🌏 Get Exclusive NordVPN deal + 4 months extra here → nordvpn.com/johnnyharris It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌
@Levitationable
Ай бұрын
bro actually preuploaded this 2 days prior 😂
@hrgunit
Ай бұрын
Fishing attacks are horrible, if you in a submarine.
@okuhtttf
Ай бұрын
maybe no...
@DrRimantas
Ай бұрын
And what you like today about.. Elon and orange man bad reporter 🤣
@PoiSonSonic
Ай бұрын
What is up with the mixed FPS? 05:00
@smaza2
Ай бұрын
very polite of all the countries to line up their submarines for this video
@johnnyharris
Ай бұрын
😆
@desamster
Ай бұрын
For documenting purposes obviously 🙄🙃
@tyrabjurman3584
Ай бұрын
For sure, a lot of negotiations was required to accomplish this feat.
@1112viggo
Ай бұрын
And a special thanks to the ocean for remaining completely calm the entire time!😆
@MegaSaq1
Ай бұрын
They only lined up for those we know about. You have to listen.
@alext.5033
Ай бұрын
The country with the largest number of Subway restaurants per million people worldwide in 2014 was Canada. I don’t know if this is relevant, since we’re talking about submarines.
@Gurumeierhans
Ай бұрын
Subway makes a lot more Subs than any other country. This is relevant context for your statement
@HotSTeh
Ай бұрын
@@Gurumeierhans without further context, Subway is a sub superpower lol
@desamster
Ай бұрын
Yes. Yes it is.
@Jabzor
Ай бұрын
Subway is disgusting
@derrekvanee4567
Ай бұрын
@@Jabzorterayaki! *Speak it son?* Sorry.
@jimalbi
26 күн бұрын
Spain once had the biggest fleet of warship on Earth. Today they have 1 sub.
@harshit22941
25 күн бұрын
Americans and British.
@scbond
25 күн бұрын
@@harshit22941 What about them?
@ibairementeria
25 күн бұрын
We got more than one, the ones that got released last year it’s the most advanced in the world
@GeneParmesan69
25 күн бұрын
@@ibairementeriathey’re great subs, but certainly not the most advanced in the world… they use diesel engines and the program has been plagued with issues
@Sr._Rubio
24 күн бұрын
@@GeneParmesan69He means the most advanced non nuclear probably
@knpark2025
Ай бұрын
South Korea: has the sixth biggest submarine fleet in the world Also South Korea: *their submarine fleet is the smallest in its neighborhood*
@London755
Ай бұрын
DPRK navy has abysmal state of readiness.
@noname1148
Ай бұрын
The DPRK submarines are utterly outdated and would be all but useless in anything other than shallow water coastal defense, they also make great use of “midget submarines” which again is utterly useless in an all out war with any modern navy such as the South Korean Navy. They only have two newer submarines that was home built in 2014, only these would be capable of offensive capabilities. Their readiness level is also extremely questionable.
@methal0-111
Ай бұрын
We have a very high density of submarines in Asian waters.
@mohitpatil8237
Ай бұрын
Perspective really sneaks up on ya doesn't it *surprised pokemon*
@bholdr----0
Ай бұрын
And the comparison between the ROK and Japan kinda implied they're allies, even if their interests generally align and they are both strong US allies... And Greece and Türkiye are both in NATO... (Which is NOT why they have a rough parity in subs!)
@alexbaxter3730
Ай бұрын
Some people like to rearrange their furniture, clean their Legos, or just read a book. Johnny likes to rank submarines 😂 my kinda guy
@jaredt.murphy8257
Ай бұрын
I was just thinking of that. There are "trains" guys - I guess Johnny is a sub guy - submarines, that is
@Tarquin2718
29 күн бұрын
@@jaredt.murphy8257 No he is a map guy. Today he mapped subs 🙂
@ukhawaja
18 күн бұрын
It's funny to see that Spain, which used to have the biggest navy, hence the Spanish Armada, only has one lonely submarine. Only one, Spain? How far ye hath fallen! Spain needs to step up its game.
@thealvatar6181
Ай бұрын
“Australia will SOON have nuclear submarines” My children will be in University before the first one is commissioned… (I have no children yet)
@DrPhilGoode
17 күн бұрын
Like your children have a shot to get into university. 😁
@pulsepix_
17 күн бұрын
@@DrPhilGoode💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@danielleoliver1734
15 күн бұрын
It would have been started if we stuck with the British contract, but American must interfere with everyone
@moustarboygamingandreplay4340
15 күн бұрын
@@DrPhilGoode For real, we're in deep trouble!
@Dr.Kraig_Ren
12 күн бұрын
@@DrPhilGoodelmao
@scottl9660
Ай бұрын
Just remember two things. 1/3 of all navy vessels are in dock for maintenance at any one time. 1/3 are transiting to or from a station, so only 1/3 are patrolling at any one time. The second thing is…the oceans are really big.
@0o0ification
Ай бұрын
JIC I went and looked at the ocean. Can confirm that it’s real big 👍
@deathdrone6988
Ай бұрын
Don't forget refueling (especially for the nuclear ones since refueling can take up to a whole year) and retrofitting/upgrades.
@erenyea5660
Ай бұрын
Radar technology has brought navies into the modern age, theres no part of one ocean a modern surface or underwater vessel cannot observe.
@actualyoungsoo
Ай бұрын
Because it’s not a war time. It’s much cheaper and better for the life span of a submarine when it’s docked on shore instead of sailing all the time.
@concinnus
Ай бұрын
Nuke subs spend a lot less time transiting unless they're getting retasked all the time. And the Russian navy is probably well over 1/3 time in dock these days, lol.
@noeman88
Ай бұрын
"Whoever rules the waves, rule the world" Mongolians: Hold my beer
@ryandanngetich2524
Ай бұрын
The British empire; You need to sit down
@Constantine0290
Ай бұрын
*Throat singing intensifies*
@GloomGaiGar
Ай бұрын
yogurt
@Jack_The_Ripper_Here
Ай бұрын
they don't exist anymore now do they? their Empire is gone so yeah it's true
@battulga91
Ай бұрын
@@Jack_The_Ripper_Here We do. Mongolia still exists
@jadenstigman9831
26 күн бұрын
13:51 Minor correction. The replacements for the US ballistic subs (Ohio Class) are going to begin entering service in 2031 (Columbia class). The first sub will be SSBN-826 USS District of Columbia. The SSN(X) program replacing current US Attack subs (Virginia Class) are projected to enter service in 2042 with builds starting in 2034. Thanks for the informative video.
