The idea that there was a beginning is as challenging for my imagination power as the idea that there wasn't one. So what!
@Great_WOK_Must_Be_Done
10 ай бұрын
Yep. It's all just speculation and guess work. I doubt we'll ever really understand the fundamental nature of this mysterious reality at the deepest levels. It's above our paygrade! LOL
@javiej
10 ай бұрын
That is because you don't understand what is time. Neither me, but I like to think that once that we understand what is time then the "beginning" question will be trivial to answer.
@MendeMaria-ej8bf
10 ай бұрын
Yes, the notion of time is hard to understand. Maybe it's even impossible in a world that is perceived as being threedimensional.
@mattd2641
10 ай бұрын
@@MendeMaria-ej8bfit shouldn’t be-a thing with a beginning is much easier to understand than a thing without one. Everything you know of in life had a beginning. You know of nothing without one. Our brains work in terms of cause and effect. The idea of effect without a cause is about as foreign to us as anything we can imagine.
@MendeMaria-ej8bf
10 ай бұрын
@@mattd2641 Well, my brain seems to function differently from yours. I always want to know what might have been before a beginning and I have a hard time imagining what nothing could be.
@tomlee2651
10 ай бұрын
I think he's conflating clock with time. No one is denying clocks/ticks/tocks aren't real. But time is an emergence property of space.
@uninspired3583
10 ай бұрын
Conflating things is typically how you argue in favor of god
@nephalm5357
10 ай бұрын
He didn't conflate the 2 at all.
@melgross
7 ай бұрын
There are physics theorems in which time doesn’t exist. The block universe is a well known version of that.
@crisismanagement
10 ай бұрын
How about a question like, "Are we accountable?" "Are there any questions we want to avoid?"
@James-ll3jb
10 ай бұрын
Accountable to what?
@crisismanagement
10 ай бұрын
Likely, that's what 1% of the population asks themselves. They're doing well at the moment.
@brianlebreton7011
10 ай бұрын
I like the depth of his thoughts. Sometimes hard to follow, but that’s why I like to listen more than once. It’s like reading a book again yet feeling like it’s a different story. Thank you.
@eddenz1356
10 ай бұрын
Answer to each episode… Uh. I don’t know. Why I call it “ no” closer to the truth. But I keep watching to be sure. Might as well keep asking and keep trying.
@festeradams3972
10 ай бұрын
Yea, and he "gets there" every time. Just keep watching to see how long he can keep it up :-).
@Rohit-oz1or
10 ай бұрын
When you can have beliefs, you can believe anything
@javiej
10 ай бұрын
This idea about chaos as the initial state makes sense to me. Because the idea of "nothingness" requires some laws of physics to exist to keep it stable (it needs energy conservation law, it needs time, and it needs the "obligatory" absence of other laws known to exist (in QM, particle and antiparticle pairs can be created out of nothing, and the fact that when time is smaller than Planck time you can have a big bang out of nothing due to Heisenberg uncertainty about energy...). It maybe counter intuitive, but having a stable "nothingness" is much more complex entity than having pure "chaos". Then, starting from chaos it could be possible to derive how our universe happened and our laws of phyisics emerged as something inevitable. Because as a difference of "nothingness" if we have chaos we have stuff to play with, we just don't know how... yet.
@James-ll3jb
10 ай бұрын
Nothingness doesn't require physical law "to be stable" because there's nothing there for which stability is applicable. Think people!Nothingness doesn't require physical law "to be stable" because there's nothing there for which stability is applicable. Think people!
@javiej
10 ай бұрын
@@James-ll3jb I don't agree. The concept of "total nothingness" is a human fantasy, it may sound intuitive to you but it is not a real possibility. Just think in reverse, go back in time up to T=0 and tell me how you can make all stuff (even time and space) to disappear into "nothingness"? The more you approach t=0 the more energy you can have (incertidumbre principle), that is not nothingness but quite the opposite. To me the ideas in this video a about chaotic state "by default" (with no laws and no metrics) makes more sense, at least spacetime could have something to emerge from. Otherwise your starting state is a "nothingness"... which explode.
@melgross
7 ай бұрын
It’s incorrect to say that nothing requires something. The definition of nothing is that there is literally, nothing. No laws of physics, no space, no philosophical arguments, nothing.
@javiej
7 ай бұрын
@@melgross it requires the energy conservation law to start with, otherwise nothing prevents stuff coming into existence
@melgross
7 ай бұрын
@@javiej no.
@ItsEverythingElse
10 ай бұрын
A lot of confusion and questions get much simpler when you stop approaching them from an anthropomorphic viewpoint or bias.
@Bill..N
10 ай бұрын
How so?
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
@@Bill..Ngive me an explanation for 153 fishes.
@peteranderson2687
10 ай бұрын
My understanding is that energy is the most fundamental force that creates everything else in our universe. It really doesn't matter what it is called it is always the same. There is a saying that "A rose is always rose no matter what it is called".
@kylelochlann5053
10 ай бұрын
Energy doesn't exist; it's an arbitrary number assigned to a system for bookkeeping purposes. Specifically, energy is the Noether charge of time-translation symmetry.
@kevinsayes
10 ай бұрын
The quality and coherence of comments between CTT episodes with physicists and ones with religy-bois is hilarious. I wish RLK would give up the god thing, or given how much info he’s been exposed to, just go ahead and land on one side or the other. I can’t personally see how anyone who has looked at the information we have as a society could ever wind up embracing anything more than possibly deism, but to each his own I guess.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
153 fishes is 7 minutes long, watch it.
@heresa_notion_6831
10 ай бұрын
cyclic universe is a thing; in which case, we're in the interesting part of it
@Alex-js5lg
10 ай бұрын
Sure, let's assume the cyclic universe idea is the right one: what started the first cycle? At some point, every belief system lands on either something coming from nothing or something having always existed.
