Son las dos bandas más grandes de todos los tiempos, las dos versiones son buenas
@angelomisterioso
3 жыл бұрын
The chords in George's solo!!! Almost 60 years and I never tire of hearing
@rickyhuff
3 жыл бұрын
Same here man. So fresh, even to this day!
@rickyhuff
3 жыл бұрын
Beatles killed it. Plain and simple.
@clashercle3792
Жыл бұрын
Primera vez que escucho esta canción 24/05/'23 ❤joyaaa🥰
@Bottiglianelleonde
3 жыл бұрын
It is not possible to compare them. The Beatles were like spreading fire around...What a band!!!
@jessicacosiguitar
3 жыл бұрын
Totally agree!
@twinsuns6629
2 жыл бұрын
I think the Stones were a good group but the Beatles are Gods.
@Bottiglianelleonde
2 жыл бұрын
@@twinsuns6629 Completely agreed!!!
@RollinRocker
2 жыл бұрын
Beatles sound better playing their own songs so? Stones sound better than the Beatles when they play their own songs too. What's your point? You could say that about any band. The Beatles would sound terrible if they tried a Led Zeppelin or Aerosmith cover.
@robertcooney1938
2 жыл бұрын
You can with this song. I agree even though they had the fake rivalries (the first of many to boost sales, which worked particularly well with hip hop.) The Stones were a Blues/Rock and Roll band (that could write some pop songs) and the Beatles were a Pop band (that utilized many genres) turned experimental/psychedelic and then I think they realized that they needed to "get back" to playing live, but the band just didn't have the discipline the Stones did with certain people's ego's. Imagine John and Paul, two huge ego's. George didn't have a problem with his ego from my point of view (but what do I know) atleast his song writing was being taken more seriously. Poor Ringo. Me having a grandpop whom was a professional drummer who could play anything and played with Sinatra, Dean Martin, Wilson Pickett, Jimmy Page, and a bunch more in the mid to late 50s at the 500 club in A.C. He got that gig at 16. He could have went to Cali and do a Chubby Checker movie or something. There was probably more entailed and more details he won't disclose, but he refused and was in the Philadelphia music union. He hates Ringo, but I understand how important he was. He doesn't have to be a technical wonder to make a difference and play what was perfect for the most famous band ever. My Grandfather likes the Stones and Charlie, though. I told him he should have kept doing the 500 Club thing which he also played in a Quartet (the band that got the gig) playing top 40 at the club. I told him he should have written their own stuff. Turns out they did record a song they wrote in the 50s that sounded like The Doors about 8 years before the Doors existed. Two guitarist (innovative back then to have a rhythm and lead guitarist an organ player who played bass with his feet. That's crazy to me to be able to do that. Mad talent. And my Pop on the skins.) My family goes way back musically. Atleast 5 professional musicians (in the U.S. I don't know about before they came from Poland, but probably musicians there.) My grandpop had an uncle with a deformed hand but had his saxophone altered and was professional and he had an uncle who played bass professionally and is on jazz records. My Grandfather who I typed about and I made the cut. I started doing shows on drums in a hardcore/metal band in the mid to late 90s. We were really good (although I hate that music now.) Doug Sabolic from A Life Once Lost was kicked out (Doug and I were too much for the beta males whom garage we practiced in.) I was kicked out a little later on, but not before I learned some things on guitar. Those beta males were very good musicians though. The drummer was a very good bass player and is good at certain genres on the drums. The guitarist was a typical nerdy dude but I never cared about high-school social status. Anyway, yes I am writing a story because I can't sleep. Hope it's entertaining. 100% factual. Nerdy dude was a really good guitar player and we were all able to swap instruments, because I learned a lot on guitar, really fast. We reformed a pop band in like 2006(which I was actually embarrassed on stage. We sounded better in the bassists house in the middle of a cemetery.) The bassist was new to playing with us but he was my first best friend (2yo)and master bag piper who lived in a cemetery called Rosedale. I was heavy into painkillers at the time because I was a low level pro BMX rider and had alot of injuries that really bother me today. Low level only because I went to college instead of BMX road trips. I invented a few grinds and stuff. So me and the bassist get out of that band (the rhythm guitarist 'bassist in the metal band' begged me to get with his ex so he could try to do he best friend. I knew that he wasn't going to succeed and I did succeed and even though I questioned him 1000 times and told him he'd be pissed, he insisted. So, she had some cocaine and we split. I was always attracted to her and I was excited. The last few times we seen each other before this was pretty flirty and I remember when they were together, her and I were on a team together in some quiz game and we dominated. She disappeared for 10 years and comes back in my life and we had a baby who just turned 2 and plays harmonica better than me. Turns out we're both Vikings. Anyway, back to 2007. My big time BMX pro rider friend who helped me with the BMX career then fucked me over when I probably would have won video part of the year. (About 60% of that was released this year to raise money for the mother of