@alexmann152
Ай бұрын
I'd like to see a similar video comparing air strength and tank strength. 1. It's very interesting to see how each NATO nation has its own special application- like how Greece has a massive tank force and how France has expeditionary capability 2. Its also fascinating to see how Air forces are advancing. Who is using the most modern gen 5 aircraft? How many bombers does each nation have?
@Alex-hu5eg
Ай бұрын
Massive tank force with 42 Leopards. Russians lose more on a random afternoon in the donbas
@bricksquad9552
Ай бұрын
USA takes the cake in every category, to no surprise lol.
@alexmann152
Ай бұрын
@@Alex-hu5eg You're right- I meant Greece. Hungary has a different specialization though I cannot remember what it was
@Tarquin2718
29 күн бұрын
And a Navy version.
@coltonadams6936
28 күн бұрын
It would be pretty cool you’re right
@camatat1329
Ай бұрын
As a romanian, I can say that we have a submarine too. It wasn't used for the past years, currently undergoin repairs, but I think it still counts as one submarine.
@buddyrd
Ай бұрын
Correct, the Delfinul, a kilo-class sub, has a captain and crew, but will never be seaworthy again unless it gets a new set of batteries. Maybe why it didn't make this list?
@duducarblog
Ай бұрын
lol its been out of service for more than 3 decades haha.
@jamesmiller4184
Ай бұрын
Really now! It should be renamed 'The Vlad" as in Tepes.
@rachelb7228
Ай бұрын
Aww how cute. Here’s a ⭐️ for your effort 😂
@shafquatsadman5191
Ай бұрын
I'm from Bangladesh & we have two used & old submarines which were gifted by China😅
@scbond
25 күн бұрын
Very odd that you mention both France and the UK having nuclear powered subs and then you move on and say "this is where you'll see nuclear weaponised subs". Both the French and the UK have nuclear weaponised subs.
@TheeBritishGuy
23 күн бұрын
We always have one with a nuke on patrol so we can always strike back i'm sore
@Moon_dance27
19 күн бұрын
@@TheeBritishGuy yes, it is called Trident and it’s our nuclear deterrent
@Accal1a
18 күн бұрын
I was just coming here to mention Trident
@spongebota.i.selfawarepant4780
17 күн бұрын
yeah its funny because french and British submarines are far more capable than many of the nations put after them. quality is a quantity of its own.
@mathebg65
11 күн бұрын
@@TheeBritishGuySame routine for us frenchmen. Strange indeed to mention nuclear missiles only later in the video
@just_mdd4
Ай бұрын
Shoutout to the cameraman; they chose a great day to shoot this video! 😝💯
@Ben-lf7sv
Ай бұрын
Cant you expect with AI 😂😂😂
@LiiMuRi
Ай бұрын
It's crazy to think that today there are less than 500 submarines World-wide, whereas during WW2, Germany alone built over 1100
@banellie
Ай бұрын
And just to add to your point, the difference is that one submarine today has far more destructive power than all of Germany's WW2 submarines combined. I think that's the truly crazy part.
@1999NIRUPAM
Ай бұрын
Quality > Quantity Countries simply don’t require that many anymore to patrol, survey and deter their enemies with their more capable smaller fleets
@abdiganiaden
Ай бұрын
@@banellieone ballistic submarine today has more firepower than ALL energy expended during WW2
@MichaelMac-u3z
Ай бұрын
But they never had more than 159 in active service at any one time....
@marcusbowerstv713
Ай бұрын
Aircraft Carriers 🗣️🇺🇸
@LtRyanPYT
Ай бұрын
Production value on this video goes crazyyyy. Big props to the editors for this one
@YoshimiMilk
Ай бұрын
"...That we atleast know" is such a powerful and scary fact at the same time
@rahulnishadxd
28 күн бұрын
Yea right, And the thing is that I can guarantee that many of them are somewhere in places like Arctic and Antarctica hiding in the depths
@ryanlee3950
Ай бұрын
It's crazy how a small country like Singapore has 8 subs
@lifevest1
Ай бұрын
I thought Canada had atleast 10!
@paulsteaven
Ай бұрын
North Korea: *Pathetic*
@dbz9393
Ай бұрын
Singapore is a small country, but they are heavily militarised due to China. Their reasoning is that they want to make it so impossible for another nation to sustain warefare with them that they don't even bother seeking them out as a target. They want to make any would be aggressor regret ever attacking them.
@ravikiran6281
Ай бұрын
But don't they need that considering their economy is heavily dependent on the malaca strait?
@Ptolemy336VV
Ай бұрын
Yeah, Singapore only lies at the Malaka straight, the busiest straight on earth with 100.00 container ships passing by annually. Versus 18.000 in Suez canal of Egypt and 12.000 of Panama canal. So yeah. Singapore has like a humongous GDP and just for 5+ million people. So yes. If Singapore wanted it could build a Submarine in front of every McDonalds as a joke on land.
@HM-mw7cg
Ай бұрын
This was such a great way of presenting this info. Imagine if schools taught geopolitics like this. Hopefully they do nowadays
@SooDamGood
26 күн бұрын
I’ve never heard of a school that teaches geopolitics
@HM-mw7cg
25 күн бұрын
@@SooDamGood well it comes up in history, and plenty of schools teach politics. But maybe you’re a poor American who only got 5 star athletic facilities and active shooter drills
@dzambicmarko
23 күн бұрын
Actually it would be pretty bad since this video is not objective at all even though it presents itself as objective. Storytelling and editing are quite manipulative…
@laziojohnny79
22 күн бұрын
Yeah 1 min in and already the numbers are wrong, the NL's has 4 not 3 and stating electro-diesel subs are inferior to nuclear powered subs is reductive to say the least; several times have Dutch, Swedish, Australian and German electro-diesel subs sunk many US vessels, ships, frigattes, destroyers, cruisers and yes even aircraft carriers. All in friendly naval exercises of course, but still. So no, this channel get's it's facts wrong almost every time and the narrator is all but objective...
@Silvar1618
19 күн бұрын
@@laziojohnny79 can you provide me reliable sources that says the facts of this video are wrong?
@johnjon5448
Ай бұрын
You missed the 4 British Vanguard subs that carry nuclear warheads as a deterrent. French have something similar as well.
