If you enjoy my videos, which take me hours, days and sometimes weeks to produce, please consider supporting me so I work less and dedicate more time to making better quality videos on literature, philosophy and psychology: ko-fi.com/fictionbeast Freudian slip: 08:16 it was the outbreak of WW2 (1939) (thanks for the correction AA)
@moulikavelangini4074
Жыл бұрын
I am from India...I am indebted to u...ur analysis top-notch....fiction beast is like treasure for us...plz let us know ,how can we support
@manicmode
Жыл бұрын
Love your channel! I want your library 📚 😂
@rajanraje6024
2 ай бұрын
Excellent
@cheri238
Жыл бұрын
Definitely, meaning is best explored through literature and art, as may be explored by literature, music, paintings. Although philosophy, histories, religious divisions, science are always imperative for interpretation. I also ask myself, may God exist outside the creation of the universe ? ✨️Some intellectuals have been discussing these ideas for some time. I love your channel. It's absolutely one of my favorites. Proust, "In Time Lost," is also one of my favorite novels. The journey of reading books 📚
@ReynaSingh
Жыл бұрын
Meaning is possibly best explored through literature. Seems that it’s one of humanities oldest and most persistent questions. Great video
@indigo22284
Жыл бұрын
Ah ha paradox once again. For, is literature not “a pacifying tool…” and “…a bourgeoisie fantasy that cushions against the harsh reality of life” ??
@fasted8468
Жыл бұрын
There were three angels that were afraid of God. One ran and came back in hope. One ran and froze in fear of God. The last Angel is still running. God embraced the first Angel, went out and found the second who hid, and is waiting for the third who was cast away and wont return. The world is simple. Shockingly simple, just like the Germans were shockingly good hosts for the French people. Shocking is only shocking for people who don't know the truth
@silentm999
Жыл бұрын
Im just now realizing that every philosopher was a creative writer, and vice versa. Meaning is DIY, but many are not capable of figuring it out for themselves.
@evaburnz
Жыл бұрын
@@indigo22284 literature also grates us with the harsh reality of life, depending on the scribe. Moreover, the phrase "harsh reality of life" is a subjective one.
@parveenjoshi8423
Жыл бұрын
She is commenting on every third video I can find on internet 😂. No offences. ☮️
@BitterDawn
Жыл бұрын
Bloody good job on piecing together and portraying Sartre's life and ideas, really thorough and interesting. I thought the remark about knowing Sartre like an uncle made me laugh aloud and after listening to this I can appreciate that statement.
@maxims086
Жыл бұрын
This is why I put a lid on philosophy and threw it into the sea... after many years of studying, and philosophising. Like an apparition philosophy has no lower extremity, there's a torso and there's the ground and nothing in between, it is spectral, hence its enemy is existence. Since it has no body it wants to possess a body to take revenge on it by ensnaring it inside a vial of rumination and soreness. It is insane for it has no body while the body is its prime concern. Of course it will never admit that it was summoned to ease the maddening burden of envy of God in heaven.
@janestones323
Жыл бұрын
You need to read Ward number 6 by Anton Chekhov. You might find similarities with yourself or guidance how to get out of your ill self. Sorry for been rude to you
@erandeser5830
Жыл бұрын
Great video. As for Sartre the philosopher: he encouraged Soviet/Maoist styled political militantism in France 20 years after Orwell published 1984 and laid bare the road followed by dictatorial collectivism. Orwell was the visionary, Sartre was the equivalent of a holocaust denier.
@noras.9774
Жыл бұрын
I follow all your video, they are brilliant! It is difficult in our days to listen such opinions, if you are not in the field; I’m not!😂 But, as an intellectual, it is a pleasure!
@Grizzlekidizzle
Жыл бұрын
Very well done. I was riveted to your narrative as I cleaned house and made dinner, all the while reconciling my own experiences and beliefs with Sartre and Existentialism in general, finally realizing that I am far more of an essentialist...and that I should read more Proust. Thanks for sharing. Really good work.
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Wonderful!
@cheri238
11 ай бұрын
@@Fiction_Beast 🙏❤️🌍🕊🌿
@chancerobinson5112
Жыл бұрын
There is no price too high for the privilege of owning yourself….