a rider we grew up with who o.d.ed on fentynal. His part was in it, too and he was my favorite rider because he was opposite style of me, but we'd teach each other certain things for like skate park. She was like a mom to all of us and would pack as many bikes and kids as she could on and in her Honda civic with 500,000 miles on it before any of us drove. Always fed us. There's not enough I can say about her except for she was a saint.) So, my dude knows me and the bassist were free from that band that I was actually lead guitarist in, though not many solos or weaving. And we start a band. I was the drummer for two practices to get a few songs written, and play guitar and get a new drummer. It was awesome. We were pumping out songs and they were good. We were all into classic rock and blues at that point. We all really loved The Stones and my buddy who's ex I now have a kid with (yes, he's still my friend.) was playing in a band who all loved the Beatles. They had a great pianist/keyboard player who at the time was just more musically knowledgeable than any of the guys in his band and ours, but my guys all had the feel, the groove, the ear and the soul. The singer/rhythm guitarist and I worked well together writing songs or jamming. The bass player usually knew what to put in and he had some great songs in his own right that I helped him with. The first drummer was afraid of the stage so I brought in my first drum student (way before I became a music teacher) played really well with us. Recorded a demo with us, tons of shows and was solid but had a serious opiate addiction. At this time I began to quit for awhile, relapse, quit, relapse, etc. Then I fully committed to quitting and only smoked and took psychedelics. But then a hot little (at the time she was little. She gained a bunch of weight since then.) Came back into my life and liked the lifestyle and she worked at Clearchannel Philly, so she worked for a few radio stations and would tell a lot of the shitty bands that came in that her boyfriend's band was better than them. But she got me using again. I wasn't doing it enough to have bad withdrawls but my sleep was messed up. Pretty little t&a temptress. Ain't they all? MySpace was around and what two live videos that were filmed really well. Kinda psychedelic for this instrumental I put together that kinda sounded like Black Sabbath mixed with Pink Floyd. I called it Black Waters. The camera was incredible and it sounded like a miced up live song but it was only the camera mic. Also, this gig was in Rhode Island and I guess there are no sound guys there, so we turned it up. We also got on video our band doing a cover of All Along the Watchtower, which we killed and I think it's better than Dylan and the Hendrix version along with about everyone who heard it. The vocalist was on point and playing them chord open and loud. I had two really good guitar solos in the song. The one was during a part where we played softer so it got quiet, the drummer does this cowbell thing that was amazing and I played a really good guitar solo. Then we come back in loud for the finale of the song. That trip was fun, (Philly to Rhode Island) except getting off 95 for no reason and being lost in the bronx. (I seen Yankee stadium so I knew it was the bronx.) The band was doing great but the drummer was getting deeper in his habit. He was younger than us and like a little bro to me. We have a big gig on his birthday and he said he was going to do it. Well, the dude whose ex is now in the other room who was playing drums for that "we love the Beatles" band recently recorded our demo and knew some of the songs, but Imagine a bluesy rock and roll band with a drummer who has zero groove and was used to playing progressive rock. (Yeah......no groove) but it went okay and he filled in for us again but I wasn't going to have to change the songs for him, and I didn't want prog rock drummer with bluesy Rock and Roll. This one part was a shuffle and he was like saying he isn't here to learn how to play drums and wanted to argue with me because he took it personally that when we were booked at the same venue, it was filled with people who knew us and like every BMXer in the tri-state area was there for us. So we requested to go on earlier because our singer/guitarist had alcohol problems, so we had to get on before he got too drunk. There was usually free coke for us (which blew this dudes mind.) He didn't know we were the house band there along with one other group. So his band was good. Especially one song in particular that the pianist wrote. But our songs were in like 8 BMX videos and we just had a huge group that came out and listened to some late 60 early 70s style bluesy rock. The stage room was filled when we played and maybe 1/4 to 1/3 filled when they played. It hurt his ego but we had an advantage with the well known BMX riders, especially the singer/guitarist and our songs he recorded being in videos sold around the world. So he was pissed about me saying 'this part is a shuffle.' I had to play a shuffle to show him and he was carrying on until the singer made 100% sense and said "You're not arguing with Rob, you are arguing with the song." He was right and he kind of made a face at first but you can see him hear that we were right. Leave me a message for the rest of the story.
@pegsmith-morrow1766
3 жыл бұрын
Amazing to see Brian Jones original Stones
@noonetime8478
2 жыл бұрын
Both are great versions! I can't say which one i like the best. These two bands are the greatest ever.