@BoxStudioExecutive
Ай бұрын
Odd choice to skip over that, but talk about it for Israeli, Russian and American subs
@royo_uki4761
Ай бұрын
True glad i m not the only one who noticed
@danLTa1
Ай бұрын
I think Johnny knows Britain trident 2s cannot be launched without US permission
@bentrafford6592
Ай бұрын
They can be launched without US permission though lol
@lukebrodin631
Ай бұрын
Bizarre to gloss over countries who actually have nuclear missiles 😊
@hibob841
Ай бұрын
It's worth noting that diesel-electric subs aren't entirely inferior; there are good reasons to run them aside from economy or lack of technology. The biggest advantage is that they can be effectively 100% silent if they are stationary, whereas a nuclear boat will always make _some_ amount of noise because it has to run pumps to cool the reactor. The latest U.S. and Russian nuclear boats _may_ be quiet enough to render this distinction almost academic, but it's still there. There's also some minimum practical size and weight for a naval reactor, which dictates a minimum displacement for nuclear boats. The larger the hull, the less effectively it can operate in shallower waters and the larger target it makes for active sonar. Of course, a diesel-electric boat's underwater endurance is such that your adversaries will generally know where they are within a certain radius; everyone knows where the boat is when it's surfaced. You can think of diesel-electric submarines somewhat like a mobile minefield. Air-independent propulsion (AIP) closes that gap significantly; these boats are potentially just as quiet as standard diesel boats, but have enough underwater endurance to make them difficult to track. During multiple NATO exercises, the Swedish 'Gotland' class has famously been able to penetrate U.S. carrier groups multiple times, undetected. This is somewhat terrifying since these boats, though technologically advanced, are quite cheap-on the order of $100M, or a bit less than an F-35.
@julius43461
Ай бұрын
Yup, those cheap subs are the drones of the ocean. They are to carriers what drones are to tanks.
@MrHvleeuwen
Ай бұрын
I was gonna type all of this in a less organised and constructive manner. So thanks for your proficiency in writing haha. Seems like Johny has some basic surface level (hehe) knowledge, without even diving (hehe) into mild specifics..
@pandaruhs9465
Ай бұрын
Exactly what I was going to write 😄
@user-ur8pi9ob5b
Ай бұрын
China will be trying to steal all the technology it can from the US for its subs. The Russian Navy, including it's submarines are famous for lack of maintenance but still a threat, including their own crews.
@tamaica7770
Ай бұрын
why bother come closer while you can attack them from far away?
@MoneyLounge1
27 күн бұрын
Alternate title: why the US doesn’t have universal healthcare
@jasper5902
8 күн бұрын
But it does have the best universal unhealthcare in the world!
@dhruvjain4015
Ай бұрын
Its always a good day when johnny harris uploads
@Wolfwarrior2024
Ай бұрын
Word
@johnnyharris
Ай бұрын
youre the best. thank you!
@Fisharecool69420
Ай бұрын
@@johnnyharrisi love the videos
@MrSdsok
Ай бұрын
Bhai propaganda dekh raha hai
@jamesthomas1967
Ай бұрын
I do enjoy his videos but sometimes
@desertninja__galactic
Ай бұрын
High quality content and decently short waiting times? Am I dreaming?
@DaTrainMan
Ай бұрын
Are we both dreaming?
@Friday4
Ай бұрын
@@DaTrainMan I think we are dreaming
@951sht
Ай бұрын
🎶 Is there more like us? Got me feeling. 🎶
@arvil8571
23 күн бұрын
Meanwhile me who's watching this from a landlocked nation and has never seen an ocean before 😢
@ryan.hanthorn
Ай бұрын
I love the *"known"* submarine cavate. The new unmanned drone "Manta Ray Submarines" sounds like a paradigm shift worth their own deep-dive!
@pin65371
Ай бұрын
That thing is pretty badass. It can produce its own power. I was watching a video on how it produces power but it was well above my understanding. It seemed like witchcraft.
@justinpetersen5273
Ай бұрын
@@pin65371yea it really is!!! Crazy!!
@Tarquin2718
29 күн бұрын
I think at the moment it is still to much in development to have real impact on the main stage. But if all predictions are true than it might be a game changer, espec in narrow places like around China. Tough titiies for China 🙂
@imsomewhatcertain1024
Ай бұрын
All of these submarines are impressive, but can they win against the Kingdom of Atlantis?
@sebastianashbury2478
Ай бұрын
Not if the Reptoids, Catholic Church, Illuminati, Cognito Inc., or Juggalos have anything to say about it :P
@billmiller8945
Ай бұрын
That one with the 100 MegaTon warhead sure would get their attention.
@MarkNealon
Ай бұрын
Interesting video, but starting the talk about ICBMs at India makes it seem like French and British subs aren't armed with ICBMs
@ion8264
26 күн бұрын
Uk isn't relevant
@niceguy5772
26 күн бұрын
@@ion8264 how ? , one of the richest and most powerful countries on earth
@ion8264
26 күн бұрын
@@niceguy5772 good cope
@niceguy5772
26 күн бұрын
@@ion8264 bruh , ur from the USA , we're literally ur ally 🤣 . why u hating on us ?
@jakemidgley7988
25 күн бұрын
@@ion8264why is there so much hate towards the UK?
@bandobandit353
Ай бұрын
South Africa’s submarines aren’t ‘anywhere’. They’re permanently broken and docked at Simon’s town
@123brando
Ай бұрын
I'm in the navy and you are speaking nonsense
@seyamilejubase9644
Ай бұрын
@123brando are the numbers accurate ?
@wimokaharawira8443
Ай бұрын
Just like it's rugby team 😎
@sandilemnguni
Ай бұрын
@@wimokaharawira8443the world champions?????
@wimokaharawira8443
Ай бұрын
@@sandilemnguni champion's of the toilet
@Chrispymedia
Ай бұрын
0:05 yeah bud bet there’s A LOT we don’t know about lol
@kyleblankenship6657
Ай бұрын
Especially when it comes to the fishies
@nicklas400
Ай бұрын
That's why he said KNOWN submarines 🤯
@Chrispymedia
Ай бұрын
@@nicklas400 that’s… that’s why I commented what I did lol. WOOOOSH
@nicklas400
29 күн бұрын
@@Chrispymedia you seemed kind of passive aggresive with the "bud", thats not a woosh thing lol
@TheInvisibleMan420
29 күн бұрын
thank you for condescendingly stating the obvious
@SakibulHaqueTanmoy
27 күн бұрын
Need this type of video for fighter jets
@miskolinaccc
Ай бұрын
Slovenia's only submarine is in a museum and nobody expects a missile strike from there 😂
@rustix3
Ай бұрын
Finland also has at least one, outside in the wild, but as museum exhibit.
@alexandrevalentin8587
Ай бұрын
I find it odd not to mention France's submarines equipped with the latest M51 ICBM, aswell as their industry capabilities since they were tasked to build the Australian subs at first.
