No one appreciating the crispness of the video?? That was crisp and bright as hell! Thank you!
@ChrisMarshall1978007
6 ай бұрын
You are very welcome. Thank you for viewing.
@georgetown8986
4 ай бұрын
This video is arguably the crispiest video I have ever had the pleasure of viewing. Sub and Pelagos are both outstanding watches. Tough choice. Slightly different dynamic, however, very very close. Well done video.
@asotomayor
3 ай бұрын
Crisp like the dial of this watch
@garyd599
Жыл бұрын
Just got the Pelagos two weeks ago from my AD. Can't take it off!
@kurtmarion2799
Жыл бұрын
There's a flip lock on the clasp, just pull that up!
@garyd599
Жыл бұрын
@@kurtmarion2799 HA HA
@itsallrobbish
Жыл бұрын
@@kurtmarion2799 LOL
@garyd599
7 ай бұрын
Mine is 7 inches@@Jimmycricket-
@jackarnold3290
Ай бұрын
Same for me. Pelagos 39 ROCKS!
@paulvon2378
Жыл бұрын
Tudor looks more modern. The Rolex has the classic 1970s look. Rolex has the stronger name. Tudor has a better price value.
@bauerfilms4832
2 ай бұрын
The rolly will still be worth at least what you bought it for 10 years from now, the Tudor will not.
@paulvon2378
2 ай бұрын
@@bauerfilms4832 Nah ...Either will because fewer and fewer are buying watches.
@bauerfilms4832
2 ай бұрын
@@paulvon2378 Rolex’s 3+ year waiting list says otherwise.
@paulvon2378
2 ай бұрын
@@bauerfilms4832 today it is true but won't be in 10 years
@bauerfilms4832
2 ай бұрын
@@paulvon2378 your basing that assumption on what?
@asotomayor
3 ай бұрын
I got it yesterday , initially thinking of the Black Bay 58 and 54, even the 925, but once the Pelagos 39 was on my wrist … game over! I tried the BB58 and 925, nice watches but they didn’t do it for me. The Pelagos 39 may not weigh much but still feels substantial, while being appropriately sized and thin enough. It is a stunning watch that you need to see and try.
@jackarnold3290
Ай бұрын
Me too! Got Pelagos 39 yesterday . Best ever and I own a lot of watches.
@paultowns9880
Жыл бұрын
Two amazing watches. Love the older subs. A great comparison. Thank you.
@misterbianco6202
10 ай бұрын
The Pelagos 39 is a nice watch, no doubt. But what I love so much about the classic, non-ceramic, no-date Subs, is that they are so unagitated, so simple, so obvious. There is nothing fancy, everything has a purpose. The design is here for 70 years and the roots are even older. It is an art-deco masterpiece, an industrial design icon. The first watch in my life where I want nothing to be different. The Submariner is the big kahuna of sports watches and will always be.
@j2dlyc
Жыл бұрын
I’ve got the 124060 no date Sub and just bought the Pelagos 39. Similar watches in many ways, but different enough to make owning both worthwhile
@Sexiestmanalive01
Жыл бұрын
why would you own both. no point there
@steelsteez6118
11 ай бұрын
Fun fact: a 124060 is just called a sub (as the original and first submariner never had a date). It's the date sub that you need to append "date" to it. So you basically just have "a submariner". The best and most iconic one :)
@Mikeylearn2rock
10 ай бұрын
The sapphire glass on the Pelagos is far nicer, at times you simply think the glass is not there.
@MT-kx2uc
Жыл бұрын
Own both and the P39 is easily my most worn.
@chiatte135
4 ай бұрын
Rolex is antic super car while P39 is brand new. I bought P39 because i had 5.000 USD limit for myself and its titanium. I buy watches for wearing not collecting. It was easier to wear since its lighter. Its my everyday watch
@paulbonaventura4969
Ай бұрын
How has it held up? I heard the titanium scratches very easy and many have reported that the lume markers are falling off.