@alexsandra6316
Жыл бұрын
The Stones are very jazzy and the Beatles are very Candy Pop.They are not equally the same but equally GREAT!!!
@LaMancha-q5o
21 күн бұрын
The beatles has more jazzy than Stones. Look the Ringo beat drums in this songs...
@en3usiastfortesque368
3 жыл бұрын
A great vibrant song......no coincidence that The Stones version and The Beatles version are both driven by the best drummers imaginable......Charlie Watts(RIP) and Ringo Starr......
@fabiomeloni8448
3 жыл бұрын
Ringo what? Best drummer?
@ramliosen3386
3 жыл бұрын
Stones : rebellious in vocals... Beatles simply melodic but still revolution.
@victoreduardozoulalian3495
3 жыл бұрын
The Beatles.. Great !!!!!!!!
@wildbillfirehands
3 жыл бұрын
The Beatles topped them on that, but I'm still a Stones fan for ever.
@MrThedonhead
3 жыл бұрын
I was into the Beatles before The stones and didn’t know anything about the rivalry as I was born mid 80s and it still baffles my mind when grown up people have ‘camps’ they prefer and echo as far as liking one and not the other 😂 . It’s the kind of thing I expect from Lady Gaga and Katy Perry fans you know young teenage girls. It’s really quite baffling when it’s grown up people. The Beatles will always be closest to me but I listen to the Stones more. The Beatles are the greatest band of all time ever there music and progression and innovation will not be beaten in rock n roll or any other field I can think of the way music is so fragmented now and The Rolling Stones are the greatest rock n roll band of all time the best band by FAR to have the ROLL as Keith always says the other bands forget about the roll and just play rock. Even Zeppelin couldn’t get the roll down no matter how hard they tried to get a feel and they did on so many songs but they just couldn’t get it. All the bands forgot rock n roll was about rebellion and dancing and having a good time and sometimes darkness violence a fuck you attitude and the Rolling Stones has all that. Aerosmith has a good feel and to there songs at times but that was from trying to sound like the stones. So basically The Beatles best band of all time, The Rolling Stones best rock n roll band of all time and Bob Dylan best solo songwriter of all time. They are the holy trinity.EVERYONE else you hear has come from them 3! Everyone!
@wildbillfirehands
3 жыл бұрын
@@MrThedonhead I like your long winded reply, in spite of glaring errors. You didn't edit. So, I'm your 2nd sub. Although you don't contribute videos, you do watch some interesting stuff. I saw The Beatles arrive, go to Ed Sullivan, and go on to change the world. Yet I listen more to The Rolling Stones always. As a singer/songwriter/artist, I like a bit of most music. Thanks for the cool reply.
@steveconn
3 жыл бұрын
Stones version way better and tougher with a savage Brian solo. Ringo version lukewarm.
@milliehernandez5050
3 жыл бұрын
Oh my goodness Ringo! I remember when I first saw him at the Greek theater 1995 in person, awesome concert
@leoniemillerl4487
3 жыл бұрын
From what ringo was saying sounds like great comradeship among lots of musicians in London. Must have been great being a teenager then. New music, new fashions, pushing boundaries. Creativity everywhere.
@simballa660
3 жыл бұрын
Beatles highly polished act.stones frayed around the edges.both versions are good.brian jones gives stones version a bluesy sound,beatles more of a pop sound.
@joseomarvallejomanzanares4732
3 жыл бұрын
Las 2 muy buenas versiones pero me quedo con la de Beatles
@alejandrourquieta341
3 жыл бұрын
Hace 45 años las oi x primera vez y desde ahí me quedo con la de Mike and Keith saludos desde MTY NL México
@forastero4ever
3 жыл бұрын
John said that you didn't think we'd give to them something better, wouldn't?😎
@marlucandixital9582
2 жыл бұрын
I love both versions.
@DefLeppard-pk8rt
5 жыл бұрын
Uf, la de los beatles con la voz de Ringo es simplemente maravillosa.
@rubenherrera3792
3 жыл бұрын
la versión de los shakers es la mejor
@HiTopsVideoMemorabilia
3 жыл бұрын
RIP Charlie Watts.
@craigcumpston5838
3 жыл бұрын
Give the Stones a four year head start on the Beatles and I’m pretty sure they would have been just as tight. Beatles started in 1958 and Stones 1962. But of course there would have been no Stones without the Beatles.Maybe the Beatles would not have been pushed to more creativity without the Stones. Anyway I’m very happy with the way it all worked out.
@davidmeyer188
Ай бұрын
Yep, The Beatles had a few hundred hours head start in Hamburg.
