This video is an edited version of the lengthy livestream from two weeks ago. A big thank you to @ahmedvertical8143 for his efforts in editing the video. He noticed the problem, solved it himself, and served an audience that don't have the time for a lengthy stream. May Allah reward the brother.
@thefuryofthedragon8715
4 ай бұрын
MashaAllah
@abdulmuqeet5987
4 ай бұрын
Ameen
@osamas5912
4 ай бұрын
Ameen
@thanoonsaleh5460
4 ай бұрын
Aneen
@gamingexpert7115
4 ай бұрын
Ameen
@Ahmad62637
4 ай бұрын
I’m famous 🦆❤. Jazak Allahu Khaira for your efforts akhi
@binkhadem
4 ай бұрын
lucky duck
@Baerock
4 ай бұрын
Jazzaka khair, akh farid, i’d suggest to make more short form videos, as the majority of people will not open a 30min video, the reach will be much greater! hafadhaka allah
@2ARM4170
4 ай бұрын
Please do more livestreams about this! Next, the companions and main narrators
@qafrd5487
4 ай бұрын
❤ Ily bro, May Allah elevate you
@DarkKnightDad
4 ай бұрын
May Allah reward you and the brother who shorten the video immensely
@muhammedshaban7951
4 ай бұрын
Assalamualaikum brother Farid, As usual your video is very informative and makes it easy to research about islam. As I have been recently studying Islam more and more I have stumbled upon something which is hard to reconcile and I think all Muslims have come across this, I tried ignoring the fact but it disturbed me a lot and sometimes it makes me question my belief. The issue I am talking about is the Qadr and Qada which is very confusing as it’s hard to reconcile Free will with Qadr. Can you please make a detailed video on this topic. Jazak Allahu khairan.
@2ARM4170
4 ай бұрын
In a nutshell: Free will and Qadr go hand in hand. Allah is all knowing. He knows what we will do. Allah wrote down the Qadar BECAUSE he KNOWS that THIS is what we will do with our OWN free will. Allah has ultimate knowledge. He KNOWS that person X will never CHOOSE to accept Islam. Therefore he wrote that person X will not die a Muslim. That person chose with his own free will not to accept Islam. The question of free will and qadar is not limited to Islam btw. All beliefs attempt to answer it. But I think Islam has the best answer. Watch the video on sapience institute's londoniyya series: Qadar.
@2ARM4170
4 ай бұрын
Londoniyya has helped me a lot with some shubuhat as well allahumma barik. Just always remember that your iman needs to be like a tree: strong firm roots whereby gusts of wind don't make it fall down. And even if a storm breaks off all the branches, the root remains. Build your iman on the ultimate facts: Allah is one. He must be one. Islam is the only proselytising Monotheistic religion on Earth. This is the religion of Monotheism. Logic leads to this. Fitra leads to this. This is the only reasonable recourse. Everything besides this is either paganism or remains of unpreserved revelation, or atheistic materialistic nihilism. THIS is the religion of the fitra. From THIS can a human truly have objective purpose. And truly, what better purpose than to do what everything in creation does: submit to the creator. The only entity deserving of worship, by necessity. "And why should I not worship the one who has created me, and to him you all shall return?" That verse answers the three existential questions: Where did I come from? Where am I going? What is the purpose of life? Then move on to the prophet, peace be upon him. How his biography is absolutely not that of a liar. And the many, many examples of that, him praying until his legs bleed, forbidding the charity from reaching his households, and even when his son Ibrahim died how there was an eclipse and people believed it was because of his Son! But he said "The sun and the moon are signs from my lord, and they don't eclipse for the life or death of any of you. So when you see them, supplicate and pray." Then move on to things like the Qur'an being the only scripture worthy of being called the speech of God: where God is directly speaking to his creation, unlike the bible, where it is a boring convoluted historical narrative. It is furthermore preserved, without any shadow of a doubt. Then things like the Qur'an's miracles and things like prophecies and such May Allah keep us firm upon the deen.
@AB-xi9im
4 ай бұрын
@@2ARM4170salam alaikum akhi as far as i know your understanding of qadar is incomplete. There is also an element of determination like when allah says: And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. 7:179
@2ARM4170
4 ай бұрын
@@AB-xi9im wa alaykum assalam, My understand is the wholistic understanding in the aqeeda of ahlusunnah. You have free will And Allah determines events. Allah determined that person X will entre jinnah Because Allah knows the actions he will do with his free will Because Allah is All-knowing. Allah also decrees life and death and nothing happens out of his will. It is once you look at all the evidences as a whole that you get the statement: Allah KNEW and KNOWS that person X will do y, with his free will, so Allah WROTE that Y shall occur BECAUSE of person X's free will. Anyway Qadar is a huge topic and certainly cannot be discussed in a youtube comment thread.
@AB-xi9im
4 ай бұрын
@@2ARM4170 yeah i dont think yt comment section is the best place to discuss this. May allah keep us on the straight path
SUNNAH cannot come from the AVESTA in the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOroastrian Converts. The last prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT followed the LAWS in the TAWRAT(according to condtion in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the Tawrat) Sunnah like STONING to death for Adulterer/Adulteress outside the city gates, Sunnah like not shaving off the sides of head and beard. etc
@samy7013
4 ай бұрын
اللّهُـمَّ صَلِّ عَلـى مُحمَّـدٍ وَعَلـى أَزْواجِـهِ وَذُرِّيَّـتِه، كَمـا صَلَّيْـتَ عَلـى آلِ إبْراهـيم . وَبارِكْ عَلـى مُحمَّـدٍ وَعَلـى أَزْواجِـهِ وَذُرِّيَّـتِه، كَمـا بارِكْتَ عَلـى آلِ إبْراهـيم . إِنَّكَ حَمـيدٌ مَجـيد Allāhumma ṣalli `alā Muḥammadin wa `alā 'azwājihi wa dhurriyyatihi, kamā ṣallayta `alā 'āli 'Ibrāhīma. Wa bārik `alā Muḥammadin wa `alā 'azwājihi wa dhurriyyatihi, kamā bārakta `alā 'āli 'Ibrāhīma. 'Innaka ḥamīdum-majīd. O Allah, bestow Your favor on Muhammad and upon his wives and progeny as You have bestowed Your favor upon the family of Ibrahim. And bless Muhammad and his wives and progeny as You have blessed the family of Ibrahim, You are full of praise, Most Glorious. Reference: Al-Bukhari, from Al-Asqalani, Fathul-Bari 6/ 407, Muslim 1/306.