@soulsphere9242
Ай бұрын
They were to be French designed but built in Australia. The whole program was a disaster, but it wasn't just Frances's fault, the design should never have been chosen in the first place. The initial preference was the Japanese Soyru class to be built in Japan but that ran into diplomatic and industrial issues. The AUKUS subs will be much too late. We should have just built a follow-on update to our existing design.
@Tarquin2718
29 күн бұрын
It is weird how France is not mentioned a lot and way way more because they the world leaders in Nuclear development. But for some reason nobody is interested.
@DW_25
29 күн бұрын
@@soulsphere9242 it wasn't France's fault at all lmao, the design requirements was literally "hey can you make a diesel electric sub that has all the advantages of nuclear" which the French somehow managed to get close. They literally offered to transfer us the technology to build nuclear subs and reactors to fuel them but we refused.
@soulsphere9242
29 күн бұрын
@@DW_25 You shouldn't accept requirements that you cannot deliver on. Not enough had been worked out by either side before the program was committed to. That said I will accept that the root of the issue was the bad decision by Australia to choose this path. We should not have embarked on building what essentially was a clean-sheet design. The decision should have been made sometime in 2007-2012 to build the so-called Son-of-Collins.
@DW_25
28 күн бұрын
@@soulsphere9242 they delivered on most of the requirements and it didn't help that scope creep meant the requirements kept on changing. We should've accepted the offer by the French for nuclear submarines+nuclear reactors and the associated technological transfer. That would make us truly independent instead of reliant on the US and UK on a project that is extremely delayed. The first sub isn't even projected to be delivered to Australia until the 2030s.
@TheLankdaddy
26 күн бұрын
13:31 this map just looks like Earth is being held at gunpoint by a supervillain 🇺🇸
@optionalcoast7478
23 күн бұрын
😎 🇺🇸
@johnbaker7102
22 күн бұрын
Superhero* like Superman patrolling
@tayar3797
19 күн бұрын
@@johnbaker7102 even as a us citizen... I feel the overwhelming power is far more supervillian than superhero
@fofopads4450
19 күн бұрын
@@johnbaker7102 With the power to pulverize you and your neighbors, the whole planet? That's no superhero. Warmongering is the US biggest business.
@abdallahh9158
12 күн бұрын
@@johnbaker7102more like Homelander.
@tayzonday
Ай бұрын
How did some sandwiches become called “submarines?”
@Jobe-13
Ай бұрын
I always wondered that too
@jamesmiller4184
Ай бұрын
Answer: Johnny Harris's parents were responsible.
@jaredt.murphy8257
Ай бұрын
Cause it looks like a submarine.
@sarahwatts7152
Ай бұрын
I looked it up real quick, and it seems to be down to looking like a submarine, but also maybe (maybe) because one of the first shops selling them was right next to a submarine base in Connecticut during WWII - though apparently the term was used in Delaware before that
@douggaudiosi14
Ай бұрын
Just look at them
@chattw6885
Ай бұрын
I think its important to point out that there is gigantic differences in submarines and their efficiency. For submarines (especially attack submarines) stealth is the absolut most important thing and with modern advancements in sonar technology its even more important. You could send a hundred north korean submarines to try and attack an US carrier and they would probably fail because they are loud af and easy to spot compared to new ones. On the other hand you have the most modern submarines which are so stealthy and hard to spot that there have been Nato exercises where a german submarine was able to sneak up right next to a US carrier without anyone noticing. Thats the scary stuff
@chuckkottke
Ай бұрын
I wonder if we need to develop a scanning long range metal detector? With a powerful enough and narrow magnetic field that can spin like a radar to create an image of large metal objects within the vicinity. Sonar seems to be fading in usefulness.
@soulsphere9242
Ай бұрын
@@chuckkottke Magnetic Anomaly Detectors were actually commonly used for sub hunting in the past. Many sub-hunting aircraft had them in a long tail boom.
@Daniel-d7h3i
Ай бұрын
@@soulsphere9242 MADs are not terribly effective in submarine warfare. Sonobuoys are okay, but just like aircraft fitted with MADs, they can only patrol a small space compared to the operating area of a sub. Plus, submarines can dive deep and avoid both given the local subsurface acoustic profile.
@chrysik.5755
28 күн бұрын
I like how the music when describing Russia's submarines is ominous but when describing the USA's is sweet and calm.
@ilovethefreezespell6531
26 күн бұрын
Because we are the good guys 😎
@onurturhal6814
25 күн бұрын
FUCK YEAH
@haydarkavak7582
25 күн бұрын
@@ilovethefreezespell6531 Good to whom? You actually are the most diabolical people ever.
@NeputuniaNepp
25 күн бұрын
@@haydarkavak7582Good to Europe, Asia, Africa, the rest of the world. We provide so much foreign aid that we over shadow the next ten countries combined.
@vladalexeev8529
25 күн бұрын
Because US never attacked any country. Oh wait..
@zumabbar
Ай бұрын
i have a feeling this guy is obsessed with submarine. wendover underwater.
@n0tawhale902
Ай бұрын
He did say in his first sub video that his Father-in-law was a captain on a boomer(SSBN)!
@larsstougaard7097
Ай бұрын
He loves diving deep into every subject 🪼
@dsong2006
Ай бұрын
China's diesel submarines are not "older", majority are Yuan class build in the 2010s and use air independence propulsion(similarly to latest European or japanese diesels) which makes them have longer endurance then older diesels. They are extremely quiet and hard to track and play a crucial role in access denial
@msvishwas5606
9 күн бұрын
Countries with nuclear subs 1) 🇺🇸 2) Russian🇷🇺 3) 🇨🇳 4) India🇮🇳 5) France🇫🇷 6) British🇬🇧💂
@picklesoda879
4 күн бұрын
You spelled that wrong correction: bri'ish
@LuisEduardodeSouza
Ай бұрын
Yep, i guess you missed Brazil, we currently have a fleet of seven submarines: Four Tupi-class submarines: Modified German Type 209 submarines. One Tikuna-class submarine: An improved version of the Tupi class. Two Riachuelo-class submarines: The first two of a planned series of four conventional submarines being built as part of the Submarine Development Program (PROSUB). It's important to note that Brazil is also developing its first nuclear-powered submarine as part of the PROSUB project.
@jamesmiller4184
Ай бұрын
I say reestablish your Kingdom!
@alinafoerster
Ай бұрын
check the sources they are in there, just not specifically mentioned in the video
@LuisEduardodeSouza
Ай бұрын
@@alinafoerster I did, and it does mention it on paper, but in this case i was talking specifically about the image in the video.
