If it ain’t broke don’t fix it. The cleaner the map the clearer the information. The less line work the better
@abdelrahmanmohammed9405
5 күн бұрын
Agree, the prev map style is better. This is why I don't watch other reporters.
@winterinvicta
5 күн бұрын
Yeah it confused me as well.
@danalexpiano
5 күн бұрын
Same
@Mab328
5 күн бұрын
agree
@cauchyschwarz3295
5 күн бұрын
"If it ain’t broke don’t fix it" is not really what you want to say. More like "If it ain't broke don't experiment with new ideas"
@fidel4023
5 күн бұрын
Old map style was not broken, no need to change it. This new one over complicates updates and makes everything an analysis/speculation which is annoying.
@class.C
5 күн бұрын
Yea, if anything they should be smooth lines to distinguish from the control zones
@dole7959
5 күн бұрын
The previous style was the best one on all the channels covering this
@nikkip46
5 күн бұрын
This new mapping is too confusing. Just use grey zones.
@u_bulatovic88
5 күн бұрын
I agree
@EgoisticAxis606v2
5 күн бұрын
or just have the ability to turn if off or on
@republicofserbia
5 күн бұрын
I want to see gray zones
@cauchyschwarz3295
5 күн бұрын
He still has grey zones and clearly explained why the new lines do not represent gray zones. They show where fighting takes place. A SF recon unit does not plunge an established position in grey zone status
@nikkip46
5 күн бұрын
@@cauchyschwarz3295 Nobody cares or knows where SF recon units are.
@franslangendonk6510
5 күн бұрын
If ZATO allows their Storm Shadows, SCALP's and Tomahawks to strike deep in Russia, then Russia can hit ZATO targets in Europe and the USA. This is a very dangerous escalation and stupid move but what can you expect from those malicious maroons.
@JosephMwema
5 күн бұрын
They are dream wheats. They cannot sea how the corns equences of their act shawns comes to heat bawrk at theme.
@Schurk-x3d
5 күн бұрын
So, Ukrain can also attack N Korea an Iran?
@Youjeez123
5 күн бұрын
Lol Ukraine isn't provided with tomahawks only weapons that are about to retire
@ailinofaolin8897
5 күн бұрын
Haven't heard of storm shadows in months those 300 ATACMS they got are all but gone, 300 missiles with very little to show for it in terms of successful strikes.
@Red-Check-Mark
5 күн бұрын
Russian air defense has also shown they can intercept Storm Shadow missiles, so they aren't the game changers Ukraine keeps thinking western weapons are.
@galinagala8260
5 күн бұрын
New map format is very confusing. Your old format was perfect.
@makavelithedon801
5 күн бұрын
Im not a fan of these new operational area lines, just needlessly complicates the map, IMO.
@S4H47
4 күн бұрын
Yes imo too
@johnsonk7490
5 күн бұрын
It is confusing. You can have it disappearing once you finish the briefing.
@AugustusCaesar88
5 күн бұрын
Appreciate the extra effort Weeb, but honestly, the new lines just make everything too complicated, makes it much harder to comprehend what’s going on.
@grahamstull2330
5 күн бұрын
It feels like the frog getting boiled. We inch closer and closer to a point of no return on a nuclear conflict, but because it's all so incremental, no one seems to see any danger.
@Zilliguy
5 күн бұрын
Idk Russia is constantly making references to using its nuclear arsenal, I’d say they’re aware of the danger
@Extra-Celestial7
5 күн бұрын
@@grahamstull2330 Only the West don't see it
@nihilistzero8066
5 күн бұрын
Say it does go nuclear...you think that wont escalate further? Once a single detonation happens its game over for every, man, woman, child and it, in existence...so question is who wins when theres no survivors? Uranium 235 has a half life of 700 million years, enjoy your time in your bunker living like sewer rats, a fitting fate to the 1% of the 1%...surviving and living very different things, something billionaires wont be accustomed too. So who wins? The cockroaches inhabit the earth while we become shadows on the sidewalk.