@heresa_notion_6831
10 ай бұрын
@@Alex-js5lg I agree, and I meant "cyclic" in the sense of the latter kind of "landing".
@davenchop
10 ай бұрын
agreed.. and it may have been cycling trillions and trillions of times... hard to gather your brain around something like that.. very interesting
@Zurealz
10 ай бұрын
@@davenchop or infinitely, with the version of you (right now) having had been reconfigured with an identical consciousness, an infinite number of times every so often in one of these infinite versions. Why not?
@micronda
10 ай бұрын
So we have a godlian time scale (of unknown interval) followed by a Newtonian type (not limited by C), which encompasses an Einsteinian space-time period, after which...?
@Maurerjuana
10 ай бұрын
This is the same video you posted about two weeks ago. Still love it, though!
@peweegangloku6428
10 ай бұрын
The simple truth is that something exists eternally because there is absolutely no way that anything can come from nothing. Whatever that something is, is a subject for investigation. Building on this premise, if something has existed eternally, then time is eternal albeit different from the way we normally view it. It does not have a beginning.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
God. 153 fishes. 7 minutes. Watch it and see your proof.
@andrewmasterman2034
10 ай бұрын
I think it may be that truly ‘nothing’ is the only state that cannot exist.
@sentientsimeon7669
10 ай бұрын
@@jarrettesselman8144that’s a great video everyone needs to watch
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
@@andrewmasterman2034 153 fishes. See your evidence. 7 minutes of your time.
@EverythingCameFromNothing
10 ай бұрын
Why do you think something can’t come from nothing? 🤔
@Ekam-Sat
10 ай бұрын
He is correct that time is Real. In fact, I would like to argue that there is only the Real. ♥️
@peteranderson2687
10 ай бұрын
Time did not exist before the creation of the universe. For me, time is just a catalyst which allows events to happen.
@johnlkeck
9 ай бұрын
The evidence for "gravity" doesn't require seconds... The concept is evident simply by considering state change. He gave a formula at the beginning of the interview that articulates the force of gravity without using a "time" scale. Gravity on earth varies depending on the density of mass, as it would anywhere. It's why bubbles float and rain falls... I wonder what time he believes it is on the moon... "Time" as we use it is a coordination system on this planet. It fails to be of much use beyond. I believe we can utilize propositional calculus to determine contextual relationships in 3 dimensional space.
@keithmetcalf5548
10 ай бұрын
That voice is absolutely legendary
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
10 ай бұрын
*"That voice is absolutely legendary"* ... That's the voice I always heard as a 2nd grader whenever I was sent to the principal's office.
@horizons2358
10 ай бұрын
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC😂
@keithmetcalf5548
10 ай бұрын
Lmao!!! Funny 😆
@richardbreeze7898
2 ай бұрын
The idea that all the matter in the universe was spontaneously created 14 Billion years ago is beyond ridiculous. We need to move past it.
@jeffwilliams6681
8 ай бұрын
For anyone familiar with Kant’s First Antinomy, this question is about as interesting as how many angels fit on the head of pin.
@bretnetherton9273
10 ай бұрын
Awareness is known by awareness alone.
@Vimana11
10 ай бұрын
To put it mildly, I think this question is best suited for an extraterrestrial race that actually has some deeper knowledge of the universe.
@stephenwatts2649
10 ай бұрын
Divine Dichotomy - Conversation With God It's important to learn about Divine Dichotomy and understand it thoroughly if you are to live in our universe with grace. Divine Dichotomy holds that it is possible for two apparently contradictory truths to exist simultaneously in the same space. Now on your planet people find this difficult to accept. They like to have order, and anything that does not fit into their picture is automatically rejected. For this reason, when two realities begin to assert themselves and they seem to contradict one another, the immediate assumption is that one of them must be wrong, false, untrue. It takes a great deal of maturity to see, and accept, that, in fact, they might both be true. Yet in the realm of the absolute - as opposed to the realm of the relative, in which you live - it is very clear that the one truth which is All There Is sometimes produces an affect which, viewed in relative terms, looks like a contradiction. This is called a Divine Dichotomy, and it is a very real part of the human experience. And as I've said, it's virtually impossible to live gracefully without accepting this. One is always grumbling, angry, thrashing about, vainly seeking "justice," or earnestly trying to reconcile opposing forces which were never meant to be reconciled, but which, by the very nature of the tension between them, produce exactly the desired effect. The realm of the relative is, in fact, held together by such tensions. As an example, the tension between good and evil. In ultimate reality there is no such thing as good and evil. In the realm of the absolute, all there is is love. Yet in the realm of the relative you have created the experience of what you "call" evil, and you have done it for a very sound reason. You wanted to experience love, not just "know" that love is All There Is, and you cannot experience something when there is nothing else but that. And so, you created in your reality (and continue to do so every day) a polarity of good and evil, thus using one so that you might experience the other. And here we have a Divine Dichotomy - two seemingly contradictory truths existing simultaneously in the same place. Specifically: There is such a thing as good and evil. All there is is love. Thank You for explaining this to me. You've touched on this before, but thank You for helping me understand Divine Dichotomy even better. You're welcome. Now, as I said, the greatest Divine Dichotomy is the one we are looking at now. There is only One Being, and hence, only One Soul. And, there are many souls in the One Being. Here's how the Dichotomy works: You've just had it explained to you that there is no separation between souls. The soul is the energy of life that exists within and around (as the aura of) all physical objects. In a sense, it is that which is "holding" all physical objects in place. The "Soul of God" holds in the universe, the "soul of man" holds in each individual human body. The body is not a container, a "housing," for the soul; the soul is the container for the body. That's right. Yet there is no "dividing line" between souls - there is no place where "one soul" ends and "another" begins. And so, it is really one soul holding all bodies. Correct. Yet the one soul "feels like" a bunch of individual souls. Indeed it does - indeed I do - by design. Can You explain how it works? Yes. While there is no actual separation between souls, it is true that the stuff of which the One Soul is made manifest in physical reality at different speeds, producing different degrees of density. Different speeds? When did speed come in? All of life is