@joshiifive
Ай бұрын
Hahahaha 😂 riachuelo, boa.
@thomasbeltman8918
Ай бұрын
Brazil can be seen at 2:00. Though only 4 submarines are shown
@87MasterJ
Ай бұрын
Great video 👍 A couple of things to add up a little: - The modern attack-submarines like the Los Angeles class can easily shoot nukes, too. All it needs is a modified warhead from the Tomahawk cruise missle - The same applies for the Russian, Cinese, UK, French submarines with their (Russian) Kalibr cruise missle etc. - The Poseidon nuclear torpedo is just propaganda. Just do the basic physics on that and you will realise that an nuke can`t move enough water for an Tsunami. The deeper it detonates, the more pressure it needs to overcome. So calm down, don`t get caught by your fears of it 😉
@colossalgainz8235
Ай бұрын
a nuke can't move enough water for a tsunami? u gotta be kidding lol even the bikini tests with far less powerful nukes indicate the opposite and we're talking 100 mt here 🤷🏻♂️
@A10Thunderbolt22
3 күн бұрын
The words “that we know about” says a ton about the secrets that the military has
@adriann2649
Ай бұрын
*Saying that non-nuclear submarines are noisy and need to surface is outdated* . Spain has fully modern submarines with an AIP system that runs on bioethanol and batteries without need for oxygen. It's a silent system with a 3-week apnea (this system is desired by countries such as Canada, Australia and India). Edit: S80+ class of submarines, in case anyone doubts my words
@samstromberg5593
Ай бұрын
My buddy he specifically said something different about Spain
@dsolis7532
Ай бұрын
He said that
@nhandinh7404
Ай бұрын
There was a small asterisk at the bottom of the video outing Spain and Sweden as the exceptions. Your comment is still well regarded though!
@bobg5362
Ай бұрын
Yay. "Up to" three weeks without surfacing. Nuke boats regularly remain submerged for ninety days. As stated in the video, the only reason they have to surface is when food starts to run low.
@pin65371
Ай бұрын
@@bobg5362 a nuclear reactor is loud though and its a unique sound. Sensors would pick that up. A diesel sub just needs to surface like a mile away from a cargo ship and night and nobody would know its there. They would just blend in. I bet that is how they move around for the most part. Just follow ships till they get close to their target and then they can do what they need to do for a couple of weeks.
@siggelilliehook7332
Ай бұрын
3:35 didn’t a Swedish sub beat the US navy recently?
@jojosworlds1208
Ай бұрын
Yes, the HSwMS Gotland was leased by the US government to test the ASW capabilities of a carrier strike group. The Gotland successfully evaded the US subs and sonars and took some photos of the hull of the USS Ronald Reagan, a aircraft carrier, which counted as sinking it. This was between 2005-2006. The German Uboot U24 did the "sink" the carrier USS Enterprise in 2001. But it has to be noted, that you can't easily sink an aircraft carrier and both cases where by friendly forces, so the US Navy has probably improved their ASW capabilities.
@soulsphere9242
Ай бұрын
20 or so years ago.
@jamesthomas1967
Ай бұрын
Too many DEI hires.
@jojosworlds1208
Ай бұрын
@@jamesthomas1967 What?
@JamesZeroSix
Ай бұрын
@@jamesthomas1967 must be tough constantly fighting your culture war. take a break. lets talk sub-fucking-marines for a second.
@mtbewan5632
19 күн бұрын
I doubt these numbers are too accurate but I love the amount of dedication of searching and sources found to make this video. Also a bizarre thing, it was abnormally easy to get a job having to do with the new submarines the us is building for “2042” as they are such massive projects
@bholdr----0
Ай бұрын
If my post below IS TLDR- Here's the gist of it: This vid is inaccurate, inconsistent, lacks nuance, and may do more harm than good towards understanding how subs work, the various doctrines behind their use, various nation's capabilities, and why such is so critically important. Nice graphic though!
@MacrosFTW
26 күн бұрын
I always don't trust videos on complicated topics that can be covered in such a short amount of time. War games would last a few hours if they used such lazy metrics of comparison between countries.
@alaint
Ай бұрын
You kinda forgot France also has 4 ICBM equipped nuclear powered subs
@zks82mdu3b
Ай бұрын
Did you refer to his source?
@spacechannelfiver
Ай бұрын
same deal with the UK, which has 4
@karisvenner3892
Ай бұрын
Or that Australia literally demanded France to deliver non-nuclear subs when they were more than happy to build Australia brand new nuclear-powered subs. So presenting the AUKUS deal as "the US trying to arm their Pacific allies against China" is absolutely hilarious. It's just Australia proving once again that they only exist as the US lapdog and will literally torpedo (pun intended) their own submarine plans just to please Uncle Sam. To be fair I only clicked this video out of morbid curiosity, and Johnny Harris never disappoints (in that he always does). He really is a dumb person's idea of a smart journalist.
@alexandrevalentin8587
Ай бұрын
Indeed, it is only mentioned in the sources that you can find in the video description.
@moonshot9056
Ай бұрын
@@spacechannelfiver I was thinking this.
@rustix3
Ай бұрын
14:03 Alongside other questions that I asked, it would be interesting to know logistics of getting the submarines. For example Iran, I doubt they produce the submarines. So they need to buy them, but submarines them selves can't come that long was. Also Iran needs to somehow transport submarine over the land to Caspian Sea, how they do this? Or the submarine comes in part and assembled on the spot? How the submarine can be transported to another shore quickly in the case of attack on another shore? Same goes to Israel, how they transfer submarines between their 2 sea accesses, do they send them under the Suez canal or over the land? Also Russia, I assume the main submarine fleet is next to Pacific Ocean which is miles away from probably the place subs get produced.
@aj897
Ай бұрын
The total number is irrelevant if the submarine is outdated or inferior, newer ones can’t be detected as easily and will eliminate most of the older/louder subs in combat.
@riderchallenge4250
Ай бұрын
also experience china may have numbers but no experience of naval battles. in actual war India Japan can actually defeat china bcz of their naval battle experiences.
@sayple109
Ай бұрын
@@riderchallenge4250 Indeed, but the quality of experience has certainly become very diminished in recent years. The whole new suite of tech found on the naval arsenals today are untested as no major naval conflict has happened in decades. With submarine warfare essentially last playing out in WWII. In that regard, everyone is on a similar playing field.
@ElizabethII-1952
Ай бұрын
@@sayple109 HMS Conqueror?
@riderchallenge4250
29 күн бұрын
@@sayple109 you need experience your subs and ships are not gonna do their work without humans. USA can control oceans due to their experience of naval battles all the time.
