"Depends on what you mean by true." Remember that this guy criticizes postmodernism.
@garbanzobeans7984
2 жыл бұрын
Because post modernism is completely evil and has led to the slaughter of over 100 million people
@mianumermian2511
2 жыл бұрын
Nice point g
@hailarwotanaz5848
2 жыл бұрын
if something is true it is an accurate representation of reality
@caldwell9-0
2 жыл бұрын
lmao 💀💀💀 btw i’m agreeing with this comment
@tito6559
2 жыл бұрын
Religion claims that the things they taught are true, so can u accept their truth of killing homosexual to death, Prohibiting women to go outside without burkha, or there philosophies which doesn't resonate with you. we do have conscience, we have a rational part in our brain According to us, truth is facts or reality which have evidence backed by it, the sun in our solar system is universally accepted fact
@revengetragedy
Жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson goes to a restaurant. A waiter greets him Waiter: Hello sir. How are you today? Jordan: Well that depends by what you mean by today?
@garythefishable
Жыл бұрын
I like how he didn't question the "sir" part as gender politics is the only topic he will ever give a straight answer to. 😅
@roquefortfiles
Жыл бұрын
Jordan peterson is the dumb guys smart guy
@sergioremigio4345
Жыл бұрын
small brain
@ianbuick8946
Жыл бұрын
I think you got it backward. Jordan Peterson explains complicated matter in simple term.
@sobbyhasselhoff
Жыл бұрын
Maybe you're just not that intelligent.
@PWDr93
2 жыл бұрын
JP does a great job of saying absolutely nothing in 30 seconds
@ashwinraphael
2 жыл бұрын
I think it's about the structure of the debate he's talking about. They base the debate on scientific truth and the religious people lack that because the bible never talks from a scientific perspective. Every bit of detail is focused and directed towards spiritual empowerment rather than explaining science which wasn't a study until recently. What's hard to understand here? He speaks the truth, Christianity and all othe religions don't have a good defending platform against science and he's right
@howardhowdy1906
Жыл бұрын
@@ashwinraphael Atheist debaters also point out contradictions and flaws in religious’s people logic without using any science.
@stanleycullen2690
Жыл бұрын
basically you’re not intelligent enough to translate what he’s saying into your basic form of language
@PWDr93
Жыл бұрын
@@stanleycullen2690 you've got it all figured out
@ashwinraphael
Жыл бұрын
@@Merciless_cg thank you
@Maltlicky50
4 ай бұрын
Long story short, Peterson basically said "Religious people can't argue against facts" No need for all the other word salad.
@lxstcheckll9348
3 ай бұрын
Unless you face a biblical 🧑🏫
@Maltlicky50
3 ай бұрын
@lxstcheckll9348 Yeah, because biblical scholars hold a lot of merit in the intellectual world 🤡 Biblical scholars can't even agree on what is literal and metaphorical, NEXT
@markd3250
3 ай бұрын
Depends on your definition of "facts" Too many people present their opinion as though it's a fact. What Jordan is asking is true at what level? Is it a true story? Is it a true account? Is it a true collection of actual writings? There are different levels of what can be called true.
@Maltlicky50
3 ай бұрын
@markd3250 I'm gonna go with Matt's definition of "objectively verifiable phenomenon in reality" because in my experience, that seems to be the most reliable.
@markd3250
3 ай бұрын
@@Maltlicky50 That would be a good general definition, a rule of thumb so to speak, but when you're talking about something like the Bible, you need to be more specific than just asking "Is the Bible true?" Then you walk right into a realm where "objectively verifiable" isn't necessarily possible; you only have circumstantial.
@TheCryptical117
2 жыл бұрын
"Richard Dawkins kicked the hell out of religious people" Well then they must be happy to not have anymore hell in them
@Falcon36957
2 жыл бұрын
😂😂🤣
@Cheesesteakfreak
2 жыл бұрын
Dawkins stills kicks religious people's ass
@joelstephenson8017
2 жыл бұрын
😎
@NA-vz9ko
2 жыл бұрын
What a dumbass thing to say lol
@lucian5389
2 жыл бұрын
@@stationorange very clear the only person seething is you based on that comment 😂
@aguy559
2 жыл бұрын
“It depends on what you mean by true” should be inscribed on Peterson’s headstone.
@junebuggy240
2 жыл бұрын
Depends on what you mean by 'dead'
@SniffnMeFingies
2 жыл бұрын
@@junebuggy240 Depends on what you mean by "depends."
@aguy559
2 жыл бұрын
@@SniffnMeFingies Right. On one hand, we have adult diapers…
@bottomline7923
2 жыл бұрын
His version of the truth means he can state that he hasn't had any hair replacement treatment.. is the Bible true? A profound question? oh, JP always tells the the truth.
@lessanderfer7195
2 жыл бұрын
But what does True mean to you? To me it is only True if it is 100% accurate for the events being referenced. However, we also have terms such as mostly true, somewhat true, half true, partly true, (X)% true, so there is no 1 definition for True. Also there is this, something doesn't have to necessarily be TRUE for it to be TRUTH. If the Bible is Truth, as most proponents espouse, than it does NOT inherently lead to it having to be True, as well. The problem is when you adopt the position that everything in the Bible is an absolute accurate retelling of an actual occurrence or event. And I think that is what JP meant by his statement.
@bengeorge9063
Жыл бұрын
Has this guy given a straight answer for once in his life ?
@n00n1n
Жыл бұрын
JP is a genius and he speaks like one, maybe that's why you're having a hard time understanding
@sangeetasingh-gq9yf
Жыл бұрын
@@n00n1n the basic idea of communication is to make people understand you, if what you speech is not understandable by majority then there is pretty much no difference in gibberish and highly intellectual and genius talks. JP uses these complicating of simple topics to give arguments which aren't there. Meaning of truth is pretty much the same for everyone it is not so different for everyone as he is claiming it to be.
@thisguy7976
Жыл бұрын
I try my hardest.
@stevebuczynski2756
Жыл бұрын
Stop watching KZitem and read a book.
@williamanon2050
Жыл бұрын
@@n00n1n lol, Jordan Peterson is a moron (or at the very least is terrible at philosophy and has moronic takes
@danger.snakes
9 ай бұрын
therapist: post-modern Jordan Peterson isn't real, he can't hurt you post-modern Jordan Peterson:
@CorbinB-Rax
4 ай бұрын
You're equivocating and think you're equating. Post modernism seeks to have no limiting parameters or definitions or set truths within the particle world. The world of objectively set truths. Quantum mechanics/meta-physics, IS the world of YET UNSET truth. This is established science. Do you need the world famous studies you cannot have possibly missed? Do you need the basics of physics explained to you?