a vibration. That which you call life (you could just as easily call it God) is pure energy. That energy is vibrating constantly, always. It is moving in waves. The waves vibrate at different speeds, producing different degrees of density, or light. This, in turn, produces what you would call different "effects" in the physical world - actually, different physical objects. Yet while the objects are different and discreet, the energy which produces them is exactly the same. Let Me go back to the example that you used of the air between your living room and dining room. It was a good use of imagery that just popped right out of you. An inspiration. From guess where. Yes, I gave it to you. Now you said that there was no specific place between those two physical locations where the "air of the living room" stopped and the "air of the dining room" began. And that is true. Yet there is a place where the "air of the lining room" becomes less dense. That is,vit dissipates, becomes "thinner." So, too, the "air of the dining room." The further from the dining room you go, the less you smell diner! Now the air in the house is the same air. There is no "separate air" in the dining room. Yet the air in the dining room sure seems like "other air." For one thing, it smells different! So because the air has taken on different characteristics, it seems as though it is different air. But it is not. It is all the same air, seeming different. In the living room you smell the fireplace, in the dining room you smell dinner. You might even go into one room and say, "Whew, it's stuffy. Let's get some air in here," as if there was no air at all. And yet, of course, there's plenty of air. What you are wanting to do is change its characteristics. So you bring in some from the outside. Yet that is the same air, too. There is only one air, moving in, around, and through everything. This is cool. I totally "get" this. I love the way You explain the universe to me in ways I can totally "get." Well, thank you. I'm trying here. So let Me go on. Please. Like the air in your house, the energy of life - what we'll call the "Soul of God" - takes on different characteristics as it surrounds different physical objects. Indeed, that energy coalesced in a particular way to form those objects. As particles of energy join together to form physical matter, they become very concentrated. Mashed up. Pushed together. They begin to "look like," even "feel like," distinct units. That is, they begin to seem "separate," different," from all the other energy. Yet this is all the same energy, behaving differently. It is this very act of behaving differently which makes it possible for That Which Is All to manifest as That Which Is Many. As I explained in Book 1, That Which Is could not experience Itself as What It Is until It developed this ability to differentiate. So That Which Is All separated into That Which Is This, and That Which Is That. (I'm trying to make this very simple now.) The "clumps of energy" which coalesced into discreet units that held in physical beings are what you have chosen to call "souls." The parts of Me that have become the lot of You are what We are talking about here. Thus, the Divine Dichotomy: There is only One of us. There are Many of us. KNOW THE TRUTH - SET YOURSELF FREE. Now I tell you this: Know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. There is no separation. Not from each other, not from God, and not from anything that is. This truth I will repeat over and over on these pages. This observation I will make again and again. Act as if you were separate from nothing, and no one, and you will heal your world tomorrow. This is the greatest secret of all time. It is the answer for which man has searched for millennia. It is the solution for which he has worked, the revelation for which he has prayed. Act as if you were separate from nothing, and you heal the world. Understand that it is about power with, not power over.
@berniefynn6623
10 ай бұрын
Where did the materials come from to allow a big bang???
@kylelochlann5053
10 ай бұрын
The Inflaton field.
@r2c3
10 ай бұрын
Heeaclitus made a very interesting point a couple of millennia ago by saying whether one steps on the same river twice... it follows that every moment brings us a new version of reality, continuously... and as such, the beginning and the end of an experience is part of an interval of interest or reference...
@simonhibbs887
10 ай бұрын
Indeed, quantum mechanics in particular shows us that there aren't any such thing as fixed immutable solid objects. Everything that exists is a dynamic process, constantly changing yet part of a consistent progression of pattern and meaning.
@r2c3
10 ай бұрын
@@simonhibbs887hello again Simon... yes to "Everything that exists is a dynamic process, constantly changing yet part of a consistent progression of pattern and meaning." you have to compare " quantum mechanics shows us that there aren't any such thing as fixed immutable solid objects." with your other coment on "what's real" video... is qm reduced to minute parts or not... and I don't even think you could even take qm as straight answer to anything without considering a collapse state which in itself is an event... there's many holes in qm theory... and also don't forget that qm applies only to the subatomic parts and not our experiences, so a direct comparison between the two might not be correct since they're bound to a different set of constraints...
@simonhibbs887
10 ай бұрын
@@r2c3 I can’t find a “what’s real” video in my history (YT comments system is terrible), but I do think quantum objects are real. They’re just not solid in the way we usually think of things. Solidity is something we experience, but it turns out it’s an emergent property and not fundamental. On QM having many holes. It depends what you mean. There are explanatory gaps, I’d say. It’s predictions have proven to be ‘rock solid’, if you’ll excuse a small joke in context. It’s been spectacularly successful. The behaviour it describes seems to actually be what happens, absolutely reliably, it just seems crazy and impossible to understand why it happens that way. I suppose we may just have to deal with it.
@JDT101
10 ай бұрын
@@simonhibbs887 I wish all disagreements were handled so politely in these parts
@r2c3
10 ай бұрын
@@simonhibbs887 "What is truth" the last video... my mistake...
@chrisjudd-uc7sh
10 ай бұрын
Brilliant man Swinburne. The only thing I could add is the tendency of mankind to humanise god. Maybe and even probably the form that god takes is something totally outside our expectations. Nonetheless IMO god must exist and is outside time and space.
@melgross
7 ай бұрын
Nope. No reason to believe in any version of god or gods.
@edench73
10 ай бұрын
What does he mean by, if there was no change in his beliefs (god) , then there is no truth of whether that period was endless or finite, at the near end of the video?
@M3V3clips
10 ай бұрын
He debunked God. God cannot be infinite if it changed its ways. Our reality itself debunks the idea of an all powerful/all good deity. That's why theism is a failure and people that want to hold on to the concept of God cling to deism and the "we dont/can't know for sure" idea.
