Bought my Omega Seamaster, black dial with Black rubber band. What a watch! Absolutely loving it
@AliiiiH
22 күн бұрын
I want exactly the same configuration! Tried it on in store and can’t wait to get it
@timjkelly2121
8 ай бұрын
I own both and the Omega impresses me more, but the Sub impresses more strangers ….
@MrMatt1923
4 ай бұрын
That’s 100% correct. I owned both at the same time and sold my sub. Was a very nice watch, but the Seamaster is also very nice, costs almost half as much and the dial is mesmerizing!
@kaunas88
Жыл бұрын
The dial on the Seamaster is quite enchanting.
@SaltBhj
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comparison, I’d sell the Sub and buy two Seamasters.
@AZadeh-nd8vx
Жыл бұрын
The Omega looks so much nicer.
@rgwilliams01
Жыл бұрын
Open case back on the Omega is a hands down winner.
@jali898
11 ай бұрын
Look at the front of the submariner..it says Rolex....hands down winner 🏆
@nomad7734
11 ай бұрын
@@jali898 Fanboy comment... lol
@sennaracinglegend1438
2 ай бұрын
The omega is the best 1 watch collection because if you spend 7k for a watch, half of it goes in the movment. Is nice to see the least.
@davidhabjanic3032
Жыл бұрын
I take the omega 💪
@jali898
Жыл бұрын
Resale.. you wish you'd got the Rolex
@steelsteez6118
6 ай бұрын
@@jali898good thing i dont collect watches for resale 😂
@gregmasters8558
6 ай бұрын
Depends on the omega watch. Ive seen used omegas for 25kusd@@jali898
@youtubeuser8436
5 ай бұрын
Omega all day every day!
@steelsteez6118
6 ай бұрын
I have both (black dial SMP300 on rubber and sub 124060) and I could never choose one over the other. They're just such completely different watches. Sometimes I crave the SMP and sometimes I crave the sub. The one extremely important thing that you left out at around 10:22, especially how you keep bringing up "for everyday wear, for everyday wear", is the massive target that Rolex paints on your back when using it as an everyday watch in an everyday popular city like London, Los Angeles, New York City, Bellevue, etc. I think that is a HUGE con that works against the sub for everyday wear. I work in downtown in a large city and there's just no way that I could wear a sub everyday in the city due to how many times ill get scoped out and eventually robbed. This is something that you need to take into consideration when choosing a Rolex as "an everyday wear". And if youre purpose for the watch is for everyday wear, but you cant wear it everyday, then that's the biggest con of all. So if its your one watch that you want to splurge $10-14k but your office is in a major city, do you really want to be worrying about that? Im very blessed and fortunate to have various pieces to choose from but for a single watch owner that wants to wear something nice to the office everyday, its something that needs to be considered. Same rings true for travel. Unfortunately, the subbies legendary iconic status works for it and against it (pretty massively). This is something I never have to worry or think about with my SMP on rubber when traveling or going into the office. The "freedom" of wearing the SMP is a huge pro that i feel you missed (especially considering you keep harping on everyday wear). Otherwise, great comparison video 👍.
@bernal4444
Жыл бұрын
I have both but the Seamaster in black. I love it but would love the blue one. Both omega and sub in black is redundant. Both are great watches
@pbtony0340
Жыл бұрын
rolex has the better braclet but for the specs and price omega all the way
@JohnConnor636
4 ай бұрын
I swapped the bracelet.
@yehoshuacirt8645
Жыл бұрын
A watchmaker says that the Rolex 10 year service interval is a marketing ploy. He says that he knows that Rolex service centers get bogged down by watches that need to be serviced WITHIN the ten year warranty period.
@Bornia1982
Жыл бұрын
Have both, looking at them, it’s impossible to know why anyone would not choose the Omega. But on the wrist, the Rolex is a part of you, while the Omega is looking pretty for other people, and you are always aware of wearing it.
@steelsteez6118
Жыл бұрын
I agree with you 100 percent if we're comparing steel bracelets vs steel bracelets. The sub has the best steel bracelet ever created imho. My SMP300 on rubber though.. Let me tell ya! Melts right onto my wrist and I forget I even have it on. It's single handedly the most comfortable watch I've ever owned or worn (have worn several pre-c and c-subs with the old maxi case and with the newer thinner lugs). While I currently do not own a sub, I have worn it several times and I know exactly what you mean. The sub is by far the most comfortable steel watch I've ever put on my wrist. Nothing has ever beat it. But on rubber, the SMP300 is the most comfortable watch I've ever experienced. This is with the slimmer Omega non-deployant rubber strap option. The fit is perfection for my wrist as well. You're so lucky to have both. Enjoy them in good health!