@freethinker79
Жыл бұрын
"Heed these words, you who wish to probe the depths of Nature: If you do not find within your Self that which you seek, neither will you find it outside. If you ignore the wonders of your own House, how do you expect to find other wonders? In you is hidden the Treasure of Treasures. Know Thyself and you will know the Universe and the Gods." --Oracle of Delphi
@jeremyhennessee6604
Ай бұрын
So that's where Yoda got all his best lines. (always wondered about that.) Nah. Kidding. I think the idea of *Knowing Thyself (in that context) tends to imply that the *House is complete and not a Work perpetually being constructed, (or in the Process of Construction.) You can also *think you know yourself and ultimately be The greatest stranger to it. (such is the nature of self-delusion.) Personally, I think that If Self is a House and the *I is the Architect or Carpenter.. neither are ever really complete and remain perpetual work in Progress. (or possibly destruction I suppose. depending on the work or neglect one puts into it.) Love the Classics though. They have a nice, Classicist ring to the that always screams Mystical. (I miss those days.)
@ragibshahriar187
Жыл бұрын
Brilliant work! Looking forward to what you do next...
@charlessoukup1111
Жыл бұрын
Spoken word is for Right Now, even if pre-recorded. Written word is for all time.
@michaelskinner3067
Жыл бұрын
Second go around with this vid, and I think I'll be listening to it a few times more.
@waqarhussainmian3980
Жыл бұрын
Very insightful and amazing narrating technique🖤
@Beesmakelifegoo
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for doing all that you do for us.
@BeesWaxMinder
Жыл бұрын
Thought-Provoking… Thanks
@ChristianSt97
Жыл бұрын
good job man. really great analysis!
@kayo5011
Жыл бұрын
Can you make a list on the most influential books to read over the past 200 years or so? Getting into literature now and have no idea where to begin
@ReiRidingSolo
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I love the longer videos
@TheCheco23
Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@TopLobster11
Жыл бұрын
Just a suggestion: Do put the Philosopher and/or the work's name in the title. It makes me watch the video more. It also signifies, it's based on them rather than your views only.
@Lopfff
Жыл бұрын
Deux romans que j’avais toujours adoré sont La Nausée et L’étranger. J’aime bien ces deux cats, et leurs romans philosophiques
@aguitarcalledchutzpah
Жыл бұрын
Satre says there's no meaning yet spent his life meaningly telling us so
@coreyroberts47
Жыл бұрын
I developed a sickness (schizoaffective) from trying to pretend my essence was not of my creation, while knowing all my ‘pain’ (not real as well) was by my own hand. Not that nothing matters in totality, but in the little slice of humanity that’s me it’s negligible. Don’t fret over anything
@samikshakumari9783
Жыл бұрын
I love your videos...and the way you explain things...💙💙
@aayushikulsunge
4 ай бұрын
"Good-looking people rarely go against the conventional establishment." So true.
@fasted8468
Жыл бұрын
This is basically Tikkan Olam. Just the blending of the world, he probably took an ancient Jewish method for blending the world and hid his sources. Christ said roughly that nature is the consolidation of power. Fish into meat, grass into wheat. So the opposite would be distributing it evenly. Which is the cold death of all things
@harootpashayan
Жыл бұрын
There are 2 Philoshopies, 1 for me and 1 for thee! There are two economies! 1 for me and 1 for thee!
@TheArchives111
7 ай бұрын
2/2 Bad faith is where we crumble from pressures in life whether challenges, failures or future. When we have bad faith of our capabilities or when we need to change our perspectives. Where freedom to choose must be in accordance to our conscience. For without conscience we give authority to others or unacceptable influence to be God over us. JamesWhiskey
@jasonroberts9788
7 ай бұрын
Imagine believing not only did the universe come from nothing, but also thinking meaning came from the same nothingness.
@rifolas
9 ай бұрын
Well thankfully when i die there will not be the hell of other people to judge me I personally think that sex and love making are different, however it's like going to a buffet instead of cooking a nice meal at home. I'm a firm beliver in the Beegees line "Too many lovers in one lifetime, ain't good for you" There's nothing wrong with aert, nor love, nor enjoying the finery of life. You have the ability to experience these things that are finite. What's the use in gorging on food till that nice childhood meal becomes another dish on the platter?
@free..to..air..
Жыл бұрын
Hell is being in a public toilet cubicle without a door lock...I think.Graham Greene said that
@aco-alexnikolov6741
Жыл бұрын
Exeptional excelency work [job] boy..keep up the enlightenment to is ultimate..good on ya..