@James-ll3jb
10 ай бұрын
Nothingness doesn't require physical law "to be stable" because there's nothing there for which stability is applicable. Think people!
@indiatemplessecretromdata262
10 ай бұрын
I've Discovered Indian Temples Depict Wormhole Travel Machines.
@sciencefirst7880
6 ай бұрын
Time scales are not the same in different regions of the multiverse. Time here would not be the same in another place. Gravity isn't as strong here as somewhere else. Physics here would not be the same in another place.
@phk2000
10 ай бұрын
The universe has to be infinite. For it not to be the endless dark empty space would have to come to an end and be replaced by...... what? What could replace the space? It has to be eternal because the alternative is that there used to be nothing and then something came into existence. You can't get something from nothing so there must always have been something - hence no beginning.
@imaginaryuniverse632
10 ай бұрын
I think the preponderance of the evidence is the Universe is an appearance in the mind of the all aka God made entirely of his, our, imagination. I think the first page of Genesis describes very well how a cell works and really how energy and information is transferred and transformed at every level from subatomic to universal. I'll be happy to elaborate if anyone is interested.
@JDT101
10 ай бұрын
Please
@nephalm5357
10 ай бұрын
Go for it
@brettbcomedy
10 ай бұрын
Yet 1 Genesis literally describes a scenario where the heavier elements in the universe, like carbon & silicon, existed before light, which is factually inaccurate.
@imaginaryuniverse632
10 ай бұрын
@@JDT101 Thank you for your politeness. I'll reference beyond the one page for logical reasons. I had a difficult time seeing the relationship between the etymology of words and syllables of words that make a statement, scriptures and how the Universe actually works until I saw for myself the examples are everywhere. Biology comes from the Greek Bios meaning mode of life and logos meaning word. Cytoplasm means the word across the waters. Phospholipids means light bearer which gives form to the word of what appears in the Universe. Phospholipids form are cell walls which allow for a resonance to form from the vibrations from the cell nucleus, it's the boundary condition for our cells but every system has a boundary condition that allows for a resonance to form over time from atoms to solar systems to galaxies. The boundary condition is called the firmament which is also called the heavens in many contexts. Cy means vibration and plasm means mother which are also represented as energy and mass times the speed of light squared, E equals MC2. Eve also represents MC2. It may be that anywhere we see "represented" this means like a symbol or a gauge on a dashboard that represents something quite different from the symbol. My opinions, Eve represents the reflection of Adam's desires like the subconscious reflects the conscious and what appears in the Universe reflects the energy resonating in space within subset boundary conditions within a single boundary possibly expanding at the speed of light eternally but no worries space has infinite potential in an imaginary Universe. Ribosomes translate messenger ribo-nucleic-acid sent from, radiating from, the nucleus of our cells read from the genes of our cells which I believe to be ever changing. Ribosome means rib of the body like the hypotenuse of a square separates two isocoles triangles each a reflection of the other and whose value is the square root of 2 for a square of side length 1( the body diagonal, axis, of a spinning cube is the square root of 3). Ribosomes form amino acids which are the building blocks of all known life forms, what appears in the world is made from the process of Ribosomes, rib of the body. It seems to me to be beyond coincidence how well the etymology of words used in science especially biology fit with ancient scriptures of many religions as many religions are clearly giving the same information using different allegories. I probably should have started off saying I believe the Bible is clearly an allegory, without a doubt, as far as it's intended message which is an opinion about what is obviously true. The difference in the major religions is just different opinions about the same agreed upon truth that consciousness is the foundation of nature. I know I didn't organize this very well and jammed in that about the body diagonal for no apparent reason but that's because I'm in a mood and I'm not clear what the √2 √3 lengths mean but I feel like the √3 is the axis mundi in something from Plato I remember hearing about but haven't seen but also for a lot of other reasons I know it's an extremely important number. I'd be happy to give my thoughts about how our Cerebral Spinal fluid system is the River Jordan that flows from the sacral pump at the base of our spines powered by our inspiration moving the coccyx to create a wave of cavitation through a conductive fluid that resonates with the fontanelle of our skulls which means receptacle of the Holy or baptismal fluid and how this relates to baptism meaning born again in the spirit but that's a good beginning. I could also answer questions how anyone can easily find tons of similar information if you believe what I have said is of importance. 🙏🎲🔯⚛️⚕️🙏
@imaginaryuniverse632
10 ай бұрын
@@brettbcomedy How so? I left a comment above also but just from memory which isn't perfect. I'll probably go read it again in a bit but let me know how you think so. I think there's something interesting about hydrogen meaning the generator of water and then the second element is helium which makes me think of a system like the solar system. Carbon is the Ribo in ribo-nucleic-acid which I think I remember ribose being the backbone of DNA but it's been a while since I saw that also and I keep forgetting to take my vitamins for memory.
@paultaylor7947
10 ай бұрын
It's what I was learning at school when a concept like always was and will be in as much God is infinite. Hard for us to ever get our heads around therefore just believe in the reality as far as reality we are meant to acknowledge
@janerkenbrack3373
10 ай бұрын
Wow. It is amazing to listen to someone craft a wild circle of ifs to rationalize belief in God. This is like a lot of apologists in a way. They craft a series of steps to reinforce a logical fallacy. That is, using God to explain what we don't know. I don't really think the beginning of the universe tells us anything about whether or not existence began, which I am inclined to believe it did not. And it makes less sense for their to be a God the more I ponder that question. If existence is eternal, then the universe, life, and us don't need a God to explain it. But if existence began, how would God have been? A being that exists when their is no existence? Of course there is the earlier question, what did God make existence out of? And the why question is also bizarre. So much scrambling to reinforce some dearly and closely held beliefs.