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
@@steelsteez6118 You’re obviously new to Rolex then otherwise you’d know that prior to the introduction of the ceramic models, the bracelet on the Submariner was shit. The clasp was a crappy piece of stamped tin which would easily come apart if you were to do something a simple as close your car door too aggressively. Omega bracelets were always better but have let themselves down in the last five years by the non tapering and belt buckle clasp.
@Bornia1982
Жыл бұрын
@@IrishScribbler yes, those tuna can clasps were inferior to what Omega was doing with the machined clasps. I have a Sub from that era and a newer Rolex, and even now I don’t love the clasps. Omega’s push button design is better. I mean the entire fit of the 300m is not right. And this is just my opinion of course. The watch should be slimmer all around, case and bracelet. I do not mind non tapering, but the links are bulky and the case a bit too thick. Cheers!
@Bornia1982
Жыл бұрын
@@steelsteez6118 yes, the rubber strap really saves this watch, it is fantastic. I just really feel like the proportions of the watch got hurt with the thicker case. The 2531.80 had a super thin ETA movement that was a tank. I’m sure the co-axial is a wonder of engineering, but the added thickness is too high a price in my opinion. I say this because I just decided to sell mine, but totally get the love for this model from so many people. It’s a classic. Cheers!
@steelsteez6118
Жыл бұрын
@@IrishScribbler "You're obviously new to Rolex..." And you're obviously lacking cognitive skills. Ive been into watches for over 20 years and could likely school you on reference numbers alone. Yes, we obviously all know the pre ceramic models with the crappy oyster bracelets with the stamped clasps and with link sag. Thanks Confucius. A lot of people consider those crappy jangly bracelets to be extremely comfortable due to their softer link flex. I was sorta, you know, making the obvious point that I've tried several models from both the pre ceramic and the current ceramic era sorta like the sub featured in this video? Hence why I said old maxi case (old pre ceramic era with thicker lugs) and newer thinner lug era (ceramic era). 2+2 =4? Again, sorry if youre experiencing deteriorating axon terminals 😂. Obviously the newer oyster bracelets on newer models like the 124060 and the 126610LV have the newer superior bracelets. (Did I say obviously?) Lol. Thanks for your asinine and douchey comment though. Goodluck to whoever has to date you and put up with that garbage 😂.
@MikeRochac
Жыл бұрын
If only Omega updated the bracelet
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
@@martinskowronek The oyster bracelet was frankly shit until the ceramic models were released 10-12 years ago. Tuna can clasps which came open if you closed your car door even a little too abruptly.
@SIZZO76
Жыл бұрын
Bracelet is iconic
@brentconley4547
4 ай бұрын
Bracelet is terrible
@franky3fingers337
Жыл бұрын
I would consider the Omega PO 39.5mm a better comparable then the SMP300. It’s actually 41mm from 2 to 8 o’clock on the case.
@rmyat1498
Жыл бұрын
IMO the Omega PO in the 39.5 one the best Omega dive-watch, somehow doesn't get talk often. I have had the PO in 37.5 over 5 years,. Daily, office to gym to hiking to the beaches. No problem.
@dstfno
Жыл бұрын
THe 300M is what Omega positions as their main dive watch and sub competitor, it doesn't matter that it differs slightly in dimension.
@fabfour289
9 ай бұрын
Omega, pls offer the new Speedy bracelet option for this Seamaster (but 20-17mm tapering only). Thanks.
@JohnConnor636
4 ай бұрын
forstner watch bracelet is all ya need. Swapped my smp300 as soon as I got it.
@allenfazer
Жыл бұрын
The Omega is the more attractive imo and technically the better watch, but will depreciate in value, the Submariner is iconic will increase in value. Ultimately it comes down to which one you prefer as both are great watches.
@vinnieomahoney6359
Жыл бұрын
How many cars have you lost money on mate ? You pay £400,000 plus for a new rolls royce, the so called best car in the world, you lose money the minute you drive away from the dealer, the buyer doesn’t care, the buyers buy the rolls because they love the car, the brand, don’t care the car depreciates
@ProfiDX
Жыл бұрын
No, the Rolex is technically the better watch (4hz, more Power Reserve...)
@anthonyb2990
10 ай бұрын
@@vinnieomahoney6359 RR is VERY far from the best car in the world (probably when BMW bought them). I was at a RR dealer and I felt multiple outside door handles.. they all rattled and felt like plastic. True scam, I feel bad for anyone buying those rolling dumpsters.
