Fruitful conversation, if things go as they think. Any country can become strong. The sad thing is, people in power will never agree with them or support them.
@thanigaivelk3766
Жыл бұрын
Whoever votes whether you are general public, Army will decide which party should form the government and who will be the prime minister. This is democracy.
@shaantanuasthana969
Жыл бұрын
Great discussion sir thanks this is go yo dictionary for all countries in the subcontinent having the same problem.
@PanakaluPoonakam
Жыл бұрын
I am an Indian. And I work with RSS on Agricultural Policy matters. My recent work was on producing a paper on Genetically Modified Crops/Seeds. Listening to the discussion led me into disbelief if this is what educated intellectuals engage in. So, these people are advocating creating of multiple "Idara" (or institutions) that deal "specifically" with implementation of policies enacted by parliament. And I can at the outset see few "conflicts" of interests in institutions proposed by this panel. It's a very long discussion and I really don't have time to re-watch and point out exactly what. Why is this panel "re-inventing" models out of thin air with an assumption that their models are better than those that exist? Did any one on this panel research if these "technocratic govt" existed elsewhere in the world ( I do remember few exceptions, may be in Italy)? I can quickly say only one thing. The reason why Army's military govt failed is because they live in their barracks, far removed from the public and have outsourced the activity of policy decisions to a "technocratic team". Now you are saying that the cure for this is have parliament create a policy and let "technocratic team" deliver it. Can you tell me who will be the fall guy if a particular policy fails? Parliament or "technocratic team"? Are there any checks/balances on this "technocratic team"? If they are, then how is it different from the bureaucracy? It seems you've reinvented the wheel. There are too many flaws I can see. But good luck!
@AKumar-co7oe
Жыл бұрын
they are all advocating for creating jobs for themselves
@AKumar-co7oe
Жыл бұрын
When they don't even have basic facts right. He says new york's economy is bigger than India's - no it's not LOL
@vivekbalasubramaniam8670
Жыл бұрын
@@AKumar-co7oe The state of NY has a GDP of 1.49 Trillion $
@Resolutemen
Жыл бұрын
Sir Excellent initiative of elevating intellectual and research perspective of youth on core issues of this country. Please tap into wider audience with shorter videos. May Allah give you more successes and help you make PIDE the root of intellectual evolution of this nation, this country direly needs it 🙏
@asadaziz6429
Жыл бұрын
Thanks to Dr. Nadeem ul Haq Sahib to highlight the issues which are unstable the economy of Pakistan. I request to Dr. Nadeem ul Haq Sahib to highlight the mindset of Pakistani rulling classes and political persanalities mindset about economical affairs. Wa Salam.
@messageoflifeislove
Жыл бұрын
Sir Agriculture is a major sector of our country economy We need to enhance this sector for more productivity and potential to raise our reserves by increasing the scope of Agriculture
@arafat8301
Жыл бұрын
Sir more than 50% of our gdp is from service sector. How agricultural is major . Yes we can only enhance irrigation systems alternatives of fertilisers that will also improve environment which is major issue nowadays. We need to produce substitute of import. there is big deficit.
@patrickdial5810
Жыл бұрын
Pity you don't such programes in English or at least with English subtitles.
@quddusquddus136
Жыл бұрын
After every 2 1/2 years Pakistan shows up naked in front of I.M.F to preserve its dwindling dignity. It talks of its meager reserves in the state bank. The problem lies in the psychological state of mind of a military state. This flourishing state with its own various criminal enterprises enabled Pakistan to stay as a failed and bankrupt state. Discussion about a paltry economy is a waste of time. A failed and bankrupt state is under no obligation to lie.
@dellhp9564
Жыл бұрын
@PIDEOfficial Where is discussion on land and real estate tax
@arifmirza692
Жыл бұрын
Your live chat is not working. My question is that with such a large shadow economy how can you incentivise them to document themselves and then how can you tax them in a reasonable manner.
@PIDEOfficial
Жыл бұрын
The Question is answered at the end, govt has to reduce it's footprint & over-regulation, let the markets flourish & money to circulate, let people invest more. Many thanks for your contribution. Keep watching
@mohammedishaque4631
Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir very informative 💞🥰
@mtalha2950
15 күн бұрын
Though it was a good discussion, the questions asked from the panelists were not answered rather other discussion was held. For example, when asked 'What is meant by reforms? Who formulates the policy documents? How does the policy document prepared?' No relevant information is provided. I have watched other videos as well, and almost all of them were fruitful, this one is not that much helpful.
@PIDEOfficial
15 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback @mtalha2950 Noted your points. You can review our recent podcasts as well.
@fazalkhaliq9749
Жыл бұрын
Sir question should be discussed that why capitalism has failed in pakistan????
@messageoflifeislove
Жыл бұрын
Please do a separate program on Agriculture sector especially 🙏
@PIDEOfficial
Жыл бұрын
Noted Dear, Thanks for your feedback & suggestion.
@durranihamzu837
Жыл бұрын
Do we have money in order to implemention of these policies?? Unfortunately we have inadequate money to pay import bill for next 3 weeks.
@manojthaker3678
Жыл бұрын
Fundamentals. Two nations theory and Zinnah has done lots of damage to Pakistan and still doing it.
@dipakbose2677
8 ай бұрын
Pakistani economists do not know how to explain a point. They just go round and round.
@shahidmehmood7762
Жыл бұрын
It is all bakwas. Did any country did this type of charter of economy. Plz ask for reforms required only in economic field. That's it. Did congress did it with bjp while made reforms 1991 for such funny charter. Did democrate did it with republican or republican did with democrates. Did Singapore Lee asked opposition for any charter. Yes we needed a charter of ethical and moral values. Nothing else. Our people are confused with what discussion some idiot opened for such a aimless charter.
Пікірлер: 27