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Much appreciated
@kevinevans8505
Жыл бұрын
Really nice piece of work. Much respect and gratitude. I would have liked names attatched to the visual art though. Who did those pictures of little grotesques playing silly buggers with dressed up owls and cats and wot-not ?
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Maestro della Fertilità dell'Uovo - Grotesque Scene with Animals and Stylised Figures No. 2
@MiltonBalbit
Жыл бұрын
There's a mistake at 08:16 : In 1939, with the outbreak of Word war one, I'm sure you mean WW2
@wanderlust451
8 ай бұрын
How did the French society react when Sartre made his “open relationship” with Beauvoir public? I am sure he faced friction, didn’t he?
@jeremyhennessee6604
Ай бұрын
You did very well with this Sir, and I am (or was) a great admirer of Sartre. But Camus' conceptualization of the World and how we tend to construct meaning rings more true to me personally. (though I wouldn't consider myself an Absurdist pe se.) I also think that He (like any thinker/philosopher who does not cease to think) would probably have greatly shifted his Ideals and conceptualizations had he been exposed to the increasing absurdities of the modern age. (as it's oddly termed.) Yeah, hell is indeed Other People. And it's Other people who make us The Heaven or Hell that we are. ( or perceive ourselves to be.) and there is likely *No Exit from this Reality other than the Literal one some take. (much to the dismay of Camus.) But perhaps some of us are also 20+ different Character in One/At Once.? (creating our own Book of Disquiet.) At any rate I digress. Great work Sir. You're my new Favorite Channel here.
@tom-kz9pb
7 ай бұрын
The existentialists are quite right to say that the universe has no intrinsic plan or meaning. The universe favors humans no more than squirrels, and favors Life no more than rocks. Humans pitiably invented the fable of "God" to try to hide from this uncomfortable realization. However, even existentialists like Sartre tried to put a "spin" on this truth, to make their philosophy more appealing, by saying that we are free to make our own meaning. While that is true, it is not a great gift so much as a poor consolation prize. It is another attempt to "hide", like the "God" fable. Human attempts to create meaning will be greatly frustrated by the lack of cooperation from the universe or from fellow human beings. The vast majority of humanity will always prefer comforting illusions over bitter truth. The pews will always be empty in the Church of Existential Despair, yet that is where truth and reality are to be found. My condolences to fellow travelers who are sticklers for truth.
@ShadowMantis702
Жыл бұрын
Great vid
@TheArchives111
6 ай бұрын
One must understand that whatever man does with his thoughts will determine if he's evil or good. For both thoughts need positive energy to grow, positive energy isn't necessary good nor bad. Devil's and angels cannot live on negative energy as a light bulb that requires live energy to be alive. Nature has no meaning without positive energy, good, bad or evil. Where eastern philosophies are mostly on thought patterns. Meaningless are when our positive energies are drawn by whatever influences within the mind where if one does not contain darkness, darkness will control one's mind.. JamesWhiskey
@mewastingmytime
Ай бұрын
1:08:39 “Sartre was short and ugly” bro explains very briefly
@yanbibiya
Жыл бұрын
Since when did any God actually say do good and you go to heaven ...I sometimes think almost no one actually has studied religion and spirituality
@StopFear
Жыл бұрын
I have a suggestion for the video creator and narrator (assuming they are the same person). I think if you are making a presentation in English you should not, and do not have to, pronounce French names in their French pronunciation. For example pronouncing the last name Sartre with the French throaty "r". (it is called the uvular r). Since in the English language most people do not pronounce the letter "r" the way French people or the Arabic speakers do, then we also do not associate hearing it with what we are supposed to perceive. So if you say "Sartre" with the letter "r" pronounced the way the Spanish and English "r" is pronounced, then it will make more sense as that is how it would be pronounced by speakers of English. But when a speaker pronounces the names as they are pronounced in French then it sounds too strange.
@ProfessorCop
4 ай бұрын
I have a question: As an expert on philosophy and literature, I have always wondered why it seems that philosophers of the past, like Sartre, are mostly fiction writers, unlike modern day philosophers. Is my assumption wrong?
@faatuipanama7262
Жыл бұрын
Philosophy is a mirror and every philosopher becomes embroiled in narcissism.