@vedder10
7 ай бұрын
@@anthonyb2990 He was making an analogy. It's really about the watches not the RR. Geez.
@9426sunny
Жыл бұрын
There is already an answer. Don't think anything else, but just look at them and pick up the beautiful(cooler) one. Of course, it's OMEGA!
@goldencalf5144
Жыл бұрын
Cooler as in lukewarm? Coz the Rolex is hot!!!
@pitohoshohe2230
Жыл бұрын
Fuck off I'm a rolex guy 😎
@trinity3422
Жыл бұрын
I’ve worn both and actually enjoy the shape of the case on the Seamaster and it’s unique design more. The Sub is more elegant and could easier pass as dress/tool watch, I personally think the Seamaster should taper that bracelet. They’ve proven they could change the bracelet on the Speedmaster and have people love it, I think the Seamaster will come next. I do love the movement in the Seamaster and think it might be better.. co-axial escapement is just debatably one of the biggest leaps in movements in the last 30 or so years. Plus everyone has a Rolex sand yet somehow no one can buy one lol. Omega is a much more unique brand but still the 2nd best seller in watches and more worth the money
@mobydick3895
Жыл бұрын
I own a 90's era Omega Seamaster 300 Diver Chrono. The Chrono is unique when guys start comparing their watches at parties even though it is less expensive than the Submariner. The Chrono diver is amazing underwater.
@trinity3422
Жыл бұрын
@@mobydick3895 I actually just got to see a white dial chrono Diver 300m this weekend for the first time in the wild. The waves were so subtle you had to catch them in different lighting. Nice piece.
@fabfour289
9 ай бұрын
Some say that Cartier is the second best watch seller...
@wristopia4101
Ай бұрын
Just about the best comparison I have seen. The only plus point to the Omega that I can see is that it comes in blue. Oh, and it has a display case back if that's a preference.
@SeniorChaChaCha
Жыл бұрын
Truthfully, two different watches in my opinion. Buy which one you like best regardless of brand and secondary market value.
@rufferafu8487
Жыл бұрын
True. Always buy the watch you like and enjoy it.
@jollyrob
Жыл бұрын
I own the seamaster (white dial) and much prefer it although they're both great. Obv if I could get the rolex at list I would but I'd sell it to get the omega and pocket the profit. The sub is a good investment new but who can get one? Used prices are falling so not the no brainer it was.
@Roy-vh9rp
Жыл бұрын
For the price - on the grey market - for Rolex, you can take one more step up in quality and go for Glashutte Original SeaQ.
@mrbud8524
Жыл бұрын
Wow l own the same watches ⌚️ l loved them both if the rolex sub is to expensive seriously go for the Omega the blue dail is striking it pops out
@rufferafu8487
Жыл бұрын
Indeed, Omega is a great value for money.
@johnellard
7 күн бұрын
The older I have gotten the more I realize the emotional and aesthetic feeling that one must have to appreciate a watch. If you get that “feeling” when you put the watch on you know it! Forget about the movement and the bracelet etc., it’s the dial and how the watch feels on your wrist that matters. If the sub gives you that feeling it’s the one for you, if it’s the seamaster then that’s the one. Don’t talk yourself out of a watch based on specs or trends or what other people say. Go by how you feel when you look at it on YOUR wrist.
@teecchnoboy
7 ай бұрын
OMEGA Seamaster all day long, I have a 2020 planet ocean very beautiful and solid watch
@VenomizedZilla
Жыл бұрын
Had both at the same time, everything about the Sub wears better, feels better and nothing compares to an oyster bracelet. With that same, if you want to be technical, the Omega has the better movement.
@paulbrowning5376
Жыл бұрын
I almost agree with you. I do agree that when it comes to steel bracelets nothing, and I mean nothing, compares to the oyster bracelet. Not only is it the best steel bracelet ever made, imho, but it's also the most comfortable steel bracelet you'll find on any watch. With that said, the SMP's OEM rubber strap destroys the oyster bracelet when it comes to comfort and how it feels on the wrist. It's such a massive game changer (the omega steel bracelet sucks bad). It's such a natural feeling, so light, so comfy. The SMP's rubber strap allows your wrist to flex more naturally too since it's not confined by steel edges. It's just so so so comfy that nothing compares. It's also almost unfair to call it rubber because it feels so premium. SMP300 on rubber for those long weekend family trips and then submariner for those single day trips and all ur bases are covered ☺️
@MikeRochac
Жыл бұрын
I know everyone will laugh at this buuuuutttttttttt….. check out the Tag Heuer Aquaracer 300 M professional bracelet and clasp, I think it wears as good as the oyster, just my opinion.