@marialuisapisasimonini7026
3 жыл бұрын
Incredibile la differenza tra la versione dei Beatles e quella dei Rolling Stones. Sembrano 2 canzoni diverse. Capisco perchè ho sempre preferito i Beatles :-)
@jessicacosiguitar
3 жыл бұрын
Anche io preferisco la versione dei Beatles! Secondo me sono i migliori! :)
@richardgreen9393
3 жыл бұрын
The Fab Four had the harmonies
@leorios4335
3 жыл бұрын
RIP CHARLIE WATTS
@alejandranavaruiz624
3 жыл бұрын
Los dos grupos más grandes del planeta y de todos los tiempos. Los Beatles más formales y poperos y Los Rolling Stones mas roqueros y rebeldones.
@Alex-sm1nt
4 жыл бұрын
No possible to compare the Rolling Stones with the greatest band of all the times
@jameswallace5967
3 жыл бұрын
Wow! The Beatles version is so much better!!!
@neilthemedflyspecial
3 жыл бұрын
of course! they’re THE BEATLES! ✌🏼🤙🏼
@pedrocarrizo5742
3 жыл бұрын
Yeahhhhh
@jessicacosiguitar
3 жыл бұрын
They're the best! :)
@craigcumpston5838
3 жыл бұрын
Three of the Beatles were playing together since 1958. They had almost a four year head start on the Stones. Three of the Stones got together in 1962. The Beatles had a huge experience edge to the Stones at this point. Of course there more polished. It’s to bad the members of the Beatles always thought that as individuals they were bigger then the band. For the Stones they realized they were only good together, as a band.
@pgroove163
2 жыл бұрын
?.. I got to disagree with you this is the best version I've ever heard
@MegaZzyyxx
4 жыл бұрын
Me encanta Richards moviéndose como los beatles,...comenzaron siendo una "Beatle band"
@robertogranai1
2 жыл бұрын
Beatles !!!!!
@miguelangelherrerasantilla8580
3 жыл бұрын
Los dos suenas muy bien !
@rheailiarome2287
3 жыл бұрын
I like both versions ☺
@sean6992
3 жыл бұрын
**the lead singer of rolling Stones sings a complex song** **a month later the Beatles drummer sings it but much better**
@mrmaestre9606
3 жыл бұрын
xD
@thomasstillman4805
3 жыл бұрын
You could serve dinner for a family of four on those tabletop sized Rickenbacker guitars! lol
@josealfonsobotejara3045
3 жыл бұрын
Los Beatles más beat, pop, los e rolling, más blues, rock Los Beatles más ritmo beat, los Rolling ves a Brian Jones , y le oyes riffs blues con la guitarra. Como la difinitiva la de The Beatles
@hectorcarrizo6145
3 жыл бұрын
Queda más que a la vista la calidad de The Beatles!!! El mismo tema, todo un exito con The Beatles, no así con los Stones. Por algo The Beatles es la mejor banda de todos los tiempos
@lennonmccartney2415
3 жыл бұрын
Estoy de acuerdo contigo
@nektariosg4310
2 жыл бұрын
I am not so sure I agree. I believe that each band achieved the sound they were looking for in this song. The Stones were a band that was rough around the edges, the bad boys, and their recording reflects that. Their sound is rougher and more raw. The Beatles, on the other hand, had a cleaner image, and this is definitely reflected in their recording.
@kelvinart8480
3 жыл бұрын
The beatles tocan el tema mas relajados, a pesar que me gustan las dos versiones la de los beatles me gusta mas.
@daniel_1969
5 жыл бұрын
Beatles vs Stones what an old battle ! When i was kid i prefered Beatles and after age of 20 the stones were my favorite band (more animal, roughest too) In fact : -Beatles > Stones on the studio -Stones > Beatles on live It depends on with era too. For example : -During "satisfaction" and "jumpin jack flash" era : stones > Beatles -During "a day in a life", "revolver" era : Beatles > stones -During "here comes the sun" and "midnight rambler" era : Beatles = stones But please don't forget The Who and the Kink because : -During "my generation" and "you really got me" era : Kinks and/or Who > Beatles and Stones. No doubt about it.
@papersun9097
4 жыл бұрын
Aero1969 You’re so right...
@varunpandey1484
4 жыл бұрын
I don't think you'd place Stones over Beatles if Beatles lasted one more decade , They were monstrous by the time of Abbey road . They were everywhere from John's , Paul's style of music to George's
@daniel_1969
4 жыл бұрын
@@varunpandey1484 no worries, i didn't say that Beatles sucks. It was Just my opinion. I think we are also agree to say that from a musical technical point of view, Beatles > stones too. But my heart prefer stones rythm, stones feelings. K. Richards is not one of the best guitarist for nothing according to classification. So my top 3 for me today is : stones, Aerosmith and GNR. No stones, no aerosmith and no aerosmith no gnr.