@Lucident1
Жыл бұрын
I agree with a lot of what Sartre says, regarding existence, proceeding essence however, I don’t think Sartre considers all the variables of existence, namely, being born, disabled, or acquiring it later on in life if we are indeed free, and we can sculpt our own meaning what is to say about those who cannot do this dut to. mental or physical impairments?
@musicbyterence4655
6 ай бұрын
Pleases talk more about the point of view a the individual vs the group among philosophers
@timnordin6230
Жыл бұрын
It doesn't appear to be well understood that meaning is God, that is, the place where you attribute meaning is your God. That includes 'meaninglessness'. Meaninglessness is a zero, not a null. A search for meaning is the null.
@johnmichaelrichards
Жыл бұрын
In 2023, there are still over 4,000 different gods worshipped around this tiny blue dot. None believe in any of the 4,000 gods they don't worship. To ask "What is the meaning of life?" presumes that there is a meaning. Why should there be any meaning to life? It is chiefly predicated on a belief that we were created by an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent entity that had some pre-ordained purpose for every one of us. That not only voids any personal purpose in or of life as well as free will. Not that any of us can truly have free will as it is prejudiced by our own consciousness. Mankind's greatest quandary is realising that we must at some point have come from nothingness... Hence, the invention of gods, which merely kicks the can down the celestial highway.
@markspano3468
Жыл бұрын
How is it that we love both Proust and J-P?
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
You have a nuanced taste in literature.
@markspano3468
Жыл бұрын
Sartre asks us to be observant. Proust taught us how.
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Very astute summary of the two.
@gracefitzgerald2227
Жыл бұрын
@@markspano3468 how beautifully put
@markspano3468
Жыл бұрын
It took Proust his whole life to understand the bad faith of his youth. You would think Sartre would have seen this. He certainly recognized the very same issues in the life Genet, but Genet only enjoyed privilege when he became famous.
@magicsinglez
Жыл бұрын
But what if to exist I want to create a work of object, a work of art.
@extantia
26 күн бұрын
'Feminine ugliness is offensive to me. I admit this and I’m ashamed of it. But the reason is simple. Even at its most formal level, even when there’s complete indifference, the association of a man with a woman always has sexual implications. An ugly woman evokes, like all women, that special pleasure we get from being in a woman’s company, but she spoils it by her ugliness. Alas. When you have the man-woman relation interfered with by ugliness - provoked and denied, well, it’s a very awkward business". Jean Paul Sartre, Playboy Magazine, May 1965.
@HenryRaeburn367
Жыл бұрын
Obviously sartre hasn't been on club18 -30 package holiday
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Me niether. what happens there?
@janscott602
Жыл бұрын
Sartre would be disappointed in todays Covidiots.
@srinp8726
Жыл бұрын
one thing is right…. satre was social justice warrior
@harootpashayan
Жыл бұрын
So there are trueisms right like a_0= "We all make mistakes" so that would be alwasy True hence a Logical Tautology, so it should go in a set, {a_0,...,..} = Tautological Philosophy
@magicsinglez
Жыл бұрын
I agree with Sartre so far, 3:00 yet these people are always straight out evil.
@davidlast4682
5 ай бұрын
Bro was a visionary.
@harrysolas2802
Жыл бұрын
Hell is other people. The apostrophe is used in the possessive form.
@TheArchives111
7 ай бұрын
1/1 Sarte, from nothingness was I created and existentialism which forms the purpose of living. Where the trials, failures, challenges or hardships of life is to develop and strengthen our character as in existentia Nietzsche God is dead - when our conscience of right/wrong is dead eg. when humans become slaves to authority. Those who has easy life are just like passing clouds without salt, not necessary good or bad. (Ref Bad faith) JamesWhiskey
@Saint.questions
6 ай бұрын
That where daria got it from 😂
@nerdingout322
Жыл бұрын
I disagree with this guy Sarte a lot. Does make decent points but in order to be a better philosopher is to be capable of listening to what you disagree with. And make sense of how and why they think that way. Funny he talks about people being fake for embracing their roles. When even Under "communist perfection" people will still gravitate to it. Plus breaking a system down will always turn into a power funnel. Things will be equal for a short time but power/wealth always floods to the top eventually. No matter the system society organizes itself around. 10,000 years of civilization and we still think whatever ideas we do have will be forever lasting and the "Correct way". History would like to have a chat haha.