@mobydick3895
Жыл бұрын
@@paulbrowning5376 Actually I feel the Omega bracket is more comfortable, but both are plenty comfortable. I think the Omega Seamaster bracelets are actually made in France, or they were back in the 1990's when I bought the chrono model. I had the submariner also, and really both watches are great, the Rolex of course has much more brand power. The marketing of Rolex is more sophisticated and than other watch brands. People in business would do well to study how Rolex markets it product. It is amazing how Rolex sucks you into their watch buying web!
@JohnConnor636
4 ай бұрын
forstner bracelet on my SMP300, I couldn't stand the OEM bracelet. I did get the rubber included but prefer my SMP300 on a bracelet
@lordhumungous7908
11 ай бұрын
I want both of these. I'll wear them at the same time on each wrist.
@lordhumungous7908
11 ай бұрын
And if I was really fat, I can set them to different time zones. 😁
@lordhumungous7908
10 ай бұрын
Well, I now have both watches. But a Sub 14060m four liner 2010 G serial. Its clasp feels cheap and flimsy but it's true to the classic Submariner and once on the wrist that feeling goes away. And yes, I've worn them on each wrist at home to keep their automatic movements moving. lol. I would say that the Sub is simple and elegant, and SMP is flashy and stunning.
@casperskestrel
10 ай бұрын
I have also have both. The Rolex is old school. The Omega is new school. The Rolex is a more desirable/collectable watch. The Omega feels more solid/has better build quality. I like both equally, but the Omega is much more watch for the money than the Rolex. The price difference between the two is really just a snob tax.
@StephenMorganCanada
Жыл бұрын
I’m in the minority here but I prefer the bracelet on the Seamaster to the boring one on the Sub. If I’m wearing a watch on a bracelet, the look of the bracelet matters to me.
@MrDucatiti
2 ай бұрын
Have both but initially purchased the 300m. Rule of thumb, don't settle. You will always be wanting a Sub no matter what.
@shawnmartin1306
Ай бұрын
I actually prefer the Omega clasp. I have both and the reason I prefer the Omega is you don’t have to take the watch off. So easy to adjust while driving. Overall comfort they are pretty even. I would give the edge slightly to the Rolex though. Mainly because of the taper. But the Omega is still super comfortable. It’s my do anything watch. Plus I love the white dial black bezel.
@eudesruct
Жыл бұрын
Rolex market watches and Omega makes watches. When you look at the inflated price of the Rolex, I would take the Omega every time.
@cecaju9516
Жыл бұрын
They both make watches and market watches. Rolex is just better at marketing.
@gekko1810
2 ай бұрын
@@cecaju9516correct
@maitrehg
4 күн бұрын
@@cecaju9516And Omega is just better at making watches.
@cecaju9516
4 күн бұрын
@@maitrehg what makes a watch “better”?
@vinnieomahoney6359
Жыл бұрын
Seamaster over a sub, seamaster looks feels better on the wrist, Rolex is so over played everyone has a sub these days, not a safe watch to wear these days either, Omega you have more choice on dial, bezel colours, no long wait list, same with Tudors, ok, neither are the investments like Rolex, BUT, we buy cars, lose money, depending on what car you buy, I’ve always bought watches I like, love, never for investment reasons, my opinion, It’s Omega, Tudor, Rolex, great video
@Mega-zi7ys
10 ай бұрын
Correct ppl put too much emphasis on so called investment angle peddled by slick salesmen. But if you look at overall picture a watch in the Rolex and omega Price range doesn't even equate to a mid priced car. It's just an expense. The investment angle has caused a lot of problem for those who were duped into buying more than they can afford due to sales talk by these sycophants... now many are in over their heads.
@jasimqureshi2672
10 ай бұрын
@@Mega-zi7ys agreed. if you buy a second hand omega, you will pretty much retain your value +/- a few hundred dollars. The remaining money you would've used to buy a Rolex can then be put into the share market for a 6-10% return. More than the Rolex's will yield. And if you change your mind later, you sell the seamster, pull your money from the share market and buy a Rolex anyways..
@Mega-zi7ys
10 ай бұрын
@@jasimqureshi2672 no sorry my point is buy bnew Omega. The feeling is different. Besides the amount is not significant enough for a so called investment. As to generalizing Omega you definitely don't know what i mean . Bec the omegas i like always retain value and some pieces are higher Second hand. Check watch charts 5 yr moving Average for Daytona and silver Snoopy. The Omega comes out on top. So NO WE DO NOT AGREE with each other. You seemed to either missed my point and injected some of your ideas as mine. Definitely buy bnew whether Rolex or Omega but write them off as expense. The money used to buy these must not be your investment money. They're just non essential expenses that's all. Sorry
@paulcu130
Ай бұрын
I love both of these watches, but I feel the Seamaster would be sooo much better if they changed out the 90's bracelet
@cecaju9516
Жыл бұрын
The Omega is the choice if you prioritize specs/$, but watches are meant to be worn and the Sub is just wears so well and is a style icon. I would take the Sub at RRP, even though it may take some time to actually get one.