@forastero4ever
3 жыл бұрын
@@daniel_1969 about tastes there's nothing written.
@joellarson8906
3 жыл бұрын
Stones.
@guillermoortega4119
3 жыл бұрын
AWESOME
@laminage
4 жыл бұрын
The Stones Version was more of a Blues Influenced Style A La Chess Records. The Beach Boys also were known to do "Covers" of Songs as filler to fulfill an album requirement for a certain amount of songs on an Album. Bobby Freeman, The Del Vikings, The Mamas & The Papas, Frankie Lymon and The Teenagers, and "Alternate" Songs of Be My Baby & And Then He Kissed Me some of the songs they did over the years.
@michealcurrie8272
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks to John and Paul for putting the Stones on the map.
@bernardmasson1630
3 жыл бұрын
Behave.
@michealcurrie8272
3 жыл бұрын
@@bernardmasson1630hey Benny, get your head out of there.and listen, they would be nowhere. 0.
@G8GT364CI
3 жыл бұрын
I've always liked the Stones version better, rocked much better, more bluesy, Beatles version was poppy, I'm both a huge Beatles and Stones fan so it's not favoritism.
@DodoTheDudu
3 жыл бұрын
The harmony in Beatles version is the main strength....
@G8GT364CI
3 жыл бұрын
@@DodoTheDudu Yeah, they're both great in their own way.
@arieltea2036
3 жыл бұрын
No it's okay, I agree with you, I like the Beatles but I have to admit that Stone's version is much better.
@joseeugeniogomezalmodovar2446
3 жыл бұрын
Sí, la de los Stones más sucia, más guarra, más disonante. Los Beatles armonizando mejor siempre. Últimamente aprecio cada vez más la version Stone
@G8GT364CI
3 жыл бұрын
@@joseeugeniogomezalmodovar2446 Brian Jones, fue responsable para el sonido de este grabacion. Creó el toque todos los guitarras.
@rodrigosouza8389
3 жыл бұрын
Beatles' version is better than Stones.
@PachinhoG2024
3 жыл бұрын
No
@rodrigosouza8389
3 жыл бұрын
@@PachinhoG2024 Beatles always unsurpassed.
@johnlennonade5869
3 жыл бұрын
@@PachinhoG2024 sorry the Beatles are better they know when to stop
@richardgreen9393
3 жыл бұрын
Always
@forastero4ever
3 жыл бұрын
@@PachinhoG2024 your comment Is giving juice!! 😂
@michou888
3 жыл бұрын
Ce sont les Beatles qui au départ l’,ont composés pour les stones…En 10 minutes!!!
@halimabdmanaf7437
3 жыл бұрын
Like the Stones. Bcos its the Stones!
@kelvinart8480
5 жыл бұрын
Por eso eran los mejores the Beatles. mejor que los rolling stone.
@skullerr2012
4 жыл бұрын
Ajá si claro
@armandogarciasantos4650
4 жыл бұрын
NO
@jairrr7597
Жыл бұрын
@@armandogarciasantos4650 si
@django19701
3 жыл бұрын
not fair to stones that Brian's slide guitar solo was cut.
@robertcooney1938
2 жыл бұрын
The Stones have a better groove, slowed down and Brian's slide guitar (very new in the U.K) is awesome. The Stones take it.
@heavymetal9749
2 жыл бұрын
RIP to his best friend on the drums, Charlie Watts
@morriszachrisson8359
3 жыл бұрын
Rolling Stones had one man extra. Needed? Extra expenses.
@seltaeb9691
3 жыл бұрын
As a Beatles fan since 1963 this song is so Stones that later on was shocked that John & Paul wrote this for the Stones when they asked the Beatles for a hit song & that night they wrote it. It suits the Stones so much like an Jagger 'apeman' picture. The Beatles own version disappoints in comparison. Have you listened to Stones music?
@IsaHarrisonLennon
4 жыл бұрын
Beatles better
@apeanutsfan6331
3 жыл бұрын
Beatles is life.
@federicoyanezf.y.8359
3 жыл бұрын
By far!
@Ioseef
2 жыл бұрын
True
@sbarr10
4 ай бұрын
I like the Rolling Stones' version better. They sneer and snarl through it.
@rogermartin798
3 жыл бұрын
Beatles greatest pop band ever..Stones greatest ROCK BAND EVER.