@MoriartyGod
4 ай бұрын
@@CorbinB-Rax I think you knew the answer to that before you even finished. Lol
@jamesthecat
4 ай бұрын
@@CorbinB-RaxWhat is this category you call quantum mechanics slash meta - physics? Is it really 'established science'? What constitutes 'estsblished' here? Do you see the problem...?
@MrSkeltal69
3 ай бұрын
Seems like you don't even try to understand his point. The thing that IS definitely true about the bible is the message behind the stories but are the stories truthful real events or just stories? Who knows, hence why he asks "what do you mean by truth". On one hand you could ask if the stories are true or you could ask if the message is true, and specifying what you mean matters. Jordans point is that you shouldn't disregard the bible as something untruthful to ignore just because the stories might not be real events, there is a lot of wisdom from the bible that many people can benefit from, and those benefits are definitely TRUE. Not even once did he ever say that you should make up your own truth about the structure of the world, which is what postmodernism is.
@ghostpiratelechuck2259
2 жыл бұрын
JP: These post-modernists are trying to redefine words. Also JP: Is the Bible true? What do you mean by true?
@barrywhite1770
2 жыл бұрын
Dood exactly. He has become what he despised. Shoulda stuck to being a professor. His lectures were really good.
@twirlykaa2222
2 жыл бұрын
@@barrywhite1770 lol. No. This is who he always was. He has been trying to break into media like this for almost 30 years now. He is a character. That is all. In his terms he would probably describe himself as the archetypal wise sage. He would think of himself as the truthful jester. In reality he is just a snake in the grass leading people away from The Truth. He would rather be the messiah. Watch this dude end up as the pm of Canada because their leadership sucks.
@barrywhite1770
2 жыл бұрын
@@twirlykaa2222 well whatever. I found his “maps of meaning” course very valuable. All this left/right and Christian garbage, not so much
@twirlykaa2222
2 жыл бұрын
@@barrywhite1770 it's all good brother. He is a very intelligent man. I'm glad you found value in what he provides. Still doesn't change the fact that he has been trying to do this for 30 years. I'm not really sure where you were going with that. My wife does that. Well most women really. They just have to be heard. Tell me more about yourself. What's your favorite food? Maybe that will further your point. Go back to maps of meaning. Maybe you haven't found it yet.
@cjoutright9255
Жыл бұрын
I think it’s good, tho. You should always question these things. People always have, way before post-modernism
@omanjabbar200
2 жыл бұрын
JP with Dawkins.. this is something I have been waiting for years.
@jackthalmann6763
2 жыл бұрын
Is that what he’s saying? That him and Dawkins had a conversation at Oxford that they’re releasing? If so I can’t wait
@omanjabbar200
2 жыл бұрын
@@jackthalmann6763 yep..
@topdog5252
2 жыл бұрын
@@jackthalmann6763 some time soon… in the next few years hopefully we’ll get loads of conversations between JP and Dawkins and Harris
@tomadshade2625
2 жыл бұрын
LETS GOOOOOOO
@Son_of_aesthetics
2 жыл бұрын
Man,I'm more hyped for this intellectual debate than been for Khabib vs Conor or even Rock vs Cena while I was a kid lol
@enemywithin1295
2 жыл бұрын
For someone opposed to postmodernism, as am I, Peterson argues very much like a postmodernist.
@thaDjMauz
2 жыл бұрын
Peterson doesnt even know what postmodernism is, he had just constructed an elaborate strawman that he keeps punching down.
@MrCmon113
2 жыл бұрын
He embodies everything he accuses "postmodernists" of.
@the_j_machine2254
2 жыл бұрын
Well I mean, it depends on what you mean by Postmodernism.
@tj-co9go
Жыл бұрын
That's exactly why he is argues against it. To obfuscate the fact that he is one
@spawncampe
Жыл бұрын
He can't even properly define post modernism
@sillynelson1
6 ай бұрын
“Excuse me, do you have the time?” JP: “Depends on what you mean by time. You know, Dostoyevsky said…”
@holyisme6377
2 ай бұрын
true
@RabidLeech1
Ай бұрын
@@holyisme6377Depends on what you mean by true!
@Sacrifice.Online.for.Offline
Ай бұрын
@@RabidLeech1 Depends on your presupposittions in relation to dependence as such, it is not obvious what you hold cardinal in relation to your comment, or that you have said anything to explore and defend your territory
@sankamuru3013
Ай бұрын
🤣
@snowyrox3331
Ай бұрын
Y'all keep trying to discredit and joke on him out of ignorance and jealousy, but nobody's actually disagreeing with him. Cause he's not wrong. Our definition of what's true is dependent upon what our five senses can detect in this 3D reality. Religious people can't win the God debate on scientific grounds because they're trying to prove the physical existence of something that exists beyond our 3rd Dimension out of our ability to detect. The only way we can try to discover or prove God exists is through reasoning.
@jarinthemood2000
Жыл бұрын
If you can't beat them, confuse them! 😂
@kingflockthewarrior202
7 ай бұрын
And to confuse them, you have to confuse yourself.
@standardprocedure7017
7 ай бұрын
This is what I hate about this guy. Master manipulator and gaslighter. He'll dismantle and deconstruct things that can not be so he's always in theory and the abstract, and his followers cling on to that thinking its profound and meaningful when anyone can reconstitute anything to their view in abstraction/thought/theory.
@Lyonessi
7 ай бұрын
@@standardprocedure7017 Is his answer wrong?
@allergy5634
6 ай бұрын
@@LyonessiYes. We have a commonly excepted definition of truth. We don’t need to define it every time we have a conversation
@greenogre22
6 ай бұрын
@@allergy5634 no, it‘s not. why? whilst there is such a thing like a commonly accepted definition of truth it means nothing if common people see claims as truth as it is quite usual. hence the science guys are right when they feel the need to ever explain it again. besides, in the beginning peterson here says the bible is a story. what do you all think he thinks then and what that means? actually he‘s quite clear.
@Ho-mb2wb
2 жыл бұрын
Stop overcomplicating things Jordan. "True" means "real". Hopefully you don't need me to explain what "real" means!
@1Chasg
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah he does that alot.
@allisRevealed987
2 жыл бұрын
poor kid hurt too much
@edwardtimothy3581
2 жыл бұрын
Many Religious people trying to distort the meaning of "truth" now. They kinda crazy
@allisRevealed987
2 жыл бұрын
@@edwardtimothy3581 so a fart created the entire Existence including the laws of Physics
@edwardtimothy3581
2 жыл бұрын
@@allisRevealed987 who said that?
@jordangill2710
3 ай бұрын
A man who does not know what “real” and “true” mean, can be ignored, since he cannot even know if he himself is lying or not
@PolyScope
9 ай бұрын
"Depends on what you mean by true." I love to listen to Jordan Peterson. I really do. Because while I'm listening to him, I not just see the gaslighting, I can smell the petroleum.