@joytekb
11 ай бұрын
I have all three
@sale83
Ай бұрын
Omega all the way. Rolex is eye-catching, since every celeb has it, but comes nowhere near to the beauty of Omega Seamaster. Specially the iconic 2531.80. Also, Omega is more accurate, as you mentioned -0, but that doesn't matter that much, both are very accurate. To me, bracelet is way better on Omega, fits better on my hand, like silk.
@mrlong6267
Жыл бұрын
I’m actually in this dilemma. Should I go Seamaster or is the extra cost worth the Submariner? To me they are both wins in their own respects
@44racing74
11 ай бұрын
I also prefer the Seamaster🙋🏻
@farzamghorbani6088
3 ай бұрын
seamaster will enchant you, especially with different nato straps, you can garnish it. just take a look at the twist on the lugs and compare it with the solid, cold form of Rolex.
@bryanryan4504
4 ай бұрын
Omega. To be honest I don't see any beauty in the casing of the rolex watches. They all use the same flat simple case as opposed to omega putting so many details into their cases. Basically you are just paying for the BEZEL on a rolex watch.
@marcdee4427
11 ай бұрын
Both really nice 👍🏻 but I’d have the seamaster 😊
@anthonyb2990
10 ай бұрын
The issue here for me is aesthetics. The Rolex looks like a high end watch.. The Omega's bracelet looks so cheap in comparison. So is it worth double the price over the Omega? I'll say this, my friend had a Seamaster as a teenager and his dad wore a Submariner. Obviously the Omega is just as capable, but the Sub just looks the business.
@pkoster5874
Жыл бұрын
Sub all the way, the Goat in my opinion (not an Omega hater, own both brands)
@maitrehg
4 күн бұрын
Omega of course. Better watch and better price. No brainer.
@vascular3988
11 ай бұрын
Omega seamaster is better in most of points , dial , bracelet , movement , bezel , and the price is half …
@305dadecounty_grabberbluem5
Жыл бұрын
I have both....honestly...I love the Omega!!! ....
@VibrantMango
Жыл бұрын
Not a great comparison considering the price difference. The omega 007 in titanium on bracelet would be a better comparison against the sub from a price point.
@Bemjji
Жыл бұрын
That would be a good video, I would like to see what people say when comparing a NTTD Sea Master vs a Sub. seeing that the price point closer.
@-triumphgt667
Жыл бұрын
@@Bemjji I have the NTTD - chose it because the SM300 is very heavy as indeed in the Sub. I have bif writs so the bracelet on the NTTD fits perfectly. My only complaint is the the hands do not stand out that well in low light conditions. Could do with more lume and not the skeleton hands.
@josevasquez1781
Жыл бұрын
It seems like the reviewer leans on the Sub, I own both, current version and one can do all sorts of things with the omega SM and it goes with any outfit, Omega SM is a killer i wouldn't put my Starbucks thru what I will the Samaster.
@65philo
Жыл бұрын
The seamaster can be had for a third of the cost of the sub😉
@michaelbishop9157
Жыл бұрын
depends which one
@65philo
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelbishop9157 well I bought a 6-month-old seamaster 300 smp black/bracelet like new 2 mons ago for $3100.00
@michaelbishop9157
Жыл бұрын
@@65philo you can get some competitively priced ones for sure. My only grip is the crazy premium they've put on bond ones like NTD which is just unjustified. But yes some gerat value for a better movement
@cecaju9516
Жыл бұрын
They also lose 1/3 when you try to sell it.
@marcdee4427
Ай бұрын
Omega for me 👍🏻
@wristopia4101
Ай бұрын
Would get the Submariner (as opposed to the Submariner Date) so it did not have the Cyclops.
@farzamghorbani6088
3 ай бұрын
there is a point I don't understand. The accuracy of Omega is 0-5, which means you can expect just your watch might go faster in a long run. I own a seamaster, and sometimes, it even doesn't have any deviation. on the other hand, the accuracy of Rolex is -2 to+2. it means that your watch is less predictable and might go slow or fast!!!!! so, from this aspect, it is clear that Omega is more reliable and accurate. I wonder why no one pays attention to this important fact and just says Rolex is more accurate!!!!!!