@temp-p4e
4 ай бұрын
WAS buhkari from the ZOROASTRIAN MAGIAN Family of PERSIAN empire???
@salaflover
3 ай бұрын
@@temp-p4e yeah
@estonian44
4 ай бұрын
i hear some1 in arena hamzas den said, the problem with chinese telephone game is "IT IS SAID SECRETLY to 1 person", if u said it OPENLY to all of those who are present, then see what comes out from the end (at the end is the person who also heared the message)
@kaiteross6596
4 ай бұрын
Don’t you brush your hair? You look very untidy . Personal hygiene is a part of the sunnah of the Prophet.
@ashifhassan1148
4 ай бұрын
Simple and humble
@djazairion6200
4 ай бұрын
When is the book out brother Farid u ain't gonna run from the question 😂😂
@FaridResponds
4 ай бұрын
Publisher sent me a cover just a couple of days ago. It needs some minor changes. Will update you folks when I have more info.
@djazairion6200
4 ай бұрын
@@FaridResponds I love brother for The sake of Allah ❤️❤️❤️
@islamforever5875
4 ай бұрын
@@djazairion6200Farid is writing a book ?
@djazairion6200
4 ай бұрын
@@islamforever5875 ohh absolutely, it's named why the sahaba رضي الله عنهم became Muslim
@Haris-ny3sw
4 ай бұрын
BarakAllaahu Feek!
@HasanIqbal-no9fx
3 ай бұрын
But how do u know that the original narration itself is correct? Couldn’t someone with historical knowledge just make the Hadith and say that so and so heard the prophet pbuh him say such and such?
@PathtoParadise-bk9yz
3 ай бұрын
someone can make up a hadith and say so and so heard it from the prophet, and this is something that was taken into consideration by the Islamic scholars
@HasanIqbal-no9fx
3 ай бұрын
@@PathtoParadise-bk9yz how did the scholars account for this?
@taimurahmad
3 ай бұрын
The scholars have syrict criteria. Attend the lessons al bayquniyyah and nuzhatun nadhr
@delistoyer
2 ай бұрын
That's why the condition is that everyone in the chain has to be trustworthy.
@delistoyer
2 ай бұрын
The only point of contention I can see is "how do you know someone didn't make a mistake"? There's also the condition that everyone in the chain has to have good memory. But mistakes can theoretically still slip through. And the response would be that, if even after trying our best to weed out mistakes and errors, we still ended up with some, then what's wrong? Did Allah say that you would be held accountable for making or following a mistake even after trying your best to follow what's correct? The Qur'an doesn't set any such standard; that you must reach 100% certainty of correctness before you can follow what a known trustworthy Muslim said. It's a standard that you are proposing and the burden is upon you to substantiate and show with evidence that Allah wants us to reach that level of certainty. There are several examples of testimony requirements in the Qur'an, such as requiring 4 witnesses for the hadd punishment. Is it theoretically impossible for 4 witnesses to be mistaken? No. Yet, that's sufficient. There are no examples of testimony requirements in the Qur'an that demonstrate a requirement of 100% foolproof theoretical certainty. لاَ يُكَلِّفُ اللّهُ نَفْساً إِلاَّ وُسْعَهَا Allah told us that we will be held accountable for only what we are capable of. The ahadith are the best of what we have after a rigorous process of scrutiny. If you're saying that following them is still wrong because they can have mistakes, then you're saying that Allah wants us to do more than what we are capable of and that the best is not enough. This is not what Allah says in the Qur'an.
@northkoreanplug
4 ай бұрын
Ily bro thank you may Allah bless u
@seamus4055
4 ай бұрын
Best video in the English language on this topic
@TheGuidedOne-nx5hh
4 ай бұрын
Peace be upon everyone, We the humans want world peace,compassion and love to prevail We the humans want this darkness of vices of inept political leaders to end In the name of God the merciful,the compassionate WE DEMAND PEACE, AMEN AMIN
@sarishaaban
4 ай бұрын
Jazakom Allah khair
@AbuIshaq17
4 ай бұрын
BarakAllahu feek
@mominhaq6295
4 ай бұрын
Good work brother. We really appreciate your knowledge and sharing it with your Ummah
@Yalla12347
4 ай бұрын
Akhi how do we join your online sessions?
@OriginalAndroidPhone
4 ай бұрын
For example in the bukhari chain, does anyone go to AY and ask AY if the chain is true?
@FaridResponds
4 ай бұрын
Abu Nu'aym (hadith #1560) has another path from AY, in which he is narrating it to Bakr bin Sahl. So yes, even on that level it is corroborated.
@suluhsabil
4 ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i There're many prophets that have beaten by their people. Bukhari 3477 : has no clue about prophet Isa 'alaihissalam. It's not related to the story of prophet Isa. So concluding that hadits is connected to surah An Nisa 157 is a guess that has no basis.
@suluhsabil
4 ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i Prophets always pray to their people, even though they were hurt by their people. Prophet Muhammad shalallahu alaihi wasallam pray when his people hurt him in Thaif. "O Allah, give guidance to my people, indeed they do not know". About Luke chapter 23 verse 34 - that not mention about prophet whose face was bleeding. Verse 33 mention a man whose hand was held on the left and right, then nails to the wood. Not bleeding on his face, and did not wipe blood from his face. So that's not what is meant in the hadith. It's not the same as what is mentioned in Bukhari 3477. So there's no contradiction surah An Nisa 157 and sahih Bukhari 3477.
@abdullahsiddiqui7168
4 ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2iit is what the prophet's say when hurt by their people. Muhammad saw said the same in the battle of uhud when he was wounded plus the hadith doesn't mention Isa AS so end of story.
