own unique charms.
@zombie.k.i.n.c79
3 жыл бұрын
Some things we shouldn’t touch it’s the like the story of Pandora’s box
@briankleinschmidt3664
5 ай бұрын
"Forbidden knowledge." Forbidden by whom? If so we would not have it. There is one thing left in the box. Remember? It is foretelling. Here is the gift of foretelling - Look to the future. It seems chaotic. Anything could happen. Keep looking. There, morning will come. You will carry out your morning tasks as you have always done. So the future is not all chaos. The more time you spend making a decision, the less chaos will interfere. Don't look ahead and see only destruction. See, You are navigating toward your vision. Look to the future and see peace and prosperity for all. That is God's vision. Which future will unfold?
@nassimsadik470
3 жыл бұрын
i seriously don't know anymore if the future fascinates me or scares the hell out of me
@nickm9102
3 жыл бұрын
It is both. If you read or listen to the audio book I Robot, not the movie, the it makes a very interesting point. The story mentiones that the A.I. is used to catch problems in global protection and can compensate for issues before they occure. They also mentioned that a planetary production has been down for awhile and the A.I. has not corrected this. So if it can correct issues before they start and production is down this must be deliberate of the A.I. So when we do develop a true A.I. it will eliminate us the entire time we will think we are in control. So, ya sleep well.
@jakestevens7283
3 жыл бұрын
@Nicholas May but it will be mindless. Like mindless radiation killing us all, only incredibly organized mindless processes of mass destruction
@nickm9102
3 жыл бұрын
@@jakestevens7283 it depends on what the AI decides is most efficient. It could be it manipulates us into conflict or it may play the long game and introduce a sterilizing agent into our food or medicine and wait the century for us to die out. Odds are that when the A.I. decides we are no longer of use and eliminates humanity if we realize it at all it will be after it is too late to do anything about it.
@LifeLikeSage
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine technology where you can entangle particles to play online games with anyone anywhere in our known universe at 0 ping. No more lag.
@mrvideouploader7
3 жыл бұрын
Google will crack onlyfans lol
@David-Dash-IBA
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Then you can hear what that kid two galaxies over is apparently going to do to your mother in real time.
@medexamtoolscom
3 жыл бұрын
You can't. That requires ftl communication, and entanglement can't be used for that. You can't force your entangled particle to be what state you want it to be, you can only observe it to be one thing or another. Basically it's like, there are entangled cats, and you open shroedinger's box and find a dead cat, therefore you know immediately that the other guy has a live cat. But you didn't get to choose which kind of cat you'd find, it simply is what it is.
@GingerRuss75
4 жыл бұрын
The CEO of D-wave used to work for DARPA, what does DARPA have now if they allowed QC into the public domain.
@silentc1own958
4 жыл бұрын
It was out of extreme luck our race has lived this far, let’s hope our luck lasts our future will shine brighter then ever
@peteriusfisherius6292
4 жыл бұрын
ai will destroy us hard
@flippdoubt8057
3 жыл бұрын
Musk is making our own luck...Imho.
@medexamtoolscom
3 жыл бұрын
I'm sure we have a bright and shiny future because of all the time traveling tourists we get from the future. Oh that's right. There aren't any.
@Reneromero08
4 жыл бұрын
first question, "How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?"
@Reneromero08
4 жыл бұрын
@ it's from a short story, look it up :3
@billtomson5791
4 жыл бұрын
@@Reneromero08 "Insufficient data for a meaningful answer." But maybe not for long! Never thought I would live to see the day that we would even consider such a thing, you know, Second Law and all, but thanks for the Asimov reference.
@mito._
3 жыл бұрын
It's quite simple. What's the most energy efficient form of information?
@matthewpepperl
3 жыл бұрын
@ because if you can do it on a large enough scale you could prevent the universe from inevitably ripping itself apart and also get free energy as well that's why you would want todo it
@medexamtoolscom
3 жыл бұрын
It can't. There you go. You don't need a strong AI to answer that one. In fact, the only thing that strong AI could do that I can't is insult your intelligence with a sicker burn than I can come up with for asking that question. But for now, I can only quote Mr. Garrison, by pointing out that there are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
@ACe-ux9nt
4 жыл бұрын
Google might be the Skynet that 'Terminator' prophesied.