@MalcolmWong
Жыл бұрын
Omega move more spot on compare Rolex…
@fj7509
Ай бұрын
“The Submariner is an Evolution, not a revolution.” I think we all know what the better watch is 😉
@JamesK1963
Жыл бұрын
I have both of those. I have the blue dial Seamaster, and the black dial Submariner (without date). I love both, but I definitely prefer the Submariner. The Seamaster is bigger, heavier, and honestly, probably too big. I have 7.5" wrists, but I still think it's bigger than it needs to be. I'm actually thinking about trading both in for the blue dial, two-tone Submariner, but not 100% sure.
@dstfno
Жыл бұрын
I agree. With basically every dimension being 1mm larger the newest 300M becomes a very bloated package compared with the sub.
@jerrywallop5647
Жыл бұрын
The bluesy……?!…..Brand new or pre owned..?……lovely piece …..I wish I had the coconuts to wear one ….😆
@JamesK1963
Жыл бұрын
@@jerrywallop5647 I have a blue Seamaster and black submariner. Both were bought brand new at an AD.
@jerrywallop5647
Жыл бұрын
@@JamesK1963 I was saying you’re trading to get a 2 tone bluesy…….😀
@JamesK1963
Жыл бұрын
@@jerrywallop5647 oh yeah, sorry. I go back and forth with that. Last week I wanted to do that. Now I'm not so sure I want to. I think I want to add the Blusey without trading anything in. Lots of overlap, but the Seamaster is nice when you want to wear a nice watch, but not a Rolex.
@snupi2001
Жыл бұрын
Both are nice. I don’t like the hands on the Omega and the magnifier on the Rolex so Rolex submariner no date for me :)
@rufferafu8487
Жыл бұрын
I love the dial symmetry of the ND.
@mrparkx2
3 ай бұрын
With the helium escape valve, rolex. Without? Omega
@webb3201
2 ай бұрын
Both great, but the Omega bracelet is not great.
@yankeeairpirate1799
10 ай бұрын
Sub....got the bling
@tonikramer5730
2 ай бұрын
ROLEX!!!!
@TestChannelWow-bh7ys
2 ай бұрын
Omega owners are forever cursed to spamming youtube comments to make themselves feel better
@Bemjji
Жыл бұрын
Not the Sub. Out of every 100 people I would be wearing the exact same watch as 4 of them, and there would be 4 more with convincing Chinese fakes to boot.
@michaelbishop9157
Жыл бұрын
I have far more friends with seamastera
@TheSuaveEntrepreneur
Жыл бұрын
Agreed. I see subs everywhere and it’s tired
@nathanf1934
10 ай бұрын
I definitely see more Seamasters. Subs aren’t even available.
@BC-im5zv
10 ай бұрын
Sub! nicer bracelet, better clasp, no ugly helium valve,
@j.l.7264
Жыл бұрын
The omega has a really bad bracelet, but other than that, i suppose the omega is alright for the money.
@warrenrhinerson6373
Жыл бұрын
I own the omega on the bracelet. It’s actually really good
@albertofourie3294
Жыл бұрын
The sub every day and twice on Sunday!
@goldencalf5144
Жыл бұрын
That's right. Always go with the iconic legend.
@johncoyle8191
Жыл бұрын
Hands down its the sub for me
@verde629
24 күн бұрын
Sub all day
@TheShantoUniverse
6 ай бұрын
I take the Rolex
@giovannibucio
Жыл бұрын
Man OMEGA all day, omega was in the millitary more than any other watch brand given to soldiers for there ruggedness. rolex is for secretaries and old ladies who work in office so there little watches dont break.
@nomad7734
11 ай бұрын
Yup... Omega is a real world tool watch... Rolex are for paper pushers... sissy boys... lol
@etgerg
Жыл бұрын
Iconic👌
@u.u.u9969
Жыл бұрын
Sub wins 1. Sub wears better. 12.5mm thin wins. Tapor bracelet wins. No helium escape valve wins. 2. Double AR Coating drives me nuts when I smudge my crystals and see dial markers in the crystal. Sub wins with no Double AR Coating. 3. Bezel turning feel. Sub wins
@nomad7734
11 ай бұрын
Lol... no
@nathanf1934
10 ай бұрын
Seamasters ugly skeleton hands. Sun wins.