@obaidaalmosuli8230
4 ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i No, Bukhari hadith 3477 doesn't speak about Jesus, that's confirmation bias. TL;DR *Hadith speaks either about prophet Noah or the prophet Mohammed is using illeism to describe himself in the battle of Uhud.*
@DomainofKnowlegdia
3 ай бұрын
If the hadith was transferred from Ibn Umar through different narrators to people like Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Abu Dawaud and the rest wouldn't that mean the hadith was narrated through the oral recitation system meaning that over time as the hadith was passed down from one generation to the other it might have got completely or somewhat altered changing the original message of the hadith to a certain extent. The hadith system makes me ponder.
@Mimi-Maa18
3 ай бұрын
How If they all narrated the same thing ?
@DomainofKnowlegdia
3 ай бұрын
@@Mimi-Maa18 they could have later agreed on the same part of the hadith which may not be the original messege.
@Mimi-Maa18
3 ай бұрын
@DomainofKnowlegdia how ? How would people from different generations, and sometimes different places, agree on the same lie ?
@DomainofKnowlegdia
3 ай бұрын
@@Mimi-Maa18 Because of Faith in Allah
@Mimi-Maa18
3 ай бұрын
@@DomainofKnowlegdia I didn't say why, I said how ? Your argument doesn't make sense
@JohnLittle-c9j
4 ай бұрын
Dear brother Assalamualaikam, I am a new revert but I am confused on if there is no compulsion in religion, as some verses sort of imply you can force Islam on others, of course it’s because I am uneducated and I accept these as true anyway, I am just confused
@Jack-qz1lg
4 ай бұрын
Wa 'alaykumus-salam. Which verses are you referring to?
@JohnLittle-c9j
4 ай бұрын
@@Jack-qz1lg my dear brother thank you for your time, original verse being, 2:256 and the verse that confused me was then this one, 9:5. Also bukhari 8:387 contradicts it as well (I say contradict but I know it’s not a actual contradiction, just me being unable to understand)
@alikhalifa1988
4 ай бұрын
@@JohnLittle-c9jRegarding 9:5, Quranic exegetes al-Baydawi and al-Alusi explain that it refers to those pagan Arabs who violated their peace treaties by waging war against Muslims.
@malhekuba7473
4 ай бұрын
There is no compulsion in religion verse is abrogated. Hell, you cant even leave islam as in the hadith the punishment is capital. There is compulsion in religion, especially if you are born muslim.
@ElyasQuick1
4 ай бұрын
@@JohnLittle-c9j Regarding 9:5. Verses talk about those who broke the treaty, expelled the Messenger ﷺ and attacked Muslims first. Read previous verses (4, 12, 13) in the same Surah 9 for context. In Quran 9:2 Allah ﷻ says that for their treachery Allah ﷻ didn’t punish them straight away but first gave them period of time to leave the land. In Quran 9:4 Allah ﷻ says that exception are disbelievers who honor the treaty, don’t act hostile towards Muslims and don’t support enemies of Muslims. In Quran 9:6 Allah ﷻ says that even during open war if any of polytheists asks for protection then Muslims should protect polytheists and escort them to a place of safety so they may hear the word of Allah ﷻ. And in Quran 9:12-13 we are explicitly told what type of people we are dealing with : people who broke their treaty, plotted to expel the Messenger ﷺ and attacked Muslims first.
@mirzaamann
4 ай бұрын
@Farid Responds i see many people going astray because of Scam Shamoun, you should refute his claims against islam
@taneeshaknight3901
2 ай бұрын
As well as "Seeking Allah Finding Jehova" on here saying he studied Islam for 16 years and left it due to its falsified origin etc.
@BaseerFaizan
4 ай бұрын
Where can I find the full live stream for this one?
@Rotisiv
4 ай бұрын
Go to his channel, click on “live”. It’s gonna show you a list of lives that’s he’s done you’ll find the whole stream there, it’s called “refuting 21 arguments against hadiths” or something like that
@PlayGuy200
4 ай бұрын
So how can we know Nafii for example was a reliable transmitter in the chain? Jazak Allah khairan akhi, all other points were well explained
@FaridResponds
4 ай бұрын
His status was determined by contemporaries.
@PlayGuy200
4 ай бұрын
@@FaridResponds thank you akhi❤
@muhammadmustaqiim8490
4 ай бұрын
Yahya Bin Yahya who narrates from Malik in the Muwatta is different from Yahya Ibn Yahya who Muslim narrates from.
@JETRANG
4 ай бұрын
Salam brother, Excuse me for this off topic message, but I had a request; Recently a series of anti Islamic (and anti religion in general) channels are getting more and more popularity, and they (three to be exact) are all governed by a man named Adam elmasri, he was even in a mythvideo video criticizing Islam. There also little to no rebuttals toward him, only thing i found was a brother that made a rebuttal to him a while back, but Adam recently made a response to his rebuttal. (Although it seems like there is a lot of people criticizing him in Arabic videos but unfortunately I don't speak Arabic, and it seems like he has responded to some of them) I wanted to know, would you take a look at his stuff and answer him if you can? It's getting out of hand
@samirhachad643
4 ай бұрын
Indeed, there are many responses to this person in Arabic. He is generally a dishonest person in reporting, and lies a lot about the sources he cites
@JETRANG
4 ай бұрын
@samirhachad643 Yes, he seems disingenuous to me, but due to his involvement with mythvision I thought that we need to respond to him more seriously
@user-eh2pv4sc7h
26 күн бұрын
"LOVE FOR THE ANSAR IS FAITH." WAKE UP FAREED THIS A FORGED AHADEETH. THIS AHADEETH RASOOLLAH WAS REFERRING TI ALI. THOSE WHO HATE AND CURSED ALI AND THE SAHABA IN YOUR BUKHARI AND MUSLIM.DID THAT. DOUBLE STANDARDS WHEN YOU SAY THE SHIA CAN'T CURSE WHEN THE SAHABA WERE KILLING, CURSING AND DISOBEYING. IF THE SHIA CURSE THEY GET THE EXAMPLE FROM YOUR BOOKS.
@reality_cant_change
4 ай бұрын
I love you my dear brother.