@ginorvdw
2 жыл бұрын
"I had a conversation with him at oxford" I can't wait to see this. Huge fans of both men.
@thorstenmarquardt7274
2 жыл бұрын
They have kept this for the last episode. This is bad news that it’s coming so fast. Keep your eyes on Taiwan
@sorcyboi2848
2 жыл бұрын
@@thorstenmarquardt7274 ????
@hailarwotanaz5848
2 жыл бұрын
@@sorcyboi2848 Do some research, it’s coming.
@hailarwotanaz5848
2 жыл бұрын
@@thorstenmarquardt7274 Watching diligently
@thorstenmarquardt7274
2 жыл бұрын
@@sorcyboi2848 Taiwan will be attacked
@blakefrancisboggs7526
Жыл бұрын
weasely is one of the best words to describe jp.
@hehehehehahaha
Жыл бұрын
It depends what you mean by weasely
@bigol9223
8 ай бұрын
I cant do it
@AdamBechtol
7 ай бұрын
:p@@hehehehehahaha
@bigol9223
3 ай бұрын
@diezeljames7910 didn't ask brother
@evanr5871
3 ай бұрын
@diezeljames7910thank god i don’t waste my time with this religion crap
@PInk77W1
2 жыл бұрын
“Fairytales are true Not because they say dragons exist But because they say dragons can be defeated” GK Chesterton
@aguy559
2 жыл бұрын
No. Fairy tales are FALSE. Non-fiction is true. Objective reality exists.
@PInk77W1
2 жыл бұрын
@@aguy559 things beyond objective reality exist too. My mom loves me, but I have no objective proof. Science is good, but science is not all.
@aguy559
2 жыл бұрын
@@PInk77W1 No. Nothing exists beyond objective reality. To say it does is a misuse of the term. And your mother’s feelings of love are the result of a chemical process that would take place whether or not we were aware of it. With the proper technology, it is objectively observable. Just like Peterson, you’re playing around with words. Fables might point to things that are true, but the fables themselves are not.
@PInk77W1
2 жыл бұрын
@@aguy559 So u believe the universe made itself ?
@aguy559
2 жыл бұрын
@@PInk77W1 So you believe god made himself?
@ilyaavrutskyi3874
13 күн бұрын
It's not that surprising, to be fair, that people would rather try and diminish somebody that threatens to highlight cracks in their worldview rather than focus on listening to the points being made It's just surprising to me how many people do it
@nathanmoore5435
2 жыл бұрын
You see this is where Peterson starts to loose me. There are so many things that I agree with him on when it comes to social issues but the minute he starts getting into religion, he starts talking in circles and is never able to say anything definitive on the subject. "It depends on what you mean by the truth." Come on man lol give me a break.
@jmeds94
Жыл бұрын
Well what do you mean when you’re talking about truth? Things that have been proven?
@AllenReviews
6 ай бұрын
He’s talking about narrative truth vs scientific truth.
@Secularexpansion9
3 ай бұрын
He’s branding. He’s essentially creating a larger audience for monetary gain. With his current rhetoric and stance on religion, he is seen as a “gem” to Christians in the west. He is luring the Christian community into book sales.
@Gk2003m
26 күн бұрын
@@Secularexpansion9 Bingo. He’s a grifter, a charlatan. His fans see him mix all these words: “look, let’s get all cognitive neuroscience on this shall we” (from his debate with Sam Harris). And they go gaga! They proclaim him to be a genius, because he uses such words. What they don’t grasp is he’s using those words to evade real exchange of ideas, and/or to attempt to dazzle.
@Jose-ru2wf
2 жыл бұрын
It reminds me of a scene from a show: "Is Super Hans my boss now?" "Depends how you define boss" "In the normal way" "Then yes, he is"
@popdop0074
Жыл бұрын
LMFAO, JP is literally a Peep Show character
@jacobrheaume1
Ай бұрын
Peep show. So great
@PeteysPonderings1220
Жыл бұрын
Anyone: "is this true?" J.P.: "define true." Proceeds to weasel, waffle and wander everywhere to not allow for any meaningful definition
@Icemann89
9 ай бұрын
Funny how he has no need to define words he's using. He just assumes we all know their meaning. And we do. He's such a coward.
@Light90u
8 ай бұрын
@@Icemann89He's not a coward just ignorant God is ultimately
@void_ling
5 ай бұрын
Unfortunate how he is like this. I used to enjoy listening to his lectures:(
@99muddy99
4 ай бұрын
He says some people will call his assertion weasel words - a common marketing strategy where one discounts an objection by stating it, without addressing it.
@annroseliju66
4 ай бұрын
Hehe 🧇
@Jeewanu216
5 ай бұрын
Man JP, props for acknowledging that religion never holds up against science.
@jd_hendricks
2 жыл бұрын
"It depends on what you mean by 'true.'" He pretends like he's not sidestepping the question when he says things like that, but that is precisely what he is doing, especially when no alternative definition of truth is proffered. Peterson really achieves nothing but obfuscation with his handling of truth. He sounds like a postmodernist.
@wirdjadochnichts
2 жыл бұрын
Spot on. Peterson the "public intellectual" is so popular because people want someone to defend their ideology. What he does is make this stuff sound plausible. Thats all.
@ahambrahmas
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah there's a weird irony in his statements here. It's something Foucault could have said.
@user-om7is7ov9v
6 ай бұрын
Every video I have watched of JP in "discussion" with various interviewers is basically this, he throws out a question in answer to a question e.g. Interviewer " is it true......" JP " well depends what you mean by true?".../ or "define true". He rarely gets around to answering the original question and if pulled up on this he then resorts to personal attack and obfuscation with jargon e.g." that's Postmodern Marxist garbage" Thought Richard Dawkins dealt with him beautifully..."Rubbish".
@ManOfThePeople75
2 жыл бұрын
I think the proper question for Jordan in regards to God, is "What do you think happens to your consciousness when your brain and heart stop functioning?"
@bluewater3783
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, per the KNOWLEDGE gained by the NDE (Near Death Experience) Experiencer videos...
@UWfalcin
2 жыл бұрын
@@bluewater3783 Stop. You can’t call that knowledge. It’s absurd.
@bluewater3783
2 жыл бұрын
@@UWfalcin Dr. Sam Parnia. "Researchers say there's evidence consciousness continues after clinical death." NYU's Langone Medical Center. Etc., Etc.
@davidtarumian4648
2 жыл бұрын
what did you experience before you were born? nothing. same answer
@ManOfThePeople75
2 жыл бұрын
@@davidtarumian4648 I also have no memory of anything before the age of two or three, but I was still alive. I hope you're wrong about the nothingness.
@hankschrader7050
Жыл бұрын
Peterson has shown that he is scientifically literate and logical. So his thing with religion is really strange. Its like he becomes a different person.