@chrisanderson5369
Жыл бұрын
Have always wanted a 14060, but just wasnt wanting to spend quite that much for one, especially with the prices now. So recently settled on the Pelagos 39. Absolutely amazing watch and definitely has me wondering if I ever will pursue a no date sub now. Great comparison and video. Thanks.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
That’s great Chris ! I’m happy you have the pelagos 39 , it’s a great watch
@chrisanderson5369
Жыл бұрын
@ChrisMarshall1978007 thank you. Maybe someday I'll get an older 14060 with tritium dial and creamy lume. But for now, extremely happy. Haven't even wanted to rotate it out with the other watches for weeks now.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
@@chrisanderson5369 that means it’s a keeper 😎
@JLUnit416
Жыл бұрын
I ended up in the same boat; a Submariner at retail didn't seem realistic for me, but I still ended up waiting 9 months for the Pelagos 39. That said, when I objectively review what I want in a dive watch; 1) good bezel action, 2) strong lume and 3) adjustable on-the-fly clasp, the Pelagos delivers. While I'm still in the honeymoon phase, I do think this satiates what I thought I wanted out of a Submariner.
@jason20341
Жыл бұрын
Nice video! Got my Pelagos 39 a week ago and haven’t taken it off yet! My Rolex GMT II has been sitting.
@itsallrobbish
Жыл бұрын
For me the 39 is probably the best looking watch, ever.
@MrM3-8888
18 күн бұрын
Absolutely the p39 it's cheap and cheerful accurate Tudors huge military history strong well built watch loads of rolex DNA.. can't go wrong 🎉
@mikeychristou
18 күн бұрын
I have 3 Tudor watches the pelagos 42 is by far the fav The blue dial is so crisp I have an original black bay and a black bay steel and gold GMT
@markbrennan4693
Жыл бұрын
Both great, but the pelagos seems to have the edge, if not quite the brand kudos.
@mrlex4725
Жыл бұрын
Great comparison and very informative. Would love to see a “vintage” Sub compared to the Tudor BB 54. 👍
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@damianthompson7821
5 ай бұрын
I have the Pelagos 42 with date, and used to own a Rolex Sub Datejust, and I've got to say, the build quality and finish on the Tudor feels more solid
@hknspc
8 ай бұрын
For me Tudor Pelagos 39 is much better than the Rolex Submariner.. Easy to use. I mean you can easily wear it and go anywhere. Titanium! thin, light and modern. Kudos to Tudor!
@EDHBlvd
Жыл бұрын
As an owner of an mid 80’s Submariner, I’d much rather have the Pelagos.
@fontyyy
11 ай бұрын
Sell it and buy one then.
@EDHBlvd
11 ай бұрын
@@fontyyyit was my father’s. It’s an heirloom. Nope.
@casperskestrel
10 ай бұрын
Agreed. I sold my 80s Sub and now own a new Pelagos 42. There are far too many Sub copies (and homages) out there nowadays, and even the new Subs seem somewhat passe nowadays.
@fontyyy
10 ай бұрын
@@casperskestrel I'm inclined to agree, I did a deal with a friend recently which saw me get his GMT Master 2 (pepsi bezel, jubilee bracelet), it's a tad small on my wrist I think and I've had to add a couple of horrid not gen links to it. But I've been wearing it for about 10 days now, and I think I could keep it as my daily wear (over my Starbucks Sub). That's a shift in my mind over the past year or two, a Sub was the watch I always wanted. That's changed for some reason.
@codycurnutte9778
11 ай бұрын
Tudor is just so good
@itsallrobbish
Жыл бұрын
Great comparison. I love that 2010 Sub and adore the 39.....I have just got o get one. They are freely available in the UK. Its good to see tha sub on your 7.5 inch wrist, same as mine; I was convinced that it would be too small for me. Still keen on the 42mm 500m date one, too. I think the Tudor is a perfect modern interprtation of a no date sub.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
I couldn’t agree more ! Thanks for watching
@TheMegsie1
8 ай бұрын
Shame they didn't do the Pelagos 39 in steel. The original Pelagos 42 was a very thick watch and benefits from being made from titanium but the 39 doesn't need it.
@RabbitWatchShop
6 ай бұрын
Agreed 💯
@resjon7981
5 күн бұрын
P39 in steel no way, we have to wait for the new Snowflake Tudor will release at some point for that.