@thefuryofthedragon8715
4 ай бұрын
MashaAllah
@shupuk
4 ай бұрын
What would your response be for a person claiming that as Qur'an is protected by Allah but not the hadith. If prophet (S.A.W) said something but later on it was changed or due to human error it got corrupted i.e added or removed and is now a part of islamic belief. Such as the coming of ESA A.S they claim that this narration is quoted in the books later on but not in the earliest hadith books and somehow it got corrupted and added that ESA A.S will come back. They claim Qur'an doesn't state the coming of him rather it says he is dead.
@TheSlaveOfAllah1992
4 ай бұрын
Do not engage with Qadiyanis, created by the bloody British colonist. They are not Muslims to begin with and likewise the hadith rejector. Allah says, O you who have believed, Obey Allah and Obey the Messenger. Whoever obeyed the Messenger has obeyed Allah. And other similar verses. The Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, said, whoever lies intentionally upon me, let him take his seat in the Hellfire. This hadith is authentic as the Qur'an. Allah preserved the Qur'an and Sunnah, it would make no sense, when Allah commanded you to obey the Messenger and commanded you to follow Muhajiroon and Ansar. How can we obey this command if the Sunnah has not been preserved. It is crystal clear that Allah preserved the Qur'an and Sunnah through Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jama'ah and Allah will continue to do it until the day of judgment. As for 'Eesa/Jesus, peace be upon him, he will return back as Allah says, rather Allah took him up to Himself. The people of the book will believe in him ('Eesa) before his death. The Ahadith of the Prophet, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, is clear that 'Eesa, will return back as this is one of the major signs.
@mohamedcherifchabane688
4 ай бұрын
the sunnah clarifies the quran so to preserve the quran's meanings it implies preservation of hadith the coming of isa is a sign of hour this is even in the quran so the one who is claiming otherwise is ignorant of the quran furthermore the hadith on this matter is mutwattir " he is dead" not only ignorant but also a liar aya 57 of al Az-Zukhruf mentionns ISA than aya 61 in the same context says in the meaning of "And indeed, Jesus will be [a sign for] knowledge of the Hour, so be not in doubt of it, and follow Me. This is a straight path." so how can they doubt it "so be not in doubt of it" as for their lie of him being dead in surah An-Nisaa 157 and 158 contains the meaning of that they didn't kill nor crucify ISA and that allah has risen him , than 159 the meaning of "And there is none from the People of the Scripture but that he will surely believe in Jesus before his death. And on the Day of Resurrection he will be against them a witness." the point is there is still people who are from the people of the scriptures that don't believe in him so he is still alive and in the hadith in his time all religions except islam will perish so they will all believe in him so not only the hadiths are in line with quran but they clarify it as in the quran 44 of An-Nahl the meaning of " [We sent them] with clear proofs and written ordinances. And We revealed to you the message that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought." don't listen to hadith rejectors they are ignorant of the quran or they know and are intentionnaly lying
@temp-p4e
4 ай бұрын
Anyone who JUDGES by the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN Converts is actually following the AVESTA under the name of MUHAMMAD. The Almighty says in the QURAN 5 44-47 And whosoever doesnt Judge by what Allah has """"""REVEALED""""" is a Disbeliever, wrong doer and defiantly disobident. Islam will always be from the QURAN and TAWRAT(according to the condition in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT) The INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to ISA and gives guidance and laws which """""CONFIRMS"""" the laws in the TAWRAT is lost to time.
@mohamedcherifchabane688
4 ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i how is that a contradiction? bukhari 3477 is about "As if I saw the Prophet (ﷺ) talking about one of the prophets whose nation had beaten him and caused him to bleed, while he was cleaning the blood off his face and saying, "O Allah! Forgive my nation, for they have no knowledge."" and al aya 157 an-nissa from its meaning negating that they cursifyed or killed ISA first the hadith doesn't say it is isa who bleed to begin with seconde it says "he was cleaning the blood off his face" and someone curisfied can't clean himself as his hands are pinned and if he is killed well it is clear he can't wipe himself furthermore it says he was hit it doens't speak about crusifixtion to begin with If someone twists the hadith from "a prophet" to "isa" and from "beaten" to "crusifyed" and removes "while he was cleaning the blood off his face" that twisting is on him and not a contradiction but his false understanding is wrong
@shupuk
4 ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i i know what you are referring towards but as my teacher taught me if something is apparently contradicting Qur'an It means that the ayah is not contradicting rather it is your own Aqal which is contradicting as the ayah is to be interpreted by the companions of the prophet as they were directly studying under the prophet S.A.W
@nathanshiferaw9498
4 ай бұрын
Not a Christian Here But I do have questions Did Muhammad See Allah? No Aisha, the wife of the Prophet Muhammad, stated that anyone claiming that Muhammad saw Allah is a liar. She cited the Quranic verse: “No vision can grasp Him” (Quran 6:103) and “None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah” (Quran 6:103). Yes: Muhammad did in fact see Allah Narrated AbdurRahman ibn A’ish Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said: I saw my Lord, the Exalted and Glorious in the most beautiful form. He said: What do the Angels in the presence of Allah contend about? I said: Thou art the most aware of it. He then placed HIS PALM between my shoulders and I felt its coldness in my chest and I came to know what was in the Heavens and the Earth. He recited: ‘Thus did we show Ibrahim the kingdom of the Heavens and the Earth and it was so that he might have certainty.’