Hey everyone! I never thought this video would get as much popularity as it did and I really appreciate it, thank you. I've seen several comments as of recent talking about the 1st dinosaur telling me it is a Kentrosaurus. Despite the toy being marketed as a Kentrosaurus, I personally disagree with the labeling purely from a morphological perspective, as I think it poorly represents the animal. I purposely chose different dinosaurs as examples for what I thought the toy most closely resembled. Looking back on it (this video is about a year old as of writing this) it would have made a lot of sense for me to do a bit more research into each toy and mention whether I agreed or not with the manufacturer's name for the dinosaur.
@ikillchildrenlol
Жыл бұрын
It's a MOTHERFUCKING KENTROSAURUSSSSSSSSS
@dinoonyx
7 ай бұрын
i clicked on the video because that kentro was there and that line is very underrated
@crimsonfox_yeah
Жыл бұрын
1:08 my man forgot kentrosaurus existed i think thats either what it was supposed to be or what it is
@MegatronEnthusiast
2 жыл бұрын
“Because Jurassic park, did it wrong” How many times do I need to quote Dr. Henry Wu in Jurassic World!?
@bluerodan561
2 жыл бұрын
The third one to me looked like it was supposed to be an older style iguanodon lol, the thumb thing just made it seem like the spike so it seemed like a carnivorous iguanodon was the intention
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
That sure is a possibility. Although even old-style iguanodon looked much better than that monstrosity.
@bluerodan561
2 жыл бұрын
@@etanguy yeah, old iguanodon at least played the part of a reptile. That kind of looked like some sort of anthropomorphic fever dream creation
@paolodini3204
Жыл бұрын
Ye me too
@Lord-xy2fr
Жыл бұрын
The only thing i see in the third one is a yellow Godzilla.
@Iseonix
9 ай бұрын
the teeth look more flat than sharp
@HungrySharkGamerthesharkojira
2 жыл бұрын
When youtube puts something your interested in to your recommendations
@Bristol_Lively
3 жыл бұрын
I make crap videos but for some reason I have 32 subscribers, you're so underrated! Like what the hell?! You're such a great KZitemr, you deserve so much more!
@FatDudeStudios
9 ай бұрын
That first one could actually pass as a mattel toy
@HungrySharkGamerthesharkojira
2 жыл бұрын
Also I’m pretty sure a kentasaurus for the first one since they do have the stego plates at the head but didn’t put the shoulder spikes
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, kentrosaurus seems to be the consensus here, although with some missing or altered details.
@ZoologyFanAndRanter
Жыл бұрын
I have to admit, the paleo accurate dinosaurs need to be introduced to children.
@liopleurodon2000
2 жыл бұрын
Holy frick I have that Kentrosaurus toy at the beginning. Thise imaginext toys were the coolest dinosaur toys ever
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
I remember them being very fun when I was younger. Honestly, still are.
@AzGd98
2 жыл бұрын
This video just got recommended, great things to come man!
@jesusramirezromo2037
2 жыл бұрын
The dilo deserved a higher rating just for not having the frill, I have never seen a diliphasaurus toy without it
@Iseonix
9 ай бұрын
i have some dilophosaurus toys that dont have frills but they have that upright stance of the 60s dinosaurs
@Octarian-j2i
Жыл бұрын
Agree with you about the diolophosaurus
@riansabin2122
2 жыл бұрын
has this guy ever heard of kentrosaurus
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
The first one does resemble a Kentrosaurus, and was marketed as one, but there are some details that make me question why it was marketed in that way other than the fact that Kentrosaurus was more popular than other related dinosaurs. The toy lacks shoulder spikes and it only has spikes along its back instead of a combination of spikes and plates that fossilized specimens of Kentrosaurus have. Because the array of spikes along the back does not really resemble Kentrosaurus spikes, I chose Chungkingosaurus and Huayangosaurus as possibilities for that toy because I thought their dorsal spikes looked closer to the toy's spikes.
@DinoLord984
2 жыл бұрын
I thought it was a tojiangosaurus
@martangelocloma6965
2 жыл бұрын
@@DinoLord984 Me too because Tuojiangosaurus had a more pointed back plates.