@raresabraleaks8216
Жыл бұрын
Suspension of disbelief. Not even smart people are exempt.
@moneystrb22
Жыл бұрын
Bc you have to suspend logic to believe it entirely.
@TheSands83
Жыл бұрын
Yeah have u seen him debate Matt dillahunty? I like jordan n I don’t like Matt. But Matt completely destroyed him. Jordan sounded like a raving lunatic
@TheSands83
Жыл бұрын
@@moneystrb22 Wich is a terrible idea 😂
@williamanon2050
Жыл бұрын
It’s because Jordan Peterson is actually really terrible at philosophy. You should go back with a critical eye to stuff he’s said about other topics than religion, I think you’ll find this is not the only sphere where his takes are awful.
@Globalfaction
8 ай бұрын
JP needs to stick to gender politics.
@tj-co9go
Жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson manages to own himself in this argument
@alshaifhir
2 жыл бұрын
"Depends on what your definition of is is" -Bill Clinton
@wess3426
2 жыл бұрын
When taking about friendship with Epstein and paedophilia
@AlcibiadesMD
Жыл бұрын
Indeed, Bill “always hard Clinton” knows how to mix words.
@centralprocessingunit4988
2 жыл бұрын
why is jordan peterson doing this to himself? lol
@ctgx7735
2 жыл бұрын
what is "this"?
@CPUtech101
Жыл бұрын
Because he sees religion as the only antidote to nihilism, and so he needs to convince himself that religious literature is sensible and valid in some way, shape or form.
@ezbody
Жыл бұрын
In all fairness, when it comes to the Conservers, they couldn't care less about what he says, they care about conserving their reality at all costs, and this is what they think JP is doing. Half of the time they don't understand what JP is saying, the other half their attention span reaches its limit.
@renewed6250
6 ай бұрын
Paycheck.
@illyriandescendant7963
5 ай бұрын
Well, it depends on what you mean by "this"? :P
@laughingman3777
6 ай бұрын
Amazing that he admits religion can only be true when you refine truth itself. By that logic anything can be true and there is no such thing as falsehood. What a hack.
@Mm-om9ol
2 жыл бұрын
Look at them staring at him totally lost
@janedoe1107
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah...sometimes I think he goes out of his way to twist, turn and distort the conversation in order to confuse people. And that is his intention. Then he gives them his interpretation of what the solutions are, thereby making it look as though he has the answers.
@TopTierDoberman
2 жыл бұрын
@@janedoe1107 Yep, even when it's totally unnecessary. I'm kind of getting tired of it.
@janedoe1107
2 жыл бұрын
@@TopTierDoberman Finally...someone who agrees with me so thank you! And Im tired of it too.
@Frilleon
2 жыл бұрын
@@janedoe1107 I disagree. I’ve heard plenty of him and he’s a very efficient and precise speaker
@ClinicalpsychFTW
2 жыл бұрын
@@janedoe1107 Or you could possibly just not understand him, which isn’t a bad thing or a slight on your end. Just because you can’t follow doesn’t mean he’s distorting things or doing something for some nefarious purpose.
@TheRoyalBavarian
2 жыл бұрын
Everytime this guy begins to rattle on I find I just don't care anymore.
@markbrowning4334
2 жыл бұрын
In fairness, these shorts libraries do tend to shove this content down our throats. I probably allign ideologically with JP or Joe Rogan or Ben Shapiro, but I find myself skipping a lot of theie content within these shorts. More isn't always better.
@brendanmaclean3013
2 жыл бұрын
JP: depends what you mean by truth JP fans: Truuuuuue!
@RinZ3993
5 ай бұрын
Gold 😂
@PhiTheSimp
2 ай бұрын
Quoting Sweet Daddy Walsh, when he said something along the lines of “It’s not a truth, it’s the truth”.
@sergiogaragarza5578
2 жыл бұрын
Word salad 🥗 Peterson.. you don't assume "True".. truth by definition should be valid and complete regardless of whatever side you are on.
@user-ny7sg9mz1v
2 жыл бұрын
Works with objects not with people.
@bokononbokomaru8156
2 жыл бұрын
Please don't confuse his incel fanboys with reality
@darkwolf4434
2 жыл бұрын
There is objective truth and subjective truth.
@bobmusil1458
2 жыл бұрын
@@darkwolf4434 And there are alternative facts 🤣🤣
@darkwolf4434
2 жыл бұрын
@@bobmusil1458 No, just facts. Subjective truth are things like opinions on abortion. There are no facts if abortion is right or wrong there are just different ways of seeing it. So a conservative may say, a fetus is a baby even before it gains conciousness. That's not a fact. It's an opinion, it's a subjective truth. And a liberal might say, a fetus is a baby after it gains conciousness. Which is also a subjective truth.
@schoowoolovesbooboo2170
2 жыл бұрын
Depends what you mean by true? I'm pretty sure Dr. Harris taught you what "true" means the first time you talked.
@ThePetlowany
Жыл бұрын
Ouch!
@christopherbriggs9526
2 жыл бұрын
How can some one be so knowledgeable and not wise.
@Gamerz00760
2 жыл бұрын
Learning is always different than acting on what is learned. Education does not equal common sense or wisdom or experience, it sets most up for failure because the instant they accept what is told they've limited their thoughts. They're constrained.
@christopherbriggs9526
2 жыл бұрын
@Ch4rLz tHa PrInCe The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. I was eluding to him not believing in God.
@christopherbriggs9526
2 жыл бұрын
@Ch4rLz tHa PrInCe Look up his answer to the question.
@elonif4125
2 жыл бұрын
@@christopherbriggs9526 Peterson is wiser than you’ll ever be. You’re, in Peterson’s words, clearly ideologically possessed
@cslantz4020
2 жыл бұрын
How ironic your statement is.
@blakeandrews3613
7 ай бұрын
He knows EXACTLY what people mean by true 😂
@slanis
Жыл бұрын
The truth is the truth. It's not on a spectrum. Either it is true or it isn't.
@jeremymead8546
Жыл бұрын
JP didnt say otherwise. But you still have to define what you are talking about. Something can be true but irrelevant if its off topic. Is the Bible true? True about what? Human character or nuclear physics? Is it untrue because it doesnt address Marxist economic theory or Plate tectonics?
@Lickhead
Жыл бұрын
@@jeremymead8546 someone who has ears and can infer deeper meaning thank you sir!
@james1098778910
Жыл бұрын
@@jeremymead8546 Not addressing something and being wrong are two completely different things.
@jeremymead8546
Жыл бұрын
@james1098778910 except of course when being wrong about something means that you effectively fail to address that something.
@james1098778910
Жыл бұрын
@@jeremymead8546 you cannot be wrong about something you did not address.
@timmothyjennings
Жыл бұрын
"It's weasley" yes, Jordan. It is weasley.
