Scottish Monarchs or Serbian Monarchs, maybe even Bulgarian if you feel like it
@denorjigalaxen9230
Жыл бұрын
It is so stunning that there was so many competent ottomam leaders until selim the drunk, no wonder why they became this powerful
@CavaxusMon2077
11 ай бұрын
You can thank Mehmed III for decrease in sultan quality and as for Selim II he wasn't even supposed to become king. It was supposed to be the more competent and able Bayezeid who perhaps would have taken power as Bayezeid III and would have been a good king in the very least.
@romanaiqbal10
11 ай бұрын
Saliem only became of that red head witch hurrem and her lover killed shazada mustafa..senerio would have been diff if mustafa ascended the throne he would have been a great king cause ppl,jannissaries,goveners all love him sulaiman made biggest mistake by exuting mustafa Sulaiman and that russian witch both were greedy for power and sulaiman ws jealous and insecure by the presence of mustafa all this shows sualiman never loved the empire or ppl of his kingdom he only loved his throne otherwise he would have not let that vicious hurrem's drunked and incapable son take the throne
@FlamingoDove
5 ай бұрын
@@romanaiqbal10 You need to read history more with attention and understand the intentions from real sorces. Do not conclude things based on mere assumption.
@dodoiserg3371
4 ай бұрын
@@CavaxusMon2077 i have a question. ottoman once won against 100k with 0 soldiers. the man who did it was he a sultan? was he good leader? how many war he won?
@yakupgencyilmaz
23 күн бұрын
Selim the Blonde not bad at all. The heir to the throne was Mehmed and everyone's favorite was Mustafa. Selim never expected that he would ascend to the throne. Mehmet died and Mustafa was executed. Also, the viziers were perfect during his time, he left the administration to them, so he did the right thing
@MrSergore
Жыл бұрын
Strong men create good times Good times create weak men Weak men create bad times Bad times made Ottoman Empire fall. No other empire have this many amazing geniuses follow each other at the beginning of the Empire and nothing but pathetic idiots at the end, who destroyed all that their glorious ancestors had built. Mahmud II being an exception, obviously.
@yaqubleis6311
8 ай бұрын
Sassanian kings >>> Ottoman rulers let’s compare them if you want
@rehenabegum3056
7 ай бұрын
I think, this is happening in the USA now. America is producing too many bad weak people now.
@agoniskrasniqi892
20 күн бұрын
So we seriously gonna ignore mahmud 1 mehmed iv although one very big mistake still had a great reign suleyman 2 murad iv ???
@aaronTGP_3756
Жыл бұрын
I think Mehmed IV's reign was only effective because of the Koprulus. When the Koprulu Vizier lost the Battle of Vienna, he was immediately executed by the Sultan. Which sent the Ottomans into a free fall, until the last straw at the Battle of Mohacs, where Mehmed IV was deposed.
@syedzameer8022
Ай бұрын
well that was a huge mistake made by the ottomans instead they should have invaded Italy which was unstable and unprepared
@Kekkodelucaz2222
11 ай бұрын
damnit, Mustafa II reconquered many cities in hungary and bosnia until he was defeated in Zenta by austrians, he did his best during his reign . I’d rank him as Good/Medium
@m.aryaanamiri2755
11 ай бұрын
exacly.He did the best with what he had.
@aha3652
10 ай бұрын
He was highly influenced by his mother and by Shaykh al-Islām 🤷
@Kekkodelucaz2222
10 ай бұрын
@@aha3652 that’s right but apart from this his reign wasn’t bad. i think ha prevetend even more territorial losses
@AxenfonKlatismrek
Жыл бұрын
On the defense side of Mehmed V, he was reigning the empire during the terrible time he had no control over and considering most of Turkey was in control of his ministers, who controled the army, this wasnt a good position to start with
@mrccos741
8 ай бұрын
Selim II was not as bad as people think he was actually a good ruler, not on his father's lever but at least good, sultan Ahmed I was also good not bad, and sultan Abdulhamid II is not bad at all, he lost a lot of territories but he saved the empire from collapsing and gave him 30 more years
@papazataklaattiranimam
Жыл бұрын
THE TURKS AND THE WEST. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
@bulutooth23
5 ай бұрын
Could have a special rank for Suleiman. Magnificent :)
@dodoiserg3371
4 ай бұрын
i find Mehmed the conqueror way better
@yourroyalchungusness
11 ай бұрын
The fact that you had to put a good point on Abdulmejid I just because he didn't lose any territories is just show how bad the previous rulers were at keeping Ottoman territory intact
@Arabian.Mapping
Жыл бұрын
Hi! I am your big fan but can you make videos on Ranking Umayyad Caliphate leaders and also Ranking Safavid rulers please!
@oh.69
6 ай бұрын
The onion heads were OP
@Tortellobello45
Жыл бұрын
Good ranking
@JasperAsmodeus
Жыл бұрын
Even though I am a huge Fan of the Eastern Roman Empire. I wonder how the Ottoman Sultans decrease in quality. Like they where almost unstoppable at first.