@StriderGMT
5 ай бұрын
Great video I noticed the 12 hr marker pip is printed on the Pelagos
@Dirtywesterner
Жыл бұрын
the current sub would dust the pelagos , and I love that version of the Tudor, but it's still the Rolex which will hold it's value better , it will be interesting how well that Pelagos stands 13 years from now in comparisons
@lucmoreau4761
Жыл бұрын
Il faut faire attention à quelque chose de très important aujourd'hui. Rolex a augmenté sa production de montres de plus de 50 % soit, environ 1 500000 montres par an. Donc, il vont pouvoir alimenter leurs réseaux plus facilement dans les mois à venir Les prix dans le marché gris vont baisser énormément. Rendez vous compte du nombre de montres Rolex dans le monde. C'est complétement fou. Ca devient la montre de tout le monde.
@steelsteez6118
11 ай бұрын
@lucmoreau4761 50% ?!?!?!?! 🤣 Where did you read that?
@orkarmy
5 ай бұрын
Both look fantastic. Maybe pelagos looks more modern. What i dont like from pelagos is the dent shape arround the bezel. Much nicer on Rolex. Also dont know how pelagos would age. Titanium seems to be soft and scratchy. I think both are built by same manufacturer, so probably their lifetime is similar. I have Rolex from my grandpa (40years old) and it still works perfectly. I would like to know if a pelagos would also live 40years. Is not a cheap watch (5000€). What i dont like from Rolex is waiting list. Such a long waiting list.
@ralphgoh2580
Жыл бұрын
Can you show and make a comparison of the movement ?
@harryukraine
5 ай бұрын
I like the Tudor a lot more.
@cxc511
7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review. I've been a longtime Submariner fan but the increasingly larger profile of the watch since 14060/16610 models is not a good fit for my smaller wrists. I'm excited to explore the Pelagos 39 as an option that I could purchase new while providing a similar aesthetic to the Submariner that is a better fit for both my wrist and budget.
@sinjinadams2862
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic review! Two of my favorite watches!
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Illsamustache
Ай бұрын
I like the Tudor a lot more. It’s just a better looking watch, imo.
@keltecdan
7 ай бұрын
I wish Rolex/Tudor would do away with the paragraph text and just state the model name and depth rating. Thats all you need.
@bagpipercalifornia8361
5 күн бұрын
I watch a lot of Horology You Tube videos. I really enjoyed this video and have subscribed.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
5 күн бұрын
@@bagpipercalifornia8361 thank you
@john-carlosynostroza
Жыл бұрын
This guy says the word champers more than any human has ever said it
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
Chamfers my friend and it’s exciting
@geeber8136
Жыл бұрын
Yea the Tudor looks like the bezel overhangs the case which is why you got nearly 40mm. Rolex crystal didn't sit flush with the bezel which is why it's thicker.
@casperskestrel
10 ай бұрын
Happily moved on from my 80s Sub and am now the owner of a Pelagos 42. The Tudor is a lot better made/finished than my old Sub, and nobody asks whether it's real (which is a fair question for people who wear Rolex because there are so many fake Subs around). I wouldn't consider owning another Rolex now, especially with all the waiting list nonsense their ADs pull these days.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
10 ай бұрын
I owned a 42 Pelagos and loved it
@FINEST-uk8nc
Жыл бұрын
That Tudor blows that particular 2010 Rolex away
@itsallrobbish
Жыл бұрын
Totally agree....best looking diver on the planet.
@pierrebozon01
Жыл бұрын
Pas d’accord… rolex reste rolex… plus classe…
@MT-kx2uc
Жыл бұрын
Own both and it does! Love my 14060M but it's a rattly old watch!
@steelsteez6118
11 ай бұрын
@@itsallrobbishbetter looking than a 5513 with a ghost bezel or a 124060? Youre smoking some good stuff arent you?
@timchan334
Жыл бұрын
Thats a Clean sub!
@bodong7
2 ай бұрын
On my P39, the lume on the hands are noticeably dimmer than the rest of the watch. Did you have your P39 hands replaced by Tudor?
@ChrisMarshall1978007
2 ай бұрын
@@bodong7 no not at all
@jessyfavor9593
11 ай бұрын
I love the pelagos 39 alot but it scratches so easyyyy
@Sandbag1300
Жыл бұрын
@ 00:32 the Tudor is so much easier to read compared to the Rolex. Unfortunately, the Titanium color of the Tudor is dress casual.
@jackarnold3290
Ай бұрын
The gorgeous darker color with titanium is so great with Black dial and bezel of Pelagos 39.