@PlaceholderAccount-l
2 жыл бұрын
1:00 I'm thinking it's a kentrosaurus
@TitaniumPrimeOFFICIAL
Жыл бұрын
Bro one random day during 1st grade my friend Bryson and I were arguing about if tyranos had 3 or 2 fingers/claws Of course me being the Dino nerd (at that time) told him that they only had 2 but he argued back and said that they had 3 And I started to actually believe him So then when I went home I searched up if tyranos had 2 or 3 fingers/claws Turns out I was right
@etanguy
Жыл бұрын
I’ve had that exact same conversation with one of my friends lol.
@Megumi_pogi_21
2 жыл бұрын
Actually it's the schleich dilophosaurus
@bestuan
2 жыл бұрын
based dilophosaurus fan
@vahidhosoda6614
2 жыл бұрын
I’m assuming it’s a ceratosaurus but ugly ughhh with human hands
@TommyPrime4
2 жыл бұрын
The second one was still fine.
@hildaputri3731
2 жыл бұрын
The first on is kentrosaurus bruh
@gabejoyner6589
Жыл бұрын
is that orange from rainbow friends
@etanguy
Жыл бұрын
No, it is an Imaginext toy.
@blo2585
2 жыл бұрын
Do a sequel
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Haha, about that... kzitem.info/news/bejne/zZ6Mt6ttqneId3Y
@thegreatgoldfilms6311
10 ай бұрын
God Shleich's dinosaurs are ugly
@JuveFan69
2 жыл бұрын
You need more subscribers
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Believe it or not, I had about 28 subscribers when this video was posted.
@JuveFan69
2 жыл бұрын
@@etanguy just by that thumbnail you gotta have 69,420 subscribers
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
@@JuveFan69 Haha, maybe someday.
@aulserna5138
2 жыл бұрын
0:33 I have that toy
@HungrySharkGamerthesharkojira
2 жыл бұрын
I actually have the second toy
@muchtoodog
2 жыл бұрын
i have a 1950's or 60's t-rex and stegosaurus so its pretty cool to see how dinosaur toys have changed over the years
@rjhamler5324
2 жыл бұрын
That first orange dinosaur is the old imaginex kentrosaurs wich was in a whole line of dinosaurs that suprisingly enough all in scale with eachother but the kentrosaurs was the same size as the stegosaurs so inacurate just right their not to mention the spike placement to manny spikes alking the back wrong placement of some no shoulder spikes and not enough plates and the placement is wrong, and the action feature is to throw a rock from the tail like a catapult and over all their was a human rider compleate with a saddle that goes with it so ya it's about a 2 to 3 on accuracys I say and quality when compared to today's imaginex dinosaurs a 5 no doubt.
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I don’t really like how they did the Kentrosaurus but imaginext definitely makes good toys
@datlizard_tho4228
2 жыл бұрын
KZitem thanks for recommending this to me
@vahidhosoda6614
2 жыл бұрын
That pteranodon looks 1:1 scale
@meyers6975
Жыл бұрын
I had the first one when I was a child, I always thought it was a kentrosaur
@godzillaandsonicxgoij7896
2 жыл бұрын
the 1st one you showed was for 1 is a Kentrosaurus and 2 its a real animal
@moonbugmattel5479
2 жыл бұрын
Hey, at least that yellow human-lizard thing doesn't have broken wrists!
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Haha, I guess that is the only thing going for it since everything else is pretty bad.
@vahidhosoda6614
2 жыл бұрын
They were kinda close to the ceratosaurus ugly model as it had 4 fingers but increased it to 5 lol still ugly
@luxario9805
2 жыл бұрын
The kangaroo looking human handed thingy looks more like a Godzilla monster than a Dinosaur
@creepermandan0925
2 жыл бұрын
The so called tyrannosaur is probably a iguanadon
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Possibly, but I think abomination is a better term to use for that “dinosaur”
@creepermandan0925
2 жыл бұрын
@@etanguy true
@michaelkabara4749
2 жыл бұрын
POV: English teacher grades your esay you spent whole weekend on
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Good thing you don't have me as an English teacher ;)
@erinmcgraw5208
2 жыл бұрын
Thagomizer!!!! Love that word 💙 Awesome video, informative & funny! Lol
@WONDERISBACK
2 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: those are the most accurate dinosaurs to ever exsist
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
That would make me very sad :(
@vahidhosoda6614
2 жыл бұрын
An almost 2 week old pteranodon that just hatched 1:1 old school
@MourningCoffeeMusic
Жыл бұрын
I think the Rex toy is supposed to be an Iguanodon !