@ivanjeremija9180
10 ай бұрын
If You are correct , 2000 years from now 38% of Earth's population will be celebrating Sartre every day!
@gphoenix8740
7 ай бұрын
If u are describing Satre’s philosophy, describe it. If u are making an opinion piece….say ur making an opinion piece on Satre’s philosophy.
@ThatsUncanny123
Жыл бұрын
50:30
@stephen7774
11 ай бұрын
Humans are not born as blank slates. First mistake. Genetic predisposition will force outcomes in a particular direction for starters.
@jenlanmoinyak8659
Жыл бұрын
Jean Paul Sartre is indeed my uncle🌚 3:12
@docm27
Жыл бұрын
He was blind to Soviet terror.
@magicsinglez
Жыл бұрын
Lol, the narrator is so funny.
@kikicloutman7182
6 ай бұрын
Phew!!!!
@charlessoukup1111
Жыл бұрын
Nihilism is actually the closest idea of our Self. Sarte. Ok?
@thenatureofsketching4622
9 ай бұрын
What is an empty cup of coffee?
@ThayRiverx
Жыл бұрын
Why do modern thinkers default to the Christian god when deciding that his is not the answer to the questions of meaning and meaninglessness Science and god are not mutually exclusive. Christianity is 😮kinda cringe. Historically and socially speaking But Hear me out here Krishna And Buddhism
@benquinneyiii7941
Жыл бұрын
Iowa Bismarck Richelieu
@dsinghr
Жыл бұрын
Why is he looking both sides at the same time ?
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
That’s how you cross the street
@billyranger2627
2 ай бұрын
Having had the benefit of an education,for decades that only leisure can provide I have to admit I find most intellectual exercises mental masturbation. Buddah, the greatest psychologist of all time is the only one that stands out since he could access all his past lives. See the total lack of meaning. What does he do once he awakes? ( Buddah means the one who awakens). He spends a life time of asking us to have compassion. Now that is patience. That seems to be wisdom. Our society,based on competition, totally misses the mark. Look at the pathetic attempts being made to locate consciousness in the material realm. A creature, us, whose body is populated by billions of non human viruses and bacterium, phlegm and shit will overlook that to decorate and refine it. Our life still restricted by our vehicle,the body. My fellow members of specie, misnamed homo sapien ( meaning the wise one), time to awaken. Time to discover the wisdom of the Upanishads that even the local,colonised,minds,have forgotten. Buying stuff. Having more than the neighbours is not the way. So I suspect.
@bobshuwab1988
Ай бұрын
3mins in ad...
@Reza090
Жыл бұрын
He gives way too much credit to free will.
@skyjuiceification
Жыл бұрын
Agreed. free will unwedded to sound judgment is not an elegant monster.
@lecelcelec
Жыл бұрын
There is a big difference between real-primary nothingness-emptiness and imaginary-mind created... "nothingness-emptiness". Sartre belonged to the second option. Even when you once consciously experience-become nothingness-emptiness, you have to be careful not to imagine-create it after that, because it's not real and as such has no real-holistic effect... let alone before that. Don't try to create something that already is, be what it is...
@azmatafridi5921
6 ай бұрын
as if he were your uncle 😂😂😂
@Me-We1985
Жыл бұрын
Sarte was indeed a genius
@ThayRiverx
Жыл бұрын
Nihilism annoys me so freaking much
@pinkpanther7030
Жыл бұрын
I don't like Sartre and his intellectual strabismus.😊
@lerviot8592
Жыл бұрын
this for u
@robertfranklin8704
7 ай бұрын
Sartre was a horrible and negative creep, and his books are worthless. Contrast the worth of Gandhi and Tolstoy. Moreover, Sartre the phoney exaggerated his role in the French Resistance. Give him and his trendy ideas a miss!
@thebrickton1947
7 ай бұрын
Freud was right, Sartre and Heidegger overlook the evolution of the human brain and its evolved epistemological hardwiring of survival, whether one likes it or not, one has varying predispositions relating to millenia of forebears and by their environments and cultural transmissions the type of consciousness at conception is not tabula rasa, but has propensities, which maketh the person. As with our language faculty or our modern self consciousness, some way back we had neither. Our pathetic softness and lack preditory endouements required socialism, while outside tribes encroaching on our food turf, a propensity to war, genetically, neuronally. I spit on tabula rasa....and marxism, global government is a joke considering the local corruption in a poky town council.