@debhurd8898
Жыл бұрын
The Prince of gobbledygook, that's JP. Gawd, he drives me crazy😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@UltriLeginaXI
11 күн бұрын
"“I am making rapid progress in the art of using many words to say nothing at all” -Otto von Bismarck
@SydBodeker
Жыл бұрын
Word salad is this guy's one and only talent
@jeremycleary2002
2 жыл бұрын
Cuz Dawkins came armed with the truth, the best of what we’ve learned to date. The truth from 2000+ years ago was not as clear as it is today.
@TV-um6ub
2 жыл бұрын
Why does a scientist care so much about whether what religious people believe is true or not based on scientific assessment?
@jeremycleary2002
2 жыл бұрын
@@TV-um6ub cuz it’s the root of the worlds problems. Everybody warring and truly believe that gods on their side. Religion is poison, every aspect of it
@TV-um6ub
2 жыл бұрын
@@jeremycleary2002 Human beings are the ones who create all the problems in the world, not religion, science, or anything else. People use religion, science or something else to hurt others while some people use them to benefit others.
@jeremycleary2002
2 жыл бұрын
@@TV-um6ub human beings created religion. I completely agree with you all human beings are capable of doing bad, but it takes religion to make good ppl do evil things that they wouldn’t otherwise do. Religion had ppl offering their children as sacrifice. Religion is why we are in perpetual war. Religion makes Muslims kill homosexuals and women for the dumbest reasons.
@TV-um6ub
2 жыл бұрын
@@jeremycleary2002 it takes anything including religion to make good people do evil thing that they wouldn't otherwise do. Innocent people have always been brainwashed to do evil things by an evil person or a group of evil people. The examples you've listed are exceptions to prevalent benevolent characteristics of religion. For example, according to the Encyclopedia of Wars, out of all 1,763 known/recorded historical conflicts, 121, or 6.87%, had religion as their primary cause.
@leonardoh.dasilva5438
2 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peterson has been with William Lane Craig. Dawkins gets the living hell kicked out of him.
@leonardoh.dasilva5438
2 жыл бұрын
I love Dr. Peterson. But he's partially wrong here.
@AlexReynard
Күн бұрын
For everyone who can't understand: Think of a myth with a profound, universal moral. Then someone asking, "But is it true?" as if that's the only thing that matters. As if "Did these events literally occur?" is the only important question, and not, '"Does this story give a useful lesson?" Something can be "true" in the sense of, "If you act on this, positive results happen.
@splotbang8296
2 жыл бұрын
Most people who claim to believe in god have never read the boring bible.
@ReasonAboveEverything
2 жыл бұрын
Tbh most people I have met who similarly say they are atheists can not tell the difference between micro and macro evolution. Humans are just lazy.
@knarfx4732
Жыл бұрын
“They are up against the mighty science” 😂🔥
@khanusmagnus577
Жыл бұрын
Most delusional cringy sentence in existence
@tionarry
2 жыл бұрын
I doubt JP saw the debate Dawkins had with John Lennox. And I'm not even religious.
@marcolorenti9637
Жыл бұрын
Lennox just repeated all the bullshit Dawkins heard 5000 times in his life, such as "the evidence is all around us" etc...He just said it in a more elegant way.
@bendj4lyfe
Ай бұрын
it must be exhausting always having to overthink everything so much💀 holy moly...
@hapustatw
2 жыл бұрын
He says "no it's not" like a toddler being scolded 😂
@patriceriksson7924
2 жыл бұрын
Deepak Chopra and Jordan Peterson. Knights of Woo.
@warriorson7979
2 жыл бұрын
One day the truth will be revealed.
@phatheffer3439
Жыл бұрын
And let me guess, it will be in your favour? 🙄
@khanusmagnus577
Жыл бұрын
@@phatheffer3439 Cry about it
@phatheffer3439
Жыл бұрын
@@khanusmagnus577 Cry about what? Someone believing they have been chosen by God because they are super special?! 🤣🤣🤣
@AIIA23
4 ай бұрын
There are lots of stories but when a story is used to infringe on the rights of others, it deserves scrutiny.
@chrisstockton4318
2 жыл бұрын
Well Dawkins keeps ducking William Lane Craig.
@pattube
6 ай бұрын
If one were cynical, one might say that his caginess and coyness about answering the question is deliberately calculated to promote his mysterious public image so as to make people even more interested in him. If you were a public relations agent for Jordan Peterson, you would tell him don't you dare answer that question straightforwardly. By not answering it, by being coy, it increases the mystique of Jordan Peterson and makes him interesting. People talk about it. They debate whether he really believes it or not. It increases his public notoriety. Whereas if he were to simply come right out and say yes or no, the debate would be over. It wouldn't be nearly as interesting. People wouldn't talk about it. So if you were cynical, you might say that this is just really well-calculated public relations. (William Lane Craig on Jordan Peterson)
@thorstenmarquardt7274
2 жыл бұрын
I knew the debate between Peterson and Dawkins will be in the last episode of the internet. WW3 is coming and they release the Peterson VS Dawkins finale.
@Joshua-dc1bs
2 жыл бұрын
😐
@fncoder
2 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know when it'll be released?
@mikehawk8526
2 жыл бұрын
Lol this aged like fine wine
@thorstenmarquardt7274
2 жыл бұрын
@@mikehawk8526 “so you believe humans drew snakes because they could see their own DNA in their heads?” Peterson: “well I took a lot of heavy drugs”
@mikehawk8526
2 жыл бұрын
@@thorstenmarquardt7274 was refering to "last episode of the internet" and "WW3 is coming", just pointing out the end of the world hasn't happened or isn't anytime soon, as for the conversation itself I totally agree Jordan totally embarrassed himself lol, kinda felt bad for the man honestly.
@gavsmith1980
3 ай бұрын
“People say that’s weasely” Yeah, cos defining ‘truth’ in your own unique way is a brilliant method of showing everyone that you aren’t really that interested in what’s true.
@OmegaFighter1
2 жыл бұрын
John Lennox has entered the chat.
@andrewwong2399
2 жыл бұрын
He lost tho
@OmegaFighter1
2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewwong2399 no he did not.
@Medalsforfucktards
2 жыл бұрын
A master of saying nothing and making it sound really good. Wins 10 debates out of 10, as long as you agree with him before he starts.
@keithberns5
2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewwong2399 nope
@abner0920
Жыл бұрын
@@andrewwong2399 Not at all.
@MoriartyGod
4 ай бұрын
“How’s about this for an answer, almost certainly not.”
@TurdFerguson456
Жыл бұрын
"Well NO IT'S NOT" always gets me 😂. That means: it is weasely, but I can un-weasel it for you, to the point where you no longer need to think of it as weasely, even though it totally is.
