Due to the vast nature of the case, there were some omissions regarding Aron Salomon's treatment. It is true that the prevailing attitude was that a businessman should pay his debts. However, the fact that it was a prevailing attitude does not mean to exclude the other attitudes of the London community at the time. It's really a very interesting case and if you are intrigued regarding the anti-semetic treatment of Salomon, I recommend reading- Adams John, Essays for Clive Schmittoff (1983).
@WhollyMowly
11 жыл бұрын
Bit of a stretch to say that the portrayal of Salomon as a miser or 'grasping merchant' is therefore evidence of 'an anti-antisemitic London', isn't it? Particularly after you quite clearly recognised that the prevailing attitude was that a businessman should pay his debts.
@sidthrh
10 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! Love from Ireland
@madhushikabawanthi7170
Жыл бұрын
👍 good
@dilchahatahai9875
6 жыл бұрын
nice explaination of this case
@BenskiEm
8 жыл бұрын
thanks shafik
@a.nahari380
9 жыл бұрын
Guys, I still dont get this case well due to my poor english, at the end, Did Salomon get away with his debts ??
@lakshyasangtani5485
5 жыл бұрын
Yes he did, as at the conclusion of the case house of lords pronounced that after registeration co. Gets a seperate legal entity which is distinct from the members constituting it.
@blairstevenson3455
10 жыл бұрын
I love the Salomon case. Great video
@sparkaleshish
8 жыл бұрын
love? why? Im hating law school :'(
@laurenstehr6740
9 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know where I can get an actual copy of the case to read? I've been looking for a while now and can't seem to find one anywhere...
@yavishaum
9 жыл бұрын
on westlaw uk.. you should be able to find the whole case + judgement , as i did ;)
Пікірлер: 13