@bogarbill6331
Жыл бұрын
The Tudor all day long..
@snaan78
Жыл бұрын
I prefer Sub14060m , your watch polished ?
@JJ-ug8np
Жыл бұрын
pelagos 39 is more handsome
@praktikalpinoytechgsm8496
Жыл бұрын
you know that rattle? that will make your watch fit your wrist better.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
Yes it’s a better fit and more comfortable due to that extra give
@praktikalpinoytechgsm8496
Жыл бұрын
@@ChrisMarshall1978007 and we love our skx007 for that!
@OFD
Жыл бұрын
Rolex all day Cuz😎🤙
@a10c032
2 ай бұрын
Great video!
@dcd010
11 ай бұрын
Great video!
@classlessbozo317
16 күн бұрын
Parachrom is an alloy not silicon
@ChrisMarshall1978007
16 күн бұрын
@@classlessbozo317 nice 👍🏻
@classlessbozo317
16 күн бұрын
@@ChrisMarshall1978007 its more than nice, its rare. Parachrom was only incorporated into the final two years of production, identified by G and random serial numbers. These will be the most coveted 14060M.
@gtiboy87ful
Ай бұрын
I don't understand the point of buying watches that resemble a Rolex? To me, makes no sense, idk?
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Ай бұрын
@@gtiboy87ful man that’s a great point
@threethrushes
Жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain what is the difference between Tudor BB and Pelagos? Thank you!
@itsallrobbish
Жыл бұрын
BB58? 58 is Stainless Steel, no crown guards, more retro in appearance, matt dial, has a red accent on the bezel pip. Has an aluminium bezel insert, faux rivets on the sides of the bracelet, pretty much the same movement as the Pelagos 39. It also has a domed sapphire crystal. The Pelagos has a radial dial and bezel insert, is more toolish and is thoroughly modern in appearance and is, in my opinion, infinitely superior as a result. If you can afford a Pelagos 39, just get one. It's a modern classic. The only reason I can see for not buying it, is if you like to have a date complication. It's amazing!
@TriptoMoon
Жыл бұрын
Pelagos is Titanium with ceramic bezel. No black bay has either of these. Its made to look modern as opposed to the retro style of the black bay line. I like the 42mm original Pelagos better than this 39mm version personally.
@fontyyy
11 ай бұрын
The Pelagos is Tudors modern interpretation of a dive watch. The BB 58 (and 54, and the Heritage and probably some others!) are basically homages to the classic divers of old.
@jeromef2001
6 ай бұрын
@@itsallrobbishif you want a date you just take the pélagos 42mm…
@teecee9660
Жыл бұрын
nice review
@asted66
Жыл бұрын
My Pelagos has back play on bezel 2 - 3 clicks also came off. I have tried others 42 and 39 all have back play brand new in AD no one seems to mention that. Don’t believe the hype.
@NeoWahNah
Жыл бұрын
Zero back play in any of the watches I've handled. You must be lucky!
@asted66
Жыл бұрын
@@NeoWahNah must just the three I’ve looked at. Mines currently away getting repaired.
@steliannikolov4163
Жыл бұрын
Mine blue Pelagos have a zero bezel play. And I bought it second hand three year old watch ...
@jlg395
Жыл бұрын
Meh. I'm still holding out for a resissue of the Tudor Snowflake Submariner with a cyclops date.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
That would be nice but I don’t believe it would ever happen. I think it would’ve already.