@J.Harry.T
9 ай бұрын
Yes, Weasely is exactly what it is.
@johnblake2483
2 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Peterson is a meme.
@maxxam3590
8 ай бұрын
"Truth" is what's factual, and a fact is a point of data that is objectively verifiable. The stories on the Bible are mostly myth, not fact, and so, they're not true. It's as simple as this: Genesis for example, never actually happened.
@GeneralFactCheck
7 ай бұрын
It's so weird how Jordan goes from being totally science oriented and rational when discussing Male/Female or racial differences in brain structure and psychology, then starts talking like this when it comes to weird superstitious beliefs and ancient myths.
@AdamBechtol
7 ай бұрын
Aye
@CoryW-h3q
6 ай бұрын
Consider he may know something
@valerian8999
4 ай бұрын
Because he needs to keep his listeners happy, it earns him a lot of money. I think he’s an agnostic in reality, but doesn’t like to say it because most of his followers are highly religious who love him for his evidence and data-driven points that can be shoehorned into their regressive beliefs.
@YogsenForfoth
2 жыл бұрын
Dawkins absolutely neuters Jorbie Peterson in every way imaginable and I’m more than certain that Dawkins views Peterson with disdain and contempt. Peterson is, after all, a complete charlatan at this point.
@roquefortfiles
Жыл бұрын
Well said. I get sick and tired of hyper intellectuals like Peterson who apply Amazing reason to any argument but do not apply the same reasoning to religion. His IQ drops a 1000 points when religion comes into it
@pantsdown6567
7 ай бұрын
@@roquefortfilesit's not religion you are perceiving it wrong and category placing christianity. Its a relationship
@roquefortfiles
7 ай бұрын
???? !!!@@pantsdown6567
@chezcoleman5421
2 жыл бұрын
What I really don't understand is, people crap on the bible because they say it was written by man....but what I don't understand is, science is created by man. Measure is created by man. So what is the difference? It takes just as much energy to beleive there is no higher power as it does to walk the road of faith believing there is an almighty God.
@samknowles3189
2 жыл бұрын
Yes but science is based on evidence. If you perform a experiment you will receive the same result as someone did 200 years ago. It's an absolute rule. God on the other hand has no guarantees. Also believing in God does not mean that you don't believe in science.
@matc87
2 жыл бұрын
science is repeatable and testable continuously by lots of "man"...and women. the other is unverifiable faith. science=every modern luxury you know faith=hope these ancient guys where right
@chezcoleman5421
2 жыл бұрын
@@samknowles3189 I'm pretty sure God has guarantees. Prophecies are screaming louder than ever before. For me, science is valuable. But for man kind to have a creation called science, someone (personal beleif) my God almighty created everything in existence. It's free will. To beleive in something else that has pretty convincing information or to stand strong on his word and follow him no matter what is out. For me the argument is already won. God has set so much out and if we walk the path we have peace. Life might still be very hard but we have peace. I really love reading these comments. The power of personal thought and belief.
@slalomfive4975
2 жыл бұрын
@@samknowles3189 "Science is based on evidence.." This statement can certainly be subjective. The real issue here is comparison of two subjects that are totally unrelated.
@exnihiloadnihilum5094
2 жыл бұрын
The big difference is science is repeatable, testable, and most importantly falsifiable. Religion does not allow for that last part.
@jaytea836
2 жыл бұрын
Richard Dawkins won't debate Kent Hovind though. Not a chance
@kevinc4325
2 жыл бұрын
He don't want to waste his time with someone who thinks the world is 6000 years old. You can't argue with a mind like that .“It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.” - Bill Murray Cinespia.
@jonathangarmuth8975
2 жыл бұрын
Hovind couldn't debate a fishing rod.
@CoryW-h3q
6 ай бұрын
@@kevinc4325a genuine question, without arguing or name calling, right now on the spot why would you think the earth is over 100k years just to start.
@kevinc4325
6 ай бұрын
@@CoryW-h3q I'll pass. The reason is in my statement above from 2 years ago. Thanks
@kevinc4325
6 ай бұрын
@@CoryW-h3q I'll pass thanks. The reason is stated above.
@godhatessinnotthesinnerhgf2659
11 ай бұрын
It's like saying I am a human being and being asked what do you mean that you're a human being? Confusion is the highest disorder.
@Mickyboi1
Жыл бұрын
The irony is that modern “science” is nothing short of organised religion
@spirostselentis6371
Жыл бұрын
"It depends on what you mean by true" My brain cells commited suicide the moment I heard that.
@hardyhardyha5767
10 ай бұрын
Yeah but what do you mean by brain? And what do you mean by cells? And what do you mean by committed? These are very complex questions.
@spirostselentis6371
10 ай бұрын
@@hardyhardyha5767 lol, my day was great. Didn't expect this to make it even better.
@salmansadeq1167
2 жыл бұрын
Lobster guy literally doing post modernism.
@WilliamTyndale1
2 ай бұрын
Never seen Dawkins win a debate on the God question.
@nathanberner7725
Жыл бұрын
This man literally says nothing. It's actual mental gymnastics. Richard Dawkins is much more logical. Also the way he said "no it's not" sounds like a 3 year old
@matc87
2 жыл бұрын
ahhh scientific definition of true...like there is any other
@janszeneri3572
2 жыл бұрын
Fauci is science
@janszeneri3572
2 жыл бұрын
@Clockwork Man I'll say. Fauci changes his mind, like every month. You can see him state masks don't work to stop viral infection in the past, and that covid will be like a bad flu season; and then he comes out touting masks and saying covid is not like the flu; Then he says wear two or three masks; then it's back to masks don't work. Yep, science changes. Just wish it weren't arbitrary, as it has become in the last two years...
@janszeneri3572
2 жыл бұрын
@Clockwork Man Oh, one more thing - no. They said sunlight helps immunity and kills viruses 100 years ago, and that is still true today. Go look it up - they put flu patients in the sun 100 years ago...
@brookemoore8369
2 жыл бұрын
There are more definitions of truth. Look at Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson’s last podcast together from a week ago. Truths aren’t just derived from facts (science truths). In order for something to be true, it has to come from a set of values or else that truth cannot be true (the is/ought conundrum). There are also deeper levels of truth that extend themselves further than factual truths…. Such as telling a fictional story with deep truths within it that don’t come from facts themselves.
@janszeneri3572
2 жыл бұрын
How does one determine myth vs reality, if truth is not fact based?
@vivlove3083
2 жыл бұрын
When you are on your dying bed.. hope I'm there to hear your last thoughts.
@JB-zd8gv
2 жыл бұрын
Thats what religion is. Wishful thinking about paradise after death
@existentialist1539
7 ай бұрын
He himself calls the science mighty. He himself implied that religion cannot stand against truth which is backed by mighty science. It's mighty for a reason.