@user-hl5so4cf4s
5 күн бұрын
ou're right. In NATO countries, politicians are frivolous lunatics
@user-hl5so4cf4s
5 күн бұрын
You're right. In NATO countries, politicians are frivolous lunatics
@LanciaSiluri
5 күн бұрын
the extra lines just makes a mess, it becomes confusing at best
@gheorghitaalsunculitei9146
5 күн бұрын
I don't like the new style
@woildee9998
5 күн бұрын
Blinken is determined to escalate.
@Human-le9nt
5 күн бұрын
Lammy & co have been advocating for it a long time. I wonder what’s in it for the UK?
@woildee9998
5 күн бұрын
@@Human-le9nt They are just doing what they are told.
@MrJekken
5 күн бұрын
@@Human-le9nt UK pawn is being pushed out to test Russia's reaction before deciding conclusively on whether or not they will escalate themselves in this way
@whitefalcon630
5 күн бұрын
People tend to forget that Iskander, X-101, Khinzal, Zircon, Avangard, X-69 are nuclear capable weapon systems. Do we need a reminder?
@Extra-Celestial7
5 күн бұрын
Nuclear escalation is inevitable, G7 will bear the brunt of it while Russia will triumph
@tingleblade4274
5 күн бұрын
They are initially developed in two versions.
@markoradulovic3307
5 күн бұрын
Why use nukes when regular missiles can do the job? Why would Russia escalate to nuclear when there is zero need for it? Stop talking nonsense, Russia will not use nukes in Ukraine, its ridiculous
@whitefalcon630
5 күн бұрын
@@tingleblade4274 Don't be dumb the warheads are not part of the rocket. It's only the cargo onboard. It can be anything from chemical munitions, conventional explosive, unconventional explosive, cluster bombs, mines or a small nuclear warhead still about 5 to 25 kiloton. The Fatboy was only 15 kilotons But the warhead in the Iskander is a Hydrogen bomb. So its even more devastating. It's better to be closer to the blast because then you won't feel anything. Even your ashes gets vaporised. Probably not even your soul remains.
@MDealer
5 күн бұрын
So, we invented big weapons to end wars quickly. Instead of using this, we are too afraid of going to hell, so we use conventional weapons to prolong it. The only hell is here and now, there is no other.
@clonetrooper71
5 күн бұрын
I think that having stuff in the gray zone was better.
@schluesseldienst_muzler_de4067
5 күн бұрын
I like more the old style. Grey zones and the fighting symbols.
@kingmaker9270
5 күн бұрын
People here are just damn, map style become much better and makes more sense now to smart people so please continue doing it
@DostoyevskyChan69
5 күн бұрын
I feel like the new style kinda just makes it all look like spaghetti.
@MatejJokic-sw2kh
5 күн бұрын
Sorry,but I don't like new style
@notpot6886
5 күн бұрын
"USA wants to know Ukraine's comprehensive plan in order to allow strikes" I think theyre asking too much
@CARL_093
5 күн бұрын
AFU had nothing left for them to set a strong defence for winter
@peterarold3623
5 күн бұрын
The agressive strategy of our Western leaders can result to Russia using nukes. The Western MSM and political parties never mention this risk. Russia will not lose this war, and if it would look like they would anyway, than the nukes come into play , if not earlier. We are beeing bullshitted by our politicians and the MSN. So far some concerns from The Netherlands.
@vladimirbrabec69
5 күн бұрын
Imagine scenario where Russia would say that if Latvia and Estonia would not surrender their territory Russia would use Nuclear weapons? It is same threat only different country. That is reason why those threats are useless, because conceding to them would lead to dangerous precedent which would basically escalated conflict either way. So if Russia would use nuclear weapons then they use them anyway so we can just ignore that rethoric. They are bad guys anyway.
@Matt_from_Florida
5 күн бұрын
Correct. They never mention it and will act 100% shocked when it happens. *_"Who could have foreseen this?"_*
@peterwilson9699
5 күн бұрын
I totally agree! This map is in a worse mess than the war itself!