@BrokenGibus
Жыл бұрын
you can thank Mehmed III for that
@Kadir792
Ай бұрын
One of my favorite states of the Turks is the Ottomans :> Great vidoe!
@eric11
Жыл бұрын
I hope you remake the bizantine or the roman one
@aaronTGP_3756
Жыл бұрын
Or it could be the whole, West, and Eastern Emperors.
@synergistd519
Жыл бұрын
plsss do parthian kings next and finish irans ancient history on kings
@papazataklaattiranimam
Жыл бұрын
Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
@user-lk4xy9eq9x
14 күн бұрын
Can you do Moroccan rulers, from idrisid to Mohamed vi
@user-lk4xy9eq9x
14 күн бұрын
Or at least the golden era Almoravid Almohad and merinid
@averytameburrito3101
Жыл бұрын
Is it true the eastern church gave the title of caesar to mehmed ll?
@Optimusturk
11 ай бұрын
It was a self proclaimed title, the Church wouldn't wish for a Muslim emperor in this time even if he conquered the capital of the Roman empire
@m.aryaanamiri2755
11 ай бұрын
@@Optimusturk the patriarch of Constantinople, the highest authority in the orthodox church awarded him the title of "Caesar e Rum" or Caesar of Rome.
@Optimusturk
9 ай бұрын
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 Yeah it's true my bad since by right of Conquests
@gamehacker0012
9 ай бұрын
Okey to be honest the part of abdul hamid II needed to be researched if he would have introduced absolutism there would have been no ottomans due to him the ottomans collapse delayed and he gave the control of empire finances to european power so that they won’t interfere in their countries Internal affairs and moreover he wasn’t overthrown by army he was slandered And overthrown by fatwa he was a good ruler if he would have got empire in good state he would had take empire to its peak for sure due to his intelligence
@user-wl7km3ff8w
7 ай бұрын
=Sultan abdul hamid II was great. He didnot lose any of his lands.
@TsarAmbatukamXIV
7 ай бұрын
Russo Turkish 1877 war says otherwise
@Doutrus
3 ай бұрын
😆
@gezginmapper3030
4 күн бұрын
@@TsarAmbatukamXIVNo, he did not lose. It was the Ottoman parliament that decided to go to war with Russia. Sultan Abdulhamid did not want this and the Ottoman Empire had constitutionalism at that time.
@aaronTGP_3756
Жыл бұрын
After Suleiman I, the Ottoman Sultans became increasingly irrelevant. Nevertheless, the Ottomans were still a superpower until 1683, and the eventual collapse of the European territories. But the Ottomans continued to be a great power until the mid 18th century, when there started to be a significant difference in military technology, inferior to the West. The true decline began in the Egyptian War, where only with the allied powers they were able to kick out Napoleon. The reforms began, but it was too late to stop the tide of nationalism and foreign aggression.
@overpredor3412
3 ай бұрын
I would rate the Abdulhamid II good he litteraly prolonged the empire for 30 years after his deposition, empire teared apart. My ratings compared to yours +education +railway and infastructure +budget control +was a good diplomat + prolonged the empire + good spy networks for control over fracturing state + modernized the army -lost bosnia serbia tunisia serbia egypt and east africa coasts - revolution target - seen as evil by european public, therefore low support from european society during crises - he was paranoid
@Iamnotracistlmao
2 ай бұрын
he did not modernize the army
@overpredor3412
2 ай бұрын
@@Iamnotracistlmao tr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmanlı_İmparatorluğu%27nda_askerî_reformlar Lol there is litteraly a page exclusive to Abdulhamid, go cry
@mr.beatfan8814
Жыл бұрын
I do think that you are a little bit harsh on Selim II
@Yaman-th4nr
9 ай бұрын
the poorest ottoman sultan is a coward
@rajawasinagial755
2 ай бұрын
You have underrated abdulhamid 2. I think you are European
@H_Oyo
Жыл бұрын
Que bien
@anika3020
Ай бұрын
You have to khow the real history of Sultan Abdulaziz & Sultan Abdülhamid II. Don’t make wrong information about them.Do you know who was Sultan Abdülhamid ll.He faced many problems and faced many kinds of assassination attempts. After all he was a very good sultan of the Ottoman empire.