(6:75) Darimi reported it in a mursal form and Tirmidhi also reported. (Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 237; ALIM CD-ROM Version) Narrated Mu’adh ibn Jabal Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) was detained one morning from observing the dawn prayer (in congregation) along with us till the sun had almost appeared on the horizon. He then came out hurriedly and Iqamah for prayer was observed and he conducted it (prayer) in brief form. When he had concluded the prayer by saying As-salamu alaykum wa Rahmatullah, he called out to us saying: Remain in your places as you were. Then turning to us he said: I am going to tell you what detained me from you (on account of which I could not join you in the prayer) in the morning. I got up in the night and performed ablution and observed the prayer as had been ordained for me. I dozed in my prayer till I was overcome by (sleep) and lo, I found myself in the presence of my Lord, the Blessed and the Glorious, in the best form. He said: Muhammad! I said: At Thy service, my Lord. He said: What these highest angels contend about? I said: I do not know. He repeated it thrice. He said: Then I saw Him put his palms between my shoulder blades till I felt the coldness of his fingers between the two sides of my chest. Then everything was illuminated for me and I could recognize everything. He said: Muhammad! I said: At Thy service, my Lord. He said: What do these high angels contend about? I said: In regard to expiations. He said: What are these? I said: Going on foot to join congregational prayers, sitting in the mosques after the prayers, performing ablution well despite difficulties. He again said: Then what do they contend? I said: In regard to the ranks. He said: What are these? I said: Providing of food, speaking gently, observing the prayer when the people are asleep. He again said to me: Beg (Your Lord) and say: O Allah, I beg of Thee (power) to do good deeds, and abandon abominable deeds, to love the poor, that Thou forgive me and show mercy to me and when Thou intendst to put people to trial Thou causes me to die unblemished and I beg of Thee Thy love and the love of one who loves Thee and the love for the deed which brings me near to Thy love. Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said: It is a truth, so learn it and teach it. Transmitted by Ahmad, Tirmidhi who said: This is a hasan sahih hadith and I asked Muhammad ibn Isma'il about this hadith and he said: It is a sahih hadith. (Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 245; ALIM CD-ROM Version) Al-Bayhaqi also narrated the hadith "I saw my Lord" in al-Asma’ wa al-Sifat with a sound chain but with the addition: "in the form of a curly-haired, beardless young man wearing a green robe," a condemned, disauthenticated addition and concatenation with another hadith that refers to Gibril. Hence al-Suyuti interpreted it either as a dream or, quoting his shaykh Ibn al-Humam, as "the veil of form" (hijab al-sura)… (Islamic Doctrines and Beliefs: Volume 1: The Prophets in Barzakh, The Hadith of Isra’ and Mir’aj, The Immense Merits of Al-Sham, The Vision of Allah, Al-Sayyid Muhammad Ibn ‘Alawi al-Maliki, translation and notes by Dr. Gibril Fouad Haddad As-Sunna Foundation of America 1999, pp. 137-138; bold and underline emphasis ours) What’s strange is that the Quran Explicitly says that no one has ever seen Allah Surah Al-An’am (Chapter 6), verses 103 No vision can encompass Him, but He encompasses all vision. For He is the Most Subtle, All-Aware. I said to 'Aisha, "O Mother! Did Prophet Muhammad see his Lord?" Aisha said, "What you have said makes my hair stand on end! Know that if somebody tells you one of the following three things, he is a liar: Whoever tells you that Muhammad saw his Lord, is a liar." Then Aisha recited the Verse: No soul can know what it will earn tomorrow.’ (31.34) She added: "And whoever tells you that he concealed (some of Allah's orders), is a liar." Then she recited: ‘O Apostle! Proclaim (the Message) which has been sent down to you from your Lord…’ (5.67) ‘Aisha added. "But the Prophet saw Gabriel in his true form twice." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 378) Aisha said, "If anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen his Lord, HE IS A LIAR, FOR ALLAH SAYS: ‘No vision can grasp Him.’ Quran (6.103) And if anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen the Unseen, he is a liar, for Allah says: ‘None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah.’" (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 477 All the Scholars and Muslims say and agree that the Prophet Muhammad was illiterate man am not sure if that's true because in Hadith 114 in Ibn `Abbas said, "When the ailment of the Prophet became worse, he said, 'Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.' If it was the companions of Muhammad who would write for him he would have not say Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement instead he would of said you will write he would not speak in the first person.
@الحقيقةالمغيبة-خ9خ
4 ай бұрын
I don't know why KZitem always deletes my response 🤦♂️
@TheSlaveOfAllah1992
4 ай бұрын
Just an advice from us, do not dulge in yourself with knowledge while you are in a terrible state. Begin with small things, learn the shahadah, what it means, then Salah, how did the Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, prayed and so on. Like in school, in kindergarten, they learn the alphabet letters, and so on. This islamic 'ilm, which is more important than what you have learned from your School. Greetings from Scandinavia.
@nathanshiferaw9498
4 ай бұрын
@@الحقيقةالمغيبة-خ9خ try to respond again
@Jaywalker45
4 ай бұрын
I am skeptic of your claims u might've copied from a missionary post cause I fact checked it and didn't find anything similar
@nathanshiferaw9498
4 ай бұрын
@@Jaywalker45 What does your instincts say about Hadith 114?
@millat_ibraheem
4 ай бұрын
Im number one?
@mammid9622
4 ай бұрын
No, Allah is
@suhaib6315
2 ай бұрын
Fabrication aside no modern historical scholars are going to validate hadith as an accurate historical source if they were written down centuries later, because there is no plausible way they would not be influenced by contemporary political understandings. The scholars who wrote the hadith were biased by their own time. This is true for everything it's why scholars also don't take the bible as historical facts for Jesus. The only way you can believe in hadith is through faith not evidence.
@FaridResponds
2 ай бұрын
Substantiate your claim about "no modern historian."
@suhaib6315
2 ай бұрын
@@FaridResponds No modern historian is going to take writings written 200-250 years later as an accurate historical representation of what happened. They're going to consider it as what people 200-250 years later thought happened subject to political bias, which is fairly accurate since there was a lot of political infighting after the Prophet's death. Similarly that is why historians don't regard the bible as historical fact.
@FaridResponds
2 ай бұрын
@@suhaib6315 You're just repeating yourself.
@suhaib6315
2 ай бұрын
@@FaridResponds And you're not responding to the point I made, modern historians do not take Hadith as historical fact. Even if they were written down directly after the death of the Prophet they would still be subject to the bias of political infighting that followed. However 200-250 years later they would more closely reflect the political context of the Abbasids not the Rashidun Caliphate. It's not just about hadith, like I said the gospels, talmud, they are not verifiable sources for absolute truth. There will always be bias according to the historical and political context which they were written in that needs to be examined.
@FaridResponds
2 ай бұрын
@@suhaib6315 You made a claim about modern historians, but you haven't attempted to substantiate it. The burden of proof is upon you, buddy.