@ih5646
Жыл бұрын
You must be finnish 😂
@villemuilu5663
Жыл бұрын
12 000 € tavallisesta Rolex Submarinerista on kyllä kiskontaa. Seamaster 300m on kaikin puolin parempi kello kuin Submariner. Rolex tekee toki erinomaisia kelloja, mutta Omega kellojen valmistajana on hienostuneempi kuin Rolex. Rolex ei myöskään ole mitenkään innovatiivisin kellojen valmistaja. Se mitä Rolex teki oikein oli markkinointi. Teknisesti Omega on aina ottanut Rolexia mutkikkaamman reitin kellojen teossa.
@jasonleber3591
Жыл бұрын
I've owned both and ultimately sold the Seamaster. As stated by others, the Seamaster is amazing on paper and in pics/vids! It's clearly the no-brainer better deal considering what you get for the cost. However, when actually wearing them both in every day life, the Seamaster begins to fall behind IMO. I wanted to love the Seamaster so bad but that bezel design real does make it so hard to actually use (not a huge deal, I get it, but still kinda silly to not be able to reasonably use the feature). Also, it's minuscule but the Seamaster is just a bit..bulkier, and over time, it's noticeable. Finally, and ultimately the straw that broke this camel's back, was the bracelet. Like many others, one of the pusher buttons ended up jamming; very annoying, but that's not the worst of it. The bracelet is just so uncomfortably larger with the non-tapper and truly too "sharp" on its edges. It just doesn't wear comfortably IMO. In contrast, I'll throw on my Sub and literally forget it's on my wrist. Many times, while out and about, I've thought I had it swiped or something because I wouldn't feel it and quickly look at my wrist to see that it's there, just so unnoticed. I truly hope to get another Seamaster one day, I just feel Omega needs to make a few more refinements and then it'll really be on par w/ the Sub. P.S. Of all the watches I've ever owned, the Sub truly is the GOAT. Goes with everything, looks amazing 24/7, feels fantastic, there's just no beating it.
@herts9999
Жыл бұрын
Came here to say the same. Technically the Omega is a better watch. Is the Sub worth an $8k premium? No,….but the heart wants what it wants.
@nomad7734
11 ай бұрын
So you have a girl's wrist... that would explain your issue... lol
@jasonleber3591
11 ай бұрын
By a "girl's wrist" I'm assuming you mean a small wrist? Men and women come in all different sizes. I've encountered men with smaller wrists, women with larger wrists, etc. For me, the Seamaster doesn't optimally fit my size of wrist; you are correct. The Sub is a much better fit and feel.@@nomad7734
@nintendokings
Жыл бұрын
Moi!
@Asianredneckwoman
Жыл бұрын
Rolex
@googleaccount718
Жыл бұрын
The Submariner is way cooler. A true icon.
@KeepingWatchUK
Жыл бұрын
I like the Seamaster. But for me the Sub is better in every way.
@1979croatia
Жыл бұрын
They are the best divers on the market. Each of them in its own way. But Sub is No1
@boeing700
Жыл бұрын
The Seamaster is too chunky and the bracelet feels like an afterthought. Furthermore, the hands on the Seamaster are super hard to read at a glance, especially at night. Rolex uses gold on all its dial indices and hands, Omega does not. As much as I would love to like the Seamaster, it doesn’t do enough to compete with the Submariner.
@ianwoollard2063
Жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t be comparing the Diver 300 to the submariner. The Planet Ocean is the more premium diver from Omega.
@lw5495
Жыл бұрын
More premium what does that even mean
@Kevinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Жыл бұрын
PO would be more comparable to the sea dweller
@metro2171
Жыл бұрын
The sub has always been the standard for the industry. Hence many manufacture copy their design or build their product not to mention the millions of fakes trying to mimic the true icon . Omega is a very good watch and has great specs however the sub is arguable the winner and the king of dive watches .
@coffeeboyclips1973
Жыл бұрын
No comparison here, the sub is the better all round watch, a watch is about how it looks and feels, nobody really cares about movements and specs. The previous seamaster is a lot better than the current one imo.
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
Wrong, wrong, and wrong again.
@Rodolfoguerra12
Жыл бұрын
Looks are subjective, and just because you don’t care about the movement does not mean that nobody does. Cheers.
@coffeeboyclips1973
Жыл бұрын
@@Rodolfoguerra12 the movement in the Rolex is solid and reliable, plus its very accurate, what else do you need, the Rolex looks better imo, its not the number 1 dive watch for no reason.
@Rodolfoguerra12
Жыл бұрын
@@coffeeboyclips1973 I respect that for you it is better looking, that’s ok. For no reason is really brand equity, and marketing. Cheers! Enjoy your Rolexes in good health.
@nomad7734
11 ай бұрын
@@coffeeboyclips1973 Lol... Rolex isn't the number one dive watch... who told you that garbage.