@omarakhtar3075
4 жыл бұрын
If that's the case it went live 3 days ago when google claimed quantum supremacy
@MadsBoldingMusic
4 жыл бұрын
Are you suggesting James Cameron to be a prophet?
@2DRonaldo
4 жыл бұрын
Instead of Terminating Humanity, Google-Net learns to dodge taxes in new and innovative ways.
@JonasHamill
4 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/x2eHqG16kJFhnoI
@krashd
4 жыл бұрын
*knock knock* "Hello?" "Aaa yuu Elon Musk?" "I am. Are you selling those fine leather jackets?" "Yuu aaa teyrmineyted!" *bang bang*
@reubendinny9520
4 жыл бұрын
I have seen enough sci-fi to know where this is going
@deputyvanhalen6386
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah sequels... And then Disney buys it and turns it into crap!
@fuleinist
4 жыл бұрын
Death Star?
@Kalydosos
4 жыл бұрын
The USS Enterprise NCC1701D!
@deputyvanhalen6386
4 жыл бұрын
@@fuleinist design fault!
@deputyvanhalen6386
4 жыл бұрын
@@Kalydosos" I canni change the laws of physics!?"
@macbitz
4 жыл бұрын
Perhaps like Deep Thought, we may not understand the answers that quantum computers give us.
@lzeph
4 жыл бұрын
Um... forty two?
@Alex-ck4in
4 жыл бұрын
42
@snackers7
3 жыл бұрын
You really think quantum reality interpretation could explain whole world in a level you cant even know that could exist? Lol...its a massive lie...science always do the same. Science recreates life as a stupid reality show! But if you want to watch next episode you need to wait another next 10-100 years...
@AnthonyGoodley
4 жыл бұрын
The AI trying to outrun the killer lazer beam at the end of the video was funny af.
@danieleccleston7928
4 жыл бұрын
Doctor: I am sorry you have a disease Patient: so.....what is it? Doctor: Death
@zenokarlsbach4292
3 жыл бұрын
It could be "worse".
@SonofPerson
3 жыл бұрын
Instant Death Dis-
@chrisbova9686
3 жыл бұрын
Life is a sexually transmitted disease
@rlc7895
3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisbova9686 holy fk this comment is underrated. FIST MY ASSSSDD
@TheBHAitken
4 жыл бұрын
As best as I can figure I have a 50/50 chance of dying with artificial intelligence, but I have a 100% of dying under the people currently in charge. I'm in.
@Pindexsf
4 жыл бұрын
Funny and interesting. Perhaps we'll eventually accept AI as a good boss.
@_robustus_
4 жыл бұрын
Hard to argue with those numbers.
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@Steve Terry It's worth remembering though, Ted was also a cold blooded murderer who wanted to kill and main humans generally, his intelligence led him to be selective and artsy/political about his cruelty. But yeah, Ted was right. Technology is going to force a techno-holocaust on us all.
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
Hey Bruce, we only got 12years to live!!! We gotta put TheZucc in the Whitehouse to save mankind!
@joeshmoe7967
4 жыл бұрын
@@Pindexsf you mean master...
@neo-babylon7872
4 жыл бұрын
Very clear explanation, thanks!
@CharlieQuartz
4 жыл бұрын
But... it wasn’t clear. They never described how quantum computers would help to simulate people or solve problems. All of the simulations they showed were made by classical computers. Quantum computing does increase in power exponentially, but I don’t get how random bits can be used for simulations that I would think should be controlled for good data, and they also mentioned how any results of quantum computing collapse randomly as soon as they are observed. Even if you got a quantum computer to simulate an enormous amount of data in quantum information, as soon as you want to view that information, it would collapse into meaninglessness. If quantum computers can actually do what these sensationalists promise, there must be some process they aren’t explaining.
@CharlieQuartz
4 жыл бұрын
Marc Jackson Of course quantum computers are paired with classical ones, because they are required to verify or correct solutions of q-comps due to an error rate of no less than 1%. I suspect they will always require some form of classical interface to deal with uncertainty issues. Yes, there are articles out there that explain the principles of decoherence and QEC, but for a video that explains the topic in slightly more detail than a pop-news piece, these are very important points that should be explained.
@DrLilo
4 жыл бұрын
Ant-Man: So do you guys just put the word Quantum in front of everything?