@eagleone-ff9lz
4 ай бұрын
Religion is based on logic, if you want to know the logic, try thinking about it Islam continues to say Christians are unreasonable, stupid, idiots but still cannot prove that Jesus or Isa was sinful, Many Christians who have converted to Islam also said that Christianity makes no sense but still cannot prove that Jesus was a sinner. But millions of former Muslims who believe in Jesus would definitely say that Muhammad's life was very evil and depraved, as said by Nabeel Quraeshi, a former Pakistani Muslim who said that Muhammad in history was very different from Muhammad in the Muslim hearts. Try to think about which logic is true, Christianity or Islam, think deeply about the millions of ex-Islamists who say it themselves, doesn't that mean there is something wrong? think seriously for the safety of your soul. Study Muhammad's life carefully, is Muhammad really a figure whose life should be emulated? If you're curious, why don't you want to study Muhammad's historical life in the Koran and Hadith? See Nabi asli. KZitem channel discussed based on the Koran and Hadith itself
@aliibnmadani
4 ай бұрын
Hadith rejectors never object about Quran . But , Attacking the hadiths with same possible objections . Objections are : may be hadiths are fabricate , may be hadiths are wrong .... may be 'etc' . Their logics are like that may be your parents are not biological parents , may be DNA test is wrong etc . Anyone can do these objection in any things . All this objections are logical fallacy , not exist in reality . Even they don't use this method in their real life and about Quran. But , In term of Hadith they do it . Because enemy of their desire is Hadith and proof . Hadith rejectors do the same fallacy . Those are only take mutawtir narrations do the same fallacy . We declare a narration authentic based on Previous Hadith Scholars sayings means our declaration based on proof . On the other hand , hadith rejectors have no proof for possible objection . Our hadith authentication fully based on proof means Jarh also Tadil is based on proof . Very interesting thing is how they do fallacies and reject proof .
@Mortablunt
3 ай бұрын
Your Hadith can’t be true when they contradict each other and contradict Quran. Only Hadith with a strong direct scriptural basis can even be considered for authenticity. As the Quran surah 6:114 through 117 tells us, the Quran is a complete guide, and there is nothing forgotten or omitted or changed from it, because it is from God, who is perfect. God is always going to be more reliable and trustworthy than human. And then there’s the Sunni, methodology, in particular, where sayings are grouped according to compiler, and then given a universal label meaning that supposedly saying that contradict each other, or even the Quran, or are otherwise impossible, when compared with other parts of the same corpus, or somehow also true at the same time, despite also being false.
@sjsisdhdjdkssosjdhxnx
4 ай бұрын
Don’t strawman your opponents position, nobody is saying that Bukhari fabricated ahadeeth. Bukhari came when Ahadeeth were already fabricated. Bukhari himself had over 600,000 ahadeeth that he rejected.
@MiloBoz
3 ай бұрын
Every Muslim knows there are fabricated and weak hadith. Thats not the problem. The problem is when you reject the Prophets judgement entirely by assuming every single hadith is fabricated - which is absurd.
@sjsisdhdjdkssosjdhxnx
3 ай бұрын
@@MiloBoz No one is saying every single hadith is fabricated, but the overwhelming majority are, as they appear over a century after the Prophet (s). The entire “science” of jarh and ta’deel is subjective opinion that cannot be proven in itself. So the entire science of hadith is based on a circular argument.
@MiloBoz
3 ай бұрын
@@sjsisdhdjdkssosjdhxnx Actually Quranists do say that and reject ahadith as a whole. Also your argument that they are fabricated because they were written down 100 years later is a fallacy. Its same fallacy made by atheists about the Qur'an. You yourself just admitted some are not fabricated, deapite being written down later. As for the science of knowing which ones are authentic and what is not - that is something which requires expertise the quranists are lacking. I dont think there exists even a single quranist who can recite the Book of Allah, letalone to have expertise in hadith sciences. Who are the top 5 "Quranist" Qur'an reciters? In all the years of quranist dawah , I dont think they've even produced one actual Qur'an reciter with proper tajweed.
@sjsisdhdjdkssosjdhxnx
3 ай бұрын
@@MiloBoz If you are really interested in this topic I’d advise you to go through Dr Joshua Little’s 500 page thesis on the hadith of the age of Ayesha. Something that up until now almost all Sunnis viewed as fact when it turned out to be nothing more than a polemical fabrication of Hisham bin Urwa to elevate her status against the Shi’a when he moved to Kufa.
@MiloBoz
3 ай бұрын
@@sjsisdhdjdkssosjdhxnx What are the qualifications of this "Dr Joshua Little", what is his religion and who are his teachers? If he has not a Muslim who has mastered classical Arabic and other areas of hadith sciences, then he's not qualified to have an opinion on any aspect of the religion and especially the sciences of hadith. Phd thesis' written by disbelievers to be judged academically by other disbelievers at pagan universities - they hold zero weight in religion and are fully rejected. Refusing to accept is worse than refusing to accept that only qualified doctors should perform surgery in hospitals.
@user-eh2pv4sc7h
26 күн бұрын
He just quotes false ahadeeth. Why don't you shoe them from the books.
@zaidmuhammad6343
3 ай бұрын
People mainly only look at the Isnad while ignoring the content of the hadith. Lots of contradictions compared to the Qur'an and also immoral things esp those ahadith claimed to be said by Abu Hurairah and Aisha ra.
@JamalAdam455
2 ай бұрын
so you reject Hadith because you don't like them 😂
@zaidmuhammad6343
2 ай бұрын
@@JamalAdam455 because a man in the right man knows a lot of them are completely fabricated and misleading.
@zaidmuhammad6343
2 ай бұрын
@@JamalAdam455 they also contradict the Qur'an, would you still accept those hadith then?
