Explained very well. No wonder all the Salafis in my area are now following the way of the true Salafus Saliheen Imam Abu Hanifah.
@annispatel43
Жыл бұрын
So they are now Hanafis lol..... finally the penny has dropped.
@abdul-baakifuseini3552
2 жыл бұрын
I always benefit a lot from your channel May Allah grant the entire team with his afwah and aafiyah in this world and the hereafter aamin
@nasmoh7182
2 жыл бұрын
Not just salafis but there is now a new fitna of those who do not follow a madhab and take from any fatwa depending on their own desires. Whilst at the same time condemning those that stick to a madhab. They Picking and choosing fatawa as though they are fuqaha and mujtahids themselves. Mainly within those that calk themselves salafi and hanbali (even though in reality they are not following the hanbali fiqh)
@thecuriousservant5549
2 жыл бұрын
Same people don't know the dua for toilet and bedroom and tajweed
@irfankhalifa7799
2 жыл бұрын
Lol fatwa shopping tbh
@abdulrahmanmohamad8370
2 жыл бұрын
Misunderstanding or blind folowing? Have you ever studied Hanbali Fiqh?
@critikzplayz8119
2 жыл бұрын
don't generalise all salafis to be ghayr muqalideen.
@Abdullah..........
2 жыл бұрын
Ghair Muqallids are the by products of salafies in the Indian Subcontinent
@Yaakov.cohen76
2 жыл бұрын
There Are No Such Things As "Salafis" They Are Wahabis Not "Salafis"
@mojojamal6203
2 жыл бұрын
May ALLAH guide us upon the straight path. Allah is Al Wahhab (in Arabic: ٱلْوَهَّابُ), which means the great giver whose blessings are freely and perpetually given. He gives with no purpose and expects nothing in return. Allah سُبْحَٰنَهُۥ وَتَعَٰلَىٰ is truly the most liberal giver, He gives to the deserving and undeserving, to the good and the evil.
@mmmm-po5ez
2 жыл бұрын
Imam Abu Haneefah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Allah has a Hand, a Countenance and an Essence as He, may He be exalted, mentioned in the Qur’an. Whatever Allah, may He be exalted, has mentioned in the Qur’an of His having a Countenance, Hand and Essence, these are attributes of His which we affirm without discussing how. It cannot be said that His Hand is His power or blessings, because that is denying the attribute, and is the view of the Qadaris and Mu‘tazilah. Rather His hand is a divine attribute, and we do not discuss how it is; His wrath and His pleasure are divine attributes, and we do not discuss how they are. End quote from al-Fiqh al-Akbar, with commentary by Mullah ‘Ali al-Qaari, p. 85. This statement shows Imam Abu Haneefa RahmiahmahuLLah affirmed that hand of Allah is an attribute but he doesnt discuss how just like the salafis/atharis. The salafis are following abu haneefa in the aqeedah when it comes to the sifaat.
@iah1235
2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes. A famous English translated paragraph of Fiqh Al Akbar passed around by Salafis to prove Imam Abu Hanifa was on their aqeedah. If u wanna take fiqh Al Akbar into account, see what it says on kalamullah. The imam said it's not letters and sounds lol. You can't just pick and choose here like this In fact in al-Ibaanah by Imam Ashari, it says Imam Abu Hanifa said the Qur'an was created. In Fiqh Al Akbar it states the Qur'an wasn't created. Either fiqh Al Akbar is sound, which makes al-Ibaanah not authentic to Imam Ashari, or Fiqh Al Akbar is not authentic, which makes Al Ibaanah authentic. Which is it? If fiqh Al Akbar is inauthentic and Al Ibaanah is authentic, why are you posting this famous paragraph from Fiqh Al Akbar?
@iah1235
2 жыл бұрын
Imam Abu hanifa forbid translating the sifat into Persian btw lol as is seen with Yad.
@manuelcardinali1287
2 жыл бұрын
@@iah1235 There isn't only fiqh ul akbar, can you tell me why we should choose (in defining the aqida of abu hanifa) imam Ashari over the Son of Abu Hanifa and his best student Abu Yusuf?