@EricZ726
Жыл бұрын
The one on the right. The Sub.
@Mike-bw5om
Жыл бұрын
Not really 😂
@goldencalf5144
Жыл бұрын
Yep, Sub everytime. If you can get your hands on one.
@Mike-bw5om
Жыл бұрын
@@goldencalf5144 I don’t think so buddy.
@goldencalf5144
Жыл бұрын
@@Mike-bw5om I know so, buddy.
@mikkotoivonen2811
8 ай бұрын
Omppu voittaa
@freshgresh
2 ай бұрын
The Omega’s bracelet is ugly AF, absolutely big & clunky with no tapered sleek look, gross. I will take the most desired Rolex any day & anyone who says anything different is a damn Rolex hater or can’t afford a Rolex. There I said it
@frankv7068
Жыл бұрын
Rolex is better Omega is the runner up
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
Kindly explain why.
@frankv7068
Жыл бұрын
@@IrishScribbler it looks better, it last longer, it’s built more comfortable, I can wear it for free, it’s built better, it wears better. I had both kept the Rolex, not the Submariner, the Sea Dweller 43mm.
@papricep6248
Жыл бұрын
Omega is a mall watch you can get at discount.
@frankv7068
Жыл бұрын
@@papricep6248 best discount is my retail Rolex, if I ever feel to part ways with it, I can sell it and get my money back. I’m practically wearing a free watch and maybe get a little extra.
@NCUTTS1000
Жыл бұрын
I’ve owned both of them. The bracelet ruins the Seamaster in my opinion. The fact it doesn’t taper at all makes the bracelet feel like a huge slab of uncomfortable metal, plus the clasp is huge also. I’d go for a Planet Ocean personally now having owned the Seamaster 300m.
@thegraciefighter102
Жыл бұрын
The sun by a long shot as there are too many issues with the seamaster. The HEV, the hands, the thickness and the bracelet are all a problem
@thegraciefighter102
Жыл бұрын
@@PepRex I don’t like the cyclops but at least it serves a purpose. The HEV is an ugly wart and isn’t functional. It’s a tool watch that doesn’t work as a tool
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
@@thegraciefighter102 And you’d know this how exactly? The Sub is the most cloned watch in the entire world. At least when you see an Omega you know it’s an Omega. 99% of the time when you see what you think is a Sub it turns out to be an Orient or a Seiko. Your Parkinson’s is obviously making you dumb as well as shaky.
@thegraciefighter102
Жыл бұрын
@@IrishScribbler you’re very sensitive . No need to be so triggered over men’s jewellery
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
@@thegraciefighter102 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You’re a proper eejit, as those of us from Ireland would said. You haven’t a clue what you’re talking about. Newsflash: I actually have the 126610 and it’s a great watch, but it isn’t the miraculous invention that idiots like you think it is. Probably because you can’t actually get one. Also, do you know how to spell? From what I can see, you clearly can’t.
@isluderea8322
Жыл бұрын
IMHO the Omega is not very pretty. The Sub looks way better.
@jerrywallop5647
Жыл бұрын
Pointless comparison really…..both unique in their own rights……completely different…..I own both & never compare them……it’s about personal taste & preference….
@ScoobieDoo-zy1rh
Жыл бұрын
They are diver watches. What else is similar ?
@1bluensx
9 ай бұрын
I own both in exact same colors, I think the sea master blows the sub away. It is so much nicer. The sub is the quintessential divers watch, but honestly I think the Omega is a much better, and better looking watch
@jali898
11 ай бұрын
Dont like the hands of the omega...sub all day long
@yarossnydertime6225
Жыл бұрын
English Pronunciation was on point 😂 good laugh
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
It’s shocking isn’t it! 😂😂😂😂
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
The anti reflective crystals on the Omega are created through the Verneuil process, also known as “flame fusion”. These are rated at Grade 9 on the Mohs-hardness scale, so if it’s being scratched you must be incredibly careless with it and doing something stupid like scraping it along concrete.
@michaelbishop9157
Жыл бұрын
nerd alert
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelbishop9157 Nope. 44 year old journalist who is just a bit picky about what he spends his money on and whether it’s fit for purpose. Sorry Madge!
@michaelbishop9157
Жыл бұрын
@@IrishScribbler thought you might be a boomer !
@IrishScribbler
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelbishop9157 Generation X. Or grumpy Irish dude, if you prefer 😉
@driller7714
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelbishop9157 44 year old people aren’t boomers. What’s worse, being a nerd or completely ignorant?
Пікірлер: 216