@JamalAdam455
2 ай бұрын
@@zaidmuhammad6343 give me an example
@JamalAdam455
2 ай бұрын
@@zaidmuhammad6343 they don't
@kashkash9244
4 ай бұрын
32:12 If only you could see the wicked hanging their heads ˹in shame˺ before their Lord, ˹crying:˺ “Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back and we will do good. We truly have sure faith ˹now˺!” (32:22) And who is more unjust than he who is given good counsel through the Signs of his Lord and yet he turns away from them? Surely We will exact full retribution from such criminals. (29:2) Do people think that they will be let go merely by saying: “We believe,” and that they will not be tested,1 (29:3) for We indeed tested those who went before them?
@rajahzia
2 ай бұрын
You need to buy/compromise only 1 person in the hadith chain to fabricate or change the saying to your liking. Do you people really believe that powerful people during the reign of Ummayads and Abbasids would not do that to fit their agenda? Literally shows 0 understanding of human greed and psychology. Al-Bukhari did make an honest effort but he was born almost 250 years after Mohammad passed away. There is no way that anything that he collected was not already contaminated with Ummayads and Abbasids view of hadith.
@supertaxi5324
18 күн бұрын
Bro please don’t embarrass yourself. You clearly don’t have a clue of what ilm al rijal is. You think Hadith scholars weren’t aware of that? The whole science of Hadith is built around evaluating narrators. The Hadith scholars were more skeptical about Hadith than you. That’s why they put so much effort into analyzing narrators and their reports. For example one way of seeing if a narrator is lying about reports (and thus considered a weak narrator) is to look for corroboration. Narrators get their reports from their teachers and teachers have many students. If we see a consistent trend of a narrator reporting a Hadith that no other student reports, then it’s a sign something fishy is going on. That’s just an example of one method, the Hadith sciences are filed with meticulous ways of catching liars and also people with weak memory. Something you don’t seem to understand is that we have extensive biographical information on narrators, their acts in everyday life was meticulously examined to see there is any flaw in them. Please for Allah’s sake, just study a subject properly before criticizing it. I swear if you study Hadith methodology properly, you will become convinced that sahih Hadiths are the most reliable historical reports to ever exist.
@rajahzia
18 күн бұрын
@@supertaxi5324 Ilm al rijal might have seen impressive a 1000 years ago to the scholars of the time, but in the light of modern psychology it is a terrible idea. You can't truly know who a good person is based on the opinions of people that died 100s of years ago. Also the most pious person will usually be the first to be compromised by a corrupt ruler. It is actually incredibly hard to know who a good person is. You trust your wife completely until suddenly, one day you find her cheating. Also this fantasy of Arab historians... Arab had no proper historians or even means of storage. Surrounding nations were already using paper. Arabs were still using skin, bones and hides. Funnily enough the reason they started to collect hadith was because there were so many fake hadith circulating. The first attempt was already too late. Please understand the magnitude of 250 years. Also it's a joke. Consider a guy like abu hurairah who spent barely 3 yrs with the Prophet yet he seems to be a source of 40,000 narrations. Consider abu bakr, he spent his entire life with the Prophet. Guess how many narrations?
@Rojav255
4 ай бұрын
Hello brother!! How can i contact you❤
@nox1772
4 ай бұрын
If this brother still believes Aisha was 9 then nothing he says is worth considering as knowledge because the foundation upon which you judge information is questionable. I dont mean to slander you, as in you intend malevolence. I doubt your intellect and rationale. When you skip tons of sources that prove her adulthood, and take the laughable stance you did, theres just no way to take you seriously.
@user-eh2pv4sc7h
27 күн бұрын
THEY WERE FORGED. STOP DEFENFING THE ENEMIES. JUST READ YOUR AHADEETH IN BUKHARI ALLAH CREATED ADAM IN HIS IMAGE TOTALLY CONTRADICTS THE QURAN. ALL HAS NO IMAGE BUT YOU SUNNI BELIEVE ALLAH DOES.
@Zylo-w6t
4 ай бұрын
Perfect Answer, good work brother.
@kashkash9244
4 ай бұрын
I ask Atheist friend can you recall anything from your childhood and he said yes lot of stuff. I then ask him why you can recall any memories is it because it was recorded for some reason? I ask what was the purpose of this recording when we are going to die? Or better yet who want your personal information and it is important enough to be recorded and even you can recall it. Many near death experience folks say their entire life flashed before their eyes, interesting . Hence the term JUDGEMENT DAY. That affirmative heaven action will not work, eveyone will be judge hence the name JUDGEMENT DAY. 3:185 Every soul will taste death. And you will only receive your full reward on the Day of Judgment. Whoever is spared from the Fire and is admitted into Paradise will ˹indeed˺ triumph, whereas the life of this world is no more than the delusion of enjoyment.
@abamqc
15 сағат бұрын
Everything can be corrupted its we should think and take what we need, improve our knowledge by reading more and also going out to learn from the outside world. Books are written or compiled by people based on their knowledge and not a complete one. Live with the present not on some past and no need to force it on others in the name of heaven or hell.
@szuvibes9474
4 ай бұрын
When will you start to refute the anti Islam videos again?
@DomainofKnowlegdia
3 ай бұрын
12:03 Hadith system is like a web linking each narrater to the other its very similar to evolutionary biology.
@CypherCyerph
4 ай бұрын
Asalamukium Farid, are you going to persue scholarship in sha Allah may allah allow us to become scholars
@hasan-mh5qp
4 ай бұрын
Brother refute Apostate Alladin
@essa200911
4 ай бұрын
Anyone say this claim that Hadith is after 200 or whatever He or she doesn’t know that the smallest student of Hadith will laugh so hard because it is very obvious that the claimer has no knowledge at all about how Hadith where written and memorised in first place and he or she don’t understand the difference between collecting what is already written and memorised but making them in a book that have them all This is a huge claim from them to say after 200 years because this show us the ignorance and dishonesty when it comes to knowledge
@temp-p4e
4 ай бұрын
Anyone who JUDGES by the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN COnverts is actually following the AVESTA under the name of MUHAMMAD. The Almighty says in the QURAN 5 44-47 And whosoever doesnt Judge by what Allah has """"""REVEALED""""" is a Disbeliever, wrong doer and defiantly disobident. Islam will always be from the QURAN and TAWRAT(according to the condition in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT) The INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to ISA and gives guidance and laws which """""CONFIRMS"""" the laws in the TAWRAT is lost to time.