@manuelcardinali1287
2 жыл бұрын
@@skywalker1296 it's a dream, like Prophet Yusuf saw his brothers represented in the image of planets, were they actually planets? No. I know perfectly well that you find this in some books of the misguided and ignorant sufis. It has been explained many times I will put a link that has detailed explanation. It's subtitled in english
@manuelcardinali1287
2 жыл бұрын
@@skywalker1296 kzitem.info/news/bejne/lpmtnKGmi2hznHo as you can hear in the video, Ibn Taymiyyah himself said whoever believes that Allah is a boy is a kafir, listen to the explanation
@syedfaisal8491
Жыл бұрын
Imam e azam abu hanifa r.a is a great imam
@user-dg4dz3ot1s
Жыл бұрын
Mashallah tabarakallah we need more ulama to educate us like this
@sullywhy
2 жыл бұрын
Salaam if you can explain the groups cus aint even heard of the ashariya and these groups etc
@nci1427
2 жыл бұрын
JazakAllah khair
@ghettofight
2 жыл бұрын
Mashallah this makes sense. Also wanted to know what's the name of the nasheed
@Darthnemesis3581
2 жыл бұрын
Here's my Idea of Refuting the Salafis in these steps, 1.Refuting Albani's Grading of Ahadith. 2. Refuting them on how they Mistranslate The Arabic words EG. The Arabic word Istiwa to Denote a Direction for Allah. 3 Refute their Rejection of Ahadith that are Categorised as Daeef as if it is the Same as Fabricated Ahadith. Ect.
@rambo9875
2 жыл бұрын
Are u saying we should reject albanis grading of hadith entirely?
@Darthnemesis3581
2 жыл бұрын
@@rambo9875 Read the Book Albani Unveiled, It will give The Variety of Ahadith that while categorised as Saheeh by Tirmidhi, Imam Muslim, Abu Dawud, Albani Claimed that Those Ahadith are Daeef While the Original Compilers claimed them to be Saheeh.
@rambo9875
2 жыл бұрын
@@Darthnemesis3581 i did hear that albani considered many hadiths that were seen as sahih by imam bukhari, muslim, tirmidi etc to be hasan or even daeef but the response i heard to this criticism of albani is that this was his private interpretation and not meant for everyone else. If u dont mind me asking, what scholars can we trust in authenticating hadith (contemporary)
@Darthnemesis3581
2 жыл бұрын
@@rambo9875 The Original Authenticator of Ahadith Such As Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim ect.
@thecuriousservant5549
2 жыл бұрын
@@ibnadam499 you can't just do it like that even the categories can be differed. Hence all the greatest of ulama from the ummah done all works but that for a reason
@hamzahabeeb8636
2 жыл бұрын
Maulana you need to mirror your camera because we are unable to read what's written there.
@ummerfarooq480
2 жыл бұрын
There is a very simple literal way to understand those words. Al-Mujadila 58:7 أَلَمْ تَرَ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَعْلَمُ مَا فِى ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَمَا فِى ٱلْأَرْضِۖ مَا يَكُونُ مِن نَّجْوَىٰ ثَلَٰثَةٍ إِلَّا هُوَ رَابِعُهُمْ وَلَا خَمْسَةٍ إِلَّا هُوَ سَادِسُهُمْ وَلَآ أَدْنَىٰ مِن ذَٰلِكَ وَلَآ أَكْثَرَ إِلَّا هُوَ مَعَهُمْ أَيْنَ مَا كَانُوا۟ۖ ثُمَّ يُنَبِّئُهُم بِمَا عَمِلُوا۟ يَوْمَ ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عَلِيمٌ Have you not considered that Allah knows what is in the heavens and what is on the earth? There are not three in a private conversation but that He is the fourth of them, nor are there five but that He is the sixth of them - and no less than that and no more except that He is with them [in knowledge] wherever they are. Then He will inform them of what they did, on the Day of Resurrection. Indeed Allah is, of all things, Knowing. Hadith عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ:"إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ يَقُولُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ: يَا ابْنَ آدَمَ، مَرِضْتُ فَلَمْ تَعُدْنِي(1) قَالَ: يَا رَبِّ كَيْفَ أَعُودُكَ وَأَنْتَ رَبُّ الْعَالَمِينَ؟ قَالَ: أَمَا عَلِمْتَ أَنَّ عَبْدِي فُلَانًا مَرِضَ فَلَمْ تَعُدْهُ؟ أَمَا عَلِمْتَ أَنَّكَ لَوْ عُدْتَهُ لَوَجَدْتَنِي عِنْدَهُ. يَا ابْنَ آدَمَ: اسْتَطْعَمْتُكَ فَلَمْ تُطْعِمْنِي، قَالَ: يَا رَبِّ وَكَيْفَ أُطْعِمُكَ وَأَنْتَ رَبُّ الْعَالَمِينَ؟ قَالَ: أَمَا عَلِمْتَ أَنَّهُ اسْتَطْعَمَكَ عَبْدِي فُلَانٌ فَلَمْ تُطْعِمْهُ؟ أَمَا عَلِمْتَ أَنَّكَ لَوْ أَطْعَمْتَهُ لَوَجَدْتَ ذَلِكَ عِنْدِي. يَا ابْنَ آدَمَ: اسْتَسْقَيْتُكَ فَلَمْ تَسْقِنِي، قَالَ: يَا رَبِّ كَيْفَ أَسْقِيكَ وَأَنْتَ رَبُّ الْعَالَمِينَ؟ قَالَ اسْتَسْقَاكَ عَبْدِي فُلَانٌ فَلَمْ تَسْقِهِ، أَمَا إِنَّكَ لَوْ سَقَيْتَهُ لَوَجَدْتَ ذَلِكَ عِنْدِي"رواه مسلم On the authority of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: Allah (mighty and sublime be He) will say on the Day of Resurrection: O son of Adam, I fell ill and you visited Me not. He will say: O Lord, and how should I visit You when You are the Lord of the worlds? He will say: Did you not know that My servant So-and-so had fallen ill and you visited him not? Did you not know that had you visited him you would have found Me with him? O son of Adam, I asked you for food and you fed Me not. He will say: O Lord, and how should I feed You when You are the Lord of the worlds? He will say: Did you not know that My servant So-and-so asked you for food and you fed him not? Did you not know that had you fed him you would surely have found that (the reward for doing so) with Me? O son of Adam, I asked you to give Me to drink and you gave Me not to drink. He will say: O Lord, how should I give You to drink when You are the Lord of the worlds? He will say: My servant So-and-so asked you to give him to drink and you gave him not to drink. Had you given him to drink you would have surely found that with Me. It was related by Muslim. Hadith 18, 40 Hadith Qudsi
@ansarialtamash9611
Жыл бұрын
They have something against imam abu hanifa ra and other three imams..I have seen what they do is take one from one and one from one like its nothing...They would start any argument saying authentic ahadeeth like Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim and when someone state a hadees from Imam Nisaai or Abu Dawood they blantly tell its zaef and wrong..usually will say Imam Albani says soo..If imams are not masoom from the first 300 years of islam then how could someone from 1200 years after be always right..
@ninjazen_0771
Жыл бұрын
You clearly know really little what you talking about. Aqeeda has really little to do with hadiths, we go back to what the early imams stated, what here differs is the interpretation of what those imams said about aqeeda issues
@smprjeas5053
2 жыл бұрын
This lie for abuhannifa coz he says that god in sky above the throat when he said(ونقر بأن الله تعالى على العرش استوى من غير أن يكون له حاجة واستقر عليه) شرح وصية ابو حنيفة ص١٠ In fine i suggest the all to read something about the thought of abuhannifa such as كتاب أصول الدين عند الإمام أبي حنيفة.
@krisyanharyadi
2 жыл бұрын
This video confirms that this Wahabi's Cult doesn't follow the Salaf ways. After long periods of attacking and mocking Imam Abul Hasan Al Asyari Radiallahu anhu on his Kalams, now they're trying to propagate that Imam Abul Hasan Al Asyari RA had the same understanding of Aqeeda like wahabism. Yes, what they did was made a takhrij on Kitab Al Ibanah ( Al-Ibânah ‘an Ushûl al-Diyânah) and fabricated some words on it, bil khusus on istawa, hulul, nuzul. At least there are 3 editions of Al-Ibânah ‘an Ushûl al-Diyânah: 1. Dâr al-Anshâr Egypt, Dr. Fawqiyyah Husein Mahmûd (Ed.), Comply with the eldest kitab by Syeikh Zâhid al-Kautsarî (Ed.), a great scholars from ‘Utsmâniyyah Caliph) 2. Maktabah al-Mu’ayyad Saudi Arabia - Maktabah Dâr al-Bayân Suriah, Basyîr Muhammad ‘Uyûn (Ed.) 3. Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah Lebanon, ‘Abdullâh Mahmûd Muhammad ‘Umar (Ed.) The text stated in Dar Al Anshar, p. 105 and Maktabah al-Mu’ayyad/ Maktabah Dâr al-Bayân, p.97) استواءً يليق به من غير طول الاستقرار was missing or taken out (Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, p.46) Dâr al-Anshâr, p.117 and Maktabah al-Mu’ayyad/ Maktabah Dâr al-Bayân, p.102 بلا كيف ولا استقرار Was taken out in Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, p.49. More evidences shown that this Wahabi's Cult will do anything at their best to propagate their Aqeeda to the ummah, even though the Salaf clearly stated the opposite. What a shame.... PS. To AllIslam Prod. Please make more videos upon this matter, so the ummah will have a better understanding the difference between Tanzih and Tasybih/Tajsim. Salam ukhuwah islamiyah from Indonesia (Syafiiyah-Asariyah-Msthuridiyah).
