Great video, thank you. Very interesting anecdote at the end. I've had a similar experience (I believe I brought home a spirit after taking part in a ghost tour of New Orleans at Mardi Gras in 2001). I'm glad you were able to shed that demonic energy. I hope the boy was alright.
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
Me too!
@robynrin7107
4 ай бұрын
Thank you for doing this important work. Police SHOULD be educating the public, not terrorizing and abusing them.
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
It's unrealistic to expect cops to EDUCATE as I am doing. It IS their job to uphold your constitutional rights, They swore under oath to protect when they pinned that badge on their uniform. NO EXCEPTIONS.
@SellamAbraham
4 ай бұрын
@@gunclassutah Do you think police officers and sheriff's deputies are properly trained on constitutional laws and limitations and principles today?
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
It's a crap shoot. Some are@SellamAbraham
@gunclassutah
3 ай бұрын
what state?
@meetshield2461
4 ай бұрын
In your example of reasonable suspicion and probable cause with the guy leaving the bar having a hard time walking, etc. You said you would probably wait until you observed a traffic violation to pull him over. Do you have a specific reason for this rather than stopping him from getting into his car and driving off? Seems the ultimate end of those 2 would be him getting a dui or having to find another ride home. 2 vastly different outcomes. Assuming in this example youd be viewing him the whole time he was driving so the chance of having an accident is slim. This just brought up another thought. Say you did view him walking like he was potentially impaired and decided to wait until you observed a traffic violation, but he does get into an accident right after he takes off. Would there be any liability to the officer for not making contact before the potentially drunk guy drove his car? Not that an officer or anyone else would tell someone I saw him staggering to his car I was just waiting to see him commit a traffic violation, but if somehow that became known. Thanks for the talk. Good info and brought up some interesting questions for me.
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
Yes, there could be some liability in the case of letting them drive away, IF you had reasonable suspicion BEFORE they drove away. Problem is that RS is a broad term that's not easily defined, hence would be the argument for allowing them to drive a short distance to observe a traffic violation. It's a discretionary decision and would depend on the desired outcome the officer wanted to see. An officer on the contrary, could argue, they wanted to give the benefit of the doubt this letting them drive to confirm suspicion
@davidcoffman4202
3 ай бұрын
I got a pi and no sobriety test
@gunclassutah
14 күн бұрын
Public intox laws vary by state. In Utah 76-9-701, Intoxilyzer is not necessary, officers only need to show that the person was intoxicated AND to a degree they presented a danger to themselves, and/or another person
@MonzaRacer
4 ай бұрын
Interesting listening to you say that you don't have to read Miranda rights yet when I went through the academy many years ago, we were told as soon as you make the arrest mirandize the arrestee because if you don't and somebody makes a mistake of not informing him of his Miranda rights you can get into serious trouble or issue.
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
your academy instruction is not consistent w case law. miranda is case law on the subject as stated in the video. here's a link that supports the video en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona
@TroyJScott
3 ай бұрын
police definitely have too much authority. Asking for ID without a crime is a scumbag POS move
@gunclassutah
14 күн бұрын
police only have as much authority as laws provide to them.
@256weknow
4 ай бұрын
Ok now let’s see a video on international affairs and how bad officers get away with crimes
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
can you be more specific?
@JustABill02
4 ай бұрын
"Laws of evidence are necessary to keep police from abusing their authority..." Necessary, but not sufficient. They can do whatever shady bs they want to search your house (criminal trespass, often a felony while armed) with no exigency, warrant or other exception etc, then arrest (kidnap) you for obstruction or based on the evidence they find. Then the can strip/cavity search you (Sexual Assault/rape). If they resist they can use force(Battery/Murder) on you. Then if you're lucky, they'll throw out the evidence from the blatantly illegal search/arrest based on these laws of evidence. You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the RAPE. To be a sufficient condition to stop police from abusing their authority, charges must be brought against the officers for all their crimes (see in paren). Then convicted sentenced and serve time for their CRIMES. Only when they are in prison as a LEO who abused their authority will their safety be really threatened. Since the number 1, 2, 3... thing LEOs think about is "Officer Safety" this might deter other officers from doing similar acts again. The real battle needs to be fought in the voting booths. Only elect DAs who will prosecute LEOs for their CRIMES. If the State Attorneys are appointed, only elect other officials who will appoint such prosecutors. Robbing the taxpayers for the CRIMES of LEOs is only more injustice piled on the original injustice.
@gunclassutah
4 ай бұрын
AGREED
@gmoore6406
4 ай бұрын
Very well put. Absolutely thumbs up on your comment
Пікірлер: 25