@davenchop
10 ай бұрын
excellent post... well thought out
@tcuisix
10 ай бұрын
The universe has not yet begun, we just have a head start
@uninspired3583
10 ай бұрын
Adding a puppet master to explain the dance is just kicking the can down the road. Why this pupper master vs another? You can keep asking why questions till we run out of answers. God isn't doesn't put a stop to that.
@imaginaryuniverse632
10 ай бұрын
Like Gheppetto is the puppet master and Pinocchio is the puppet. But Pinocchio is the creation of Gheppetto so it must be that Gheppetto imagines Pinocchio wants to be a real boy.
@shahidmiah917
10 ай бұрын
I personally think there are only 2 rational options : Atheism or Islam. If there is a God, it must be the Muslim God. Islam itself validates Christianity and Judaism but without creating absurd models of God like in Christianity, that God can be a human or that 3 is the same as 1 in the Trinity.
@bparcej6233
10 ай бұрын
In infinite time and space, the universe expands and contracts infinitely 💫
@mitseraffej5812
10 ай бұрын
Our brains can not conceive of anything other than in relation to time and space, both which came into existence with what we call the Big Bang.
@bparcej6233
10 ай бұрын
I’m suggesting several big bangs…
@gettaasteroid4650
10 ай бұрын
Centroid schematics? that was like the 1950s That no inherent meaning can be assigned to the simultaneity of distant events is the single most important lesson to be learned from relativity. - David Mermin, It’s About Time
@jmanj3917
10 ай бұрын
No, sir. We're all just kind of sitting here, waiting...😅 Go Bluejays!
@lucianmaximus4741
10 ай бұрын
Kudos from 444 Gematria!
@revolvant
10 ай бұрын
Kraus may disagree, but it would seem the Kune has given you the time.
@stephenwatts2649
10 ай бұрын
Why do people have a hard time with INFINITY. Stop talking about when the universe began, because everything exists within INFINITE SPACE, and All Space Is Energy Vibrations, which existed before any material universe was born in the Mind of God Consciousness. Time only exists while in the mortal body and when you die you will realise that you haven't lost your Mind of Imaginaion.
@briangarrett2427
10 ай бұрын
Some of this seems right, but remember that the official Christian doctrine is of a created universe, not an eternal, sustained universe.
@annapaulal.h.1393
10 ай бұрын
... "To see a World in a Grain of Sand And a Heaven in a Wild Flower Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour" William Blake ... (... Hebrews 11: 3...❣️💎📖💎❣️ )
@maxpower252
9 ай бұрын
Not yet
@melgross
7 ай бұрын
While I find that a fair amount of what theologians say may be interesting, none is convincing.
@patientson
10 ай бұрын
You are the beginning of the universe. I cant go further this analogy as my God or patience knows I am right. As for Christ I will keep to my patience's relationship with the natural elements going through us right at this moment. I am speaking for myself cause my sheep know me and I know my sheep. I definitely do not need to explain to anyone what I know and accomplish from the knowledge passed down to me via my father and that of the West through Christianity and English language. I am an advocate of know yourself since this was the primary knowledge that came with us on an individual basis after birthing us to this world. As long as my peace (heaven) doesn't hurt you but encourage you to do better especially for your family, I am at peace with that cause it proves you have been a good servant to patience and the natural elements. Your senses needs or internal members requires your obedience as long as the natural elements exist. It must be done like a newborn did when they figured and took gradual steps in most cases to acquire skills, stature and insight made flesh, all due to movement and not necessarily judging another. The moment that newborn start dismissing you, it is apparent that they have learned something from their parents or people around them, yet, movement is still the order of the day and it must be done in absolute patience within. Chastisement matters a whole lot, however, it can only come through the parents or the living endurance and self-control built by default in you. If you really want to test the powers of patience in you, walk for hours with your hands clenched like a boxer but this time allow it to swing side by side whilst your tongue is firmly attached to the roof of your mouth - things will be t happen and you alone will bear witness of what the holy spirit in you is capable of accomplishing or had achieved in the moment. Relationship and the natural elements are acausal - there is no fighting it without repercussion. No man can fight patience and win, including a man or woman whom you know to be really patient and kind.
@cliftongaither6642
10 ай бұрын
huh ?
@tedgrant2
10 ай бұрын
Of course the universe began ! It began on October 22, 4004 BC just after tea.
@TheRealSolardisaster
10 ай бұрын
all this is my only fesr. out of all things to fear, the concept of existemce and its beginning, terrifies me. I think the answer will reveal unimaginable evil.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
153 fishes. It’s 7 minutes long. Watch it and then explain it to me.
@hassansyed5661
10 ай бұрын
Our creator is independent of time because even begin after the big bang. Anything which was present before big bang is independent of time
@uninspired3583
10 ай бұрын
How do you figure? It could have been an event we can't see past but prior time existed. When a ship drops over the horizon does it no longer exist?
@davenchop
10 ай бұрын
no evidence other than fairy tales
@olivierdelyon8196
10 ай бұрын
God is DA Universe,da Universe IS God,da Holy Spirit of da Bible being da energy of da Universe!Ya guys all go for baptism.......😲🫡
@johnrichardson7629
10 ай бұрын
That mass behaves like mass needs God to explain? This is idiotic. Since theists once widely believed in a world with no beginning, it's hard to imagine how this issue makes any difference either way. People don't feel the strength if the argument from the uniformity of nature because that argument is utterly feeble.
@jykox
10 ай бұрын
the reality ist we just trying to understand our visible universe and making it the center of everything like the earth was the center of the universe ath the begining of the astronomy, but i like the word chaos to describe outside our own understanding in our own universe we call buble, that haos is the pure first building block beyond information and pure energy when u taking out all the things we know in our observable universe. So theory of everything have too much layers like onion and we just on starting to peal only the first layer and what we call fundamental that can be not even close to the real thing how everything is working
@cmhiekses
9 ай бұрын
Good grief. White noise.