@chocolatechip337
2 жыл бұрын
What like science saying humans evolved and came from apes or a pool of bubbling mud
@luv83
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, why is it that humans have differences around the world? Why is it that geographical differences completely change what a human looks like? Doesn't that prove evolution to an extent? Or nevermind, a book made by some dudes in the desert that has been mistranslated a thousand times and also given a second edition for some reason is what we should believe. The dudes who wrote the book ate dumber than you and you still believe them.
@chocolatechip337
2 жыл бұрын
@@luv83 go educate yourself. Those who lived in the days actually were alive at the same time in most cases. And for it all frustrated handed.. stupid is as a stupid does.. Seek the truth for yourself. And not by what someone who hates religion writes... the fact of the matter is scientist are now say the Bible is accurate.. but as always anti religion people an the media won't report on it. Anyone with commonsense would know that evolution fake and false
@luv83
2 жыл бұрын
@@chocolatechip337 Tell me why people look different around the world then? Tell me why people from different races have different affinities? Humans are the same species but different subsets just grew out of some God's ass I guess. Nothing to do with adaptation aka evolution.
@kevinc4325
2 жыл бұрын
@@chocolatechip337 Lol. Point me to a published Scientific paper about the bible that has gone under peer review and agreed upon as fact. I love how you tell this person to educate themselves while being ignorant. Please show me where I can find a so called Scientist that believes in: Virgin births Taking snakes Forever burning bushes Zombies Water to wine Walking on water and much more claimes that are outside the laws of physics. Let me know what lab this person works in.. I would feel compelled to contact the appropriate people so they're aware of a crack pot working for them.
@danielkrcmar5395
2 жыл бұрын
@@luv83 The differences could be less from evolution and more to due with the fact they have unique subspecies DNA from mating. sub-Saharan African's have DNA from a human group no other modern humans do and the same with the Europeans and Asians.
@troycoleman918
2 жыл бұрын
The Selfish Gene was/is amazing.
@2ndamendment684
2 жыл бұрын
Dawkins got dismantled by Lennox on more than one occasion! 😂
@kerravon4159
6 ай бұрын
"No its not Weasely!" Yes Jordan, it absolutely _IS_ Weasely.
@poctordepper4469
5 ай бұрын
damn this comment section is filled with a surface level understanding of what this guy is saying
@josephjohnson2481
4 ай бұрын
most people don't actually "think", they just act with a faulty value system and miss the mark.
@Secularexpansion9
4 ай бұрын
These types of comments are literally on every JP video, typically when most of the comments are attacking him. JP fan boy: “You all just don’t have the intellectual capability to understand what he is saying”
@josephjohnson2481
4 ай бұрын
@@Secularexpansion9 Never said they were unintelligent. I believe everyone would come to an understanding, how long that takes however would be a scrutiny on their intelligence. When talking about ideas that matter they don't dig deep enough though to find out.
@poctordepper4469
4 ай бұрын
@@Secularexpansion9 not even close to a jp "fan" but it wouldn't be far fetched to say that your average KZitem comment section is more than likely to largely miss the meaning behind something said by someone who is significantly more sophisticated both in an intellectual and literary sense. The mere fact that these people can't comprehend that there could be multiple implied meanings by the word "true" pretty much shows what I'm saying.
@Secularexpansion9
3 ай бұрын
@@poctordepper4469 no I truly believe that many people on here completely understand “truth” in regard to things like Christianity and the Bible. I understand that the Bible and it’s collection of stories, has been a guiding factor that has influenced society. I completely understand that this is a type of “truth”. It seeks to lay out a framework of morality that can be applied to life on this planet and so on…. Peterson defends the Bible because he thinks that if you extract this brand of theology out of western society, you will be left with serious problems. For him, it’s irrelevant if the Bible is actually the true word of God or not. I get that.
@android12921
2 жыл бұрын
No argument here. Peterson posits that the question, "is the Bible true " is invalid unless definition of true has to be ascertained first. Asking a question like, " I heard you are leaving the country tomorrow, is that true? " this question can be answered without pondering over "fundamental concept of true " It's a stupid argument to claim, "asking a question, is Bible true?" is profound. No. Bible is one of the many "sacred" books in the world.
@luckybean5837
2 жыл бұрын
But now we must ponder over the fundamental concept of "sacred"...
@gozzilla177
2 жыл бұрын
Well the problem is the bible has stories in it which are wild and bold, but there is no supportive evidence to back them up. The story of Noah's ark for example a man and his small family build an ark that is over 500 ft long over 3 stories high and he lived 950 years! Yet there is no evidence in the soil that says flooding happened world wide, a boat of this magnitude has never bin found either. Also 950, when the life expectancy was like what 30.....
@gozzilla177
2 жыл бұрын
@Ch4rLz tHa PrInCe Yes, science is sure that within the time frame, no such flood gas left its mark keep in mind this isnt the most ancient of times the story took place about 2300BC this man in the bible lived 950 years..... now I'd you wanna say the bible isn't meant to be taken as literal and only interpreted, well it also has rules such as how disobedient children should be stoned.... how would one interpret that? The bible is so said to be directed by the word of god, who I would remind you is meant to be a flawless being that is and sees all..... nut he wrote an old testament 😆 if he knew all and the results as such, why would he inspire an old testament that would go outdated? If he knew and had such foresight one would think he would only write the news testament and never inspire the old.... Also a lack of evidence is evidence itself, and there is a massive lack of evidence supporting god. All that said I dont think religion is so bad it should be gone, in fact it's quite useful in many ways and I'm glad it helps people. But I can also say for myself that god doesnt exist.
@gozzilla177
2 жыл бұрын
@Ch4rLz tHa PrInCe But I was taught in Sunday school that the bible was written by man and both inspired/advised by gods word. Maybe you were taught different 🤷♂️
@markharris4421
2 жыл бұрын
@Ch4rLz tHa PrInCe the consequences of sinning are pretty dire and yet the rule book was written by man? God is either insane or simply malicious. "Here you go humanity, generations of Chinese whispers and gobledygook that if not obeyed gets you a ticket to hell!"
@feizo
9 ай бұрын
Jordan Peterson is the prime example of a pretentious pseudo-intellectual.
@elijiahburgess5506
7 ай бұрын
He’s mostly a philosopher now. I find it funny how many people in the comments don’t understand the concept of truth or rather they believe they have a sold definition of what truth is. Why don’t you read a book on this subject before commenting on it like you know anything. Start with Alan Watts and then move into some Manly P. Hall. Maybe then you’ll actually be able to think for yourself.