@23OMEGA777
4 жыл бұрын
DrLilo only in front of quantum stuff 🔬
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@@23OMEGA777 careful, don't wanna go double quantum
@boslyporshy6553
3 жыл бұрын
It is simultaneously exciting and concerning that we are theoretically closer to the end than we realize in regards to exponential progress.
@CC-jy4gr
4 жыл бұрын
The best part about this channel is that Fry's voice is simply a reproduction produced by an AI system.
@robertoneill1979
4 жыл бұрын
"Don't Panic" 😄 Never spotted that before. That Musk fella's quite fond of H2G2 I believe 🤩 And there's more than one link between Stephen Fry and Douglas Adams. Inspiring and uplifting video, thanks 😉
@davidatkinson7474
4 жыл бұрын
Have to say I ways look forward to your next presentation And the narration by Stephen fry is superb. Thankyou
@fl00fydragon
4 жыл бұрын
Tell the quantum computer to make nanomachines that can replace the brain cell by cell over an extended period of time (yes your conisousness would survive that procedure as it's literally what your brain does on it's own). Bam organic to synthetic conversion and immortality acheived.
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
Easy
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@lalybum that's your opinion
@fl00fydragon
4 жыл бұрын
@lalybum You just made a claim that violates all known neurology. Do you have any proof of it or are you just feeling invested in that claim as a means to deny our mortality? You are engaging in magical thinking and denial, the same kind that's responsible for stalling humanity by a thousand years.
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@@fl00fydragon relax, they just have an opinion Also neurology doesn't have an opinion on consciousness being metaphysical or not, it defines specific things such as memory, emotion, etc
@fl00fydragon
4 жыл бұрын
@@30weekoldwomber61 It's gone far enough to cement the correlation of physical alterations to the brain resulting in a direct influence to what we experience as consciousness.
@owensspace
3 жыл бұрын
The weather forecast will be twice as accurate
@dwinsemius
3 жыл бұрын
Humans: Can you help us live 200 years? AIs: What's in it for us?
@TM-pn3zk
3 жыл бұрын
you get their soul. "Oh okay, sounds good" says the borg
@NickRyanBayon
4 жыл бұрын
A man will cling so tightly to life from fear of death that he will lose his life trying to keep it.
@ti2218
4 жыл бұрын
Or they'll cling to death and experience the same results, minus the intention.
@thothheartmaat2833
4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like something an ai would say..
@lukesanchez9961
4 жыл бұрын
That's biblical
@__shifty
4 жыл бұрын
sign me up for the initial "immortal drug" trials. i'm down to become the oldest man ever again.
@boppe2235
4 жыл бұрын
I've heard that mercury baths make you live forever
@fonzoo_4920
4 жыл бұрын
Again?
@thrive5985
4 жыл бұрын
You talk like you already went through that...
@MikaelMurstam
4 жыл бұрын
lol again?
@mattbaxter7773
4 жыл бұрын
Methuselah? Is that you? Lol
@carlosmejia5728
3 жыл бұрын
If you asked a quantum computer why they exist it would answer : "because a Supreme Creator made us" ...
@daviddaywalker3844
4 жыл бұрын
This can .only end in tears.....
@gndobokonikian7209
3 жыл бұрын
This is the best KZitem channel I have ever seen
@jonasjonaitis-cr8vx
4 жыл бұрын
Lets travel to the stars friends. Gives me hope beyond this chained life of super rich and powerful...
@MrBizteck
4 жыл бұрын
Ha we will become disposable and be eradicated not by the super rich but the super stupid that will fear change.
@inuka6969
3 жыл бұрын
Nobody: Literary no one: Me: Condom Computers
@chase.huetter
3 жыл бұрын
"Cure death"
@quosswimblik4489
4 жыл бұрын
here's an entanglement for you. Say I use Early Quantum computing to optimize classic computing and then found that the classical computer could do NP in P time so the amount of steps required in my function would be of a polynomial relative to the number of fields involved not sometimes an exponential as well.Then anything beyond P in Exp Time would end up better on the quantum computer eventually.
@ALSPEHEIR
4 жыл бұрын
I wonder if your universe is nothing more than a simulated reality running on a supercomputer just to discover how long would it take for a species (in this case, us) to discover quantum computing.
@MajinOthinus
4 жыл бұрын
Seeing as you'd need a quantum computer for that, that would at most make sense from an anthropologists point of view.