@etanguy
Жыл бұрын
Whether it is supposed to be a rex or an Iguanadon, it does an awful job resembling either. It's kind of like a combination of the two, in my opinion.
@MourningCoffeeMusic
Жыл бұрын
@@etanguy you’re right ! I grew up with dinosaur toys like this and they used to “Rex-ify” all these dinosaur toys. Even their herbivores had Rex teeth 🤦🏻♂️
@springwire2979
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah its probally a huayangosaurus, its pretty close ajd doesnt have the shoulderspikes
@cryoking5025
6 ай бұрын
Dilos weren’t the largest predatory Dino’s of their time, and it’s not cryo either, cryo actually comes second, it’s actually a ceratosaur from the early Jurassic that was discovered just a couple years ago
@kevincoleon7864
2 жыл бұрын
Remeber Jurassic park Dino’s had frog dna in em and John might’ve wanted to make him in his way so you have to really that
@ArchAngel900
8 ай бұрын
I like the foam pteranodon figure and I had that orange kentrosaurus when I was young
@BlackCappedChickadee
Жыл бұрын
0:49 it's a Kentrosaurus a real dinosaur
@rayonnasanders2919
Жыл бұрын
The dilophosaurus acid and frills are just the imagination of the creator
@vahidhosoda6614
Жыл бұрын
How would Ryan clayton react even though he could have some invicta models
@Raydinosaurmaster
9 ай бұрын
7:16 it’s Godzilla
@ChicagoMel23
Жыл бұрын
Earth isnt millions of years old, just a few thousand
@sandipyadav-ht9vw
Жыл бұрын
They are kids not paleontology
@karolinaostr91
3 ай бұрын
I have that dilophosaurus
@ejworld7458
2 жыл бұрын
Beginning of the video: this is not real dinosaur me: i thought you were saying scientific accuracy you have no idea that is a species of stegosaurus
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
An animal with the spike and plate arrangement seen on the toy does not exist. I was quite nitpicky with it while researching and comparing the toy to other Stegosauria fossils. The toy is supposed to be a Kentrosaurus but personally, I disagree with the labeling.
@celisdeandaeliudalberto5335
2 жыл бұрын
This video deserves more views
@beansiamon2313
2 жыл бұрын
I like the first one and that's a kentrosaurus
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
It definitely does resemble Kentrosaurus. I avoided mentioning it because Kentrosaurus has a combination of spikes and plates along the spine while the toy only has spikes (granted, it does have two plates on the neck). It also lacks the large shoulder spike found on Kentrosaurus. Nevertheless, I think identifying it as Kentrosaurus makes total sense.
@Hood-i5f
9 ай бұрын
1:08 bro that’s kentrosaurus
@basiclyanything808
Жыл бұрын
You know that your "Dilophosaurus Wetherilli" is supposed to be a Guanlong Wucaii right? Btw I know because I searched up guanlong toys and found it there
@etanguy
Жыл бұрын
Not sure where you found the toy labeled as Guanlong, that is incorrect. If you look up Schleich Dilophosaurus you will find the toy I have. Guanlong was a proceratosaurid with a single crest and no subnarial gap. The two species may look similar but the number of crests in the big giveaway that my toy is a Dilophosaurus (although Dilophosaurus was not the only dinosaur with two crests as a few viewers have informed me. It is the most popular dinosaur with two crests though, so when you see a dinosaur with two crests in pop culture, it will most likely be Dilophosaurus).
@StevnPlayzRoblox
2 жыл бұрын
That is either a kentrosaurus or tuojiangosaurus at the beginning
@asiancheems501
2 жыл бұрын
True
@springwire2979
2 жыл бұрын
Does anyone even remember that in jurrasic park the dinosaurs ARENT suppost to he accurate??? I was told that they gave it poison and frills becuase otherwise its just a fancy velocoraptor, also they look sp different because the jw movie legit SAID it, along the line of "they arent Suppost to be realistic," and they wouls be more boring if they were accurate
@Is-wunny
2 жыл бұрын
Dainsos
@diogod2347
2 жыл бұрын
I feel like they were going for Miragaia in the first one
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
The thagomizers on the toy do look very similar to Miragaia's thagomizers. Also, Miragaia is quite an interesting dinosaur. What is most notable about it is that it had 17 vertebrae just in the neck, which is more than most sauropods.