@renewed6250
7 ай бұрын
@elijiahburgess5506 Metaphysical substrate. That should clear up for you what original poster is talking about. Clearly you are a JP fan...and that's cool. He is spot on when it comes to free speech, woke culture, and youth need for self-discipline. But being his fan doesn't mean you can successfully defend him on 'everything'. Because he (like everyone else) is not right about 'everything'. JP, for all his strengths - is an absolutely blabbermouthed idiot when it comes to religion. As for 'truth'. Yes, there are philosophical approaches to truth, meaning, and interpretation. But religion is not 'true' when it comes to comparing how science is 'true'. Here I will make it simpler...evolution is TRUE. Intelligent Design (so called) is false and has zero evidence for it and a mountain of evidence in the other direction.
@leebode4643
7 ай бұрын
@@renewed6250 Love your response here. Great work! I wholeheartedly agree with every single point you made.
@renewed6250
7 ай бұрын
@leebode4643 thank you! Rereading it, I hope I don't come off as a jerk. Didn't mean to. JP is one of those people in that category where, people who like him struggle to find any fault in him. I for instance, am a huge fan of Jocko Willlink, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Dan Gilbert (the psychologist...not the Cavs owner). They all definitely have their points where I don't just disagree, they are systemically incorrect. That is just humans for you. I likely have a mountain of thoughts I am systemically incorrect about. So I hope it was received well.
@elijiahburgess5506
7 ай бұрын
@@renewed6250 let’s be reasonable here. I never said or even hinted that I find no fault in him. The original poster is also not exactly in line with you either. I don’t think they wrote enough to even be able to steel-man anything. Yes you are correct that there is a difference between truth in regards to different subjects and their respective axioms. But by my estimation Dr. Peterson is more in line with philosophical religious “truths” rather than scientific truths which he is also completely aware of. I believe he is struggling with the problem of perception ultimately and he does indeed come off as sort of beating around the bush but I don’t think it’s because he can’t answer any specific question in line with a mainstream answer but rather he wants to answer it on his terms through his own perspective. But no I don’t and won’t defend him in all he does. I dislike his hyper vocal tendencies, his lack of self control in a conversation, his need to repeat everything to new people. Best example would be the Richard Dawkins interview. It’s was unbearable. I stopped listening to him for the most part after that. But overall no I don’t think you were being a jerk or anything. However this wasn’t your conversation in the first place and your comment to me seemed like a well placed barb to attract a vicious response. Could be wrong.
@MuscleMan500
3 ай бұрын
"Depends what you mean by true" "Well that depends what you mean by mean"
@lorde0147
2 жыл бұрын
I'd personally love to see a conversation with that guy and a Jehovah Witness. Just saying.
@jif8802
2 жыл бұрын
Just curious, what exactly would you expect to see?
@lorde0147
2 жыл бұрын
@@jif8802 Well typically, a Jehovah Witness, is well rounded, as they need to be, so that they have a means of understanding the people that they talk to about religion, and are able to withstand scrutiny as well. This means that they would more than likely be able to verbal joust efficiently enough or there abouts. At least I think so.
@kevg1617
2 жыл бұрын
Who is "that guy"?
@ChiyoSanabria
2 жыл бұрын
@@lorde0147 JW are useful parrots. The big majority of them are uneducated.
@carlablizard8514
2 жыл бұрын
A JW will never debate because they are only allowed to go in pairs. They can never stand alone.
@EricPeelMusic
11 ай бұрын
Richard Dawkins doesn’t come armed with “perception” of the truth. He comes armed with the truth. THAT is why Dawkins always kicks the hell out of religious people when debating them.
@thecountofmontecristo.4542
Жыл бұрын
How can you say so much and absolutely nothing at the same time.
@illmerica322
5 ай бұрын
Richard Dawkins always gets me thinking but that's the point of faith also to be able to face these questions and neither answer them or believe that they aren't strong enough to derail my faith...
@KavlosteMeViagra
Жыл бұрын
Atheists: How could it be real? Religious people: How could it not be real?
@crackerslim2469
2 жыл бұрын
There is enough light in faith for those who want to believe and enough Shadows for those who don't
@matc87
2 жыл бұрын
shadows?
@gobbled123
2 жыл бұрын
Have you heard of the enlightenment?
@matc87
2 жыл бұрын
@@gobbled123 sounds subjective
@gobbled123
2 жыл бұрын
@@matc87 America society was founded in the enlightenment period. A separation of church and state. Democracy. Scientific reformation was the foundation of the United States. It was a rejection of religious fundamentalism and the rights of religious organisations of heredity. The USA is fundamentally a non religious organisation.
@matc87
2 жыл бұрын
@@gobbled123 wow with all that enlightenment going around I'm surprised anyone owned or used slaves to build their family property state and country. yes freedom of religion thank fuck because we can see what not having freedom of religion produces. I'm not American so I cannot say but I try stay up to date with religious legal affairs over there. it deffinetly seems like alot of politics leans into the religious pandering
@arcanaz6583
Жыл бұрын
Religion is by far Peterson's weakest link.
@Marcel-eg9bz
7 ай бұрын
"How was your breakfast?" JP: "Well it depends by what you mean by how. Well it depends by what you mean by was. Well it depends by what you mean by your. Well it depends by what you mean by breakfast."
@ralphpeirson8475
2 жыл бұрын
The Bible has a lot of interesting information within it The discovery and translation of the NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY IN Egypt, as well as the Dead Sea Scrolls cast a much different light on the Bible Then, when you look into the other "authentic" religions you find a string of agreement that goes through all of them. The obvious conclusion is that this is mankind's attempt to explain the unfathomable.
@Idothinkysaurus
2 жыл бұрын
The strings of agreement you can find are incredibly spooky. A fundamental rewriting of what we understand as history, and even reality, kind of spooky. I just wonder what happened that led us to be so out of touch with it all. There've been a couple knocks on the door of drugs, which would bring some theories of human evolution more consideration, but it's a mostly untapped and dismissed well of information.
@lessanderfer7195
2 жыл бұрын
Or, that it is actually evidence of universal Truths. Your biases will decide which way you frame it.
@goodshorts
2 жыл бұрын
The Bible has historical archaeological fact and universal moral truth.
@lada8744
2 жыл бұрын
It could also indicate that there was one true region from God and as man made others they retained core truths. A central origin is also a good way to have universal concepts.
@jacobw1644
2 жыл бұрын
Who did Richard Dawkins “kick the hell out of” in a debate? Please don’t say John Lennox. Lmao
@crazykubla
2 жыл бұрын
Everyone, and yes including Lennox. Peterson lays this out perfectly, these apologists don't have a clear conception of what they think truth means. Richard did. It's that simple.
@LazzaRuss
Жыл бұрын
The master of word salad.
@daniellevy2272
10 ай бұрын
I believe he Jordan later says that it's because The Bible is a precedent to truth, which I think is a *facinating* idea in every way.
@horrificpleasantry9474
2 жыл бұрын
KZitem "the Dawkins delusion" for something utterly hilarious
Пікірлер: 4,9 М.