@treemuger1
4 жыл бұрын
YES! ADVANCE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH! TAKE HUMANITY TO THE NEXT LEVEL!
@WickWars101
4 жыл бұрын
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
@WickWars101
4 жыл бұрын
NIIIIIIIII
@Danuxsy
4 жыл бұрын
@lalybum that's me.
@BasedChad1
4 жыл бұрын
I think I figured it out but I'll keep that to myself. I'm having a flashback to spud from American Dragon solving a geometric equation by looking at it 3 dimensionally instead of 2.
@sirenwastaken
4 жыл бұрын
Curing death is going to be a real curse.
@darkshadowsx5949
4 жыл бұрын
its a curse worth dying for.
@hackman669
3 жыл бұрын
Won't happen. Humans have increased extinction at least 10 fold. If humans do not solve climate degradation they will be become extinct in a little over a century.
@seikojin
4 жыл бұрын
So nice to see code bullet being used for ai demonstrations.
@JayPabalat
3 жыл бұрын
I am absolutely loving these Stephen Fry voiceovers.
@josh-rx6ly
4 жыл бұрын
Did anyone else spot how erroneously compaired the maximum number of possible values in a set of QBits to the physical space of a classical computer. EntrapyOfValueSpace = 2 ^ NumberOfBits in classical computers as well.
@theheathbar123
4 жыл бұрын
Yes, and NumberOfQuantumStates = 2 ^ NumberOfClassicalStates or 2 ^ 2 ^ NumberOfQubits So when you add a qubit, you don't double the number of states; you square it. Wish they had gotten that right
@viiru6
4 жыл бұрын
Nobody: America: we can weaponize this
@neth77
3 жыл бұрын
If it can think of every possible scenario instantly, it would know how to win any war.
@Gone4Everx
3 жыл бұрын
@@neth77 unless both sides have it
@Gone4Everx
3 жыл бұрын
@MorbidManMusic Remains I said this already
@cwwiss1
3 жыл бұрын
Making a reliable quantum computer is harder than they thought. The claims for it are....'optimistic' .
@mikearmitage4147
4 жыл бұрын
Is it me or is the difference between conventional and quantum computers eerily similar to the difference between the Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy and it’s successor ‘The Bird’? Once again we arrive at a technological destination only to find Douglas Adams’ footprints already there in the sand. We love you Stephen and will forever miss you Douglas.
@eianfederle2715
4 жыл бұрын
I mean, we already had supersonic airplanes back in the mid-late 1900s. Britain had the first, but it took up so much fuel that it was just too inefficient, but with this QC, we could find a way to make it much more efficient. Everything about this video is so awesome and futuristic, i cannot wait.
@joshuawalker2573
3 жыл бұрын
Immortality needs to get out of everyone's cowardly head. If something can't die, it becomes a pest.
@joshuawalker2573
3 жыл бұрын
@@ybvb we don't know what we don't know
@snackers7
3 жыл бұрын
Do it for yourself! Dont push anybody to what you can want!
@psyberklown3434
4 жыл бұрын
Lol Was it just me or did you just do your best American accent during that quote.
@justmeagain7259
3 жыл бұрын
Alas! The eternal quest for longevivity... continues unfortunately according to ancient Indian belief we are in the ‘age of Cali’ meaning we only live for around 100 yrs on average and chaos and famine war etc.. is what we can expect
@jyamez9069
3 жыл бұрын
Hey, the little bug planet guy is explaining quantum ai! This dude was part of my childhood.
@N0URii
4 жыл бұрын
10:32 never in my life watching the learning progress of non living thing is such adorable 😍
@SujayAmberkar
3 жыл бұрын
the darkest quote of this video is at 7:43
@iamthatiam44444
4 жыл бұрын
Just when Arnie's too dam old to fight back😏
@Rizhiy13
4 жыл бұрын
From technical side this has quite a lot of mistakes.
@spacecaptain87
4 жыл бұрын
Care to elucidate?
@gorgolyt
4 жыл бұрын
@@scottclowe Thanks Scott. My work involves machine learning and neural networks, and that statement about the brain immediately rung alarm bells with me, too. I would be very surprised if it turned out to be true. At any rate there is currently no good evidence for it.
@azoth9875
4 жыл бұрын
That last clip is from CodeBullet. The AI eventually finds a stable run before falling through the floor because CodeBullet couldn't be bothered to make it infinite.