@johnlennonade5869
3 жыл бұрын
Technically not pop anymore so the Beatles are the best band ever :)
@MrThedonhead
3 жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t call the Beatles just pop I always say the Beatles best group ever and the stones best rock n roll group ever. Rock is very different to rock n roll.
@bluepeng8895
3 жыл бұрын
The Beatles weren’t a pop band. They were a rock band who played pop, rock n roll, rhythm and blues, folk rock, psychedelic rock, acid rock, hard rock, heavy metal, and blues rock
@kevinemmanuelfraustosantia4311
4 жыл бұрын
Las dos versiones están chingonas.
@emmageorgia1564
5 жыл бұрын
Rolling Stones has slower version and The Beatles has faster version
@artexjay
5 жыл бұрын
The Beatles version is the true version since they wrote it and knew how to play it correctly.
@marty6779
5 жыл бұрын
@@artexjay but they wrote it for the stones.
@jackssmirkingrevenge9365
5 жыл бұрын
look im a huge beatles fan but even beatles' fans must concede the stones absolutely smashed their version, it is a great cover
@daniel_1969
5 жыл бұрын
@@jackssmirkingrevenge9365 Thank you. I think Brian Jones did a great job to reach that level
@Jj22342
4 жыл бұрын
Paul Grey Lmao, the Beatles execute harmonics better, a nicer pace, and the music by far sounds more collected. The Beatles were far past anyone including the stones during this, even though they were essentially part of the same musical wave, you can’t touch them, crazy that this is the stones first hit written by them too 😂
@colinpumpernickel2605
3 жыл бұрын
If the Beatles and Stones were milk, the Beatles would be Gold Top and the Stones Long Life UHT.
@zoltanszokev.zoltan9065
3 жыл бұрын
👍♥️
@babyyoda3118
2 жыл бұрын
Beatles is the studio version stones are live! If you compare the studio versions I like stones better!
@pinkandersonsguitar7591
3 жыл бұрын
A time when Mr Rambler had no idea of what to say or sing and then Mr Warlus connected him in the British way It was a time when Jagger Big Mouth hadn't yet done anything like Lennon's
@davidsmall1128
3 жыл бұрын
Not the best Beatles song... but it’s 1964 man!
@robertcooney1938
2 жыл бұрын
Check out the Stones doing this live pretty recently. It's really good.
@setobrownstone
4 жыл бұрын
Man, Beatles' cover is better, of course. I mean, it's a completely different song. These 4 guys could really feel the music.
@setobrownstone
3 жыл бұрын
@Eddy Vanderhellen Right.
@bluepeng8895
3 жыл бұрын
The Beatles version isn’t a cover. They the ones who wrote it. The Rolling Stones’ version is the cover version
@setobrownstone
3 жыл бұрын
@@bluepeng8895 Right (once again!)
@MsThebeMoon
2 жыл бұрын
Beatles are hotter -- each one more cuter than the next.
@robertcooney1938
2 жыл бұрын
Guitar solo with chords. George Harrison and possibly Keith are the only early Pop/ Rock and Roll guitarist to do it.
@carlossilva9049
3 жыл бұрын
Com os Beatles era muito mais legal
@supremongkatipunan7293
3 жыл бұрын
The Beatles DOES IT BETTER!!!
@MrThedonhead
3 жыл бұрын
Would of been good to hear a version arranged properly by the Beatles with Lennon or McCartney singing. I can vision a cool Lennon riff ‘ticket to ride day tripper’ style to it and McCartney putting a proper bass line down for it and George doing a better solo. As it is The Beatles used it as a throwaway and I don’t think that last one of Johns things that he said that ain’t really true. It’s obvious by listening to it that not a lot of thought went into it
@robertcooney1938
2 жыл бұрын
Keith even did the early Beatles hair shake. Lol. The Stones version is better.
@jorics68
3 жыл бұрын
The Beatles completely trashed the Stones on this one... It just wouldn't compare. Like heaven and hell... Heaven for the Beatles version and shitty hell for the Stones version.
@MrThedonhead
3 жыл бұрын
I was into the Beatles before The stones and didn’t know anything about the rivalry as I was born mid 80s and it still baffles my mind when grown up people have ‘camps’ they prefer and echo as far as liking one and not the other 😂 . It’s the kind of thing I expect from Lady Gaga and Katy Perry fans you know young teenage girls. It’s really quite baffling when it’s grown up people. The Beatles will always be closest to me but I listen to the Stones more. The Beatles are the greatest band of all time ever there music and progression and innovation will not be beaten in rock n roll or any other field I can think of the way music is so fragmented now and The Rolling Stones are the greatest rock n roll band of all time the best band by FAR to have the ROLL as Keith always says the other bands forget about the roll and just play rock. Even Zeppelin couldn’t get the roll down no matter how hard they tried to get a feel and they did on so many songs but they just couldn’t get it. All the bands forgot rock n roll was about rebellion and dancing and having a good time and sometimes darkness violence a fuck you attitude and the Rolling Stones has all that. Aerosmith has a good feel and to there songs at times but that was from trying to sound like the stones. So basically The Beatles best band of all time, The Rolling Stones best rock n roll band of all time and Bob Dylan best solo songwriter of all time. They are the holy trinity.EVERYONE else you hear has come from them 3! Everyone!