@paulmicks7097
5 күн бұрын
The way these systems and even the shorter range still requires the US NATO involvement in targeting, they are not allowing Ukrainian military to freely access these special systems ... If they go that deep with operations it's an escalation of incredible proportion.
@kgbgb3663
5 күн бұрын
I've just had a head comment not just hidden but completely nixed. Replies seem to survive better, so I hope you don't mind me replying to you to make my point. The Western leaders seem to have completely lost all the analytical ability that was used during the Cold war to avoid the ultimate disaster. They seem totally incapable of seeing how their actions look to their counterparts on the other side. They talk among themselves, and get used to regarding any attempt to take the opinion of the other side into account, _even if just to work out how to achieve your own aims,_ as tantamount to treason, if not evil. So they push us closer and closer to disaster, while convincing each other that they are being wise and moral. Heaven help us all.
@OWnIshiiTrolling
5 күн бұрын
Ukraine has no storm shadows, no scalps, and possibly no himars. The first two are operated by british or french military personnel, and I'm not sure about the third. Using them in russia is a direct attack by nato against russia. It's a really dumb idea. But we'll see how russia responds.
@peterwilson9699
5 күн бұрын
Yes, but THEY WANT TO AND WILL escalate! The west wants to destroy Russia!
@hhkk6155
5 күн бұрын
NATO is already involved: recon, soy satellites, AWACS planes, all command and control is NATO. Supplies, money, all the gear - NATO
@achrafparkour382
5 күн бұрын
i guess many people said it already . i prefere the old style . and keep the good work thank you
@francisu4180
5 күн бұрын
Not a big fan of the new map approach. The previous one was perfect
@gruenerteufelDD
5 күн бұрын
Whatever map you are using, Ukraine is losing. Rhymes and is true.
@Gerryio
5 күн бұрын
I don't like this new change, it's confusing and I find it useless honestly
@LansiOwO
5 күн бұрын
bro are you trying to explain the situation or trying to make a metro map??
@Juan_van_Eeden977
5 күн бұрын
Keep the format as you have done before, this video.
@mpc7440
5 күн бұрын
No offense, but the new lines don’t contribute much and only make the map a headache to look at. We get enough information based on your commentary.
@ReichLife
5 күн бұрын
Interesting idea with new mapping style, but execution just doesn't work at all. It's way too confusing. Maybe it would look better with dotted/dashed line with ~50% transparency level. Overall kinda pointless given how rarely 'in danger' territories actually are so.
@thebigsam
5 күн бұрын
I think these additional lines make the general situation a bit less readable. Maybe if the lines weren't as similar to the recent gains zones, it would be better. I suggest, If that wouldn't make it harder for you, you draw these operational zones by hand, I think it will be easier to digest it that way.
@lukauric3748
5 күн бұрын
I like the old mapping better👍🏻
@adwest68
5 күн бұрын
Danger time, NATO plays with fire
@sannajabang3227
5 күн бұрын
I think they want to test the red line of Russia.
@martinh1277
5 күн бұрын
@@sannajabang3227 Putin has red lines. Selinsky has white lines.
@janlul1284
5 күн бұрын
Please Web union no more extra line. Your map was already good, this is too much. Thank you for work you do.
@clark6024
5 күн бұрын
I like the old map
@BillMartin-h2g
5 күн бұрын
I'm jumping on the bandwagon. Don't change your mapping style.
@apostolosderakis9840
5 күн бұрын
The new style (your guesswork :-) is informative, in that it communicates what you want to tell us, which is your educated guess. Many people, tend to think of maps as static, because this is what they have in their daily life. Perhaps you can use a different pattern (no a line but maybe something like ++++ or ???? ) to remind people that it has to be understood in a specific way.
@barbarap6992
5 күн бұрын
It becomes too complicated. If you are going to do it, please don't make the lines the same color as the lines showing newly captured territory. It becomes red lines intersecting red lines and the same with blue. You need to look at the background color to figure out what it is. And there is such a small difference in color between the gray zones and the Ukrainian held zones (i.e., green with a slight blue color, and green) It is getting so visually confusing!
