oh my god this is an amazing explanation! thank you
@padakathu2882
Жыл бұрын
very good explanations, thank you so much
@retroexplorers5853
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. Quick question. How do we convert this section into an actual depth section?
@orbitalvelocityofthemoon8748
Жыл бұрын
You need to invert the data. ResInv2D/Zonge (commercial software) etc can do this, but there are also open-source solutions like ResiPY and pygimli that can do 2D resistivity inversions on arbitrary array configurations.
@padakathu2882
Жыл бұрын
Please explain Wenner-Schlumberger 2D ERT array electrode move position, due to dipole dipole can't investigate with deep depth, i am looking for another electrode configurations which can give good resolution
@orbitalvelocityofthemoon8748
Жыл бұрын
If you do the forward modelling, Dipole is the best depth penetration (for array length) by a long way. Wenner and Sclumberger do better at layer thickness resolutions, and a lot of industry are using gradient arrays which are a good trade-off for layer resolution, depth, and apparent dip angles of structures.
@SvSzYT
3 жыл бұрын
thanks for the detailed explanation! for dipol-dipol measurements, the measured point in the pseudosection is created in 90° angle between current and potential electrodes. Can you explain how this works for wenner and schlumberger configuration?
@orbitalvelocityofthemoon8748
Жыл бұрын
It's really just based on the midpoint and relative depth in the pseudo section - the angle is just apparent in this example. It would be the same for the sclumberger/wenner.
Пікірлер: 8