@davecurry8305
10 ай бұрын
The universe is infinite both in time and dimensions. Parts of it are always beginning and parts are always ending.
@charlesbadrock
10 ай бұрын
Mythology is very powerful in the human psyche the human species developed coping mechanisms to cope with the harsh realities and struggles of everyday life and also to cope with one's own personal mortality a denial of fatalism what amazes me about people is how they will take one part of World Mythology and acknowledge it as such being Mythology yet take another part and argue that as literal truths that's neither rational nor logical because something would be nice don't make it so putting the Manmade Theological Mythologies aside the Cosmology area is a totally separate area and many people confuse this the Intelligent Design Hypothesis for the cosmos is a possibility among a multitude of possibilities Random Natural Processes is another possibility pre existing universes multi universes infinite space eternal so much we still don't know the theist is out to prove the atheist is out to disprove I'm neither out to prove nor disprove whatever is is whatever is not is not
@sujok-acupuncture9246
10 ай бұрын
12:54 yes before the begining of universe there was just god. .... Then he created the universe in just six days . Seventh day he ran away seeing the mess he created. And thus we celebrate every seventh day as holyday.
@kos-mos1127
10 ай бұрын
There was no beginning of the universe. The Cosmos was originally a dense uniform state of matter then expanded everywhere causing time to be defined.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
Have you watched 153 fishes yet? It’s 7 minutes long. It proves God wrote the Bible.
@sujok-acupuncture9246
10 ай бұрын
God can never be understood or proved by reading any book ever printed.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
@@sujok-acupuncture9246 but that’s not so. Have you watched 153 fishes? It’s only 7 minutes.
@imaginaryuniverse632
10 ай бұрын
It may be that the seventh day can be represented in the spin of a di 🎲⚛️🔯⚕️ as being the center of gravity. Walter Russell said the Universe is involved in the creation of a single form the cube-sphere. My profile picture is a two dimensional representation of a 3-d derivation of the flower of life. I made the 3-d derivation by constructing tetrahedrons the same side length as a hexagon and then connecting the tops. This created a new hexagon I believe phi smaller than the first and rotated 30°. I'm pretty sure I checked the measurements on this using a compass and ruler but I can't remember exactly. 🤔 But I found later this is the same pattern as can be seen in the video of the storm at the N. Pole of Saturn taken by the Casinni space probe which can easily be found searching KZitem. In the enhanced video it can clearly be seen that every vertex of the hexagonal storm has a vortex, storm, for the six points of the hexagon with the pattern repeating inwardly. At the center of these rotations I think it is right to presume a center of rotation like the center of a hurricane as having the lowest pressure with each hexagon radiating outward I presume as relatively equal gradients of higher pressure. I named my construction Genesis and put it on Facebook without explanation, just the label to see if someone would say why because I didn't really know other than it possibly represented how the Universe could expand infinitely inward from a single point as a process of division. Di-vision is an interesting word. E equals MC2 equates to one thing is energy divided by energy which equates to one thing is energy divided by energy with energy being the alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end of the one thing which holds infinite possibilities in it's division or one could say divinity.
@fjgiie
10 ай бұрын
Mine turns out like this more than not.
@mitseraffej5812
10 ай бұрын
Swinburne has spent a good deal of his life arguing for the existence of God / Creator, and using so called logic to support his arguments. If I apply my logic to all I see around me I have come up with a few possibilities There is no God /Creator and never has been There was a God / Creator but somewhere alone the way he/she/it ceased to exist, or maybe just left. Most likely at the moment of creation. There is a God / Creator and he / she/ it is one mean SOB.
@sciencefirst7880
6 ай бұрын
The multiverse explains this easily... when you say "oh god did that" it becomes lazy science.
@RupertFear
10 ай бұрын
Ah, Mr word salad returns.
@shahidmiah917
10 ай бұрын
But unfortunately if you need to explain something complex if requires a complex explanation.
@RupertFear
10 ай бұрын
I does, but so far we do now what that is. Furthermore what created the complex thing...ad-infinitum@@shahidmiah917
@infinitygame18
10 ай бұрын
you have to develop a new branch of science, Science of Fundamental Reality , beyond the block of memorical understanding of existence by mind ,There is a true observer Inside in reality following different rule to set to communicate subconsciously and most of the intelectual humanity is lacking that true knowledge of the observer and its functionality , Find Your True "I" , The day you meet your true I , your thrust of material knowledge ends as you get to know the cause of all happening in true reality
@ArtThouGardener
10 ай бұрын
No, not yet.
@simonhibbs887
10 ай бұрын
I really like Swinburne, he's the theist philosopher and Christian apologist I admire the most by a long way. In this discussion I agree with almost everything he says, but. In theoretical cosmology this problem is solved using the concept of imaginary, or complex time. Before you start laughing, remember imaginary numbers are fantastically practically useful concepts. They allow us to solve otherwise impossibly intractable problems in fields such as electrical engineering, signal processing, physical systems with periodic motion, etc. They're a mathematical tool that we know works. Right now you are browsing the internet using 3 or 4 technologies that were engineered using imaginary numbers. In this case they are used to describe mathematical objects called instantons, which are applied practically in calculating quantum tunnelling behaviour such as in semiconductor transistors, but in this case are applied to theoretical descriptions of the process of universe creation.
@richardharvey1732
9 ай бұрын
H i C T T, you start with a reference to the original inventors of religions and the 'creation' of the universe. I suggest that one should remember that this original invention came in the form of a 'story' a product of a person's imagination. It then seems quite natural to me that those that invented and promoted those beliefs had to invent a creation to make the story even remotely credible. This of course has no relationship with the physical universe which we seek to understand, to the best of our ability we may be able to establish some of the basic mechanical characteristics of this universe and some of them do imply a 'history' and sequences of events. It is not too big a step then to propose that some of those sequences might have had a start point at some time in the distant past but this can only ever be speculation!. There is no primary need for any of it to have a beginning or and end, the fact that it is very hard for us humans with our obsession with time and our very limited period of existence but that is only related to that peculiar attribute we have for self-consciousness which is so much a part of our sense of reality that we forget it does not actually exist! and therefore can simply 'die' with each of us while persisting in those still living. Such is the 'reality' of imagination. Cheers, Richard.