@bantakkor8039
5 күн бұрын
Honestly not a fan of the new map model, getting to cluttered with guess work, that might happen soon or not at all, it's better to stay with confirmed data alone.
@KMisty1
5 күн бұрын
Too many lines make your map cluttered. Keep it simple.
@Komsomolskaya
5 күн бұрын
Preferred the previous mapping style
@jerzygenello8542
5 күн бұрын
Looks like Ukies are begging for complete defeat! As they run out of living soldiers....
@xconnorgrillox
5 күн бұрын
Like the old map
@ebadhaque2689
5 күн бұрын
OP line looks complex, can be use in extreme conditions but not everywhere.
@AakashBisht-pf7zy
5 күн бұрын
Old map is good this is confusing
@danapeck5382
5 күн бұрын
Thanks. Like the new map feature. All the best
@namelessnick2145
5 күн бұрын
Yeah. Old map style please
@korollich347
5 күн бұрын
These new lines are confusing. If you want you can try dashed lines with arrows such as "направление дальнейшего наступления" (the direction of the offensive after the combat mission has been accomplished) in soviet&russian notation (i don't know how it labeled in NATO notation)
@Delgarothe
5 күн бұрын
I personaly don't mind the additional line, it gives an extra info. But agreed, it takes longer to understand the map.
@fayeznasrati5352
5 күн бұрын
However you are trying to provide more accurate information but I feel, simple it is too much to observe it. I would add that it would be better if you don’t the extra line. Thanks
@fahim7884
5 күн бұрын
I like the new feature of the map u r using to describe the operational zone in detail
@Theone-bc7tr
5 күн бұрын
Old mapping was way better
@bieber_and_dolik
5 күн бұрын
Ukraine's military expedition in kursk is going wrong.
@MarkCBristol
5 күн бұрын
I think the mapping change is excellent addition.
@fakhrifr7833
5 күн бұрын
The new map made me confuse, maybe change the new line as dote then give curve to operation.
@paulnedimovich7902
5 күн бұрын
The new mapping system is okay but better to not include it as it will likely confuse people rather than help to inform them. Remember, the majority of people do not know how to properly read a basic map, let alone a military situation map.
@Lina_Antoniou
5 күн бұрын
Maybe they should have a chance to learn then?
@arostwocents
5 күн бұрын
AD obviously has been moved to the at risk areas. Most of Russia is totally open now 😢 This is a big issue and we will see some disasters before Russia gets used to the new situation
@QuinquetPourpre
5 күн бұрын
I think this style could work to differentiate active and passive grey zones, but once you start overlapping it with "controlled territory" it just makes things messy
@alexandergabrovsky8405
5 күн бұрын
Good new map approach
@Felgrim1993
5 күн бұрын
Keep the old style please without the new lines
@SilentShadowPunisher
5 күн бұрын
Next step control of the sky
@balazsszekely2132
5 күн бұрын
Interesting mapping, it actually gives the reality that war frontlines aren t just a single line, they are usually complicated and chaotic
@Imperial.Soldier
5 күн бұрын
??
@balazsszekely2132
5 күн бұрын
@@Imperial.Soldier your incompetence have already jeopardized the empire’s interest
@braislorenzo8770
5 күн бұрын
I like the new map, after two or three videos it will be easy to see the proyection of the advances
@mattiasandersson5300
5 күн бұрын
Prefer the old map
@Reptilian.cricket
5 күн бұрын
No need to change your map in any way. Keep it as it is please.
@DarkSorrow29
5 күн бұрын
I feel like the new lines are a bit confusing the way they are right now. I would suggest to use a thinner and dotted line instead.
@Ged-k7w
5 күн бұрын
So what does the Security Council say on the start of the third world war
@johnhanamy9795
5 күн бұрын
I like your new tracking style. Very clear.
@КалоянБорисов-к7ю
5 күн бұрын
Don't like the new lines, confusing. You explain very well the directions of the attacs and heavy fightings. So, these new lines(zones) seems senseless to me. Otherwise keep going, watch you everytime!