@rosielowndes4525
3 жыл бұрын
well, the Stones and Beatles early fans were teenage girls! That's what pushed them to such heights of popularity! :) And even then, they would fight over sides haha
@bandicoot5412
3 жыл бұрын
The Stones were the dirty Beatles, guess it helped.
@kattialucas9522
3 жыл бұрын
Best versión rolling stones.
@britooliveira368
3 жыл бұрын
Prefiro com os beatles
@ianstu1940
2 жыл бұрын
Goddamn they destroyed the Beatles. The stones will always be the better band, performers and artists.
@stuartharrison165
3 жыл бұрын
Love both bands , but I've gotta admit The Stones version is slightly better , it's such a wild sound for the time . Really close though .
@LaMancha-q5o
21 күн бұрын
La version de los stones solo destaca por el slide de Brian Jones y la buenisima linea de bajo de bill wymman. El resto es un desastre y muchos la confunden con una cancion proto punk cuando en realidad es un ritmo basico de beat pero con una mala producción. Charlye no se que esta haciendo con el hi-hat por que suena mal y fuera de tempo. Jaggerr canta mal(hasta ringo la canta mejor esta version) y richards lo basico basico. La version de los beatles no solo esta mejor producida sino que es mas interesante. Tiene un genial Ringo con swing unico y unos golpes al platillo que es dificil de tocar. Tiene el solo de George que introduce acordes menores y una guitarra de lennon con tremolo que le da a una cancion pop un tono mas agresivo y rockero.
@stevehelton997
3 жыл бұрын
Did somebody say Rock and Roll ?
@pattyolczak7287
3 жыл бұрын
NOBODY compares to the Beatles.. Stones suck
@teruo.saitou
3 жыл бұрын
作ったのはポール・マッカートニー1人です!ジョン風ですけど
@mauroluiz420
3 жыл бұрын
A versão dos Beatles é melhor.
@starporter4849
5 жыл бұрын
No contest here, the Beatles do it right, the Stones rendition shouldn't have ever happened!
@MozillaFireFox1967
5 жыл бұрын
Star Porter Did you even hear the studio version to begin with?
@DaftSwank
5 жыл бұрын
Mmm ... The Stones version is nothing to scoff at or dismiss outright - it’s pretty damn good, too.
@keefoutliveseverything6834
5 жыл бұрын
Stones>Beatles
@andrewr62
3 жыл бұрын
That sStones guitar solo is painful. Beatle version way way better.
@joevargas3457
5 жыл бұрын
lo que sucede de acuerdo a mi opinion es que resulta que The Rolling Stones por su estilo muy singular eran capaces de estar al mismo nivel de The Beatles y la cancion I Wanna be your man es una clara prueba ya que la interpretaron primero luego de ser cedida por Lennon y Mccartney y efectivamente sorprendio bastante a tal punto que The Beatles la interpretaron a su estilo claro esta casi con el mismo aire de los Rolling Stones y luiego editarla para el segundo album With The Beatles yo soy Beatlemaniaco a muerte pero creo que The Rolling Stones sin duda hicieron muchos meritos para estar casi al mismo nivel de los Fab Four
@MegaZzyyxx
4 жыл бұрын
esa es la palabra que define todo..."casi"...
@musicaparatufiestaofficial
3 жыл бұрын
Entre ellos dos mi banda favorita son The Beatles, pero de esta canción me gusta mas la versión de los Rolling Stones.
@AndreTall
3 жыл бұрын
Rolling motherfuckers Stones. devil's sons. Terrible sound. Beatles forever!!!
@davidbarriopedro7893
5 жыл бұрын
La de The Beatles es mejor
@canticus7068
3 жыл бұрын
"Stones": Horrible...😱
@ovalvox7888
3 жыл бұрын
Mick’s vocals were better than Ringo’s. Brian Jones’ lead guitar was better than George’s. The Beatles tempo made it more pop and danceable. The Stones just made it a blues tune that sounded a little punk. The Beatles was produced better. The same song but really two different songs the way they are played.