@relaxbirisi568
3 ай бұрын
👍
@fahriddinsheraliyev5952
Ай бұрын
I think Abdulkhamid II period wasn't bad
@saobaomenace
4 ай бұрын
if you had put ataturk on here, he would definetly be great
@nshoofficial
10 ай бұрын
The only Ottoman sultan I know here is Murad V
@The_last_prime
4 ай бұрын
Personally id say mehmed IV gets too much of a bad rap. He was in my opinion very good if not great ottoman sultan. He won wars after wars. The only reason he lost in vienna was because of incompetent generals and viziers. If that werent the case he wouldve been up there with the like of mehmed II and suleiman I
@overpredor3412
3 ай бұрын
He litteraly executed the grand vizier who won many wars after his failure without giving a chance. He litteraly sealed the fate of great turkish war. Kara Mustafa Pasha was a very intelligent guy he was the only one who could reverse the defeat at vienna
@The_last_prime
3 ай бұрын
@@overpredor3412 yeas thats probably the biggest blunder, now that ive read more and studied more id say he was very good at best. And yes kara mustafa was very intelligent he probably couldve turned the situation around for the ottomans. If he wasnt killed then most likely battle of zenta would be a victory for the ottomans personally is see him definitely beating eugene of savoy. He was very carefull cautious and competent general. The ottomans would almost have had vienna if it werent for the coalition and the crimean uprising. But yes i agree with you
@bakerbrox212
8 ай бұрын
In My Opinion Osman I Great Orhan I Great Murad I Great Bayzeid I Very Good Mehmed I Good Murad II Very Good Mehmed II Great Bayzeid II Good Selim I Great Suleiman I Great Selim II Medium Murad III Medium Mehmed III Very Good Ahmed I Bad Mustafa I Bad Osman II Bad Murad IV Very Good Ibrahim I Bad Mehmed IV Bad Suleiman II Good Ahmed II Bad Mustafa II Medium Ahmed III Medium Mahmud I Medium Osman III Bad Mustafa III Bad Abdulhamid I Medium Selim III Good Mustafa IV Bad Mahmud II Very Good Abdulmecid I Good Abdulaziz I Good Murad V Bad Abdulhamid II Great Mehmed V Bad Mehmed VI Bad
@TsarAmbatukamXIV
8 ай бұрын
AbdulHamid ii is overrated imo
@mythicalumut6174
7 ай бұрын
@@TsarAmbatukamXIVgood muslim and he had big plans to modernise the ottoman empire but the young turk revolution stopped him from doing that.
@TsarAmbatukamXIV
7 ай бұрын
@@mythicalumut6174 He lost almost all of Balkan possesion and Constantinople almost get conquered by Russia under his reign
@Nordsjaelland180
6 ай бұрын
Abdulhamid II very overrated and Mustafa I should be very bad
@mythicalumut6174
6 ай бұрын
@@TsarAmbatukamXIV true but like i said, the military was bad during his reign and the ottomans were severely weakened. I would call abdulhamid a good ruler, he had potential to be the best, but because of the state of the empire he didn’t fare very well. A sultan like abdulhamid 2 would be among the best sultans during times of peace. Something that we didn’t have during his reign unfortunately because the world was trying to destroy us and parititiom us.
@bore4k
3 ай бұрын
fact: Osman II r**ed by Janissaries
@dodoiserg3371
2 ай бұрын
when?
@hadimali6392
2 ай бұрын
Not Great, Magnicifent!..
@balrawg5990
Жыл бұрын
The list has some awful takes
@cricketinglife8801
Жыл бұрын
Sultan Abdul Hamid 2nd not a bad sultan He is a great on that time
@ahnafhasanrajjo
Жыл бұрын
Nah. People only think that because of the Turkish tv shows which portray him as one of the greatest sultans.
@Arabian.Mapping
10 ай бұрын
no,he lost many teritories during his reign and plus he lost many wars you just say he was good because of the serial called Payitaht AbdulHamid
@umairamir2830
9 ай бұрын
Abdul Hamid is not bad bad the territories lost in his reign was due to parliament’s mistakes and he was overthrown by young Turks supported by European powers
@mythicalumut6174
7 ай бұрын
@@ahnafhasanrajjoto be fair. His reign was not the best but he out of any sultan had the most potential. If only the young turk revolution didn’t happen then the ottoman empire might have gotten their strength back up to a reasonable amount for the europeans to leave them alone for the time being.
@TsarAmbatukamXIV
7 ай бұрын
Russia almost lay siege to the city of Constantinople under his reign if British didn't tell them to stop
@ruffy657
7 ай бұрын
abdulhamid and abdulaziz was great
@Nordsjaelland180
6 ай бұрын
Funny 😂
@ruffy657
6 ай бұрын
its not funny anani skm@@Nordsjaelland180
@iamparrot_6755
Ай бұрын
@@Nordsjaelland180 Why u always try to prove sultan abdulhamid not good?
@ruffy657
7 ай бұрын
sultan mehmed 3 was bad his son ahmed the first was a very great sultan !!!
@MohammedShams-rd7uh
6 ай бұрын
Don't trust what u see in magnificent century, except Osman 1,Orhan, Murad 1, Bayezid 1,Murad 2, Mehmed 2, Selim 1, Suleiman 1,Murad 4 Abdul Majid 1, no sultan was good every sultan was good for nothing
Пікірлер: 111