@SkittleStudios
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Etat guy I learned some new things about Dino’s today! I love them too
@lesclapper37
2 жыл бұрын
That pterodactyl has been some things
@lesclapper37
Жыл бұрын
And also that humanoid dinosaur looking thing looks traumatized it looks like it’s been through the war
@randomsupergodzillalizardd9981
2 жыл бұрын
The first one might be a dacentrurus
@randomsupergodzillalizardd9981
2 жыл бұрын
And the one you thought was a t.rex I think is actually an iguanodon
@jesusramirezromo2037
2 жыл бұрын
Wait, why is your sub count so low????
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
I think I had around 30 when I made this video. Sometimes it takes a bit for the algorithm to do its magic.
@elijahzilla619
2 жыл бұрын
Man tell me some dinosaur toys are official like Jurassic World but sometimes they’re bootlegs
@Zain_production
2 жыл бұрын
i use to collect them they like super hard to find hack even my parasulo and tricera where small piece from the dino quest line
@M3tricSystem
2 жыл бұрын
I think for the 1st one they were going for kentrosaurus
@quinnking8008
2 жыл бұрын
76 sub
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!!
@PilotoDeP-51
2 жыл бұрын
Is toys for kids soo A
@beverleejames6406
2 жыл бұрын
The big chungis wasn't that inaccurate
@mixmaster2909
2 жыл бұрын
There are things in life i didnt know i needed
@GeoffAnimations
2 жыл бұрын
in Jurassic parks defence the Dilophosaurus was supposed to be quite young and in dominion it will be bigger cuz 20 years have gone by since Jurassic park
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
I've definitely heard that the dilos in Jurassic Park are juvenile, so I'm hoping dominion will scale them up a bit.
@GeoffAnimations
2 жыл бұрын
@@etanguy me to
@hcollins9941
2 жыл бұрын
The third one has a pointy thumb, so… -_-‘ ah $&!? It’s an Iguanodon.
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
haha, might as well be.
@gecko_9505
2 жыл бұрын
Nice
@HunterPhenomMakoy
2 жыл бұрын
Hold your forearm in place and try to rotate your hand. It not the wrist that rotates. . . .your wrist is a hinge.
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, you are right with respect to pronation and supination occurring in the forearm, specifically the distal radioulnar joint (closest to the wrist) and the proximal radioulnar joining (farthest from the wrist, near the elbow), allowing the rotational movements to be possible. However, the wrist itself is much more complex than a hinge joint. Your knee is an excellent example of a hinge joint, which only moves in one plane. Your wrist cannot only move up and down (extension and flexion) but also side to side (radial and ulnar deviation). In some definitions of the wrist (apparently there are multiple), the distal radioulnar joint is included to reflect the full range of motion of the wrist. Keep in mind that this is for human anatomy. Dinosaur anatomy is different, so their range of motion differs as well. They lacked specific articulated bone structures to allow for the ulna and radius to cross (I'm not sure about the specifics of the articulations, which may differ from species to species). If you would like to look into the mobility of the forelimbs of Dilophosaurus (it just happened to be the paper that I found, I didn't specifically look for Dilophosaurus), then check out this paper. It has a lot in it but sheds some light on how the wrists of Dilophosaurus moved. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5b31/50c50bac23dae2a3fd785a734a63bebbc371.pdf Stay curious! :)
@HunterPhenomMakoy
2 жыл бұрын
@@etanguy I wasn’t thinking about wrists moving side to side, I just mean that the hand rotation involves much more then the wrist. You couldn’t look at just that joint and know for sure. (Like how the knee is a hinge but you lower leg has much more range of motion)
@etanguy
2 жыл бұрын
@@HunterPhenomMakoy I see what you mean. The wrist as a whole isn't a singular joint but a combination of many different joints and bones. There are also a lot of muscles involved in rotating the wrist that are not anywhere near it such as the bicep. So yes, if for example all we had were the carpal bones then the full range of motion of the hand and wrist could not be determined without more evidence.
@Medicbagg
2 жыл бұрын
lmao got your video recommended to me, hope you have a good KZitem life also pog vid lol
Пікірлер: 121