Redundant publications, is a significant issue in the academic and scientific community. They occur when authors publish the same or substantially similar content in multiple venues without proper cross-referencing or acknowledgment of the prior publication. This practice can distort the scientific record, lead to the inflation of an author's publication count, and waste valuable resources.
Best Practices for Authors
1. Transparency: Be transparent about previous related publications and how new submissions differ.
2. Permissions: Seek permission from the original publisher if substantial content is being reused.
3. Responsible Reporting: Only submit original research and avoid slicing data (i.e., dividing a single study into multiple smaller publications).
4. Clear Differentiation: When building upon previous work, clearly differentiate new findings and advancements from what has been previously published.
5. Transparency in Methods: Detail any overlap in methods or datasets between publications, making it clear how the current study extends or differs from past work.
6. Ethical Training2: Undergo training in publication ethics and familiarize yourself with guidelines from COPE and other relevant organizations.
Conclusion
Avoiding redundant publications is crucial for maintaining the quality and integrity of the academic literature. Authors, reviewers, and editors all play a role in ensuring that each publication represents a genuine and unique contribution to the field.
Негізгі бет Redundant publications -(salami slicing, overlapping publication, duplicate publications)
Пікірлер: 4