@sayple109
29 күн бұрын
@@riderchallenge4250 I didn't deny the value of experience, just qualified it to the modern context. Where USA obviously leads in experience, their infrastructure, investment, and dominating lead in technical innovations are among the many reasons it remains the only naval superpower of today. Regardless, a naval battle today is going to look very different from one decades ago, it is yet to see how much of an advantage experience is. But hopefully, this won't be tested for the sake of amateur military observers like us. Cheers
@Puttrich
Ай бұрын
Image not talking about the Gotland class when making a video about submarines
@AmandaHugnKiss-g4x
Ай бұрын
When I was a kid I hot air ballooned with the Navy Commander that test launched the first Polaris missile. Pretty sure it was the stock footage used in the video. He had a framed picture of the missile launch in his home office, amongst others. Really cool guy.
@Baby_TheRealityRevealers
Ай бұрын
Incredible breakdown, Johnny! 🌊 Submarines are such a crucial part of naval power. Your detailed analysis and visuals made this complex topic so engaging. Can't wait to see more of your deep dives into global military capabilities!
@jean-pierre5221
Ай бұрын
You skipped over the UK's nuclear arms capabilities and went straight to India. The UK also has nuclear weapons on their submarines like Trident.
@elemes24
Ай бұрын
Nobody cares about the UK anymore
@zealousepileptic2690
Ай бұрын
no one cares lol
@callumarcher2848
Ай бұрын
That’s if they actually work lol
@riderchallenge4250
Ай бұрын
UK is US puppet.
@ElizabethII-1952
Ай бұрын
@@zealousepileptic2690 People care about the most successful navy in history lol
@rjeption
23 сағат бұрын
This graphic was so satisfying
@HeisenbergFam
Ай бұрын
"whoever rules the waves rules the world" one of the most accurate sentences said in history
@TheWebstaff
Ай бұрын
Until we have large space forces. Then that will all be all over with a few rods from god.
@iimcrandomgamer711
Ай бұрын
@@TheWebstaff Bro we don't need space base rods we already have countries with capabilities to built and already built delivery systems that capable of targetin anywhere in the glob. If we talk about putting space based rods from gods, then they are also the same countries that capable of do that to the certain degrees.
@syedmakbul8414
Ай бұрын
Would love to see a breakdown of this type of the strongest militaries
@junbun3642
Ай бұрын
There are literally dozens of great military channels that give factual "breakdowns"
@origami83
Ай бұрын
Spoiler; the US is always on top.
@Matt-bp5vy
26 күн бұрын
0:39 Poland number one! 💪
@rickysidabutar1678
22 күн бұрын
At least your country got one XD
@tayar3797
19 күн бұрын
Literally number one
@thecubanman6381
19 күн бұрын
Cuba number 2 💪 🇨🇺
@thecubanman6381
19 күн бұрын
Cuba number 2 💪 🇨🇺
@extinnocence
Ай бұрын
I love how much you love submarines.
@mitthrawnuruodo7517
Ай бұрын
You forgot to mention that the very modern German submarines have also AIP. And you could have explained that AIP usually or actually always means that pure oxygen is carried in pressure vessels and converted into electricity with a fuel in a very quiet process (for the Sweden with a Stirling engine that runs on diesel and for the Germans with a hydrogen fuel cell). So it's independent from air not oxygen, that's what the A in AIP stands for. But besides this minute technical details it was once again a wonderful video, which I enjoyed watching.
@superpintotube
Ай бұрын
The portuguese and greek navy, also have German made submarines with AIP
@perrablerra
28 күн бұрын
@@superpintotube Swedish submarines also have AIP. In 2004, America borrowed one of them to practice against that type of submarine, but the Swedish submarine always managed to fool the shirt of the Americans and managed to sink both submarines and aircraft carriers (simulated attacks, of course). So these are definitely to be reckoned with. kzitem.info/news/bejne/wqWD0GWKo4CFeaw
@neelabhraj9080
13 күн бұрын
India also have proven AIP now..Developed by Drdo
@serpente3550
Ай бұрын
What about swedens submarine? The Gotland class is one of the best stealth submarines in the world
@Obsidian-Nebula
28 күн бұрын
So stealthy they could find it for the video
@ciaranReal
27 күн бұрын
😂@@Obsidian-Nebula
@ruruyouming
24 күн бұрын
@@Obsidian-Nebula😊
@aleong.9566
Ай бұрын
hypothetically speaking you even dont need any other nuclear weapon except the ones within the submarines. They are by far the most dangerous ones which are almost impossible to track.
@jojosworlds1208
Ай бұрын
It's always better to have different options. Hell even with all that fancy submarine launched ICBMs the US as has aircraft dropped atom bombs stationed in Germany.
@julius43461
Ай бұрын
@@jojosworlds1208 Yup, the triad is needed in case some of them fail. Subs are the quickest and best, then ICBM's, and then of course air dropped as a last resort, but those will probably never be used as they are easiest to take down. Russia also has nukes on rails and those mobile ones riding on trucks in Siberia.
@ryankline1164
Ай бұрын
Those nuclear armed stealth bombers are also kind of a threat...
@IndigoSierra
Ай бұрын
@@ryankline1164They are, but they will take quite some time to arrive at their target, at which point the target in question will be on full alert and likely have fighter coverage of any important assets. It is much easier to shoot down a bomber than ballistic and cruise missiles.
@krashd
27 күн бұрын
@@julius43461 China also has the great subterannean wall (or is it subterranean great wall?) whereby they've built a large underground network along their east coast to hide ICBM launchers and they routinely reposition them. Similar to Russia's mobile launchers but observers have to guess where in the country they are since the only visible parts of the great subterranean wall are the various entry and exit points.
@alexandrefranca8621
20 минут бұрын
Verry good this video, congratulations! Best Regards from a Chief Petty Officer - Brazilian Navy Chief. Rio - Brasil.
@adnastu
Ай бұрын
HERE WE GO!
@johnnyharris
Ай бұрын
hey adam! great work on this.
@OlamideT.
Ай бұрын
are you fabrizio romano?
@danielrichardson4868
Ай бұрын
@@OlamideT. I am yes
@bryangomez2876
21 күн бұрын
THERE WE LAND
@adnastu
21 күн бұрын
@@bryangomez2876 🤣🤣🤣
@on__off2923
Ай бұрын
Johnny STRIKES again !!!
@MsTribus
28 күн бұрын
in short: we're all cooked
@lennymarinez
16 күн бұрын
pretty much.
