great job Shang i think u deserve to have a fully functional rocket my advice to you keep it small when testing
@andrewborger1099
2 жыл бұрын
Good Job, Love your engineering keep going!
@bun72642
2 жыл бұрын
Love your content, keep it up
@ericon.7015
2 жыл бұрын
Good ! 👏👏👏👏. Is difficult, but we are here supporting you.
@optimuss8806
Жыл бұрын
What is your propellant formula???
@argentinetegu98
2 жыл бұрын
I remember watching him when I was 11. I wanted to make my own rocket and fly into space. Now I’m 16, suicidal and not interested in anything. Still get his videos recommended though. Brings me back.
@elwildo14
2 жыл бұрын
Please speak to someone, you have value. It gets better
@TheExplosiveGuy
Жыл бұрын
If you push past those couple shitty years of your teens it gets a lot better. Maybe you were just in a bad mood when you wrote this but please don't say such things lightly, you get some people like me who have had family commit suicide really worked up, and while I'm not saying this for my benefit it would really make me feel better if you said you were OK.
@eucraudecitv4206
2 жыл бұрын
Sou do Brasil 🇧🇷 ...e pode acreditar um vídeo desse aqui é Raridade ....até hoje ninguém conseguiu fazer um foguete de combustível líquido eu estou tentando ser o primeiro...tô quase terminando
@sycambriacorporation9467
2 жыл бұрын
It was great! My Master :)
@tejasbirute4838
2 жыл бұрын
Great buddy! More Info ?
@nevo1311
2 жыл бұрын
keep it up!
@kfwj001
2 жыл бұрын
重复使用发动机 ? 音乐配得很棒。
@spaceengineer56
2 жыл бұрын
🔥🔥🔥
@AllisonAndrew98
Жыл бұрын
👏👏👏
@RamShish-kj5jl
5 ай бұрын
Hi sir
@tHaH4x0r
2 жыл бұрын
Why did you decide to use canards for control? I assume that you won't be doing very extreme maneuvers in flight, and it makes stability much worse.
@TinyHouseHomestead
2 жыл бұрын
Then why do about 100% of guided missiles put the control fins in front?! Hmmm?! 🤣👍✌
@highasheaven9239
2 жыл бұрын
it only worsens the stability if you don't have big enough fins at the back, so long as your CP is at the right spot you won't have any problems. Canards prevent you from needing to use 1. TVC, complex and takes a lot of space, or 2. articulated back fins, which severely reduce the size of your motor for the same rocket diameter. I'm assuming here he chose to use canards to have an actively stabilized rocket without sacrificing on the motor size or having a huge rocket
@TinyHouseHomestead
2 жыл бұрын
@@highasheaven9239 BIIIIINGO! 🤪👍✌
@tHaH4x0r
2 жыл бұрын
@@TinyHouseHomestead They dont. Firstly, you are adressing likely just a subset of 'guided rockets' namely air to air missiles. And why do you think they, unlike hobbyist rockets, use the instability to achieve greater mobility in reaching the target. Secondly, even concerning your specific subset of rockets you are just plain wrong. Actually most missiles use tail control: Rapier 2000, seaworlf, sea dart, super 530, FSAS Aster, Mica, R37, AA-12, AS-17, SS-N-22, AIM-120, AIM-54, RIM-66/67, RBS-70/90, AIM-132, Starstreak, Crotale, Roland, Grumble SA-10, PAC-3, PAC-2 (Patriot), AIM-9x, AGM-114 hellfire, BGM-71 TOW. Some with wing control: AIM-7 sparrow, skyflash, AA-10, AGM-88 HARM, Aspide And some with nozzles/reaction jets: THAAD, LOSAT. If you think one type of control is just 'better' than others, you are severely mistaken. Control surfaces should be chosen concerning the requirements of the rocket, and for most model rockets you want stable flight, robustness (i.e. you want 'fail-safe' behavior, if the control surfaces fail your rocket should still fly upwards and not erratically) and dont require much maneuverability.
@tHaH4x0r
2 жыл бұрын
@@highasheaven9239 I think what you fail to see about the stability, is the loss of control if any malfunction happens. If a control rod breaks with tail control, the rocket will maintain stability. If a canard fails you will likely lose all stability. That is indeed what I think he was going for, but that's why I asked, I want to confirm whether that is the case.
Пікірлер: 25