@RollinRocker
2 жыл бұрын
Beatles sound better playing their own songs so? You could say that about any band. The Beatles would sound terrible if they tried a Led Zeppelin or Aerosmith cover.
@andrespalacios1122
2 жыл бұрын
Juaaajjaaajjaaa... haaaahhaaa... I can not believe it..!!! My God... What is this, a joke? Are they taking us for idiots? I cannot credit such a demonstration of infantilism... Let's see, if necessary... let's clarify the trouble: what is presented to us in this video is misleading... and even naive. The Beatles sound great because they are lip syncing over the officially released recording (playback)...! Or at least, someone took the job to edit the original video and overlap it with the professionally edited disc audio. While the version of the Stones shown here, is a live shot on TV at the time (quite precarious, by the way)... and on top of that, the tape is in a terrible state and skids... !!! Hence the difference... It is notorious that no one "has noticed"... (without wanting to?). It is more than clear that here there is a lot of cynics who are playing the fool, and that it does not need clarification on this... Almost with as much cynicism, as the one who combined this video so stupidly. A REAL SHAME ... It becomes boring to periodically witness such insistence on pounding over and over again that the Beatles are the greatest and the best ... Tell me what you brag about, and I'll tell you what you suffer from. So much insecurity and immaturity ... that leads to this real ridicule. Don't you see that this puts you in evidence? Anyway... nothing new... And for those of you who have naively believed in this and fell for this "trapdoor" ... do yourself a big favor, take the job to do a little research and listen to the version officially released by the Stones (straight out proto-punk, ultra-garage and anarchic for sure), and then we continue talking ... Or better yet, here too someone set about making the same TV video, but assembled with the officially released version of the Stones single. kzitem.info/news/bejne/r5iK2oRso1-grJw
@goplad1
3 жыл бұрын
The Stones version of I Wanna Be Your Man obliterates the Beatles Ringo version. The song was purposely written for the Stones in their style. The only reason the Beatles recorded it was to give Ringo his obligatory track on their upcoming album. In my opinion the Stones defined that song.
@genez429
3 жыл бұрын
Wrong... The Beatles version swings and sparkles. The Rolling Stones version is dark and plods in comparison.
@goplad1
3 жыл бұрын
@@genez429 Seriously? The poor double tracking on Ringo's voice makes the song awkward and anything but sparkling. The Stones own that song just like Joe Cocker owns "With A Little Help From My Friends". Ringo's vocals always drag down any song he sings. Only my opinion of course.
@genez429
3 жыл бұрын
@@goplad1 ... hey? To each his own. If I think the Beatles had a better version? Why should your world end? Its only a song.
@bluepeng8895
3 жыл бұрын
I like the Beatles version better, but I’m not a huge fan of the song regardless
@Mark27472
3 жыл бұрын
Not to mention Brian Jones played the most blistering slide guitar solo ever heard up to that time. Was documented it wasn't a coincidence they produced it themselves to get it closer to their live sound. That slide solo remains awesome.
@RollinRocker
2 жыл бұрын
A Beatles song sounds better when the Beatles play it...so? Stones should stick to their own songs. They sound better than the Beatles when they play their songs.
@weksheddweller
3 жыл бұрын
I'm going to get flak for this, but I thought the Rolling Stones' version was better.
@alejandranavaruiz624
3 жыл бұрын
Que vivan ambos pero Los Stones por algo son la banda de Rock And Roll más grande del mundo
@a.s.v4261
3 жыл бұрын
When whites learned how to make a lot of money with black music! Ops, sorry Elvis was first, the King of Hamburgers!
@rogermartin798
3 жыл бұрын
Elvis changed the speed and beat .
@kcuhc84
3 жыл бұрын
@@rogermartin798 When Blue men learned to sing the whites.
@thestones2789
4 жыл бұрын
I LOVE BOTH BANDS BUT, the beatles quit touring in 66 , the beatles broke up in 1970 so they are a dead end for me
@elihartsoe6718
5 жыл бұрын
can’t believe there are people who think the beatles version is better
@giobolkvadze3658
5 жыл бұрын
beatles version is better ✌✌✌
@rosaliedoane1534
4 жыл бұрын
Sorry to say it but I like the Beatles better bc it’s a little more upbeat and the Stones is a little slow for my liking, but hey I’m not not hating on the Stones though
@elihartsoe6718
4 жыл бұрын
Rosalie Doane the stones version is slow?! what?!
@rosaliedoane1534
4 жыл бұрын
Eli Hartsoe yea I guess it was a little bit slower but idk don’t listen to some of the things I say I like both bands so it doesn’t really matter lol
@serpentstudios7768
4 жыл бұрын
I prefer the Beatles version, sounds more intense, and I love that.
Пікірлер: 211