@danielgil8071
5 күн бұрын
The Ukronazis are trapped and trying to figure out how to escape alive. 1943 vibes.
@gustave9249
5 күн бұрын
Not a big fan of the lines it is rather confusing and a little annoying
@Tomasknudsen
5 күн бұрын
Keep the old mapstyle plz
@GeorgePowell-b8f
5 күн бұрын
I fully understand the map. Good work
@OXY187
5 күн бұрын
Old better
@rachidsabil3873
5 күн бұрын
I don’t like the new lines
@ruggerodeceglie6164
5 күн бұрын
The New map is confusing …
@trex45100
5 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot for your informative and actual analysis.
@TurtleChad1
5 күн бұрын
Ukies couldn't even stop the Russians from advancing in one area.
@CaptainSpiritz
5 күн бұрын
I like the idea of a red line to indicate Russian contested area. I would you to test this idea : fill the grey zone with a darker grey color (so the grey zone is more apparent) and use your red line or blue line to indicate wich side is more on the offensive in that grey zone.
@NightTeamClub
5 күн бұрын
Use the old style bud
@johnrohde5510
5 күн бұрын
Thank you. In my opinion, this is the best of the sites mapping this war. It has impartial, measured and insightful commentary.
@Ali-7676
5 күн бұрын
This and Defense Politics Aaaaassiiiia
@peterwilson9699
5 күн бұрын
But incomprehensible!
@Ali-7676
5 күн бұрын
@@peterwilson9699 maybe you need to increase the level at which you can comprehend.
@blueguy3333
5 күн бұрын
I think the new style makes the map unnecessary messy and complicated, especially when both sides are attacking eachother in the same area. A cleaner map is better and more easier to understand.
@vandensoforth
5 күн бұрын
I like the new “Operational Zone” lines since it gives a clearer picture of the direction of operations by a given side. Nice job developing your work and trying new things!
@petercsabai6668
5 күн бұрын
Don't think the new map is going to please anyone.
@pieterwoerden2701
5 күн бұрын
Dear, I find your new style useful.
@BerlinCardYard
5 күн бұрын
The Idea with those lines is great - but visibility should be advanced by using a brighter blue and a brighter red so on smartphones it will be easier to see. Thanks from Berlin
@afterisforever
5 күн бұрын
Thanks for striving for continued improvement however I personally prefer it without the new lines.
@ВалерийРажиев-ш8у
5 күн бұрын
Согласен с теми, кому не понравился "новый" стиль карты. Очень много линий синего и красного цвета с разным смыслом, от которых только рябит в глазах. Я бы посоветовал, если это технически возможно, сделать линии "особой напряженности" пунктирными. Цвет пусть продолжает означать, кому в этих зонах напряженнее. Или наоборот, кто создает в этих зонах такую напряженность.
@DosPanzer
5 күн бұрын
I like the new mapping style. Can you highlight garrisons and supply routes also?
@magyarandrastamas2485
5 күн бұрын
I like your danger zone weeb!
@bernfrank3966
5 күн бұрын
Thank you 👍
@skasteve6528
5 күн бұрын
I'm not against the new map format. However using red for offensive and blue foe defensive operations is a bit confusing when those are the colour of the two countries' forces. Using different colour might help but it might also make the maps a complete mess.
@nightelfuser
5 күн бұрын
I don't have a strong opinion in regards to the new style. I'm here for the unbiased and accurate reports.
@alanmcbride6658
5 күн бұрын
Cheers Weeb.
@remington2216
5 күн бұрын
I actually like this new map style
@alexbocle8472
5 күн бұрын
MaketheMapGreatAgain🙏
@hhkk6155
5 күн бұрын
Wake-up Weeb has posted another vid
@SuperLuky64
5 күн бұрын
Do you still believe in Ukrainian propaganda? Until yesterday they accused and fled without any support, and today with the Russian recovery in Kursk, also noticed by the allies, they are starting attacks elsewhere again. Even an amateur would understand.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Пікірлер: 392