@catherinemoore9534
10 ай бұрын
🤔🤔🤔
@horizons2358
10 ай бұрын
Well explained Sir !
@sciencefirst7880
6 ай бұрын
The moment you put God into science, it's no longer science. There is evidence now that may suggests the universe had no beginning.
@rochford59
10 ай бұрын
All this just from something the size of a Grain of sand...maybe?...its like trying to disappear up one's own backside..
@akpanekpo6025
10 ай бұрын
What a pretentious and longwinded way of saying "I haven't a clue."
@thewefactor1
10 ай бұрын
There is no need for any pronouns to describe this Universe or any other older/younger universes in other space configurations of a Nothing infinite space... or expanding into a Nothing. As well as any universes that may be in the same space as our own, but a dimension differently in time? ... or right under our own noses? with all the same kind of matter here, but only a dimension differently in its time...? no need for pronouns, such as 'his', this seems unnecessary.
@davidrobinson5180
10 ай бұрын
Swinburne is brilliant. And better, he's correct about at least most of this.
@uninspired3583
10 ай бұрын
He's wrong about gravity, some models suggest it wasn't always an attractive force
@davidrobinson5180
10 ай бұрын
@@uninspired3583 So if a scientist suggests a model, a person who thinks something else is wrong?
@uninspired3583
10 ай бұрын
@@davidrobinson5180 he made a claim that implied a certainty that isn't justified
@davidrobinson5180
10 ай бұрын
@@uninspired3583 To you. But he may have a justification we don't know.
@uninspired3583
10 ай бұрын
@@davidrobinson5180 that would require he knows more about physics than physicists. Keep digging my friend
@Bill..N
10 ай бұрын
My intuitive opinion leads me to believe the idea of a "one and DONE" Big bang universe is intellectually absurd.. Whatever influences were present to initiate such an event should STILL exist as opposed to simply dissipating after OUR big bang event.. It seems that an unending sequence of Big bangs should be occurring in some sort of superspace like "the BULK".. This is pure speculation of course, but more satisfying than a singular creation construct.. Peace.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
More satisfying for you because you love sin. And you worship a god-state. Watched 153 fishes yet? It’s 7 minutes long.
@Maxwell-mv9rx
10 ай бұрын
Let can get It seriously. Guys shows doesnt know nothing absolutetly . He predict universe forever after Big bang. However he doente knows How figure out forever universe though theology or fundamental Law of phich. He speaks with arrogant thinking his words show up evidence and true but his words is boring rambling gibberich put theology or phich proceendings out.
@benjiedrollinger990
10 ай бұрын
Well God does exist. So there is that.
@kos-mos1127
10 ай бұрын
The Universe did not began. In Einstein’s General Relativity only clocks are real and define time.
@stellarwind1946
10 ай бұрын
If the universe has been around forever we would be in thermodynamic equilibrium
@mikel4879
10 ай бұрын
No you wouldn't, because there's always more volumetric realm to expand into, ad infinitum.
@Bill..N
10 ай бұрын
@@mikel4879 There is no space for the universe to expand INTO, right?? Still if we invoke the concepts of OTHER types of preexisting "space" like the concept of the bulk which is theorized to exist between bubble universes, THEN you could be right.. Peace..
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
@@Bill..Nyou will have no peace. You’ve rejected Christ. Watched it yet?
@Alex-js5lg
10 ай бұрын
We pretty much *are* in thermodynamic equilibrium on cosmic scales: the CMB is the same temperature to within .00001 K no matter where in the observable universe you measure it.
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
@@Alex-js5lg have you watched 153 fishes?
@kylelochlann5053
10 ай бұрын
This Swinburne guy doesn't understand physics, not even a little.
@mikel4879
10 ай бұрын
Richard's comments are pure BS.
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
10 ай бұрын
(12:40) *RS: **_"If the universe began, then there was a period of empty time before it."_* ... Swinburne goes on to describe how any period before the universe which demonstrated _no change_ would constitute "empty time." ... I prefer to call it a "timeless period" because there's nothing changing for time to measure. ... *Example:* If nothing existed that demonstrated any height, ... would "height" still exist? As for if there was a beginning of the universe, Big Bang and the CMB show us that there was. And as I've pointed out many times before, one's "core beliefs" dictate what other beliefs you are allowed to accept. As Swinburne alluded to, an atheist doesn't like the idea of a "finite beginning" because it can be used by theists in support of their God. So, what do the atheists do instead? They fabricate _their own_ version of God in the form of an infinitely existing, infinite stream of infinite universes where every possible situation is met with every possible outcome: The Multiverse. ... What goes around comes around!
@simonhibbs887
10 ай бұрын
In quantum field theory this is solved by considering imaginary time, which is time calculated using imaginary numbers. It turns out this actually works mathematically, as imaginary numbers so often do, and allows us to describe solutions to the equations of motion called instantons. Their practical application is in mathematical descriptions of quantum tunnelling effects, but they also turn up in mathematical descriptions of quantum states that describe the process of universe formation.
@Bill..N
10 ай бұрын
If you spent more TIME studying multi-verse theories as the very viable ideas they ARE, you might not be so hard headed about dismissing them with prejudice.. One opinion friend..
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
@@Bill..Nyou’ll be dismissed and God is going to enjoy it. Remember how often I warned you, that will be the best part, knowing that you will remember it.
@simonhibbs887
10 ай бұрын
@@jarrettesselman8144 God is a peevish, petty minded sadist, and so are his worshipers? You're not selling me on the idea of god as deserving of worship, nor of the idea of associating with his acolytes.