@manuelcardinali1287
2 жыл бұрын
It's not true that if you accept the literal meaning you automatically accept the form, because it is limiting your intellect and limiting Allah With Tashbih, if I tell you "eye" and you accept its literal meaning doesnt mean you have to visualize the eye of a person, could be eye of a needle, eye of a hurricane etc... And Allah made quran without contraddictions, so if you imagine one of his attributes with tashbih you are going against what Allah said "Nothing is like Him". So Tashbih not only is limiting yourself and Allah, but it's a clear prohibition in the Quran. And we have to stop before falling into the prohibition, not to fall into it and then negate what Allah said about himself because we can't cope with our limited intellect. It's very easy to understand
@sheikhzeeshan731
2 жыл бұрын
Upload more
@ayubmatadar1136
2 жыл бұрын
*وَﻋَﻠَﻴــْﻜُﻢُ ﺍﻟﺴَّــــﻼَﻡُ ﻭَﺭَﺣْﻤَﺔُ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪِ ﻭَﺑَﺮَﻛـَـﺎﺗُﻪ* May Almighty Allah give you plenty barkah in your beneficial knowledge Ameen
@hollaifyahearme5771
2 жыл бұрын
@Al-IslamProductions CAN YOU PLEASE TELL US WHO THE NAQSHABANDIYYAH ARE AND WHAT THEIR CORE BELIEFS ARE? BECAUSE YOU DEFENDED THEM SO MUCH IN YOUR LAST VIDEO...
@slaveofallah3747
2 жыл бұрын
Naqshbandiya is a branch of Tassawuf or Tariqat which refers to Spritual path while Shairat is used for physical/outward path of Islam. All these methods of Tariqat are used for a purpose and aren't Asl(objective) themselves. To purify the Nafs and Qalb. Read the book At-tassawuf-as-salook by Peer Zulfiqar Naqshbandi in which the same has been explained by Quran/Sunnah and Quotes of Salaf
@ummerfarooq480
2 жыл бұрын
Half the world was naqshbandi only last year because of COVID-19. Naqsh bandi literally means 'ornament a prison'. Like trying to enlighten the experience of being in a prison. I feel it's from the following hadith in _Saheeh al-Bukhaari (2225) and Saheeh Muslim (2110) from Sa’eed ibn Abi’l-Hasan, who said: “I was with Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) when a man came to him and said, ‘O Ibn ‘Abbaas, I am a man who earns a living by the work of my hands, and I make these pictures (or images).’ Ibn ‘Abbaas said: ‘I will only tell you what I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say, and I heard him say, “Whoever makes an image in this world will be punished until he breathes life into it, and he will never be able to do so.’’ The man became very upset and his face turned pale. He - meaning Ibn ‘Abbaas - said, ‘Woe to you! If you insist on making them (images), then you can make images of these trees and everything that does not have a soul.’”_
@unknownak4171
2 жыл бұрын
@@slaveofallah3747 who is your peer/shaykh?
@Abdullah..........
2 жыл бұрын
Subhan'Allah. Keep going.
@Sunii565
2 жыл бұрын
3:02
@arsenal870
2 жыл бұрын
Sheikh you just quoted imam abu hanifa saying " Allah has wajh, yadd,nafs" Just like Allah has stated in the Quran, they are his attributes without modality. Do Salafi's not say the same thing? They say Allah has hand but we don't know the meaning. Asharis don't say Allah HAS hand/yad, I could be wrong.
@samir2319
2 жыл бұрын
No salafis say Allah has a unknown modality. We say modality doesn't apply for Allah at all. They affirm modality but don't know how it is and that's why they make ridiculous statements like ibn Uthaymin made saying "Allah's face could be a triangle, square etc. We don't know." The fact they deem such things possible for Allah is falsehood already even when you claim you don't know how. The same thing applies with their understanding of 'hand'. They ascribe a literal hand to Allah but say they don't know how. So their understanding is a unknown limb.
