So annoyed Clarry didn't get a fine, he does it all the time. He fell before he got pushed, you can clearly see the second motion from him. Gawn does it too. They need to fine it across the board, they should not need the backlash to enforce their own rules. What's the point in the rule if you need backlash to enforce it?
@qbmac2306
2 ай бұрын
Imagine the MRO in charge of a regular soccer game and how many staging fines would be handed out.
@thomes7318
2 ай бұрын
They could hand out 5-10 per round in the AFL. You'd get a few in every Melbourne game alone
@minirobo7904
2 ай бұрын
How many fines will Butters get before they say enough is enough and give him a week. Kind of a piss take that he can keep doing it and keep walking away with a fine
@JusGiveMeMyMoney
2 ай бұрын
2:24 even the goal umpire is trying to split the players up from fighting 😂😂😂
@papleylivesrentfreeinurhead
2 ай бұрын
afl should pay more attention to staging they’d get about 10 a week, 8 from the dees. like the danger call, mays a flop
@JusGiveMeMyMoney
2 ай бұрын
2:18 that was a mouthful 😂
@nickannand3367
2 ай бұрын
I don't understand why the umpires are treated as such fragile, glass people. Wines wasn't moving and was holding his ground against his opponent when the umpire ran backwards into him and barely brushed him. That is the softest call and a sad state for footy when THAT kind of contact is met with a fine. I'm a Collingwood man through and through but blind Freddy can see that is incidental contact. Play on!
@thomes7318
2 ай бұрын
Harry Jones gets a week for less than danger. Neither of them should be a week, but danger has to be now that the precedent has been set with other players already getting a week for less. You shouldn't get off for big name recognition or anything cringe like an aboriginal elder getting bloody Charlie Cameron off for good behaviour. The MRO and tribunal are tetering on the edge of fairness and are pretty inconsistent. I'd hate for them to judge on any legal case that's for sure
@papleylivesrentfreeinurhead
2 ай бұрын
essendon never challenged the suspension. cameron should have never gotten off. not sure why they didn’t challenge jones suspension as it was pretty soft. also when did an aboriginal elder come out and support charlie’s tackle. heard lots of things but this one’s a new one. hate the game not the player and certainly not the race
@thomes7318
2 ай бұрын
@papleylivesrentfreeinurhead copied from ABC article: Character references from Adelaide and Carlton champion Eddie Betts and an Indigenous elder also helped sway the tribunal. Yeah bombers not challenging was stupid, they had a defeatist attitude about it from the start. There have been plenty of dangerous tackle rulings that shouldn't have been 1 match based on the danger ruling now. The MRO should have to change their standard now, not relying on clubs having to appeal everything at the expense of their soft cap.
@DeanWhipper
2 ай бұрын
I agree that the Danger one is just a tackle, but the AFL have been dishing out weeks for this for years, the inconsistency is absolutely laughable. Name a sport worse than the AFL in terms of suspension inconsistency, I dare you lol.
@mal1760
2 ай бұрын
Of course Redman should have been let off.
@Nolsey21
2 ай бұрын
fining wines for that contact is weak as piss
@davidanderton2437
2 ай бұрын
Staging should be a week
@ThatAussieBloke1
2 ай бұрын
Wtf is that Wines fine? That's utter BS.
@BAILEIGH-LIKES-PORT
2 ай бұрын
Ollie wines isn’t his fault the umpire ran into wines
@indyspud
2 ай бұрын
My opinion is if the AFL is serious about stamping out certain behaviours then these types of fines just don't cut it. When big name players are earning hundreds of thousands of dollars each season a fine of a thousand or two, that is reduced with an early plea is just a joke. It's pocket change. And then it's all said and done, they just go about playing next week. Actually make the punishment inconvenient. If it's a fine, then make it equal to their match pay, or that month, or even a percentage of that year's salary. If they do it again, then each one of those options doubles. Or, even easier, 1 game suspension for first offence. Second offence, 2 games, and so on. Or make it non-negotiable, fine for the first incident which can be considered the warning, and repeat actions then get the suspensions. You see my point though, yeah these are pretty heavy-handed punishments but that's the point. You don't want players taking the risk and then just going on with little to know consequence. Also, IMO if a player reacts to a tackle by indicating they have received an impact to the head, then they need to be immediately sent off for a compulsory concussion test. If it's a genuine concussion then great, the process has worked. If not and they were staging, then they've mucked up the team's rotations and game plan while they're sitting idle on the bench for 15 minutes. edit: Also how the shit does Butters *still* only get a fine - this is his FOURTH striking incident this season alone, and the only reason he played on the weekend is because he managed to beat the third charge that held a one game suspension. Clearly he has a history of this behaviour, and again was this not an action that the AFL wanted to stamp out of the comp? And he has the audacity to give lip to Berry while he's down on his haunches. What an absolute muppet.
@chadchadderton
2 ай бұрын
oliver was hit with more force than berry, yet one is labelled a flop and the other isn't. Don't give in to the sickening bias this channel spews out sometimes, berry 100% deserved the lip he got from trying to milk a free... There's genuinely a hundred of those "strikes" per game, it's just no one else gets the attention that butters does. The fact that he was initially given a week suspension last round was a public embarrassment to the AFL.. the footy world (minus crows fans) rejoiced when he was fairly let off at the tribunal for a reason. The FACT remains that if berry didn't dive to the ground there wouldn't even be a discussion over it. Basically all footy fans minus the biased ones wanted to see berry get the steven may treatment.
@connorhawkins7342
2 ай бұрын
@@chadchadderton mate Berry got a knee into that spot in his side in a marking contest about 10 minutes before and was on the ground for a considerable amount of time. Butters obviously noticed this and decided to target his sore area like a sniper. He was not 'milking a free'. All these people saying players are milking after getting roundarmed in the gut need a few liver shots themselves
@minirobo7904
2 ай бұрын
@@connorhawkins7342 to also add on he was down for a minute or 2 after the Butters hit and had 2 club doctors with him while he was on the ground. Butters was going at him all day and had a sour attitude with the Berry tag. Some hits like Olivers the player will milk it staying on the ground and bounce right back up when the free is given.
@JusGiveMeMyMoney
2 ай бұрын
Erm.. what the sigma, Redman is fine because the west coast player was just being a silly Billy
@rerooar
2 ай бұрын
Instead of a fine, Stephen May should of been sent off and stood down for 2 weeks with concussion protocols. And the Dees should of been fined for not taking him off and endangering player safety.
@holdingthebull
2 ай бұрын
Don't you think that's a little harsh?
@carletonclements4931
2 ай бұрын
How I'd Rule Each One: Paul Curtis: $500. Patrick Dangerfield: Nothing. Steven May: Nothing. Zac Butters: $500. Melee: Similiar Sanctions, minus 90% of cost. Mason Redman: Nothing. Ollie Wines: Nothing.
@thomes7318
2 ай бұрын
Melee nothing because it's everyone's favourite part of the game haha. May should miss 4 weeks and be forced to sit in a tutu and watch from the sidelines
Пікірлер: 28