@simonhibbs887
10 ай бұрын
@@Bill..N His ideas are prejudices, yours are opinions. But you are right, we're all friends here, or at least that should be the aspiration.
@suatustel746
10 ай бұрын
If that is all God creation that he made a such mess with faulty universe and faulty products.... I could have done a better job.....
@jarrettesselman8144
10 ай бұрын
Watch 153 fishes Lucifer.
@michelangelope830
10 ай бұрын
My only hope is that this loving poem ends up in the hands of innocent and vulnerable children. Do you know what is God? If you don't know God is the creator of the universe is because they have deceived you manipulating the information with disastrous eternal consequences. Eternity or infinitude never ends. The universe is the creation or what has a beginning of existence, like for example you. You didn't exist before you were born. God is incredible, spectacular, wonderful, magnificent, astonishing because it created all the reality you are part of. God designed and created the Miracle of Infinite Possibilities of God's life and death. Did you understand? Would you try to understand since I say unambiguously to end all the wars in the world and atheism and religion the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy has to be news? The greatest knowledge of all time is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. The atheist logical fallacy would test your intelligence and honesty and the error in reasoning is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself. The atheist logical fallacy would make you doubt about other unexplored possibilities. I want you to reflect on the fact that regardless of when the universe was created God existed always before. What else could God be but Time and Space? God was born to be alive. They are trying to make me believe I am crazy and ignorant and I think it is logically impossible the existence of the creation without the creator. Would you trust me? To witness a miracle you just have to share literature to overcome the most severe and devastating censorship in history. If you didn't understand you and i are God you have to keep reading until the end or until you understand. What do you want? I want to rest in peace knowing future generations know the atheist logical fallacy. I am a poet that writes prose to be understood better, all my work is poetry.
@kos-mos1127
10 ай бұрын
This is nonsense.
@michelangelope830
10 ай бұрын
@@kos-mos1127 Emergency! Attention! Danger! Stop! You have to think fast to understand reality and survive. Now you are playing in the perfect role playing game of the Miracle of Infinite Possibilities of God's Life and Death and your mission is to help me overcome the most severe and devastating censorship in history in a social media era for many years trying to save lives with knowledge. Do you want to participate in the greatest project ever? The question that humanity can't answer and don't dare to ask is "is atheism a logical fallacy?". The logical fallacy that humanity don't understand is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. The atheist logical fallacy would test your intelligence and honesty and the error in reasoning is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself. The atheist logical fallacy would make you doubt about other unexplored possibilities. Would you try to understand since I say unambiguously to end all the wars in the world and atheism and religion the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy has to be news? What is news? Is not to prove God's existence what atheists want? Humanity are lying and don't want what they say they want. An atheist is an organ asking for evidence that the body exists. Logically it is impossible the existence of the creation or finitude without the creator or infinitude. God is the first uncaused cause that the kalam cosmological argument talks about and atheists don't talk about. If you don't know the kalam cosmological argument is because they have deceived you manipulating the information with disastrous eternal consequences. If you don't know God is the creator of the universe is because they have deceived you manipulating the information. God is intelligent because created inteligence and everything else from self from an eternal existence. Why the idea that God is Time and Space is censored? Why I am suffering the most severe and devastating censorship in history in a social media era for many years trying to save lives with knowledge? I hope for God's sake to be understood. I am a poet that writes prose to be understood better and I have developed a style of writing to keep you reading til the end or until you understand. I am a psychologist and I am warning you against the dangers of atheism and religion. You would know them by the consequences. Ignorance is the mother of evil and atheism and religion are misunderstandings of reality harmful to God's Life, the only that matters and exists for me. I am confident because humanity are defending an idea without any arguments deceiving innocent and vulnerable children, and when they are told they don't care. What are humanity waiting for? Lives were lost while I talked. Censoring is lying to oneself. Is it possible to believe it is impossible to be wrong believing? God is perfect justice with perfect knowledge with perfect hell and heaven because everything we do we do it to Ourself in perfect karma being the past, present and future of God. We are accountable for all our lives, every thought, fantasy, intention, emotion. Humanity can not be more deceived because I am talking about God, eternity. The universe is perfect because being wrong being irrational destroying God’s creation has justly eternal consequences, giving life an absolute meaning and purpose. It is important that you understand I am not asking you to agree with me and everyone can be right or wrong, which doesn't mean I can not be right and all humanity past and present can not be wrong believing God is the idea of perfection for a religious person, a personification of oneself to worship, obey and fear confusing hatred with perfect love and perfection with bullying.
@KUPT123
10 ай бұрын
Who gives a damn whether it began or grow like a mushroom! There are so many problems on this planet that this question is like having a smoke and a whisky and having an intellectual chat😡😡😡
@richardsylvanus2717
10 ай бұрын
Democrats ruin everything
@JDT101
10 ай бұрын
Broooo... What's wrong with having a whiskey, smoke and stimulating conversation?
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
10 ай бұрын
*"There are so many problems on this planet that this question is like having a smoke and a whisky and having an intellectual chat"* ... So, we should only discuss problems with our planet? All other questions are irrelevant?
@irfanmehmud63
10 ай бұрын
This channel is clearly not for you.
@el_unico_cuban_blood8959
10 ай бұрын
Time is an illusion is a fact my brothers and Sisters. Whenever something begins is in the here and now moment correct? The big bang began in the here and now moment as well correct? OK with that as the base, the here and now is what creates the past and the future correct? Meaning the here and now Always comes first than the future and the past correct? Meaning if here and now is always first and here and now is always here and now no matter if you would be able to time travel you would arrive at any time you wish but to a here and now. You can clearly observe the fact that here and now is all there is and the rest of it is an illusion created by the fact that you accumulate memory and imagine the tomorrow. 💪🥷🏻❤🙏☯️
Пікірлер: 276