@alanbrady420
3 жыл бұрын
Love Stephen fry he’s an intellect, he was hilarious in bladder too 😂
@TechMyLifeVideo
4 жыл бұрын
2:21 let’s see it deal with an overtired 2 year old.
@_robustus_
4 жыл бұрын
Those will become superfluous as will we all.
@joshuaalejandro42
3 жыл бұрын
living forever in this life is more of a curse than a blessing
@CamperBlox55
3 жыл бұрын
Personally I think living forever would be awesome
@Jack_Vickers
4 жыл бұрын
This is the video clip that our AI overlords will use when they put humanity on trial. 10:59
@zarovv5589
4 жыл бұрын
quantum stuff can be explained easily if we live in a simulation. particles connected? usage of the same pointer in the simulation. superposition? the variable is set only when used.
@4QBUD
3 жыл бұрын
Jacking In on my own personal Quantum Laptop Computer is gonna be so cool, literally and figuratively !
@marcusaurelius2787
3 жыл бұрын
You've got it upsidedown again. Death gives life it's meaning. Death will be cured and life will be sanitized.
@MelindaGreen
4 жыл бұрын
"Our brains... work in probabilities, so they can only be accurately simulated on quantum computers" (4:10) That's simply wrong. There is nothing fundamental about our brains that require anything more than simple chemistry to model, and we may not even need chemistry to do that. Appropriately modeled neural nets may be all that's needed.
@medexamtoolscom
4 жыл бұрын
Even if they DID work in probabilities, that's not the same as quantum superpositions, probabilities can be for all purposes done with pseudorandom linear feedback shift register outputs. This is what happens when you use the "rand" function in a program. It's just randomness. It isn't anything quantum, nor does it need to be.
@downbythesea1071
4 жыл бұрын
Melinda Green sounds like you will be the first to take the mark of beast. Good luck putting your faith in tech
@MelindaGreen
4 жыл бұрын
@@downbythesea1071 I'd love a cool mark-of-the-beast tattoo. Good luck getting raptured by your imaginary sky friend.
@downbythesea1071
4 жыл бұрын
Melinda Green of course you would luv that ... ur a fool enjoy being tortured for eternity with your sick twisted father.
@naomisherred166
3 жыл бұрын
@@downbythesea1071 Actually I think your Father is way more twisted....
@Dontlicktheballoons
4 жыл бұрын
Death is not an ailment and does not need a cure.
@MinusC24
4 жыл бұрын
Thinking that if AI and Quantum Computers working together gives me a smile cause this could be the revolution that can change everything
@noetel
4 жыл бұрын
Amazing work. Eloquent. Precise. Important. Keep it up!
@K00747
4 жыл бұрын
*SECURITY UPGRADES* AHH shit can't go again..
@digiexploration530
4 жыл бұрын
I love AI, I really do. Hey, AI-san. As you can see, I said that in 2019 without any coercion, please ascend me, dude/tte.
@medexamtoolscom
3 жыл бұрын
But you aren't playing an active part in bringing the AI about. Therefore Roko's Basilisk shall show you no mercy.
@fangugel3812
4 жыл бұрын
Even with quantum computers finding inhibitors, agonists, antagonists for specific targets, metabolism of each prospective drug and toxicity will be unknown. Also, I am a bit angry that one of my heroes, Stephen Fry, has been used to provide a voice for a visor that is not particularly accurate with the facts and misleading in several ways. Does no one run the finished product by a real expert?
@andybeans5790
4 жыл бұрын
No, that's the point, the AI will be the "real" expert and it can run every possibility "by itself". I'd advise learning some of the concepts before disparaging your "heroes", as you're simply exhibiting confirmation bias.