@Balrig1
4 ай бұрын
Very helpful video mashallah, may Allah reward you
@yourstruly5706
4 ай бұрын
I don't think that's the claim, the claim is two people can't agree on what was said or what they saw. The wording in the narattions opens things up to the claim of narrators not being reliable even if they're called sound by their advocates. And a secondary issue that Imam Malik may narrate mursalaat from people who the 6 may narrate Marfooat from, etc. It doesn't mean they're fabricated, but as am absolute source:/ It explains why huffaz of hadith followed one of the 4 Imams, even though they were in position to gauge things to a greater degree.
@FaridResponds
4 ай бұрын
It is actually the more common claim. It may not be yours, but it is popular.
@Mo-sw7ho
3 ай бұрын
1.) All you did was link a bunch of dudes saying they heard this and that from the prophet, but can't anyone just attribute someone's name and said this narrator said X,Y,Z and call it a day? 🤣 2.) Every single narrator you mentioned lived 100-200 years after the Prophet's death. Not during. Anas was born 711 AD, 80 years after the Prophet. Case closed. Easy debunk.
@RayhaanBhoola-tr3jc
3 ай бұрын
1. Yes, except that its very obvious and the muhadditheen picked up on it. If someone fabricates chains then, theyre going to make a lot of mistakes in those chains (like when the isnad chronologically makes no sense or it's impossible the narrators met geographically), or theyll become known for narrating things with unverifiable chains (then they're declared to be unreliable as a whole), or they'll narrate contradictory reports or... I think you get the point. The scholars were incredibly thorough with isnaad. 2. You've confused Anas Bin Malik (who was a sahabi and born in 612) with his son Malik Bin Anas. And the hadith Farid mentions is corroborated by a very similar report with a seperate, authentic sanad from Al-Bara'a Bin 3azib, also a sahabi. "Easy debunk" yea...
@JamalAdam455
2 ай бұрын
Knowledge issue😂
@mozi4305
4 ай бұрын
In the Quran had no Word Call-- "" Muhammad "" But Then Why in the Quran had or has Mudammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , ?? Then -- What is the Meaning of "" Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIN , Muhammad"AAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAN , Muslim"AAAN , Muslim"UUUN , ????
@Mimi-Maa18
4 ай бұрын
What are you talking about ?
@mozi4305
4 ай бұрын
In the Quran Surah No--47 Named it Was Called -- Al-Qital ( The Fighting ) ,After that -- Top Islamic Scholars They were lied They Were Changed The Name They Put New Named Called -- Muhammad , But Surah "" Muhammad And In the Quran -- [ Muhammad"UUUN , IIIN, AAAN ] Completely Different From Each Other ,
@devega38
3 ай бұрын
@@mozi4305 Take some basic arabic classes and you will understand what un in and an are.
@mozi4305
3 ай бұрын
@@devega38 Please Learn Quranic Grammar , But Not Arabic grammar , Arabic Language is a Fraud Language , If you are a Truthful Islamic Scholar Then Please Answer me -- What is the Meaning of "" Maaa Kaaanaa Ibraaaheem"MU Yaahoodiyy"AAAN , ??? Then -- Maaa Kaaanaa Muhammad"UUUN abb"AA ??? In This Point -- What is the Meaning of "" Kaaanaa "" ??? Then -- Judge Yourself about Islam and Muhammad and Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAN
@mozi4305
3 ай бұрын
@@devega38 Please answer me -- What is the Meaning of "" Maaa kaanaa Ibraaaheem"MU Yaahoodiyy"AAAN ??? And -- Maaa Kaaanaa Muhammad"UUUN abb"AA ??? Judge Yourself about Islam and Muhammad and Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAN ,
@mohammadrahman7496
4 ай бұрын
I ask that you please give a detailed response to the following comment. This is something I would like to know as well. "Akhi Farid, this is Mohammad from Brisbane, Australia. I have someone locally here in Brisbane who rejects hadith. When I sent this video to him, he came back with this following response: All he was trying to show in that video was that Bukhari didn't fabricate those hadiths. However, this is not our issue, and he even then admits that you could argue that someone at the beginning of the chain fabricated them. So all he showed was that these hadiths are plausible historically passed down narrations of things that possibly happened (i.e. people said this & people did that at this time or the other, which have absolutely NO impact on the Theology of The Religion nor become an extra part of it), which I have never argued against, as I have always claimed that these are HISTORY books. Even the Christians and Jews can show that their narrations were historically passed down through several different chains of people, but they CANNOT show that they are from God & His Messenger. What he didn't, and CANNOT show is that these hadiths are RELIGIOUS Books that are from Allah and His Messenger and therefore form part of the Theological ideology of The Religion alongside The Quran (which is the ONLY Theological Text approved by Allah and His Messenger). Our issue is whether these narrations are from Allah & His Messenger and therefore from an extra part of The Theology of the Religion. What you and others don't seem to understand is that the Messenger's words are NOT Muhammad's personal words but are in fact only The Words of Allah that he is honorably relaying (passing on) to us in his Role of Messenger of Allah. That's the whole point of the role of Messenger of Allah. It's NOT to give you his own words, but simply to relay the Words of Allah. So you need to stop conflating the Words of Allah which are relayed by His Messenger (which constitute the Theology of the Religion) with the personal words of the man Muhammad outside of his relaying role of Messenger (which do NOT form a part of the Theology of the Religion but are merely his own free willed personally chosen speech)."
@pingu.3712
4 ай бұрын
okay, this is interesting brother, i will come back to u with an answer
@mohammadrahman7496
4 ай бұрын
@@pingu.3712 JazakAllah khair brother, this had been weighing down on me for a while becauseI could not come to a reconciliation with this. A response would be greatly appreciated.
@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273
2 ай бұрын
That's why we have multiple sahabah narrating the same hadith By the way no religion claim this accuracy of transmission Other prove it is materialistic like sana'a manuscript prove the tradition @@mohammadrahman7496
@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273
2 ай бұрын
Well if two companion of the prophet narrate the same hadith, then common link is the prophet We have مشهور و عزيز hadith
Пікірлер: 322