@Julianna.Domina
Ай бұрын
Johnny- Rockets are a propulsion method/unguided weapon, missiles are guided and use either a rocket engine or a jet engine. The definitions of all these military terms can get a bit tough to keep track of, but it's very important to keep them straight. I've heard journalists refer to the M2 Bradley as a tank, when it very, very much isn't. A bradley doesn't stand a chance against basically any tank ever made, it's made to stop up to .50 cal weapons, shrapnel, maybe small mortar rounds, and it has a 25mm autocannon. The M1 Abrahams CAN stand up to a lot of tank guns, anti-tank missiles, etc
@GiveBackAll
28 күн бұрын
Just curious- how do you define a tank? The Bradley is as much a tank as the first vehicles that earned the name in WW1.
@Julianna.Domina
28 күн бұрын
@@GiveBackAll A tank is a tracked vehicle with heavy armor and a single-firing, large caliber gun, made for direct fire engagements against other armored vehicles or in defense of infantry. The Bradley is tracked and is meant for direct fire engagements, but it has an automatic firing small caliber cannon, and it cannot be relied on to take out anything with any real level of armor. Its primary purpose is also to carry infantry into combat, whereas a tank is meant to just come in and blow you things that need a big gun.
@naders1771
28 күн бұрын
*Abrams
@GiveBackAll
27 күн бұрын
@@Julianna.Domina I was never in armor, but I have fired both the Bradley and the M1 and I have studied military history. The original definition of a tank was something that was impervious to small arms fire. Tanks have never been able to withstand artillery, and the primary purpose of a tank is to be superior to unarmored infantry or vehicles. For taking out tanks the US Military relies mostly on artillery and missiles, not just tanks. So I don't know where you are getting your definition from.
@sez5435
Ай бұрын
Welcome to watchmojo. Today we will be ranking the top 10 submarine arsenals
@gabrielperezmurillo3583
2 күн бұрын
This video is the definition of manufacturing consent !
@kratos_wish
12 күн бұрын
7:00 mf show the correct map of india
@Galaxyeyez
Ай бұрын
1:12 Ngl Im South African and I didn't really know we had subs lol. Hell I'll be surprised if we even have tanks🤣🤣
@khumbelobele6674
Ай бұрын
All I know we got is GNU with Gayton... The sub never crossed my mind. 😂😂😂
@darrenrodgers6425
Ай бұрын
I’m an ex SAN submariner. We have them, and they have a different role to what nuclear submarines are. This is info you can get off Google.. they just didn’t Google enough I guess. But diesel electric are quiet and meant for patrols and insertion of special forces, small, slow, quiet. Nuclear is big, fast, and loud.. meant to be firing platforms for ICBMs, like a mobile island, and they usually have a number of diesel electric subs around them that no one knows about.
@edhikurniawan
Ай бұрын
But you have tanks on Wargame Red Dragon. The Olifant or something. What idk is if they're still operational.
@Galaxyeyez
Ай бұрын
@@darrenrodgers6425 Are they still operational and or currently in use?
@blazer9547
23 күн бұрын
You even had nukes.
@yoavbarnea1005
29 күн бұрын
Questions: - why does actually take so long to build them? - are their special materials that would at a certain point disappear or wont be available in the world anymore and could cause a problem producing submarines? - in which depth are they mostly run? - where did the most accidents / wars happend with submarines along history? Cool topic!
@julianchee2894
Ай бұрын
It’s not the largest. It’s who improves the fastest.
@ChickenPlayz4
Ай бұрын
which is the U.S.? Whom also has the largest?
@dm3280
Ай бұрын
Still the US. You would think they will fall behind in technology, specially militarywise? Then you are underestimating the real Godzilla of the ocean who keeps evolving.
@julianchee2894
Ай бұрын
Yes, to all triggered, it’s still America
@rustoo3823
Ай бұрын
14:01 @johnnyharris : Please cover the future of submarines. How it will evolve in the next 10, 50, 100 and 200 years, esp with the advent of AI and robotics.
@jfbaezv
24 күн бұрын
Se nota que sabes español, elegiste muy buena voz para el doblaje. Muchísimo mejor que la de otros en KZitem. Es muy disfrutable y de altísima calidad. Gracias!
@ChaoticTruthLive
Ай бұрын
Awesome video, insanely informative!
@fardvpn
Ай бұрын
one of your more statistical videos
@Z34_aidan
4 күн бұрын
The most surprising part of this video is that it takes 20 years to build the new US submarines
@H.P206
28 күн бұрын
1:31 what about German submarines? They have fuel cells that don't need oxygen and they are a lot more quiet then nuclear powered subs because of the water pumps for the cooling water for the nuclear reactors
@theninjanolan8160
Ай бұрын
8:36 two of those North Korean Subs look disturbingly like Apple pencils…
@1-lil_nico
27 күн бұрын
it's basically a "we're doomed" situation if they launch it simultaneously
@BeeRory
Ай бұрын
I know im late in typing this, and the source is "trust me" but i can say with confidence that the United Kingdom has at least 16 submarines, not 10. 12 of the 16 are nuclear powered, and nuclear armed. This comment will be lost down below anyways.
@JamesField
29 күн бұрын
Is your source a locality to Faslane? There are six or seven visible on Google Maps, including the five in port and one or two semi-submerged in the firth.
@ciaranReal
27 күн бұрын
@@JamesFieldrosyth, Portsmouth and Plymouth
@H.P206
28 күн бұрын
German subs are AIR INDEPENDANT TOO
@mohammedirfan802
29 күн бұрын
I love how the bgm for russiia is dark and villain intro type and then for america it changes to hopeful superhero intro type
@AdityaSingh-fy5vv
Ай бұрын
Hey, One thing you might've forgotten to say about diesel electric submarines is that Since they use residual fuel for lighting, they actually are quieter than the average nuclear submarine. It's a weird thing but it's true that diesel subs are quieter and slower than nuclear ones. Except the seawolf class of subs.
@pin65371
Ай бұрын
Exactly... the problem with nuclear subs is that reactors are pretty loud and its a unique sound which is easy to detect. The diesel electric subs are louder when the diesel engine is running but when they are on any missions they are quiet since its just electric at that point. They could just cruise along at night around large cargo ships to charge up and nobody would know they are there. Its pretty easy to blend in.
@JalilTheBourne
Ай бұрын
YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT ALGERIA: Algeria has a total of 8 submarines: 2X Kilo-class (Project 877) 4X Improved Kilo-class (Project 636) and 2 more Kilo-class submarines
@disazndoe5778
27 күн бұрын
Should do a video about military strength (tanks, planes, etc.) by country. Would be interesting to see
@trey3905
Ай бұрын
i highly doubt Russia has a sub with a 100 megaton torpedo, considering the biggest ever detonated was 50 and the size of that bomb was insane. other than that really great and fun video.
