Your teaching style is like you..beautiful ❤ And the content was nice😎
@ramizulislam5284
5 жыл бұрын
Thank u for such a video!
@sarahchem4219
5 жыл бұрын
Happy it helped!
@amnasiddique8645
4 жыл бұрын
@@sarahchem4219 lovly way of teaching v helping and too the point m also a chemistry teacher
@pooranakirandaruman4056
5 жыл бұрын
your teaching is awesome
@franky0226
6 жыл бұрын
thanks
@sarahchem4219
6 жыл бұрын
Happy to help!
@franky0226
6 жыл бұрын
yea...I getting what you are sayin..I think this is the crux point Thanks....
@sarahchem4219
6 жыл бұрын
Another way to think about it is that the bonds that are mostly formed are those that are required to make the product when the transition state is closer to the product (the reactant bonds are mostly broken). The converse would be true when the transition state is closer in energy to the reactants.
@MrMrannoying
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Qgggggggg
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much 😊🙃
@prakashbishnoi6593
4 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation
@mohduroojalikhan3641
2 жыл бұрын
Hey can you explain hinsberg's reaction with amine
@franky0226
6 жыл бұрын
can u explain Hammond's postulate...please??😫
@sarahchem4219
6 жыл бұрын
Hi Franklin. I can definitely add that to my request list. For now, the Hammond postulate essentially says that the transition state will look most like whatever species it is closer in energy to. In other words, if the transition state is closer in energy to the reactants than the products, it will look more like the reactant (in terms of the bonds formed/broken) than the product.
Пікірлер: 16