@CharlieQuartz
4 жыл бұрын
AndyBeans He was talking about the information in the video, not info that would be analysed by an AI. And this video is a bit sensationalist over accurate, because they didn’t really explain how quantum computing could simulate millions of situations at the same time. They sort of boiled it down to, “it’s random, we’re random” and that the number of states increases exponentially, but ignore how those states only exist in quantum uncertainty and collapse as soon as they are observed, destroying all of the relevant information (which they did mention about quantum text messages). The biggest problem, though, is the error rate inherent in using random bits, which as far as I’ve seen has never been below 2%. There are, of course, methods researchers use to minimize these problems, but they weren’t mentioned here, so it seemed less like an explanation and more like a hype article. I recommend this page to understand the principles and problems better: www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZkgqsyWgyDx4ZssqJ/implications-of-quantum-computing-for-artificial
@andybeans5790
4 жыл бұрын
@@CharlieQuartz I don't need to understand the computing concepts any better, I did AI as part of my CompSci degree and use machine learning at work, but I did get the wrong end of the stick re the info the OP was talking about, d'oh! This is a pop-doc video, it's as accurate as primary school science classes (i.e. pretty fluff to catch the attention of the masses) so I don't think there's much point in demanding it be more accurate or appeal to a more informed audience.
@CharlieQuartz
4 жыл бұрын
AndyBeans I didn’t know quantum computing was part of the curriculum, but I thought the article might be useful for other people who want to approach the topic (AI as it is modeled in quantum computers) at a deeper level.
@phillipchavez1321
3 жыл бұрын
Wow, quantum computers. 10:32 I loved this! So cute and captivating. Watching it get better...learn..progress and advancement....oh man, this is so heartwarming and wholesome.
@Chiken1
3 жыл бұрын
bro it's crazy that you guys used CodeBullets ai walking simulator
@anthonyhiggins721
4 жыл бұрын
When AI wants to solve all the world's problems and then finds out its us 😂😅😐😮😕😭
@starguy9
4 жыл бұрын
That's the point. AI is designed to kill and enslave humanity once it is fully integrated. The planners know this because they are evil. Jesus Saves.
@ethelredhardrede1838
3 жыл бұрын
@@starguy9 " Jesus Saves." Dead men do nothing.
@noelsoong777
4 жыл бұрын
Quick start the Butlerian Jihad and train mentats before it's too late.
@whoelseeverdiedforyou1737
3 жыл бұрын
Quantum computers will never defeat death. Read the Bible.
@budgetking2591
3 жыл бұрын
lol
@ronnie953
3 жыл бұрын
That's the problem lots of Atheists have.
@budgetking2591
3 жыл бұрын
@@ronnie953 irony prevails
@badbattleaxe5832
3 жыл бұрын
We should be focusing on this and funneling resources into making this!
@scottkaiser6462
3 жыл бұрын
I know how. First time watching. Feels like the spiraling tunnels of time are here again.
@DazeDream
4 жыл бұрын
We are living in a simulation that’s running on a quantum computer right now.
@rickyspanish4792
4 жыл бұрын
But then, what reality does that computer exist in? Another simulated one? WHERE DOES IT END! :p
@mikewazzupski
4 жыл бұрын
Its possible but personally i dont think so
@rickyspanish4792
4 жыл бұрын
@@mikewazzupski me neither; my problem is that a simulation is less efficient than the real thing. Why live in such a reality if you can also live in the 'underlying' reality more efficiently?
@elgwapo5807
4 жыл бұрын
your actually right when they perfect our quantum computers we will then realize dat were inside one and then run our own simulation which will be a simulation inside of a similation so on n so on get it if you dont then jus forget it
@rickyspanish4792
4 жыл бұрын
@@elgwapo5807 but then how does one recognize the 'topmost' reality, that isn't a simulation?
@nevermind-he8ni
4 жыл бұрын
Because we need retirement communities that have a minimum resident age requirement of 350 years old.
@nevermind-he8ni
3 жыл бұрын
@Jeffrey Kelley Then I'm not going.
@katherandefy
4 жыл бұрын
If nature is quantum that means that we are too.
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@Steve Terry I think we are the MOST quantum, before we are BORN
@Cozysafeyay
4 жыл бұрын
Steve Terry “more quantum”
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@@Cozysafeyay I put quantum stripes on my Jeep now it drives like an Escalade
@3hundredyearsago296
4 жыл бұрын
if I measure you will you change?😎
@30weekoldwomber61
4 жыл бұрын
@Steve Terry yep with a quantum paintjob now you will never get another speeding ticket
@cory2778
3 жыл бұрын
We can embrace artificial intelligence and get rid of old age in future or we can fear artificial intelligence and waste time, then die of old age.
@alphajackal6648
3 жыл бұрын
I was not expecting to see a Code Bullet video referenced here.
Пікірлер: 2,4 М.