Sir Thomas More has, for centuries, been used as almost a primary source on for the story of Richard III and the Princes in the Tower. This is a mistake. More never meant us to use his work this way. That's why he didn't finish it or publish it.
What was More really writing? What did he mean by his work? What about the latest evidence that More might have been correct?
All is not what it seems.
Негізгі бет Richard III: The Sources - The Problem With More
Пікірлер: 21