Wonderful! Nino's responses are right on the mark.
@MontyCantsin5
7 жыл бұрын
Great! I particularly enjoyed Zanghi's response to the question concerning the role philosophy should play in physics.
@naimulhaq9626
5 жыл бұрын
This guy is right. QM is saying something beyond the theory, it is saying what lies beyond reality, it is indicating why a SINGLE probability wave function governs everything in the universe, and the proof is in a proper understanding of QM. Just like phase transition transforms non-life matter into life and consciousness, similarly the Quantum Field self-simulate intelligent conscious 'observer', collapsing the field into fine tuned particles (matter) that creates life with perfection and with probability ONE, implying that the Anthropic Principle follows from the mathematics of QM.
@david203
2 жыл бұрын
You've missed the whole point of this conference, which has as its goal eliminating anthropomorphism from QM, eliminating the need for an observer. Physics should describe what actually exists and how it works, without involving human observation or consciousness in some mysterious or religious way. Historically, Bohr crafted the standard interpretation of QM to contain a set of mystical axioms that cannot be questioned. It is this baggage that makes QM theory so difficult to understand.
@david203
Жыл бұрын
@@BobbyT-ov3rk An example is that we cannot, according to Bohr, ever know what is going on inside a QM system until a measurement occurs. There are lots more examples, but I'm too busy to write a long article.
@david203
Жыл бұрын
@@BobbyT-ov3rkHe's wrong. While Bohr made enormous contributions to the knowledge of the physics at tiny scale, the revolution that David Bohm contributed is also important, but has been ignored and misunderstood, according to John Bell, who proved that QM is nonlocal and may have hidden variables. Bohm predicted deterministic paths, such as through the double-slit experiment, while the standard interpretation predicts the impossibility of any such paths. Bohm's paths are distinctive--for example, he predicts that single particles are constrained to the half of the screen on the side of the slit it goes through. Not only that, but a couple of experiments have actually succeeded (through the low-energy technique) in visualizing deterministic paths. Guess what--the paths shown by experiment are, within experimental error, the same as the paths predicted and published by Bohm. Mysticism is saying that the foundations of QM cannot be proven, therefore must be taken as axioms. Eliminating mysticism is proving the axioms! And this is being done by Bohm's few followers today, for example by the simple insight of including a simplified measuring device as part of the quantum state of the experiment. I really should not be spending all this time on this because I'm busy and because you are unlikely to ever change your fixed opinions. Best of luck. This is my last reply.
@phoule76
5 жыл бұрын
Nothin' shakin' on Shakedown Street. Used to be the heart of town. Don't tell me this town ain't got no heart. You just gotta poke around.
@circusOFprecision
10 жыл бұрын
The idea of QM without observers is like the idea of science without scientists.
@Holobrine
7 жыл бұрын
circusOFprecision No, it means a way of keeping quantum mechanics the same regardless of whether or not we are looking at it.
@neffetSnnamremmiZ
4 жыл бұрын
Science is very useful insofar as scientists substract themselfs..
@david203
2 жыл бұрын
@@neffetSnnamremmiZ Yes; it is quite ignorant to try to make everything in the Universe revolve around us; it only reflects our ego, not reality.
Пікірлер: 11