@arsenal870
2 жыл бұрын
@@samir2319 Ok so basically Imam abu hanafi is saying Allah has hand, nafs etc., it's part of his attributes , however he does not know its meaning and denies the modality of it. Do asharis say the yadd of Allah is his attribute? Jazakallah khair for explanation, unknown limb astagfirullah
@servantofallah6971
2 жыл бұрын
@@samir2319 can you please provide the reference for where Uthaimeen said face could be s triangle or square
@abyrahman6610
2 жыл бұрын
@@arsenal870 Ahle Sunnah Wal Jamat say that these are attributes of Allah SWT.....we accept them as they have been revealed i.e. on their apparent words (only Allah knows their meanings) and we do not establish any modality. However, the Salafis say they accept them on their apparent meanings and whilst there is a modality, they leave it to Allah SWT. What these pathetic people don't seem to understand is that they jump into anthropomorphism by accepting the literal meaning and then try to jump back out by saying the Kayfiya is not like the creation. They are confused people who try to confuse others!
@samir2319
2 жыл бұрын
@@servantofallah6971 sure. Here you go. This shows the salafis of today are not on the path of the salaf, but hidden mujassimah. Ibn al-Uthaymin ascribes modality to Allah and says whether its square or triangle or long etc,, we don't know. So he deems all those things possible for Allah. This is why we Ahl al-Sunnah deny modality for Allah for it does not befit His Majesty. (( ويبقى وجه ربك ذو الجلال والإكرام )) أي ثوابه فحملوا الثواب ما لا يحتمل هل الثواب موصوف بالجلال والإكرام أبدا لا يستحق هذا الوصف إلا وجه الله عز وجل اذن نؤمن بأن لله وجها حقيقيا ولكن لو سئلنا عن كيفيته أمستطيل هو أو مستدير أم مربع أو مدور أو ما أشبه ذلك أيش نقول الطالب : الله أعلم www.alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=154260
@sheesmustafa9522
2 жыл бұрын
Super based
@Eserimumin
2 жыл бұрын
What is the meaning of literal meaning? Does it have a reality? The literal meaning of a word/ism only remains in our mind/dhihn and is subjective. This subjectivity causes kayfiyyah, a reality which changes per attributed being/mawsoof. So in order for us to understand a word, we’ve to look at the context: the mawsoof which is atributted with that sifah. An example for a better understanding: The literal meaning of hand is subjective and changes per being. We as humans define hand as “the part of the body at the end of the arm with fingers that is used for holding, moving, touching, and feeling things”. This meaning is completely subjective and only remains in our mind and can’t effect the reality of other beings who are attributed with this attribute. So when we talk about the hand of an ant, the modality will change. The hand of an ant will not have the same qualities as the hand of a human being. It doesn’t have a finger for instance. The conclusion is that commonality in name/attribute doesn’t necessitate a commonality as a whole, because the attribute/sifah changes per attributed being/mawsoof. Therefore even if there are commonalities between the used name for the attribute of an ant and human is same, that doesn’t necessitate that the reality/kayfiyyah of them is the same (we have shown that the ant doesn’t have fingers and a human being does). When we talk about the Hand of the Almighty. Subhnaneh, we do say that the kayfiyyah is unknown, but we can say that it is not physical, nor a limb, nor a part of Him, exalted is He. God said that there is nothing like Him (surah al-Shuraa 11). Therefore it is possible for us to do ithbat of the meaning and doing tawidh on the kayfiyyah.
@servantofallah6971
2 жыл бұрын
Whether the kafiyyah changes or not, does not make a difference, Salaf denied kayfiyya and full stop
@Eserimumin
2 жыл бұрын
@@servantofallah6971 How can an attribute without a kayfiyya exist? Read what I wrote again brother, I don’t think you people understand what we mean by modality
@jamalkhalil77
2 жыл бұрын
We negate the kayfiyyah, and consign the meaning to Allah, simple
@servantofallah6971
2 жыл бұрын
@@Eserimumin the Shaik has clearly shown the text of Abu Hanifa denying kayf, so if you follow Salaf then shut up and follow properly and leave your own home baked explanations at home.
@nasmoh7182
2 жыл бұрын
@@Eserimumin The point being made is simple. You missed it and went on a tangent. With any example you put, you are still giving a literal meaning. That was rejection by imam Abu hanifah. That's the main point.
@ahmedal-sharabi5322
2 жыл бұрын
Stop lying. You reject the meaning not only the Kaif. For example, you reject that "Yadd" means hand. You are a liar. As for us, the Sunnis, we have always said asking about Kaif is Bid'ah. But you're not only addicted to Bid'ah, but you are also addicted to lying upon us.
@Ryan-lf6ds
2 жыл бұрын
Wackabis not Sunnis. Don't talk in the name of Ahl-Synnah Wal Jamaah.
@abdullahdacoola5388
2 жыл бұрын
Why is he talking so fast..is he upset or something?
Пікірлер: 86