@sharknot9011
27 күн бұрын
Tsar bomba was 26 feet in length and 6.9 feet in diameter and had a weight of 27 tons. FYI the torpedo they are talking about is 65 feet long and 6,5 feet wide, unknown weight but lets imagine it is times three of Tsar bombas and is like 90 tons. Compared to modern sized submarines and their capabilities of carrying several THOUSANDS tons worth of weight thats not even that big of a deal. I also dont understand the comparison of the amount of megatons of the biggest explosion test in 1960s done by plane and todays weapons that are meant to be exploded and carried underwater. Even rockets USSR made in 1970s were able to carry 20 megatons worth of explosives by AIR on their own. I suggest for you to do some research on your own - you will be amazed by todays technology and power some countries have.
@trey3905
27 күн бұрын
@@sharknot9011I think you just made my point that it would be too big to be 100megatons…
@sharknot9011
27 күн бұрын
@@trey3905 Please elaborate on that, since I cannot see how would you come to such a conclusion after reading my comment. In my understanding and according to my previous comment: all data indicates that with some logic and calculations we can come to a conclusion that it is not only possible but highly likely that such weapon exists and can be transported and used without issue underwater. Also Tsar bomba was initially set to be at 100 megatons but soviets were worried that it would be too powerful and decided to cap it at 50 megatons (and it still turned out to be way more powerful than expected). So if production of 50mt and a 100mt bomb in 1960s wasnt an issue why would it be nowadays?
@trey3905
26 күн бұрын
@@sharknot9011 it's well documented how insanely huge and heavy that bomb was, they had to remove parts of the plane. now this was decades ago so obv technology is better but still a 100megaton torpedo is too big and doesn't exist. edited to say that also it's stupid and unnecessary. it's exactly something Russia would make up because they think it sounds scary and cool but you can do plenty of bad with the much smaller nukes that actually do exist.
@shishiragrahari7126
Ай бұрын
@Johnny Harris 6:59 Map of India is not complete. Kindly put the complete map. Jammu and Kashmir is part of India.
@JamesBaylockJr
4 күн бұрын
Sooo interesting! Amazing video!!! Would love to see/hear more about submarines!!!!!
@SgtCake101
Ай бұрын
11:37 Mediterranean ocean?
@McCarthy911
16 күн бұрын
Apparently, it's an ocean now 😅
@MAR_10-x5w
Ай бұрын
here goes the tax money, i was wondering where it was going...
@CristianKlein
Ай бұрын
"Imagine all those people, Living in harmony iiiiii ihhhiii".
@user-hq1ct7ox1h
29 күн бұрын
I know it's a bit crazy but I kind of want to see this cool subs get used in actual battle 💀
@Ankityadav-670
Ай бұрын
7:03 please use the correct map of #india ..for more details refer to Indian govt official website or UN
@ibrahimchelanga6109
20 күн бұрын
🙌👏👏👏 thanks for the class I’m 15 mins smarter about the world than I could have imagined. Great documentary
@freja9398
Ай бұрын
Sweden is the only country who has sank a US aircraft carrier with our subs (with Stirling engines) in a military practice with US (obviously not with live ammunition). You should have talked more about Swedens very special submarines with Stirling engines, they are independent of oxygen despite not being nuclear powered!
@scottl9660
Ай бұрын
USS Wasp and USS Yorktown have left the chat. Don’t get so caught up in national chest thumping that you ignore facts. The only two countries that have sunk US carriers are Japan and the US.
@soulsphere9242
Ай бұрын
Sweden isn't the only county to have Air Independant Propulsion subs, even though they were the first. They are also not really fully independent of oxygen as they carry liquid oxygen onboard and can only travel at very slow speeds if their batteries are drained. A nuclear submarine can steam for months at 30 knots.
@freja9398
Ай бұрын
@@soulsphere9242 All these submarines are built in Sweden. They are much more silent than nuclear submarines. No nuclear submarine has sunk an US aircraft carrier in a military practice.
@OZOZOZ968
29 күн бұрын
Australia’s ‘new’ submarines will being over 20 years away so not sure why you say soon
@EpicFrenzy
26 күн бұрын
20 years is quite soon when you look at military capability.
@jkc3738
26 күн бұрын
It took China 20 years to build from nothing..🤣
@zachking5138
29 күн бұрын
Enough firepower to destroy Earth 1,000 times over.... And they're still making more!
@hydra70
Ай бұрын
Fun fact, once Australia acquires a nuclear powered submarine, they will become the only county that does not have nuclear weapons to also operate nuclear submarines. This is especially interesting because submarine reactors are powered by essentially weapons-grade Uranium to make up for their small size. So once Australia has that submarine, they could at any time remove it's fuel to build a small number of Uranium gun-type bombs in a matter of weeks if they wanted to.
@Adan11961
Ай бұрын
I dont know the science or logistics or their capacity to do so in secret. But if this is truly doable and in secret this is actually bad news to Australia. Because this makes Australia a de facto nuclear state and therefore a target for preemptive nuclear strike in a widespread nuclear exchange. So they’re essentially a nuclear deterrent first strike target without a deterrent of its own.
@SL89999
Ай бұрын
The USA has CIA monitoring bases on Australian soil. Australia could never do anything in secret from the US. So this isn’t a risk.
@FFContent
Ай бұрын
@@Adan11961 Theres many nations who are first strike targets who don't even operate nuclear subs let alone nuclear weapons
@tonysisemore958
Ай бұрын
There is a Wikipedia article about nuclear capable countries. Meaning countries that can make nuclear weapons if wanted to. They only don't because of the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons agreement, which is signed by most countries.
@SBSanChill
Ай бұрын
@@Adan11961pretty sure America is our nuclear deterrent our older brothers are the uk and the USA 😂
@cgmax7
Ай бұрын
6:45 India 🕉🕉
@george.l2593
Ай бұрын
Ya man used to spread the smell of masala everywhere 👏. Soon scam call centers will sprout all over the world from the masala. And then the deodorant market will boom~`!!!🤯🤯🤯
@I_hu85ghjo
Ай бұрын
do the submarines contain functional toilets though?
@aaradhyarawat7589
27 күн бұрын
@@I_hu85ghjoThey don't operate on Californian water of USA.
@aaradhyarawat7589
27 күн бұрын
What's "🕉️", a hindu chant for universal peace have to do with this?
Пікірлер: 3,2 М.