@u.u.u9969
5 ай бұрын
39.8 is 40 39.1 is not 40
@robalexander7348
Жыл бұрын
I do own a Pelagos, there a stunning watch for its price, i do prefer the Pelagos Matt finish bezel 👍
@Ride_on54
Жыл бұрын
If they had made it in a 40 maybe but it’s to small for me and i can see why they never did it would rival the sister 41 submariner to much
@chrisn4369
3 ай бұрын
The "Snowflake" is the signature of Tudor; always thought all their watch lines should have the snowflake hands and hour markers
@bigjes
8 ай бұрын
The fact that the Pelagos and the black bay58 exist, is killing my desire for the sub, I’ve wanted a sub for a while and this is breaking me man, I hate the fact that I could have a sub and then someone can have the Tudor , and it’s the same fricken watch! , I’m circling back to the explorer or dj rn it makes me sad tbh , I would love a sub but wtf the pelagos is the same but better tbh idk , all this shit is overrated tbh.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
8 ай бұрын
Yes definitely overrated! I would buy the Tudor
@bigjes
8 ай бұрын
@@ChrisMarshall1978007 my desire for that model in general is just not there now bro lol but yea I like the all blue Tudor lol it’s titanium also , its badass
@jlg395
Жыл бұрын
It's okay that your neighbors are in THEIR swimming pool? Ummmm...yeah. It is.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
😂
@jamesestrada82
2 ай бұрын
A 2010 Submariner should not have a bracelet with hollow end links. Rolex began using solid end links in the early 2000’s. Not to mention, a 2010 Rolex Submariner bracelet absolutely has screws in their links. Sounds like you have a bit of a Frankenstein.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
2 ай бұрын
@@jamesestrada82 the model 14060m always had hollow end links up until model 114060 . Don’t be confused with date model 16610 which later models had solid end links ! Thank you
@ChrisMarshall1978007
2 ай бұрын
@@jamesestrada82 before you comment, you need to do a lot more research and look at all the models I’ve been doing this for over 20 years. I happen to know a lot about this stuff thank you so much.
@jamesestrada82
2 ай бұрын
@@ChrisMarshall1978007 I stand corrected. And you are correct in that I was basing my comment off of the 16610 model with date. Admittedly, I’ve never owned a 14060 no date Sub. My assumption was incorrect. That said, you don’t need to be snarky or condescending with your reply. Especially when I’m man enough to admit I was wrong.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
2 ай бұрын
@@jamesestrada82 it’s a ok 👌 sorry to seem snarky but when someone says they have a frankenwatch that’s a serious allegation to a collector.
@jamesestrada82
2 ай бұрын
Understood. I definitely hesitated to make that allegation. My apologies. ✌🏼
@cyberprepper
Жыл бұрын
Tudor is beautiful but at 39mm it is too small IMO.
@issimonete
Жыл бұрын
That’s why they have a regular size Pelagos
@itsallrobbish
Жыл бұрын
The reviewer shows it on a 7.5 wrist and I thought it looked perfect. Now, that is a big wrist. I changed my mind that it would look too small.
@Rich542620b
11 ай бұрын
Tudor 39 Pelagos allday over tje dated Rolex
@fontyyy
11 ай бұрын
But the Rolex is old, a 124060 is the Rolex to compare with the Pelagos.
@grintalk8462
Жыл бұрын
Dude don’t compare. Tudor is a shutter any day of the week compared to Rolex
@heinrichheuer6510
Жыл бұрын
Both are boring
@chiliprepper7678
Жыл бұрын
The resale or trade value on Tudor is trash. I have Tudors and Rolexes. A.D.s are not interested in the Tudor after they have unloaded them on you. But the Rolexes are valued. Don't waste your Rolex $ on Tudors. Keep saving up for the Rolex.
@Ferien7
Жыл бұрын
21mm lug width totally ruins the pelagos 39. Another stupid move by tudor
@keliishaine
11 ай бұрын
I have the new Sub but I think I want a P39 now
@jackarnold3290
Ай бұрын
Good call. Pelagos 39 rocks!
@LaFritePerreGoat
Жыл бұрын
Simply great to have an option of an improved 5 digit for half the current price of a second hand one.
@user-pm8uc5dc3e
Жыл бұрын
Pelagos 39 is a lovely looking watch, but it really feels cheap in the hand (May be a psychological trick due to weight of titanium)
@georgetown8986
9 ай бұрын
It’s not that much lighter in weight. In fact, surprisingly heavy for titanium. The Pelagos 42 is hefty and is an outstanding and versatile watch.
@georgetown8986
9 ай бұрын
@dellwright1407 Do you happen to have the weight of the 42 Pelagos?
@asotomayor
3 ай бұрын
That is exactly why I got it vs the BB58, it feels light but did not feel cheap to me.
@michaelriera6277
Жыл бұрын
I’ll take the Rollie anytime.
@ChrisMarshall1978007
Жыл бұрын
Same here
@philiphawkins4684
Жыл бұрын
Give me the Tudor over the Rolex! Rolex is for old men.
@bloodymarvelous4790
5 ай бұрын
When you don't know how to use a caliper or read decimals...
Пікірлер: 149