Newton didn’t want “gravity” ascribed to him. And he states that it is “so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it.” Original letter from Isaac Newton to Richard Bentley (1692) “Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.” - Author: Isaac Newton For Mr Bently at the Palace in Worcester A 4th Lett. from Mr Newton Source: 189.R.4.47, ff. 7-8, Trinity College Library, Cambridge, UK Published online: October 2007
@ericbrocious6047
Жыл бұрын
It’s amazing to me that Sartre and some of his contemporaries, can see human life as pointless and devoid of meaning, then rationalize that fact as a motivation for self actualization.
@havefunbesafe
Жыл бұрын
Yes. This is helpful to young persons trying to sort out this bizarre existence they will probably experience
@MrEitan44
Жыл бұрын
I enjoyed very much your presentation. It was brilliant, clear, precise, compact and substancial. A bit fast for me, an Spanish speaking old man. This forced me to stop from time to time, which is an advantage since I could assimilate Sartre's ideas and reasoning. I was lucky enough to meet Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir on a kibbutz in Israel during their visit and my visit to the Middle East in the mid-1960s. I was invited to participate to a meeting around 7-9 people with them. They were interested in the communal life of the kibbutz, the possibility of war with Egypt and Syria (we were in the Upper Galilee, 500 meters from the border).
@AlexandraNevermind
Жыл бұрын
You can change the speed of the video in settings. I sometimes find it helpful, though sometimes it makes it too slow.
@Sachie465
Жыл бұрын
I think a philosopher can be measured by his influence. Sartre’s existentialism was influential in literature in this part of the world, for example Kobo Abe, Kenzaburo Oe, Takeshi Kaiko and more. I appreciate the length of this video and I was so moved by the concluding remarks.
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Sartre as a public intellectual wanted to be an every person's man. Proust wanted to be an artist so he wanted to create a work of art that stood the test of time. Both succeeded in their mission.
@fasted8468
Жыл бұрын
I think the world needs the opposite. Still worth exploring.
@StevenDykstra-u3b
5 ай бұрын
In this world, it is not popularity but truths that, in the end, matter. Influence? Many sadly influential things are promoted and end up of little consequence. But it is true, men like Hobbes and his Social Contract reverberates even today.
@thecapn_uk8034
Жыл бұрын
This is a brilliant exposition, and the artwork that enhances the narrative is breathtakingly well-chosen. I especially enjoyed the painting where the little girl is entranced by the magical wonder of the goldfish swimming in a bowl whilst the adults gaze at each other, and the baby, each adult with a preoccupation of some kind. Is it possible to access a list of the artwork?
@RanbirSingh-dh4ux
Жыл бұрын
MAN, i was totally immersed in this, very logical, and burdened by the responsibility of my so called 'freedom of choice'. Thank You
@marcimolnar1701
Жыл бұрын
You are actually the best KZitemr ever , you have a video on every philosopher / author that I read , your videos are perfectly structured and your explanations are fantastic. Keep it up, you are amazing
@Fiction_Beast
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 😀
@cheri238
11 ай бұрын
@@Fiction_Beast 💯 correct😊
@Boesowigo
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video! Sartre’s work is utterly brilliant.
@derbucherwurm
Жыл бұрын
great video on Sartre. His existential philosophy is really great.
@brunischling9680
Жыл бұрын
No. It is quite shallow.
@Socratez7
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. My empty cup of coffee is now full of meaning.
@tommyvictorbuch6960
Жыл бұрын
"Thanks to the telescope and the microscope, religion no longer offers an explanation for anything important." - Christopher Hitchens -
@sophiafakevirus-ro8cc
Жыл бұрын
The controllers of the telescope and microscope are liars
@tommyvictorbuch6960
Жыл бұрын
@@sophiafakevirus-ro8cc bollocks. The person who claims to know the mind of God/Gods, are the OBVIOUS liar. Well... It's obvious to those who are capable of critical thinking. Religion was invented, when the first fool met the first conman.
@LilBafta
Жыл бұрын
When talking of JPS sleeping with other women, and stating that Simone didn’t take advantage of their open relation as much, I wonder why you didn’t mention the fact that Simone slept with other women…? Well teenage girls. Complicating the biological aspect of the point? I do enjoy your videos very much by the way, so not coming for you.
Пікірлер: 322